SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), running in the 2020 presidential primary for the Democratic Party nomination, marches with supporters to early vote on February 27, 2020 at Winston-Salem State University in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. (Photo by Brian Blanco/Getty Images)
"America needs something more right now than a 'must-do' list from liberals and progressives. America needs a different story... the leaders, and thinkers, and activists who honestly tell that story and speak passionately of the moral and religious values it puts in play will be the first political generation since the New Deal to win power back for the people." --Bill Moyers, "A New Story for America" (2006)
It has become nearly cliche to say we are enduring a crisis of democracy. But the fact remains. We are. However, let's be clear about it. The crisis did not begin 2016. It has been 45 years in the making. And to address it, progressives must offer not simply an attractive progressive economic legislative agenda, but also a truly compelling and transformative democratic story, vision, and unifying project.
A story, vision, and project that speaks to Americans' deepest memories, anxieties, and aspirations. That will remind us that--whether we are native born or newly arrived--we are heirs to a revolutionary promise of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Progressives must offer not simply an attractive progressive economic legislative agenda, but also a truly compelling and transformative democratic story, vision, and unifying project.
We must organize around a story that will enable us to see, as the progressive writer and activist Henry Demarest Lloyd wrote 120 years age: "The price of liberty is something more than eternal vigilance. There must also be eternal advance. We can save the rights we have inherited from our fathers only by winning new ones to bequeath our children." Indeed, that will encourage us to recognize, as FDR's Solicitor General and soon-to-be Attorney General and then a Supreme Court Justice, Robert H. Jackson put it in 1938: "We too are founders... We too are makers of a nation... We too are called upon to write, to defend and to make live, new bills of right." A story that will lead us not only to vote progressively, but also to make history progressively.
Doing so is imperative. If we progressives fail, we will remain politically marginal--and American democracy will remain in peril.
The 2022 primary season, which has already begun, provides an opportunity we must seize. To do so, we must make clear to the American people the tremendous promise for democratic and social renewal inherent in the progressive program. Promise spelled out by a 21st Century Economic Bill of Rights.
This is the third of three articles we have published at Common Dreams urging progressives to advance an economic bill of rights that would assure economic security, economic opportunities, and economic prosperity. Inspired by President Franklin D. Roosevelt's call in 1944 for an Economic Bill of Rights for all Americans; energized by the ensuing efforts of A. Philip Randolph, Martin Luther King Jr, Senator Bernie Sanders, and Wisconsin Assemblywomen Kristina Shelton and Francesca Hong to enhance and realize FDR's vision; and informed by the recent work of economists Mark Paul, William Darity, and Derek Hamilton to spell out what it might entail today, we began in the first by proposing and outlining a 21st Century Economic Bill of Rights.
A Second Bill of Rights which would establish that all Americans have a right to:
1. A useful job that pays a living wage.
2. A voice in the workplace through a union and collective bargaining.
3. Comprehensive quality health care.
4. Complete cost-free public education and access to broadband internet.
5. Decent, safe, affordable housing.
6. A clean environment and a healthy planet.
7. A meaningful endowment of resources at birth, and a secure retirement.
8. Sound banking and financial services.
9. An equitable and economically fair justice system
10. Recreation and participation in civic and democratic life.
Just as FDR knew from polls conducted at the time that he was articulating exactly what his fellow American truly wanted to pursue and secure following the Second World War, we firmly believe that this roster of rights--based on poll after poll, progressive electoral victories in 2018 and 2020, and workers' own renewed labor agitation and organizing--clearly expresses Americans' growing yearnings to progressively transform the nation's oppressive and destructive economic order. Yearnings incited by more than 45 years of corporate, conservative, and neoliberal class war against the democratic achievements and hard-won rights of workers, women, and people of color in the course of the long Age of Roosevelt from the 1930s to the 1960s. Yearnings definitely intensified by the many devastations of the Great Recession of 2008-10 and the pandemic of these past two years.
In the second of our essays, we cited a multitude of legislative initiatives and bills by progressive Democratic Senators and Representatives to demonstrate that, together, progressives already have essentially embraced a 21st Century Economic Bill of Rights.
Most progressives are not leading with a clear economic framing of issues--let alone a visionary one like the 21st Century Economic Bill of Rights.
In this essay, we focus on why, if progressives are serious about winning political power and changing the world, they not only have to highlight their economic program in the 2022 election cycle and beyond--but they must do so in a way that both captivates the public imagination and spells out why their proposed changes are readily attainable and will improve the lives of the vast majority.
Of course, we also can't pull any punches in showing how the past 45 years prove that our moderate and conservative opponents hold forth no such promise for American society.
Sadly, most progressives are not leading with a clear economic framing of issues--let alone a visionary one like the 21st Century Economic Bill of Rights.
This is political suicide for two reasons. First, the economy has polled as the issue of greatest concern for Americans throughout most of the neo-liberal era (on aggregate, surpassing all other matters by a longshot)--and it does so again today. It goes without saying, this is not because people are happy with the economy.
Second, the progressive economic program is very popular with the general public--and spectacularly so with Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents.
As such, progressives should be sweeping Democratic primaries this year, but the public is not adequately aware of the transformative social contract on offer from progressives. Here's how to change that.
