

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

The door is wide open to try something new.
Lately, I’ve been writing about the doom and gloom that is the Democratic Party. But that’s no way to end this challenging year. So, I thought I’d share some optimistic findings from my upcoming book, “The Billionaires Have Two Parties, We Need One of Our Own” (available by March, I hope).
I think we all can agree that rural America—the bedrock for MAGA—is a lost cause for the Democrats. Remember the red flashes on our TV screens as rural county after rural county overwhelming went for Trump in 2024? Nationally, there were 20 Congressional districts in which the Democrats didn’t even run a candidate in 2024, and overall, there were 132 districts that the Republicans won by 25 percent or more.
But while rural America may be a lost cause for the Democrats, it’s an area of opportunity for a new working-class political formation.
Why do I think a working-class candidate would do well in these overwhelmingly red districts? Because of what we found in our YouGov survey of 3,000 voters in four key industrial (and surprisingly rural) states.
Our data shows that voters in flaming red rural areas in Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin are willing to support a new working-class political organization dedicated to a very progressive economic platform.
We asked the following question:
Would you support a new organization, the Independent Workers Political Association, that would support working-class issues independent of both the Democratic and Republican parties? It would run and support independent political candidates committed to a platform that included:
That’s a very radical idea and a very radical platform, clearly more progressive than what any congressperson is currently willing to support, except for maybe Sen. Bernie Sanders. Yet we found that 57 percent of the 3,000 respondents supported this new organization, which doesn’t even exist!
The survey also collected information about voters living in five areas: Big city, Smaller city, Suburban area, Small town, and Rural Area. Let’s zoom in on rural areas, where 585 of the 3,000 respondents (19.5%) live. Trump won in these rural areas with 51 percent of the vote in 2020 and 61 percent in 2024.
How did our Independent Workers Political Association do? Surprisingly well.
Voter Support for the Independent Workers’ Political Association
Rural Republicans: 50%
Rural Independents: 50%
Rural Democrats: 77%
This is good news for working-class advocates like me. The spoiler argument goes away because in these areas the Democratic Party hardly exists. A new workers’ party would rapidly become the second party, not the third party, challenging the Republicans.
The door is wide open to try something new. But that requires that a core group of labor unions come together to experiment with running working-class candidates in a few of these rural districts, ideally this cycle.
The idea has yet to catch on, although a few labor leaders like Shawn Fain of the UAW seem interested. Let’s hope more support emerges soon, because a rural red district with no Democratic Party is a terrible thing to waste.
Happy Holidays!
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Les Leopold is the executive director of the Labor Institute and author of the new book, “The Billionaires Have Two Parties, We Need a Party of Our Own” (2026). His previous books include: “Wall Street’s War on Workers: How Mass Layoffs and Greed Are Destroying the Working Class and What to Do About It" (2024); "Runaway Inequality: An Activist's Guide to Economic Justice" (2015); and “The Man Who Hated Work and Loved Labor: The Life and Times of Tony Mazzocchi” (2007). Read more of his work on his substack here.
Lately, I’ve been writing about the doom and gloom that is the Democratic Party. But that’s no way to end this challenging year. So, I thought I’d share some optimistic findings from my upcoming book, “The Billionaires Have Two Parties, We Need One of Our Own” (available by March, I hope).
I think we all can agree that rural America—the bedrock for MAGA—is a lost cause for the Democrats. Remember the red flashes on our TV screens as rural county after rural county overwhelming went for Trump in 2024? Nationally, there were 20 Congressional districts in which the Democrats didn’t even run a candidate in 2024, and overall, there were 132 districts that the Republicans won by 25 percent or more.
But while rural America may be a lost cause for the Democrats, it’s an area of opportunity for a new working-class political formation.
Why do I think a working-class candidate would do well in these overwhelmingly red districts? Because of what we found in our YouGov survey of 3,000 voters in four key industrial (and surprisingly rural) states.
Our data shows that voters in flaming red rural areas in Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin are willing to support a new working-class political organization dedicated to a very progressive economic platform.
