

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Marcus Frias (Bowman), (305-979-4515)
Taylor St. Germain (Markey), (202-224-2742)
Today, Congressman Jamaal Bowman (D-NY) and Senator Edward Markey (D-Mass.) introduced the Heating and Cooling Relief Act, legislation to invest in and expand the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) to universalize energy assistance. Currently, it is estimated that only 16 percent of households eligible for LIHEAP are actually served.
"There is no reason why, in the richest nation on Earth, people in our communities should be forced to choose between staying warm in the winter or cool in the summer and being able to make rent or put food on the table," said Congressman Jamaal Bowman (NY-16). "Senator Markey and I are working toward an America that respects our collective humanity and our Heating and Cooling Relief Act makes it so that every family can afford their energy bills. This is a racial and economic justice issue, with Black, Latino and Indigenous households all experiencing disproportionately high energy burdens. The lack of energy assistance is also a public health crisis, with high energy burdens associated with a greater risk for respiratory diseases and heat strokes. The fact is that no one, anywhere in this country, should have to resort to using their stoves or turning on space heaters because of exorbitantly high bills. This legislation is a bold approach to energy assistance that meets the moment by making energy assistance much more accessible to tens of millions more people and I am proud to have a partner in Senator Markey as we take on this fight."
"Access to life-saving heating and cooling is a basic human right that ensures our health and safety and should not be reserved only for those who can afford it," said Senator Ed Markey (D-Mass.). "This winter, families should not have to choose between paying bills or suffering chills. I am grateful that Congressman Bowman and I are fighting to make sure that home energy funding--a critical lifeline for families throughout the country--will be available to all of those who need it. Our Heating and Cooling Relief Act would provide LIHEAP funding to millions more Americans and ensure that the program has all the support it needs to enhance outreach efforts and serve all eligible households. The bill also takes steps to reduce the energy burdens of LIHEAP recipients and cut down our fossil fuel use by increasing investments in weatherization. The Heating and Cooling Relief Act is the ambitious and comprehensive legislation we need to help ensure the health and safety of American families and support a just transition away from fossil fuel consumption."
Specifically, the Heating and Cooling Relief Act:
"The Heating and Cooling Relief act would end energy poverty in the US by providing that no family would spend more than 3 percent of their family's budget on home energy and would provide states with the flexibility to weatherize up to 1 million homes per year," said Mark Wolfe, Executive Director of the National Energy Assistance Directors' Association (NEADA). "The net result will be an end to the stubbornly high utility arrears and shut-offs that low income families have been struggling with for many years."
Congressman Bowman and Senator Markey have been champions for energy and utility justice issues throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. On January 5, 2022 Congressman Bowman, Senator Markey, and Rep Schakowsky led a letter to the Federal Energy Regulation Commission (FERC) urging the Biden Administration to protect consumers from unfairly high heating and energy prices. Last year, Congressman Bowman introduced the Public Power Resolution with Congresswoman Bush to make power a public utility, and he also introduced the Broadband Justice Act to deliver accessible, free broadband to every subsidized household in the nation. As part of the American Rescue Plan, Senator Markey advocated for $20 billion in funding for Emergency Rental Assistance (ERA) and $4.5 billion in additional funding to LIHEAP. Last Congress, he also introduced a bill that would have set the sense of Congress that states and utilities should issue a moratorium on gas and electric service disconnections, late fees, reconnection fees, rate hikes, and other penalties for all consumers as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Original cosponsors of this legislation are Senators Kirsten Gillibrand (NY), Elizabeth Warren (MA), and Representatives Andre Carson (IN), Emanuel Cleaver II (MO), Adriano Espaillat (NY), Jesus G. "Chuy" Garcia (IL), Pramila Jayapal (WA), Mondaire Jones (NY), Barbara Lee (CA), Carolyn B. Maloney (NY), Grace Meng (NY), Gwen S. Moore (WI), Eleanor Holmes Norton (DC), Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY), Mark Pocan (WI), Ayanna Pressley (MA), Jan Schakowsky (IL), Mark Takano (CA), Rashida Tlaib (MI), Nydia M. Velazquez (NY), Bonnie Watson Coleman (NJ), and Frederica S. Wilson (FL).
