A Ukrainian man stands in the rubble in Zhytomyr on March 02, 2022, following a Russian bombing the day before. The shelling killed at least 3 people and injured nearly 20 according to locals and local authorities, destroyed a local market and at least 10 houses on March 01, 2022. (Photo: Emmanuel Duparcq/AFP via Getty Images)
Putin's War on Ukraine Could Spark a Nuclear Catastrophe
As the U.S. has roughly the same number of warheads as Russia, both countries have enough nuclear firepower to destroy human civilization (such as it is) many times over.
Death and destruction have descended on Ukraine as Russia's invasion continues into its second week. The invasion has killed thousands and created the largest refugee crisis in Europe since WWII, with over one million Ukrainians fleeing to Poland, Romania, Moldova and beyond. Russia's invasion could trigger further catastrophes, including a meltdown of one of Ukraine's 15 nuclear reactors, or even the unimaginable, nuclear war.
As Russian forces began attacking on February 24th, President Vladimir Putin issued a warning to any nation contemplating intervention, clearly threatening nuclear retaliation: "Russia will respond immediately, and the consequences will be such as you have never seen in your entire history."
The situation worsened days later, when, with sanctions against Russia mounting and its invasion faltering, Putin put his nation's nuclear forces on "special combat readiness." The United States did not reply in kind, and canceled a scheduled ballistic missile test out of caution.
Belarus, which is actively participating with Russia in the invasion, held a nationwide referendum, widely described as rigged, which reversed Belarus's long-standing neutrality and non-nuclear status. Belarus President Alexander Lukashenko, a Putin ally who is described as "Europe's last dictator," has signaled he's willing to host Russian nuclear missiles in Belarus.
The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists recently estimated that Russia has 4,477 nuclear warheads, of which 1,588 are deployed on ballistic missiles, on long-range bombers, or on submarines, ready to launch on a moment's notice. As the U.S. has roughly the same number of warheads as Russia, both countries have enough nuclear firepower to destroy human civilization (such as it is) many times over.
"We have found it almost impossible to imagine, 30 years after the end of the Cold War, that there could be a nuclear war between the United States and Russia," Dr. Ira Helfand, the former president of International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War and co-founder and past president of Physicians for Social Responsibility, said on the Democracy Now! news hour. "The crisis in Ukraine is putting that possibility on the table again. If the conflict there spreads, if NATO and Russia get drawn into active combat, both of these blocs have in their military doctrine provision for the use of nuclear weapons if things are not going well in a conventional war."
Dr. Helfand went on to describe the "nuclear winter" that would follow an all-out nuclear war, when ash filling the atmosphere would block the sun, causing temperatures to plunge: "The ecosystems which have evolved in the last 10,000 years would collapse, food production would stop, and the vast majority of the human race would starve to death."
Nuclear war is not the only threat. Ukraine has 15 nuclear power reactors at four facilities around the country, as well as the deactivated reactors at the Chernobyl nuclear disaster site. In 1986, one of Chernobyl's four reactors exploded, precipitating the worst nuclear accident in history. Last week, Russian forces captured the Chernobyl site, presumably to open the highly contaminated "Chernobyl Exclusion Zone" for their military drive to Kyiv, the Ukrainian capital. The Russians are reportedly demanding the Ukrainian staff there continue their work keeping the long-shuttered nuclear disaster site safe. Increased levels of gamma radiation were temporarily detected at Chernobyl, attributed to the disturbance of radioactive topsoil by the hundreds of heavy Russian military vehicles passing through en route to lay siege to Kyiv.
Another enormous risk lies in the potential disruption to Ukraine's 15 operational nuclear plants. As Greenpeace detailed in a paper released on Wednesday on the vulnerability of nuclear plants during war, nuclear reactors and spent fuel reserves require flawless, continuous operation of complex energy- and water-intensive systems to properly cool the reactors to avoid meltdowns and explosions. Anything from an indiscriminately fired artillery shell to collapse of the power grid could precipitate a nuclear disaster surpassing those that befell Chernobyl or Fukushima, Japan.
On Wednesday, Russian officials informed the International Atomic Energy Agency that its military controlled the territory around Ukraine's Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant, the largest nuclear facility in Europe. Despite that, reports indicate that hundreds of workers and others successfully blocked access to the plant with their bodies and vehicle barricades. It is currently unclear who is in control of the Zaporizhzhia plant.
"Are we on the brink of World War III?" a reporter from Al Jazeera asked Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov this week. "The Third World War can only be nuclear," Lavrov replied.