Adopt a clear and inspiring way to present the program, such as a 21st Century Economic Bill of Rights. We apologize for the example but think of the success of the GOP's 1994 Contract with America, which Newt Gingrich and company used to win control of the House of Representatives for the first time in 40 years. It's also important that the public understand that progressives are directly addressing economic concerns since that is what's most important to voters--of course we can highlight other issues too, but a focus on the economy must be central and loudly stated.
Then, make clear the distinctions between progressives and our rivals. Explain how the American political landscape shifted with the 2016 presidential election. Since that time, we have three distinct political tendencies vying for power inside our two-party system. On the far right, we have the Trumpian reactionaries; in the "center" we have the status quo neo-liberals, who stretch from the Romney wing of the Republican Party through the Clinton wing of the Democratic Party; and on the left, we have the progressives.
This configuration was confirmed by the emergence of the squad in 2018 and the results of the 2020 presidential election, in which Sen. Bernie Sanders took "third place" for a second consecutive cycle--while Trump once again challenged establishment stalwarts in the general election.
Of these three political tendencies, only the progressives are proposing a vision of economic, social, environmental, and democratic renewal for American society that will improve the quality of life for the vast majority of the population.
Don't be shy. Explain that the neo-liberals have run America for forty-five years and that they've produced a society of ever-greater wealth inequality, excessive costs for basic necessities like healthcare, housing, and education, in which the average person has to work 60-70 hours a week, with little to no benefits, just to get by. So, in this primary season, explain to voters who are disgusted with Democrats for failing to make the changes they want (even though they mouth support for them on the campaign trail) that there are two parties inside the Democratic Party: neo-liberals who are beholden to their corporate donors and progressives who serve the people.
As for Trump, after much populist bluster on the campaign trail, he only broke with neo-liberalism over global trade deals; and, even on this front, only made marginal adjustments. More significantly, he doubled down on classical GOP neo-liberalism when his party was in control of both houses of Congress. His signature domestic policy achievement was his tax plan, which produced an even greater reallocation of wealth upwards than occurred under Reagan, Clinton, the Bushes, and Obama.
On top of that, the dominant role of money in politics weakened democracy in the neo-liberal era; and Trump, of course, accelerated America's drift towards oligarchy with overt attacks on our democratic traditions.
Seriously, of the three major political tendencies, only progressives offer a truly promising alternative for America.
This is an astonishingly powerful position for progressives to hold. Dissatisfaction with the current economic and political order is legion among the great majority of Americans. They are crying out for a different social contract along the lines of a 21st Century Economic Bill of Rights.
Now is the perfect time to bring these demands to the American electorate and ask them to vote them into reality. In the spring of 2022, we are emerging from the greatest disruption of American life in generations--and there is ample evidence, from the great resignation to a groundbreaking wave of union organizing, that as things return to normal after COVID, people don't want to return to the old normal. What better time to propose a positive new vision for American society and the economy?
Only progressives offer a truly promising alternative for America.
Better yet, we can easily achieve our program. These principles and practices are already the norm in every other rich industrialized country in the world--from Japan and South Korea to Europe and Canada. And guess what? These countries are doing better, much better, than the United States in virtually every social index--from education to personal health to happiness itself--with prosperous middle classes, lower wealth inequality, and stable democracies.
Lastly, when it comes to strategy, progressives need to take another page from the GOP, and insist upon greater unity and discipline from our elected officials. If we are to become a mature political movement, one powerful enough to alter the direction of society, the importance of this cannot be overstated. The public must be able trust that progressive candidates will not back down from the progressive agenda when elected. We have a great role model in this regard. The foundation of Bernie Sanders' unrivalled popularity is his unwavering commitment to progressive social-democratic policies across his entire career.
A clear platform, like a 21st Century Economic Bill of Rights, allows the public to understand when politicians follow through on their promises. So, just like Grover Norquist's notorious No Tax Pledge operates for Republicans, a 21st Century Economic Bill of Rights can anchor the progressive movement--and impress upon the American people that we are the political movement to support because we will work for them and transform the economy in the ways that they want--and if a politician breaks with this pledge, they will be challenged and defeated in the next election.
When we sat down to write the first installment of this series, we were motivated in part by the grotesque misrepresentations of our movement that we saw in the media (as a Stalinist thought police, "canceling" anyone who dared oppose them); and how any mention of economics tended to be absent even in more positive representations of progressives. Yet we knew that the central focus of progressives in the current congress were on core economic issues--particularly in strengthening the best elements of the Build Back Better package--and that the public was very supportive of the progressive position.
With the midterm elections around the corner and understanding that the economy was consistently the most important issue for voters, we felt progressives were about to miss a great opportunity. By consolidating around their economic platform, progressives can contrast their coherence against the failure of the centrists and grow their strength in the left-liberal coalition, with the goal of becoming dominant within the Party.
In recognizing that the current progressive economic program matched up brilliantly with FDR's Economic Bill of Rights--as well as later iterations by A. Philip Randolph, Martin Luther King, Jr, Bernie Sanders, and others - we not only found an apt vehicle to promote the current progressive economic program, but one that tied it to the most compelling and popular visions for American society from the past century--which, just as in 1944 and 1963, can set us on a path towards fulfilling our limitless promise.
We now live in the most ethnically diverse country in the history of this world on a plentiful continent-wide land mass. That this beautiful tapestry of cultures should remain trapped under the yolk of an exploitative economic system that perpetuates the injustices of the past, and the devastation of the planet, is unconscionable. A 21st Century Economic Bill of Rights, brought to fruition by the contemporary progressive movement, can bring down the curtain on the failed neo-liberal era and deliver the freedom, democracy and economic justice that will be the foundations of a truly egalitarian America.
