To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.

×
      LATEST NEWSOPINIONCLIMATEECONOMY POLITICS RIGHTS & JUSTICEWAR & PEACE
      LATEST NEWS
      OPINION

      league of women voters

      missouri voters

      Missouri Court Blocks Restrictions on Voting Rights Groups Days Before Midterms

      "While the 2022 election is only a few days away, this ruling means that civic engagement organizations will be able to engage with voters over the weekend and in future elections, so every Missourian can make their voice heard."

      Jessica Corbett
      Nov 04, 2022

      The League of Women Voters of Missouri and state arm of the NAACP on Friday celebrated after the Cole County Circuit Court granted a preliminary injunction blocking parts of a new law intended to restrict activities of groups encouraging Missourians to vote.

      "With today's ruling, we will uplift our voices loud and strong to protect the right to vote heading into next week's critical elections."

      Keep ReadingShow Less
      News
      Politics
      voting rights protest

      'The Time Is Now': 200 Activists Arrested While Demanding Biden, Congress Defend Voting Rights

      "We are here today to send a message that President Biden must take action now to ensure the promise of our democracy and protect our freedom to vote."

      Brett Wilkins
      Nov 17, 2021

      Activists on Wednesday took to the streets of Washington, D.C., where organizers said around 200 people were arrested while demanding the passage of key voting rights legislation, an end to the filibuster, and bold action from President Joe Biden in defense of an imperiled democracy.

      "This movement is about ensuring that the arc of the moral universe continues to bend toward justice."

      Keep ReadingShow Less
      News
      Rights & Justice

      Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law Sues Postmaster General DeJoy and Other Officials for Disrupting 2020 Election Cycle

      The Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law and its pro bono counsel, Arnold & Porter LLP, filed suit this evening in federal court for the District of Maryland on behalf of the National Urban League, Common Cause and the League of Women Voters U.S.

      Newswire Editor
      Aug 19, 2020

      The Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law and its pro bono counsel, Arnold & Porter LLP, filed suit this evening in federal court for the District of Maryland on behalf of the National Urban League, Common Cause and the League of Women Voters U.S. against Postmaster General Louis DeJoy and the United States Postal Service, challenging actions intended to disrupt the 2020 election by making it more difficult for mail ballots to be delivered on time.

      "Postmaster General Louis DeJoy has wreaked havoc across the country with reckless policies intended to disrupt the timely delivery of mail just weeks in advance of a general election," said Kristen Clarke, president and executive director of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law. "Without question, DeJoy is weaponizing the United States Postal Service (USPS) to disenfranchise Americans who choose to vote by mail amid an unprecedented pandemic gripping the nation. We are filing this lawsuit to stop actions that were adopted unlawfully and that were intended to cause delays intended to disrupt the November election. DeJoy's statement vowing to suspend changes rings hollow in the absence of remedial action taken to address the damage that his actions have caused."

      The suit alleges that DeJoy's actions in implementing President Trump's stated desire to undercut the delivery of mail ballots violates the constitutional right to vote because of the burden it places on voters choosing to vote by absentee ballot. The actions also violate the First Amendment, because they target voters who are intending to vote by mail and, the complaint claims, that DeJoy failed to follow the law which required him to submit his plans to the U.S. Postal Commission before implementing them, placing his actions outside the scope of his legal authority.

      The lawsuit was filed along with pro bono counsel, Arnold & Porter LLP. The suit was filed on behalf of the National Urban League, Common Cause and the League of Women Voters U.S. against Postmaster General Louis DeJoy and the United States Postal Service.

      "The drastic and disruptive changes to the Postal Service by the Trump administration have been an attack on every American's right to vote and their First Amendment right to free speech - and they must be rolled back definitively with more than just a press release," said Karen Hobert Flynn, President of Common Cause. "These efforts to undermine the effectiveness of the Postal Service under President Trump must ALL be rescinded. In the midst of a pandemic we need to know that ballot applications and ballots will be delivered in a timely manner so that every American will be able to make their voice heard on Election Day without having to choose between protecting their health and exercising their right to vote."

      Keep ReadingShow Less
      Newswire
      SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER
      Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.
      Follow Us
      Most Popular

      East Palestine Soil Contains Dioxin Levels Hundreds of Times Over Cancer Risk Threshold

      Rupert Murdoch Lies at the Heart of Democracy's Destruction Worldwide

      'I Will Burn the Session to the Ground' Over Anti-Trans Bill, Says Nebraska Democrat

      'Important Victory' for Florida Higher Ed: Court Upholds Block on DeSantis Censorship Law

      South Carolina Bill to Execute People Who Have Abortions Gets Support From 21 Republicans

      It's Clear the GOP Is a Party of Death, Not Life

      Deadly Disinformation – The Underreported Scandal at the New York Times

      'They're Such Cowards': GOP Pushes Bill Targeting Food Aid for the Poor

      After Brutal Assault, Yanis Varoufakis Urges Progressives to Focus on 'What Really Matters'

      GOP Author of Bank Deregulation Law Says 'No Need' for Tougher Safeguards

      SUPPORT OUR WORK.
      We are independent, non-profit, advertising-free and 100%
      reader supported.