We asked the following question:
Would you support a new organization, the Independent Workers Political Association, that would support working-class issues independent of both the Democratic and Republican parties? It would run and support independent political candidates committed to a platform that included:
That’s a very radical idea and a very radical platform, clearly more progressive than what any congressperson is currently willing to support, except for maybe Sen. Bernie Sanders. Yet we found that 57 percent of the 3,000 respondents supported this new organization, which doesn’t even exist!
The survey also collected information about voters living in five areas: Big city, Smaller city, Suburban area, Small town, and Rural Area. Let’s zoom in on rural areas, where 585 of the 3,000 respondents (19.5%) live. Trump won in these rural areas with 51 percent of the vote in 2020 and 61 percent in 2024.
How did our Independent Workers Political Association do? Surprisingly well.
Voter Support for the Independent Workers’ Political Association
Rural Republicans: 50%
Rural Independents: 50%
Rural Democrats: 77%
This is good news for working-class advocates like me. The spoiler argument goes away because in these areas the Democratic Party hardly exists. A new workers’ party would rapidly become the second party, not the third party, challenging the Republicans.
The door is wide open to try something new. But that requires that a core group of labor unions come together to experiment with running working-class candidates in a few of these rural districts, ideally this cycle.
The idea has yet to catch on, although a few labor leaders like Shawn Fain of the UAW seem interested. Let’s hope more support emerges soon, because a rural red district with no Democratic Party is a terrible thing to waste.
Happy Holidays!
Les Leopold is the executive director of the Labor Institute and author of the new book, “The Billionaires Have Two Parties, We Need a Party of Our Own” (2026). His previous books include: “Wall Street’s War on Workers: How Mass Layoffs and Greed Are Destroying the Working Class and What to Do About It" (2024); "Runaway Inequality: An Activist's Guide to Economic Justice" (2015); and “The Man Who Hated Work and Loved Labor: The Life and Times of Tony Mazzocchi” (2007). Read more of his work on his substack here.
Lately, I’ve been writing about the doom and gloom that is the Democratic Party. But that’s no way to end this challenging year. So, I thought I’d share some optimistic findings from my upcoming book, “The Billionaires Have Two Parties, We Need One of Our Own” (available by March, I hope).
I think we all can agree that rural America—the bedrock for MAGA—is a lost cause for the Democrats. Remember the red flashes on our TV screens as rural county after rural county overwhelming went for Trump in 2024? Nationally, there were 20 Congressional districts in which the Democrats didn’t even run a candidate in 2024, and overall, there were 132 districts that the Republicans won by 25 percent or more.
But while rural America may be a lost cause for the Democrats, it’s an area of opportunity for a new working-class political formation.
Why do I think a working-class candidate would do well in these overwhelmingly red districts? Because of what we found in our YouGov survey of 3,000 voters in four key industrial (and surprisingly rural) states.
Our data shows that voters in flaming red rural areas in Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin are willing to support a new working-class political organization dedicated to a very progressive economic platform.
We asked the following question:
Would you support a new organization, the Independent Workers Political Association, that would support working-class issues independent of both the Democratic and Republican parties? It would run and support independent political candidates committed to a platform that included:
That’s a very radical idea and a very radical platform, clearly more progressive than what any congressperson is currently willing to support, except for maybe Sen. Bernie Sanders. Yet we found that 57 percent of the 3,000 respondents supported this new organization, which doesn’t even exist!
The survey also collected information about voters living in five areas: Big city, Smaller city, Suburban area, Small town, and Rural Area. Let’s zoom in on rural areas, where 585 of the 3,000 respondents (19.5%) live. Trump won in these rural areas with 51 percent of the vote in 2020 and 61 percent in 2024.
How did our Independent Workers Political Association do? Surprisingly well.
Voter Support for the Independent Workers’ Political Association
Rural Republicans: 50%
Rural Independents: 50%
Rural Democrats: 77%
This is good news for working-class advocates like me. The spoiler argument goes away because in these areas the Democratic Party hardly exists. A new workers’ party would rapidly become the second party, not the third party, challenging the Republicans.
The door is wide open to try something new. But that requires that a core group of labor unions come together to experiment with running working-class candidates in a few of these rural districts, ideally this cycle.
The idea has yet to catch on, although a few labor leaders like Shawn Fain of the UAW seem interested. Let’s hope more support emerges soon, because a rural red district with no Democratic Party is a terrible thing to waste.
Happy Holidays!