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
"America needs something more right now than a 'must-do' list from liberals and progressives. America needs a different story... the leaders, and thinkers, and activists who honestly tell that story and speak passionately of the moral and religious values it puts in play will be the first political generation since the New Deal to win power back for the people." --Bill Moyers, "A New Story for America" (2006)
It has become nearly cliche to say we are enduring a crisis of democracy. But the fact remains. We are. However, let's be clear about it. The crisis did not begin 2016. It has been 45 years in the making. And to address it, progressives must offer not simply an attractive progressive economic legislative agenda, but also a truly compelling and transformative democratic story, vision, and unifying project.
A story, vision, and project that speaks to Americans' deepest memories, anxieties, and aspirations. That will remind us that--whether we are native born or newly arrived--we are heirs to a revolutionary promise of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Progressives must offer not simply an attractive progressive economic legislative agenda, but also a truly compelling and transformative democratic story, vision, and unifying project.
We must organize around a story that will enable us to see, as the progressive writer and activist Henry Demarest Lloyd wrote 120 years age: "The price of liberty is something more than eternal vigilance. There must also be eternal advance. We can save the rights we have inherited from our fathers only by winning new ones to bequeath our children." Indeed, that will encourage us to recognize, as FDR's Solicitor General and soon-to-be Attorney General and then a Supreme Court Justice, Robert H. Jackson put it in 1938: "We too are founders... We too are makers of a nation... We too are called upon to write, to defend and to make live, new bills of right." A story that will lead us not only to vote progressively, but also to make history progressively.
Doing so is imperative. If we progressives fail, we will remain politically marginal--and American democracy will remain in peril.
The 2022 primary season, which has already begun, provides an opportunity we must seize. To do so, we must make clear to the American people the tremendous promise for democratic and social renewal inherent in the progressive program. Promise spelled out by a 21st Century Economic Bill of Rights.
This is the third of three articles we have published at Common Dreams urging progressives to advance an economic bill of rights that would assure economic security, economic opportunities, and economic prosperity. Inspired by President Franklin D. Roosevelt's call in 1944 for an Economic Bill of Rights for all Americans; energized by the ensuing efforts of A. Philip Randolph, Martin Luther King Jr, Senator Bernie Sanders, and Wisconsin Assemblywomen Kristina Shelton and Francesca Hong to enhance and realize FDR's vision; and informed by the recent work of economists Mark Paul, William Darity, and Derek Hamilton to spell out what it might entail today, we began in the first by proposing and outlining a 21st Century Economic Bill of Rights.
A Second Bill of Rights which would establish that all Americans have a right to:
1. A useful job that pays a living wage.
2. A voice in the workplace through a union and collective bargaining.
3. Comprehensive quality health care.
4. Complete cost-free public education and access to broadband internet.
5. Decent, safe, affordable housing.
6. A clean environment and a healthy planet.
7. A meaningful endowment of resources at birth, and a secure retirement.
8. Sound banking and financial services.
9. An equitable and economically fair justice system
10. Recreation and participation in civic and democratic life.
Just as FDR knew from polls conducted at the time that he was articulating exactly what his fellow American truly wanted to pursue and secure following the Second World War, we firmly believe that this roster of rights--based on poll after poll, progressive electoral victories in 2018 and 2020, and workers' own renewed labor agitation and organizing--clearly expresses Americans' growing yearnings to progressively transform the nation's oppressive and destructive economic order. Yearnings incited by more than 45 years of corporate, conservative, and neoliberal class war against the democratic achievements and hard-won rights of workers, women, and people of color in the course of the long Age of Roosevelt from the 1930s to the 1960s. Yearnings definitely intensified by the many devastations of the Great Recession of 2008-10 and the pandemic of these past two years.
In the second of our essays, we cited a multitude of legislative initiatives and bills by progressive Democratic Senators and Representatives to demonstrate that, together, progressives already have essentially embraced a 21st Century Economic Bill of Rights.
Most progressives are not leading with a clear economic framing of issues--let alone a visionary one like the 21st Century Economic Bill of Rights.
In this essay, we focus on why, if progressives are serious about winning political power and changing the world, they not only have to highlight their economic program in the 2022 election cycle and beyond--but they must do so in a way that both captivates the public imagination and spells out why their proposed changes are readily attainable and will improve the lives of the vast majority.
Of course, we also can't pull any punches in showing how the past 45 years prove that our moderate and conservative opponents hold forth no such promise for American society.
Sadly, most progressives are not leading with a clear economic framing of issues--let alone a visionary one like the 21st Century Economic Bill of Rights.
This is political suicide for two reasons. First, the economy has polled as the issue of greatest concern for Americans throughout most of the neo-liberal era (on aggregate, surpassing all other matters by a longshot)--and it does so again today. It goes without saying, this is not because people are happy with the economy.
Second, the progressive economic program is very popular with the general public--and spectacularly so with Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents.
As such, progressives should be sweeping Democratic primaries this year, but the public is not adequately aware of the transformative social contract on offer from progressives. Here's how to change that.