Organizations endorsing the Heating and Cooling Relief Act include National Energy Assistance Directors' Association (NEADA), National Consumer Law Center (NCLC), National Housing Law Project, Public Citizen, Sunrise Movement, Evergreen Action, Green and Healthy Homes Initiative (GHHI), Sierra Club, Local Initiatives Support Coalition (LISC), Food and Water Watch, Rocky Mountain Institute, Center for Biological Diversity, Ecological Justice Initiative, Elevate, Dandelion Energy, Building Electrification Institute, Rewiring America, Association for Energy Affordability, Sustainable Westchester, New York Lawyers for Public Interest, Bloc Power, NY Geothermal Energy Organization, and NYC-Environmental Justice Alliance, Massachusetts Association for Community Action (MASSCAP), and NY Renews.
En Espanol:
NOTICIAS: El Rep. Bowman y el Sen. Markey Presentan la Ley de Asistencia para Calefaccion y Refrigeracion que Reforma el Programa de Asistencia para Energia para Hogares de Bajos Ingresos (LIHEAP)
WASHINGTON, DC - Hoy, el Congresista Jamaal Bowman (D-NY) y el Senador Edward Markey (D-Mass) introdujeron la Ley de Asistencia para Calefaccion y Refrigeracion, un proyecto de ley que invierte y amplia el Programa de Asistencia para Energia para Hogares de Bajos Ingresos (LIHEAP) para universalizar la asistencia energetica. Actualmente, se estima que solo el 16 por ciento de los hogares elegibles para LIHEAP realmente reciben esta ayuda.
"No hay ninguna razon por la cual, en la nacion mas rica de la Tierra, las personas de nuestras comunidades deban verse obligadas a elegir entre mantenerse calientes en invierno o frescas en verano y poder pagar el alquiler o poner comida sobre la mesa", dijo el Congresista. Jamaal Bowman (NY-16). "El Senador Markey y yo estamos trabajando para que Estados Unidos respete nuestra humanidad colectiva y nuestra Ley de Asistencia para Calefaccion y Refrigeracion hace que todas las familias puedan pagar sus facturas de energia. Este es un problema de justicia racial y economica, ya que familias afroamericanas, latinas e indigenas experimentan gastos energeticos desproporcionadamente altos. La falta de asistencia energetica es tambien una crisis de salud publica, los altos costos de la energia estan asociados a un mayor riesgo de enfermedades respiratorias e hipertermia. El hecho es que nadie, en ningun lugar de este pais, deberia tener que usar sus estufas o encender calefactores por facturas exorbitantes. Esta legislacion es un enfoque audaz para la asistencia energetica que la hace mucho mas accesible para decenas de millones de personas mas, y me enorgullece tener un gran aliado como el Senador Markey en esta batalla".
"El acceso a los sistemas de calefaccion y refrigeracion que salvan vidas es un derecho humano basico que garantiza nuestra salud y seguridad y no debe reservarse solo para aquellos que pueden pagarlo", dijo el Senador Ed Markey (D-Massachusetts). "Este invierno, las familias no deberian tener que elegir entre pagar facturas o sufrir escalofrios. Estoy agradecido de que el Congresista Bowman y yo estemos luchando para asegurarnos de que los fondos de energia para el hogar, un salvavidas fundamental para las familias en todo el pais, esten disponibles para todos aquellos que lo necesiten. Nuestra Ley de Asistencia para Calefaccion y Refrigeracion proporciona fondos al plan LIHEAP que beneficiaria a millones de estadounidenses mas y garantiza que el programa tenga todo el apoyo necesario para mejorar los esfuerzos de divulgacion y servir a todos los hogares elegibles. El proyecto de ley tambien toma medidas para reducir los gastos energeticos de los beneficiarios de LIHEAP y reducir nuestro uso de combustibles fosiles al aumentar las inversiones en climatizacion. La Ley de Asistencia para Calefaccion y Refrigeracion es la legislacion ambiciosa e integral que necesitamos para ayudar a garantizar la salud y la seguridad de las familias estadounidenses y apoyar una transicion justa para reducir el consumo de combustibles fosiles".