This week, Ichiro Ogasawara, Japan's ambassador to the UN's Conference on Disarmament offered a warning: "As the only country to have suffered atomic bombings during war, Japan is fully aware of the catastrophic humanitarian consequences of the use of nuclear weapons...such tragedy must never be repeated again."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just three days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Death and destruction have descended on Ukraine as Russia's invasion continues into its second week. The invasion has killed thousands and created the largest refugee crisis in Europe since WWII, with over one million Ukrainians fleeing to Poland, Romania, Moldova and beyond. Russia's invasion could trigger further catastrophes, including a meltdown of one of Ukraine's 15 nuclear reactors, or even the unimaginable, nuclear war.
As Russian forces began attacking on February 24th, President Vladimir Putin issued a warning to any nation contemplating intervention, clearly threatening nuclear retaliation: "Russia will respond immediately, and the consequences will be such as you have never seen in your entire history."
The situation worsened days later, when, with sanctions against Russia mounting and its invasion faltering, Putin put his nation's nuclear forces on "special combat readiness." The United States did not reply in kind, and canceled a scheduled ballistic missile test out of caution.
Belarus, which is actively participating with Russia in the invasion, held a nationwide referendum, widely described as rigged, which reversed Belarus's long-standing neutrality and non-nuclear status. Belarus President Alexander Lukashenko, a Putin ally who is described as "Europe's last dictator," has signaled he's willing to host Russian nuclear missiles in Belarus.
The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists recently estimated that Russia has 4,477 nuclear warheads, of which 1,588 are deployed on ballistic missiles, on long-range bombers, or on submarines, ready to launch on a moment's notice. As the U.S. has roughly the same number of warheads as Russia, both countries have enough nuclear firepower to destroy human civilization (such as it is) many times over.
"We have found it almost impossible to imagine, 30 years after the end of the Cold War, that there could be a nuclear war between the United States and Russia," Dr. Ira Helfand, the former president of International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War and co-founder and past president of Physicians for Social Responsibility, said on the Democracy Now! news hour. "The crisis in Ukraine is putting that possibility on the table again. If the conflict there spreads, if NATO and Russia get drawn into active combat, both of these blocs have in their military doctrine provision for the use of nuclear weapons if things are not going well in a conventional war."
Dr. Helfand went on to describe the "nuclear winter" that would follow an all-out nuclear war, when ash filling the atmosphere would block the sun, causing temperatures to plunge: "The ecosystems which have evolved in the last 10,000 years would collapse, food production would stop, and the vast majority of the human race would starve to death."
Nuclear war is not the only threat. Ukraine has 15 nuclear power reactors at four facilities around the country, as well as the deactivated reactors at the Chernobyl nuclear disaster site. In 1986, one of Chernobyl's four reactors exploded, precipitating the worst nuclear accident in history. Last week, Russian forces captured the Chernobyl site, presumably to open the highly contaminated "Chernobyl Exclusion Zone" for their military drive to Kyiv, the Ukrainian capital. The Russians are reportedly demanding the Ukrainian staff there continue their work keeping the long-shuttered nuclear disaster site safe. Increased levels of gamma radiation were temporarily detected at Chernobyl, attributed to the disturbance of radioactive topsoil by the hundreds of heavy Russian military vehicles passing through en route to lay siege to Kyiv.
Another enormous risk lies in the potential disruption to Ukraine's 15 operational nuclear plants. As Greenpeace detailed in a paper released on Wednesday on the vulnerability of nuclear plants during war, nuclear reactors and spent fuel reserves require flawless, continuous operation of complex energy- and water-intensive systems to properly cool the reactors to avoid meltdowns and explosions. Anything from an indiscriminately fired artillery shell to collapse of the power grid could precipitate a nuclear disaster surpassing those that befell Chernobyl or Fukushima, Japan.
On Wednesday, Russian officials informed the International Atomic Energy Agency that its military controlled the territory around Ukraine's Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant, the largest nuclear facility in Europe. Despite that, reports indicate that hundreds of workers and others successfully blocked access to the plant with their bodies and vehicle barricades. It is currently unclear who is in control of the Zaporizhzhia plant.
"Are we on the brink of World War III?" a reporter from Al Jazeera asked Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov this week. "The Third World War can only be nuclear," Lavrov replied.