Adopt a clear and inspiring way to present the program, such as a 21st Century Economic Bill of Rights. We apologize for the example but think of the success of the GOP's 1994 Contract with America, which Newt Gingrich and company used to win control of the House of Representatives for the first time in 40 years. It's also important that the public understand that progressives are directly addressing economic concerns since that is what's most important to voters--of course we can highlight other issues too, but a focus on the economy must be central and loudly stated.
Then, make clear the distinctions between progressives and our rivals. Explain how the American political landscape shifted with the 2016 presidential election. Since that time, we have three distinct political tendencies vying for power inside our two-party system. On the far right, we have the Trumpian reactionaries; in the "center" we have the status quo neo-liberals, who stretch from the Romney wing of the Republican Party through the Clinton wing of the Democratic Party; and on the left, we have the progressives.
This configuration was confirmed by the emergence of the squad in 2018 and the results of the 2020 presidential election, in which Sen. Bernie Sanders took "third place" for a second consecutive cycle--while Trump once again challenged establishment stalwarts in the general election.
Of these three political tendencies, only the progressives are proposing a vision of economic, social, environmental, and democratic renewal for American society that will improve the quality of life for the vast majority of the population.
Don't be shy. Explain that the neo-liberals have run America for forty-five years and that they've produced a society of ever-greater wealth inequality, excessive costs for basic necessities like healthcare, housing, and education, in which the average person has to work 60-70 hours a week, with little to no benefits, just to get by. So, in this primary season, explain to voters who are disgusted with Democrats for failing to make the changes they want (even though they mouth support for them on the campaign trail) that there are two parties inside the Democratic Party: neo-liberals who are beholden to their corporate donors and progressives who serve the people.
As for Trump, after much populist bluster on the campaign trail, he only broke with neo-liberalism over global trade deals; and, even on this front, only made marginal adjustments. More significantly, he doubled down on classical GOP neo-liberalism when his party was in control of both houses of Congress. His signature domestic policy achievement was his tax plan, which produced an even greater reallocation of wealth upwards than occurred under Reagan, Clinton, the Bushes, and Obama.
On top of that, the dominant role of money in politics weakened democracy in the neo-liberal era; and Trump, of course, accelerated America's drift towards oligarchy with overt attacks on our democratic traditions.
Seriously, of the three major political tendencies, only progressives offer a truly promising alternative for America.
This is an astonishingly powerful position for progressives to hold. Dissatisfaction with the current economic and political order is legion among the great majority of Americans. They are crying out for a different social contract along the lines of a 21st Century Economic Bill of Rights.
Now is the perfect time to bring these demands to the American electorate and ask them to vote them into reality. In the spring of 2022, we are emerging from the greatest disruption of American life in generations--and there is ample evidence, from the great resignation to a groundbreaking wave of union organizing, that as things return to normal after COVID, people don't want to return to the old normal. What better time to propose a positive new vision for American society and the economy?
Only progressives offer a truly promising alternative for America.
Better yet, we can easily achieve our program. These principles and practices are already the norm in every other rich industrialized country in the world--from Japan and South Korea to Europe and Canada. And guess what? These countries are doing better, much better, than the United States in virtually every social index--from education to personal health to happiness itself--with prosperous middle classes, lower wealth inequality, and stable democracies.
Lastly, when it comes to strategy, progressives need to take another page from the GOP, and insist upon greater unity and discipline from our elected officials. If we are to become a mature political movement, one powerful enough to alter the direction of society, the importance of this cannot be overstated. The public must be able trust that progressive candidates will not back down from the progressive agenda when elected. We have a great role model in this regard. The foundation of Bernie Sanders' unrivalled popularity is his unwavering commitment to progressive social-democratic policies across his entire career.
A clear platform, like a 21st Century Economic Bill of Rights, allows the public to understand when politicians follow through on their promises. So, just like Grover Norquist's notorious No Tax Pledge operates for Republicans, a 21st Century Economic Bill of Rights can anchor the progressive movement--and impress upon the American people that we are the political movement to support because we will work for them and transform the economy in the ways that they want--and if a politician breaks with this pledge, they will be challenged and defeated in the next election.
When we sat down to write the first installment of this series, we were motivated in part by the grotesque misrepresentations of our movement that we saw in the media (as a Stalinist thought police, "canceling" anyone who dared oppose them); and how any mention of economics tended to be absent even in more positive representations of progressives. Yet we knew that the central focus of progressives in the current congress were on core economic issues--particularly in strengthening the best elements of the Build Back Better package--and that the public was very supportive of the progressive position.
With the midterm elections around the corner and understanding that the economy was consistently the most important issue for voters, we felt progressives were about to miss a great opportunity. By consolidating around their economic platform, progressives can contrast their coherence against the failure of the centrists and grow their strength in the left-liberal coalition, with the goal of becoming dominant within the Party.
In recognizing that the current progressive economic program matched up brilliantly with FDR's Economic Bill of Rights--as well as later iterations by A. Philip Randolph, Martin Luther King, Jr, Bernie Sanders, and others - we not only found an apt vehicle to promote the current progressive economic program, but one that tied it to the most compelling and popular visions for American society from the past century--which, just as in 1944 and 1963, can set us on a path towards fulfilling our limitless promise.
We now live in the most ethnically diverse country in the history of this world on a plentiful continent-wide land mass. That this beautiful tapestry of cultures should remain trapped under the yolk of an exploitative economic system that perpetuates the injustices of the past, and the devastation of the planet, is unconscionable. A 21st Century Economic Bill of Rights, brought to fruition by the contemporary progressive movement, can bring down the curtain on the failed neo-liberal era and deliver the freedom, democracy and economic justice that will be the foundations of a truly egalitarian America.