La Ley de Asistencia para Calefaccion y Refrigeracion, especificamente:
"La Ley de Asistencia para Calefaccion y Refrigeracion terminaria con la pobreza energetica en los EE. UU. al establecer que ninguna familia gastaria mas del 3 por ciento de su presupuesto familiar en energia para el hogar y brindaria a los estados la flexibilidad para climatizar hasta 1 millon de hogares por ano", dijo Mark Wolfe, Dir. Ejecutivo de la Asociacion Nacional de Directores de Asistencia Energetica (NEADA). "El resultado neto sera el fin de los obstinadamente altos retrasos y cortes de servicios publicos con los que las familias de bajos ingresos han estado luchando durante muchos anos".
El Congresista Bowman y el Senador Markey han sido defensores de justicia energetica y de servicios publicos ante los problemas causados por la pandemia de COVID-19. El 5 de enero de 2022, el Congresista Bowman, el Senador Markey y el Rep. Schakowsky lideraron el envio de una carta a la Comision Federal Reguladora de Energia (FERC) instando a la Administracion Biden a proteger a los consumidores de los precios injustamente altos de calefaccion y energia. El ano pasado, el Congresista Bowman presento la Resolucion para un Sistema Publico de Energia, con la Congresista Bush para convertir el sistema electrico en un servicio publico, y tambien presento la Ley de Justicia de Banda Ancha que hacer del sistema de banda ancha uno accesible y gratuito para todos los hogares subsidiados de la nacion. Como parte del Plan de Rescate Estadounidense, el Senador Markey abogo por $20 mil millones en fondos para el programa de Ayuda de Emergencia para el Alquiler (ERA) y $4.5 mil millones en fondos adicionales para LIHEAP. En el ultimo periodo de sesiones legislativas, tambien presento un proyecto de ley bajo el cual el Congreso hubiese exhortado a los estados y a las empresas de servicios publicos a emitir una moratoria sobre las desconexiones de los servicios de gas y electricidad, cargos por mora, cargos por reconexion, aumentos de tarifas y otras sanciones para todos los consumidores como resultado de la pandemia de COVID-19.
Los co-patrocinadores de esta propuesta son los Senadores Kirsten Gillibrand (NY) y Elizabeth Warren (MA), y los Reps. Andre Carson (IN), Emanuel Cleaver II (MO), Adriano Espaillat (NY), Jesus G. "Chuy" Garcia (IL) , Pramila Jayapal (WA), Mondaire Jones (NY), Barbara Lee (CA), Carolyn B. Maloney (NY), Grace Meng (NY), Gwen S. Moore (WI), Eleanor Holmes Nortton (DC), Alexandria Ocasio -Cortez (NY), Mark Pocan (WI), Ayanna Pressley (MA), Jan Schakowsky (IL), Mark Takano (CA), Rashida Tlaib (MI), Nydia M. Velazquez (NY), Bonnie Watson Coleman (NJ) y Frederica S. Wilson (FL).
Entre las organizaciones que respaldan la Ley de Asistencia para Calefaccion y Refrigeracion estan la Asociacion Nacional de Directores de Asistencia Energetica (NEADA), el Centro Nacional de Derecho del Consumidor (NCLC), el Proyecto de Nacional de Derecho de Vivienda, Public Citizen, Sunrise Movement, Iniciativa de Hogares Verdes y Saludables (GHHI), Sierra Club, Coalicion de Apoyo a Iniciativas Locales (LISC), Food and Water Watch, Rocky Mountain Institute, Centro para la Diversidad Biologica, Iniciativa de Justicia Ecologica, Elevate, Dandelion Energy, Building Electrification Institute, Rewiring America, Association for Energy Affordability, Sustainable Westchester, Abogados de Nueva York para el Interes Publico (NYLPI), Bloc Power, Organizacion de Energia Geotermica de Nueva York (NY-GEO), Alianza de Justicia Ambiental de la Ciudad de Nueva York, Asociacion para la Accion Comunitaria de Massachusetts (MASSCAP) y NY Renews.