This week, Ichiro Ogasawara, Japan's ambassador to the UN's Conference on Disarmament offered a warning: "As the only country to have suffered atomic bombings during war, Japan is fully aware of the catastrophic humanitarian consequences of the use of nuclear weapons...such tragedy must never be repeated again."
Death and destruction have descended on Ukraine as Russia's invasion continues into its second week. The invasion has killed thousands and created the largest refugee crisis in Europe since WWII, with over one million Ukrainians fleeing to Poland, Romania, Moldova and beyond. Russia's invasion could trigger further catastrophes, including a meltdown of one of Ukraine's 15 nuclear reactors, or even the unimaginable, nuclear war.
As Russian forces began attacking on February 24th, President Vladimir Putin issued a warning to any nation contemplating intervention, clearly threatening nuclear retaliation: "Russia will respond immediately, and the consequences will be such as you have never seen in your entire history."
The situation worsened days later, when, with sanctions against Russia mounting and its invasion faltering, Putin put his nation's nuclear forces on "special combat readiness." The United States did not reply in kind, and canceled a scheduled ballistic missile test out of caution.
Belarus, which is actively participating with Russia in the invasion, held a nationwide referendum, widely described as rigged, which reversed Belarus's long-standing neutrality and non-nuclear status. Belarus President Alexander Lukashenko, a Putin ally who is described as "Europe's last dictator," has signaled he's willing to host Russian nuclear missiles in Belarus.
The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists recently estimated that Russia has 4,477 nuclear warheads, of which 1,588 are deployed on ballistic missiles, on long-range bombers, or on submarines, ready to launch on a moment's notice. As the U.S. has roughly the same number of warheads as Russia, both countries have enough nuclear firepower to destroy human civilization (such as it is) many times over.
"We have found it almost impossible to imagine, 30 years after the end of the Cold War, that there could be a nuclear war between the United States and Russia," Dr. Ira Helfand, the former president of International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War and co-founder and past president of Physicians for Social Responsibility, said on the Democracy Now! news hour. "The crisis in Ukraine is putting that possibility on the table again. If the conflict there spreads, if NATO and Russia get drawn into active combat, both of these blocs have in their military doctrine provision for the use of nuclear weapons if things are not going well in a conventional war."
Dr. Helfand went on to describe the "nuclear winter" that would follow an all-out nuclear war, when ash filling the atmosphere would block the sun, causing temperatures to plunge: "The ecosystems which have evolved in the last 10,000 years would collapse, food production would stop, and the vast majority of the human race would starve to death."
Nuclear war is not the only threat. Ukraine has 15 nuclear power reactors at four facilities around the country, as well as the deactivated reactors at the Chernobyl nuclear disaster site. In 1986, one of Chernobyl's four reactors exploded, precipitating the worst nuclear accident in history. Last week, Russian forces captured the Chernobyl site, presumably to open the highly contaminated "Chernobyl Exclusion Zone" for their military drive to Kyiv, the Ukrainian capital. The Russians are reportedly demanding the Ukrainian staff there continue their work keeping the long-shuttered nuclear disaster site safe. Increased levels of gamma radiation were temporarily detected at Chernobyl, attributed to the disturbance of radioactive topsoil by the hundreds of heavy Russian military vehicles passing through en route to lay siege to Kyiv.
Another enormous risk lies in the potential disruption to Ukraine's 15 operational nuclear plants. As Greenpeace detailed in a paper released on Wednesday on the vulnerability of nuclear plants during war, nuclear reactors and spent fuel reserves require flawless, continuous operation of complex energy- and water-intensive systems to properly cool the reactors to avoid meltdowns and explosions. Anything from an indiscriminately fired artillery shell to collapse of the power grid could precipitate a nuclear disaster surpassing those that befell Chernobyl or Fukushima, Japan.
On Wednesday, Russian officials informed the International Atomic Energy Agency that its military controlled the territory around Ukraine's Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant, the largest nuclear facility in Europe. Despite that, reports indicate that hundreds of workers and others successfully blocked access to the plant with their bodies and vehicle barricades. It is currently unclear who is in control of the Zaporizhzhia plant.
"Are we on the brink of World War III?" a reporter from Al Jazeera asked Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov this week. "The Third World War can only be nuclear," Lavrov replied.
This week, Ichiro Ogasawara, Japan's ambassador to the UN's Conference on Disarmament offered a warning: "As the only country to have suffered atomic bombings during war, Japan is fully aware of the catastrophic humanitarian consequences of the use of nuclear weapons...such tragedy must never be repeated again."