"America needs something more right now than a 'must-do' list from liberals and progressives. America needs a different story... the leaders, and thinkers, and activists who honestly tell that story and speak passionately of the moral and religious values it puts in play will be the first political generation since the New Deal to win power back for the people." --Bill Moyers, "A New Story for America" (2006)
It has become nearly cliche to say we are enduring a crisis of democracy. But the fact remains. We are. However, let's be clear about it. The crisis did not begin 2016. It has been 45 years in the making. And to address it, progressives must offer not simply an attractive progressive economic legislative agenda, but also a truly compelling and transformative democratic story, vision, and unifying project.
A story, vision, and project that speaks to Americans' deepest memories, anxieties, and aspirations. That will remind us that--whether we are native born or newly arrived--we are heirs to a revolutionary promise of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Progressives must offer not simply an attractive progressive economic legislative agenda, but also a truly compelling and transformative democratic story, vision, and unifying project.
We must organize around a story that will enable us to see, as the progressive writer and activist Henry Demarest Lloyd wrote 120 years age: "The price of liberty is something more than eternal vigilance. There must also be eternal advance. We can save the rights we have inherited from our fathers only by winning new ones to bequeath our children." Indeed, that will encourage us to recognize, as FDR's Solicitor General and soon-to-be Attorney General and then a Supreme Court Justice, Robert H. Jackson put it in 1938: "We too are founders... We too are makers of a nation... We too are called upon to write, to defend and to make live, new bills of right." A story that will lead us not only to vote progressively, but also to make history progressively.
Doing so is imperative. If we progressives fail, we will remain politically marginal--and American democracy will remain in peril.
The 2022 primary season, which has already begun, provides an opportunity we must seize. To do so, we must make clear to the American people the tremendous promise for democratic and social renewal inherent in the progressive program. Promise spelled out by a 21st Century Economic Bill of Rights.
This is the third of three articles we have published at Common Dreams urging progressives to advance an economic bill of rights that would assure economic security, economic opportunities, and economic prosperity. Inspired by President Franklin D. Roosevelt's call in 1944 for an Economic Bill of Rights for all Americans; energized by the ensuing efforts of A. Philip Randolph, Martin Luther King Jr, Senator Bernie Sanders, and Wisconsin Assemblywomen Kristina Shelton and Francesca Hong to enhance and realize FDR's vision; and informed by the recent work of economists Mark Paul, William Darity, and Derek Hamilton to spell out what it might entail today, we began in the first by proposing and outlining a 21st Century Economic Bill of Rights.
A Second Bill of Rights which would establish that all Americans have a right to:
1. A useful job that pays a living wage.
2. A voice in the workplace through a union and collective bargaining.
3. Comprehensive quality health care.
4. Complete cost-free public education and access to broadband internet.
5. Decent, safe, affordable housing.
6. A clean environment and a healthy planet.
7. A meaningful endowment of resources at birth, and a secure retirement.
8. Sound banking and financial services.
9. An equitable and economically fair justice system
10. Recreation and participation in civic and democratic life.
Just as FDR knew from polls conducted at the time that he was articulating exactly what his fellow American truly wanted to pursue and secure following the Second World War, we firmly believe that this roster of rights--based on poll after poll, progressive electoral victories in 2018 and 2020, and workers' own renewed labor agitation and organizing--clearly expresses Americans' growing yearnings to progressively transform the nation's oppressive and destructive economic order. Yearnings incited by more than 45 years of corporate, conservative, and neoliberal class war against the democratic achievements and hard-won rights of workers, women, and people of color in the course of the long Age of Roosevelt from the 1930s to the 1960s. Yearnings definitely intensified by the many devastations of the Great Recession of 2008-10 and the pandemic of these past two years.
In the second of our essays, we cited a multitude of legislative initiatives and bills by progressive Democratic Senators and Representatives to demonstrate that, together, progressives already have essentially embraced a 21st Century Economic Bill of Rights.
Most progressives are not leading with a clear economic framing of issues--let alone a visionary one like the 21st Century Economic Bill of Rights.
In this essay, we focus on why, if progressives are serious about winning political power and changing the world, they not only have to highlight their economic program in the 2022 election cycle and beyond--but they must do so in a way that both captivates the public imagination and spells out why their proposed changes are readily attainable and will improve the lives of the vast majority.
Of course, we also can't pull any punches in showing how the past 45 years prove that our moderate and conservative opponents hold forth no such promise for American society.
Sadly, most progressives are not leading with a clear economic framing of issues--let alone a visionary one like the 21st Century Economic Bill of Rights.
This is political suicide for two reasons. First, the economy has polled as the issue of greatest concern for Americans throughout most of the neo-liberal era (on aggregate, surpassing all other matters by a longshot)--and it does so again today. It goes without saying, this is not because people are happy with the economy.
Second, the progressive economic program is very popular with the general public--and spectacularly so with Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents.
As such, progressives should be sweeping Democratic primaries this year, but the public is not adequately aware of the transformative social contract on offer from progressives. Here's how to change that.