Jamaal Anthony Bowman is an American politician and educator serving as the U.S. representative for New York's 16th congressional district since 2021.
(202) 225-2464"This is our God: Jesus, King of Peace, who rejects war, whom no one can use to justify war."
Pope Leo XIV used his Palm Sunday sermon to take what appears to be a shot at US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.
In his sermon, excerpts of which he published on social media, the pope emphasized Christian teachings against violence while criticizing anyone who would invoke Jesus Christ to justify a war.
"This is our God: Jesus, King of Peace, who rejects war, whom no one can use to justify war," Pope Leo said. "He does not listen to the prayers of those who wage war, but rejects them."
The pope also encouraged followers to "raise our prayers to the Prince of Peace so that he may support people wounded by war and open concrete paths of reconciliation and peace."
While speaking at the Pentagon last week, Hegseth directly invoked Jesus when discussing the Trump administration's unprovoked and unconstitutional war with Iran.
Specifically, Hegseth offered up a prayer in which he asked God to give US soldiers "wisdom in every decision, endurance for the trial ahead, unbreakable unity, and overwhelming violence of action against those who deserve no mercy," adding that "we ask these things with bold confidence in the mighty and powerful name of Jesus Christ."
Mother Jones contributing writer Alex Nguyen described the pope's sermon as a "rebuke" of Hegseth, whom he noted "has been open about his support for a Christian crusade" in the Middle East.
Pope Leo is not the only Catholic leader speaking against using Christian faith to justify wars of aggression. Two weeks ago, Cardinal Pierbattista Pizzaballa, the Latin patriarch of Jerusalem, said "the abuse and manipulation of God’s name to justify this and any other war is the gravest sin we can commit at this time."
“War is first and foremost political and has very material interests, like most wars," Cardinal Pizzaballa added.
"Trump’s problem is that whatever the claims he might make about the damage to Iran’s nuclear and military capacity, which is substantial, the regime survives, the international economy has been severely disrupted, and the bills keep on coming in."
President Donald Trump is reportedly preparing to launch some kind of ground assault on Iran in the coming weeks, but one prominent military strategy expert believes he's heading straight for defeat.
The Washington Post on Saturday reported that the Pentagon is preparing for "weeks" of ground operations in Iran, which for the last month has disrupted global energy markets by shutting down the Strait of Hormuz in response to aerial assaults by the US and Israel.
The Post's sources revealed that "any potential ground operation would fall short of a full-scale invasion and could instead involve raids by a mixture of Special Operations forces and conventional infantry troops" that could be used to seize Kharg Island, a key Iranian oil export hub, or to search out and destroy weapons systems that could be used by the Iranians to target ships along the strait.
Michael Eisenstadt, director of the Military and Security Studies Program at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, told the Post that taking over Kharg Island would be a highly risky operation for American troops, even if initially successful.
“I just wouldn’t want to be in that small place with Iran’s ability to rain down drones and maybe artillery,” said Eisenstadt.
Eisenstadt's analysis was echoed by Ret. Gen. Joseph Votel, former head of US Central Command, who told ABC News that seizing and occupying Kharg Island would put US troops in a state of constant danger, warning they could be "very, very vulnerable" to drones and missiles launched from the shore.
Lawrence Freedman, professor emeritus of war studies at King's College London, believes that the president has already checkmated himself regardless of what shape any ground operation takes.
In an analysis published Sunday, Freedman declared Trump had run "out of options" for victory, as there have been no signs of the Iranian regime crumbling due to US-Israeli attacks.