Adopt a clear and inspiring way to present the program, such as a 21st Century Economic Bill of Rights. We apologize for the example but think of the success of the GOP's 1994 Contract with America, which Newt Gingrich and company used to win control of the House of Representatives for the first time in 40 years. It's also important that the public understand that progressives are directly addressing economic concerns since that is what's most important to voters--of course we can highlight other issues too, but a focus on the economy must be central and loudly stated.
Then, make clear the distinctions between progressives and our rivals. Explain how the American political landscape shifted with the 2016 presidential election. Since that time, we have three distinct political tendencies vying for power inside our two-party system. On the far right, we have the Trumpian reactionaries; in the "center" we have the status quo neo-liberals, who stretch from the Romney wing of the Republican Party through the Clinton wing of the Democratic Party; and on the left, we have the progressives.
This configuration was confirmed by the emergence of the squad in 2018 and the results of the 2020 presidential election, in which Sen. Bernie Sanders took "third place" for a second consecutive cycle--while Trump once again challenged establishment stalwarts in the general election.
Of these three political tendencies, only the progressives are proposing a vision of economic, social, environmental, and democratic renewal for American society that will improve the quality of life for the vast majority of the population.
Don't be shy. Explain that the neo-liberals have run America for forty-five years and that they've produced a society of ever-greater wealth inequality, excessive costs for basic necessities like healthcare, housing, and education, in which the average person has to work 60-70 hours a week, with little to no benefits, just to get by. So, in this primary season, explain to voters who are disgusted with Democrats for failing to make the changes they want (even though they mouth support for them on the campaign trail) that there are two parties inside the Democratic Party: neo-liberals who are beholden to their corporate donors and progressives who serve the people.
As for Trump, after much populist bluster on the campaign trail, he only broke with neo-liberalism over global trade deals; and, even on this front, only made marginal adjustments. More significantly, he doubled down on classical GOP neo-liberalism when his party was in control of both houses of Congress. His signature domestic policy achievement was his tax plan, which produced an even greater reallocation of wealth upwards than occurred under Reagan, Clinton, the Bushes, and Obama.
On top of that, the dominant role of money in politics weakened democracy in the neo-liberal era; and Trump, of course, accelerated America's drift towards oligarchy with overt attacks on our democratic traditions.
Seriously, of the three major political tendencies, only progressives offer a truly promising alternative for America.
This is an astonishingly powerful position for progressives to hold. Dissatisfaction with the current economic and political order is legion among the great majority of Americans. They are crying out for a different social contract along the lines of a 21st Century Economic Bill of Rights.
Now is the perfect time to bring these demands to the American electorate and ask them to vote them into reality. In the spring of 2022, we are emerging from the greatest disruption of American life in generations--and there is ample evidence, from the great resignation to a groundbreaking wave of union organizing, that as things return to normal after COVID, people don't want to return to the old normal. What better time to propose a positive new vision for American society and the economy?
Only progressives offer a truly promising alternative for America.
Better yet, we can easily achieve our program. These principles and practices are already the norm in every other rich industrialized country in the world--from Japan and South Korea to Europe and Canada. And guess what? These countries are doing better, much better, than the United States in virtually every social index--from education to personal health to happiness itself--with prosperous middle classes, lower wealth inequality, and stable democracies.
Lastly, when it comes to strategy, progressives need to take another page from the GOP, and insist upon greater unity and discipline from our elected officials. If we are to become a mature political movement, one powerful enough to alter the direction of society, the importance of this cannot be overstated. The public must be able trust that progressive candidates will not back down from the progressive agenda when elected. We have a great role model in this regard. The foundation of Bernie Sanders' unrivalled popularity is his unwavering commitment to progressive social-democratic policies across his entire career.
A clear platform, like a 21st Century Economic Bill of Rights, allows the public to understand when politicians follow through on their promises. So, just like Grover Norquist's notorious No Tax Pledge operates for Republicans, a 21st Century Economic Bill of Rights can anchor the progressive movement--and impress upon the American people that we are the political movement to support because we will work for them and transform the economy in the ways that they want--and if a politician breaks with this pledge, they will be challenged and defeated in the next election.
When we sat down to write the first installment of this series, we were motivated in part by the grotesque misrepresentations of our movement that we saw in the media (as a Stalinist thought police, "canceling" anyone who dared oppose them); and how any mention of economics tended to be absent even in more positive representations of progressives. Yet we knew that the central focus of progressives in the current congress were on core economic issues--particularly in strengthening the best elements of the Build Back Better package--and that the public was very supportive of the progressive position.
With the midterm elections around the corner and understanding that the economy was consistently the most important issue for voters, we felt progressives were about to miss a great opportunity. By consolidating around their economic platform, progressives can contrast their coherence against the failure of the centrists and grow their strength in the left-liberal coalition, with the goal of becoming dominant within the Party.
In recognizing that the current progressive economic program matched up brilliantly with FDR's Economic Bill of Rights--as well as later iterations by A. Philip Randolph, Martin Luther King, Jr, Bernie Sanders, and others - we not only found an apt vehicle to promote the current progressive economic program, but one that tied it to the most compelling and popular visions for American society from the past century--which, just as in 1944 and 1963, can set us on a path towards fulfilling our limitless promise.
We now live in the most ethnically diverse country in the history of this world on a plentiful continent-wide land mass. That this beautiful tapestry of cultures should remain trapped under the yolk of an exploitative economic system that perpetuates the injustices of the past, and the devastation of the planet, is unconscionable. A 21st Century Economic Bill of Rights, brought to fruition by the contemporary progressive movement, can bring down the curtain on the failed neo-liberal era and deliver the freedom, democracy and economic justice that will be the foundations of a truly egalitarian America.
"This sends a chilling message that the U.S. is willing to overlook some abuses, signaling that people experiencing human rights violations may be left to fend for themselves," said one Amnesty campaigner.
After leaked drafts exposed the Trump administration's plans to downplay human rights abuses in some allied countries, including Israel, the U.S. Department of State released the final edition of an annual report on Tuesday, sparking fresh condemnation.
"Breaking with precedent, Secretary of State Marco Rubio did not provide a written introduction to the report nor did he make remarks about it," CNN reported. Still, Amanda Klasing, Amnesty International USA's national director of government relations and advocacy, called him out by name in a Tuesday statement.
"With the release of the U.S. State Department's human rights report, it is clear that the Trump administration has engaged in a very selective documentation of human rights abuses in certain countries," Klasing said. "In addition to eliminating entire sections for certain countries—for example discrimination against LGBTQ+ people—there are also arbitrary omissions within existing sections of the report based on the country."
Klasing explained that "we have criticized past reports when warranted, but have never seen reports quite like this. Never before have the reports gone this far in prioritizing an administration's political agenda over a consistent and truthful accounting of human rights violations around the world—softening criticism in some countries while ignoring violations in others. The State Department has said in relation to the reports less is more. However, for the victims and human rights defenders who rely on these reports to shine light on abuses and violations, less is just less."
"Secretary Rubio knows full well from his time in the Senate how vital these reports are in informing policy decisions and shaping diplomatic conversations, yet he has made the dangerous and short-sighted decision to put out a truncated version that doesn't tell the whole story of human rights violations," she continued. "This sends a chilling message that the U.S. is willing to overlook some abuses, signaling that people experiencing human rights violations may be left to fend for themselves."
"Failing to adequately report on human rights violations further damages the credibility of the U.S. on human rights issues," she added. "It's shameful that the Trump administration and Secretary Rubio are putting politics above human lives."
The overarching report—which includes over 100 individual country reports—covers 2024, the last full calendar year of the Biden administration. The appendix says that in March, the report was "streamlined for better utility and accessibility in the field and by partners, and to be more responsive to the underlying legislative mandate and aligned to the administration's executive orders."
As CNN detailed:
The latest report was stripped of many of the specific sections included in past reports, including reporting on alleged abuses based on sexual orientation, violence toward women, corruption in government, systemic racial or ethnic violence, or denial of a fair public trial. Some country reports, including for Afghanistan, do address human rights abuses against women.
"We were asked to edit down the human rights reports to the bare minimum of what was statutorily required," said Michael Honigstein, the former director of African Affairs at the State Department's Bureau of Human Rights, Democracy, and Labor. He and his office helped compile the initial reports.
Over the past week, since the draft country reports leaked to the press, the Trump administration has come under fire for its portrayals of El Salvador, Israel, and Russia.
The report on Israel—and the illegally occupied Palestinian territories, the Gaza Strip and the West Bank—is just nine pages. The brevity even drew the attention of Israeli media. The Times of Israel highlighted that it "is much shorter than last year's edition compiled under the Biden administration and contained no mention of the severe humanitarian crisis in Gaza."
Since the Hamas-led October 7, 2023 attack on Israel, Israeli forces have slaughtered over 60,000 Palestinians in Gaza, according to local officials—though experts warn the true toll is likely far higher. As Israel has restricted humanitarian aid in recent months, over 200 people have starved to death, including 103 children.
The U.S. report on Israel does not mention the genocide case that Israel faces at the International Court of Justice over the assault on Gaza, or the International Criminal Court arrest warrants issued for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity.
The section on war crimes and genocide only says that "terrorist organizations Hamas and Hezbollah continue to engage in the
indiscriminate targeting of Israeli civilians in violation of the law of armed conflict."
As the world mourns the killing of six more Palestinian media professionals in Gaza this week—which prompted calls for the United Nations Security Council to convene an emergency meeting—the report's section on press freedom is also short and makes no mention of the hundreds of journalists killed in Israel's annihilation of the strip:
The law generally provided for freedom of expression, including for members of the press and other media, and the government generally respected this right for most Israelis. NGOs and journalists reported authorities restricted press coverage and limited certain forms of expression, especially in the context of criticism against the war or sympathy for Palestinians in Gaza.
Noting that "the human rights reports have been among the U.S. government's most-read documents," DAWN senior adviser and 32-year State Department official Charles Blaha said the "significant omissions" in this year's report on Israel, Gaza, and the West Bank render it "functionally useless for Congress and the public as nothing more than a pro-Israel document."
Like Klasing at Amnesty, Sarah Leah Whitson, DAWN's executive director, specifically called out the U.S. secretary of state.
"Secretary Rubio has revamped the State Department reports for one principal purpose: to whitewash Israeli crimes, including its horrific genocide and starvation in Gaza. The report shockingly includes not a word about the overwhelming evidence of genocide, mass starvation, and the deliberate bombardment of civilians in Gaza," she said. "Rubio has defied the letter and intent of U.S. laws requiring the State Department to report truthfully and comprehensively about every country's human rights abuses, instead offering up anodyne cover for his murderous friends in Tel Aviv."