Freedman wrote that Trump now "appears to inhabit an alternative reality," noting that "his utterances have become increasingly incoherent, with contradictory statements following quickly one after the other, and frankly delusional claims."
Trump's loan real option at this point, Freedman continued, would to simply declare that he had achieved an unprecedented victory and just walk away. But even in that case, wrote Freedman, "this would mean leaving behind a mess in the Gulf" with no guarantee that Iran would re-open the Strait of Hormuz.
"Success in war is judged not by damage caused but by political objectives realized," Freedman wrote in his conclusion. "Here the objective was regime change, or at least the emergence of a new compliant leader... Trump’s problem is that whatever the claims he might make about the damage to Iran’s nuclear and military capacity, which is substantial, the regime survives, the international economy has been severely disrupted, and the bills keep on coming in."
"The NY Times saves its harshest skepticism for progressives," said one critic.
The New York Times is drawing criticism for publishing articles that downplayed the significance of Saturday's No Kings protests, which initial estimates suggest was the largest protest event in US history.
In a Times article that drew particular ire, reporter Jeremy Peters questioned whether nationwide events that drew an estimated 8 million people to the streets "would be enough to influence the course of the nation’s politics."
"Can the protests harness that energy and turn it into victories in the November midterm elections?" Peters asked rhetorically. "How can they avoid a primal scream that fades into a whimper?"
Journalist and author Mark Harris called Peters' take on the protests "predictable" and said it was framed so that the protests would appear insignificant no matter how many people turned out.
"There's a long, bad journalistic tradition," noted Harris. "All conservative grass-roots political movements are fascinating heartland phenomena, all progressive grass-roots political movements are ineffectual bleating. This one is written off as powered by white female college grads—the wine-moms slur, basically."
Media critic Dan Froomkin was event blunter in his criticism of the Peters piece.
"Putting anti-woke hack Jeremy Peters on this story is an act of war by the NYT against No Kings," he wrote.
Mark Jacob, former metro editor at the Chicago Tribune, also took a hatchet to Peters' analysis.
"The NY Times saves its harshest skepticism for progressives," he wrote. "Instead of being impressed by 3,000-plus coordinated protests, NYT dismisses the value of 'hitting a number' and asks if No Kings will be 'a primal scream that fades into a whimper.' F off, NY Times. We'll defeat fascism without you."
The Media and Democracy Project slammed the Times for putting Peters' analysis of the protests on its front page while burying straight news coverage of the events on page A18.
"NYT editors CHOSE that Jeremy Peters's opinions would frame the No Kings demonstrations and pro-democracy movement to millions of NYT readers," the group commented.
Joe Adalian, west coast editor for New York Mag's Vulture, criticized a Times report on the No Kings demonstrations that quoted a "skeptic" of the protests without noting that said skeptic was the chairman of the Ole Miss College Republicans.
"Of course, the Times doesn’t ID him as such," remarked Adalian. "He's just a Concerned Youth."
Jeff Jarvis, professor emeritus at the CUNY Graduate School of Journalism, took issue with a Times piece that offered five "takeaways" from the No Kings events that somehow managed to miss their broader significance.
"I despise the five-takeaways journalistic trope the Broken Times loves so," Jarvis wrote. "It is reductionist, hubristic in its claim to summarize any complex event. This one leaves out much, like the defense of democracy against fascism."
Journalist Miranda Spencer took stock of the Times' entire coverage of the No Kings demonstrations and declared it "clueless," while noting that USA Today did a far better job of communicating their significance to readers.
Harper's Magazine contributing editor Scott Horton similarly argued that international news organizations were giving the No Kings events more substantive coverage than the Times.
"In Le Monde and dozens of serious newspapers around the world, prominent coverage of No Kings 3, which brought millions of Americans on to the streets to protest Trump," Horton observed. "In NYT, an illiterate rant from Jeremy W Peters and no meaningful coverage of the protests. Something very strange going on here."