The Tuesday release came after a coalition of LGBTQ+ and human rights organizations on Monday filed a lawsuit against the U.S. State Department over its refusal to release the congressionally mandated report.
This article has been updated with comment from DAWN.
"We will not sit idly by while political leaders manipulate voting maps to entrench their power and subvert our democracy," said the head of Common Cause.
As Republicans try to rig congressional maps in several states and Democrats threaten retaliatory measures, a pro-democracy watchdog on Tuesday unveiled new fairness standards underscoring that "independent redistricting commissions remain the gold standard for ending partisan gerrymandering."
Common Cause will hold an online media briefing Wednesday at noon Eastern time "to walk reporters though the six pieces of criteria the organization will use to evaluate any proposed maps."
The Washington, D.C.-based advocacy group said that "it will closely evaluate, but not automatically condemn, countermeasures" to Republican gerrymandering efforts—especially mid-decade redistricting not based on decennial censuses.
Amid the gerrymandering wars, we just launched 6 fairness criteria to hold all actors to the same principled standard: people first—not parties. Read our criteria here: www.commoncause.org/resources/po...
[image or embed]
— Common Cause (@commoncause.org) August 12, 2025 at 12:01 PM
Common Cause's six fairness criteria for mid-decade redistricting are:
"We will not sit idly by while political leaders manipulate voting maps to entrench their power and subvert our democracy," Common Cause president and CEO Virginia Kase Solomón said in a statement. "But neither will we call for unilateral political disarmament in the face of authoritarian tactics that undermine fair representation."
"We have established a fairness criteria that we will use to evaluate all countermeasures so we can respond to the most urgent threats to fair representation while holding all actors to the same principled standard: people—not parties—first," she added.
Common Cause's fairness criteria come amid the ongoing standoff between Republicans trying to gerrymander Texas' congressional map and Democratic lawmakers who fled the state in a bid to stymie a vote on the measure. Texas state senators on Tuesday approved the proposed map despite a walkout by most of their Democratic colleagues.
Leaders of several Democrat-controlled states, most notably California, have threatened retaliatory redistricting.
"This moment is about more than responding to a single threat—it's about building the movement for lasting reform," Kase Solomón asserted. "This is not an isolated political tactic; it is part of a broader march toward authoritarianism, dismantling people-powered democracy, and stripping away the people's ability to have a political voice and say in how they are governed."
"Texas law is clear: A pregnant person cannot be arrested and prosecuted for getting an abortion. No one is above the law, including officials entrusted with enforcing it," said an ACLU attorney.
When officials in Starr County, Texas arrested Lizelle Gonzalez in 2022 and charged her with murder for having a medication abortion—despite state law clearly prohibiting the prosecution of women for abortion care—she spent three days in jail, away from her children, and the highly publicized arrest was "deeply traumatizing."
Now, said her lawyers at the ACLU in court filings on Tuesday, officials in the county sheriff's and district attorney's offices must be held accountable for knowingly subjecting Gonzalez to wrongful prosecution.
Starr County District Attorney Gocha Ramirez ultimately dismissed the charge against Gonzalez, said the ACLU, but the Texas bar's investigation into Ramirez—which found multiple instances of misconduct related to Gonzalez's homicide charge—resulted in only minor punishment. Ramirez had to pay a small fine of $1,250 and was given one year of probated suspension.
"Without real accountability, Starr County's district attorney—and any other law enforcement actor—will not be deterred from abusing their power to unlawfully target people because of their personal beliefs, rather than the law," said the ACLU.
The state bar found that Ramirez allowed Gonzalez's indictment to go forward despite the fact that her homicide charge was "known not to be supported by probable cause."
Ramirez had denied that he was briefed on the facts of the case before it was prosecuted by his office, but the state bar "determined he was consulted by a prosecutor in his office beforehand and permitted it to go forward."
"Without real accountability, Starr County's district attorney—and any other law enforcement actor—will not be deterred from abusing their power to unlawfully target people because of their personal beliefs, rather than the law."
Sarah Corning, an attorney at the ACLU of Texas, said the prosecutors and law enforcement officers "ignored Texas law when they wrongfully arrested Lizelle Gonzalez for ending her pregnancy."
"They shattered her life in South Texas, violated her rights, and abused the power they swore to uphold," said Corning. "Texas law is clear: A pregnant person cannot be arrested and prosecuted for getting an abortion. No one is above the law, including officials entrusted with enforcing it."
The district attorney's office sought to have the ACLU's case dismissed in July 2024, raising claims of legal immunity.
A court denied Ramirez's motion, and the ACLU's discovery process that followed revealed "a coordinated effort between the Starr County sheriff's office and district attorney's office to violate Ms. Gonzalez's rights."
The officials' "wanton disregard for the rule of law and erroneous belief of their own invincibility is a frightening deviation from the offices' purposes: to seek justice," said Cecilia Garza, a partner at the law firm Garza Martinez, who is joining the ACLU in representing Gonzalez. "I am proud to represent Ms. Gonzalez in her fight for justice and redemption, and our team will not allow these abuses to continue in Starr County or any other county in the state of Texas."
Gonzalez's fight for justice comes as a wrongful death case in Texas—filed by an "anti-abortion legal terrorist" on behalf of a man whose girlfriend use medication from another state to end her pregnancy—moves forward, potentially jeopardizing access to abortion pills across the country.