

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Marcus Frias (Bowman), (305-979-4515)
Taylor St. Germain (Markey), (202-224-2742)
Today, Congressman Jamaal Bowman (D-NY) and Senator Edward Markey (D-Mass.) introduced the Heating and Cooling Relief Act, legislation to invest in and expand the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) to universalize energy assistance. Currently, it is estimated that only 16 percent of households eligible for LIHEAP are actually served.
"There is no reason why, in the richest nation on Earth, people in our communities should be forced to choose between staying warm in the winter or cool in the summer and being able to make rent or put food on the table," said Congressman Jamaal Bowman (NY-16). "Senator Markey and I are working toward an America that respects our collective humanity and our Heating and Cooling Relief Act makes it so that every family can afford their energy bills. This is a racial and economic justice issue, with Black, Latino and Indigenous households all experiencing disproportionately high energy burdens. The lack of energy assistance is also a public health crisis, with high energy burdens associated with a greater risk for respiratory diseases and heat strokes. The fact is that no one, anywhere in this country, should have to resort to using their stoves or turning on space heaters because of exorbitantly high bills. This legislation is a bold approach to energy assistance that meets the moment by making energy assistance much more accessible to tens of millions more people and I am proud to have a partner in Senator Markey as we take on this fight."
"Access to life-saving heating and cooling is a basic human right that ensures our health and safety and should not be reserved only for those who can afford it," said Senator Ed Markey (D-Mass.). "This winter, families should not have to choose between paying bills or suffering chills. I am grateful that Congressman Bowman and I are fighting to make sure that home energy funding--a critical lifeline for families throughout the country--will be available to all of those who need it. Our Heating and Cooling Relief Act would provide LIHEAP funding to millions more Americans and ensure that the program has all the support it needs to enhance outreach efforts and serve all eligible households. The bill also takes steps to reduce the energy burdens of LIHEAP recipients and cut down our fossil fuel use by increasing investments in weatherization. The Heating and Cooling Relief Act is the ambitious and comprehensive legislation we need to help ensure the health and safety of American families and support a just transition away from fossil fuel consumption."
Specifically, the Heating and Cooling Relief Act:
"The Heating and Cooling Relief act would end energy poverty in the US by providing that no family would spend more than 3 percent of their family's budget on home energy and would provide states with the flexibility to weatherize up to 1 million homes per year," said Mark Wolfe, Executive Director of the National Energy Assistance Directors' Association (NEADA). "The net result will be an end to the stubbornly high utility arrears and shut-offs that low income families have been struggling with for many years."
Congressman Bowman and Senator Markey have been champions for energy and utility justice issues throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. On January 5, 2022 Congressman Bowman, Senator Markey, and Rep Schakowsky led a letter to the Federal Energy Regulation Commission (FERC) urging the Biden Administration to protect consumers from unfairly high heating and energy prices. Last year, Congressman Bowman introduced the Public Power Resolution with Congresswoman Bush to make power a public utility, and he also introduced the Broadband Justice Act to deliver accessible, free broadband to every subsidized household in the nation. As part of the American Rescue Plan, Senator Markey advocated for $20 billion in funding for Emergency Rental Assistance (ERA) and $4.5 billion in additional funding to LIHEAP. Last Congress, he also introduced a bill that would have set the sense of Congress that states and utilities should issue a moratorium on gas and electric service disconnections, late fees, reconnection fees, rate hikes, and other penalties for all consumers as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Original cosponsors of this legislation are Senators Kirsten Gillibrand (NY), Elizabeth Warren (MA), and Representatives Andre Carson (IN), Emanuel Cleaver II (MO), Adriano Espaillat (NY), Jesus G. "Chuy" Garcia (IL), Pramila Jayapal (WA), Mondaire Jones (NY), Barbara Lee (CA), Carolyn B. Maloney (NY), Grace Meng (NY), Gwen S. Moore (WI), Eleanor Holmes Norton (DC), Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY), Mark Pocan (WI), Ayanna Pressley (MA), Jan Schakowsky (IL), Mark Takano (CA), Rashida Tlaib (MI), Nydia M. Velazquez (NY), Bonnie Watson Coleman (NJ), and Frederica S. Wilson (FL).
Organizations endorsing the Heating and Cooling Relief Act include National Energy Assistance Directors' Association (NEADA), National Consumer Law Center (NCLC), National Housing Law Project, Public Citizen, Sunrise Movement, Evergreen Action, Green and Healthy Homes Initiative (GHHI), Sierra Club, Local Initiatives Support Coalition (LISC), Food and Water Watch, Rocky Mountain Institute, Center for Biological Diversity, Ecological Justice Initiative, Elevate, Dandelion Energy, Building Electrification Institute, Rewiring America, Association for Energy Affordability, Sustainable Westchester, New York Lawyers for Public Interest, Bloc Power, NY Geothermal Energy Organization, and NYC-Environmental Justice Alliance, Massachusetts Association for Community Action (MASSCAP), and NY Renews.
En Espanol:
NOTICIAS: El Rep. Bowman y el Sen. Markey Presentan la Ley de Asistencia para Calefaccion y Refrigeracion que Reforma el Programa de Asistencia para Energia para Hogares de Bajos Ingresos (LIHEAP)
WASHINGTON, DC - Hoy, el Congresista Jamaal Bowman (D-NY) y el Senador Edward Markey (D-Mass) introdujeron la Ley de Asistencia para Calefaccion y Refrigeracion, un proyecto de ley que invierte y amplia el Programa de Asistencia para Energia para Hogares de Bajos Ingresos (LIHEAP) para universalizar la asistencia energetica. Actualmente, se estima que solo el 16 por ciento de los hogares elegibles para LIHEAP realmente reciben esta ayuda.
"No hay ninguna razon por la cual, en la nacion mas rica de la Tierra, las personas de nuestras comunidades deban verse obligadas a elegir entre mantenerse calientes en invierno o frescas en verano y poder pagar el alquiler o poner comida sobre la mesa", dijo el Congresista. Jamaal Bowman (NY-16). "El Senador Markey y yo estamos trabajando para que Estados Unidos respete nuestra humanidad colectiva y nuestra Ley de Asistencia para Calefaccion y Refrigeracion hace que todas las familias puedan pagar sus facturas de energia. Este es un problema de justicia racial y economica, ya que familias afroamericanas, latinas e indigenas experimentan gastos energeticos desproporcionadamente altos. La falta de asistencia energetica es tambien una crisis de salud publica, los altos costos de la energia estan asociados a un mayor riesgo de enfermedades respiratorias e hipertermia. El hecho es que nadie, en ningun lugar de este pais, deberia tener que usar sus estufas o encender calefactores por facturas exorbitantes. Esta legislacion es un enfoque audaz para la asistencia energetica que la hace mucho mas accesible para decenas de millones de personas mas, y me enorgullece tener un gran aliado como el Senador Markey en esta batalla".
"El acceso a los sistemas de calefaccion y refrigeracion que salvan vidas es un derecho humano basico que garantiza nuestra salud y seguridad y no debe reservarse solo para aquellos que pueden pagarlo", dijo el Senador Ed Markey (D-Massachusetts). "Este invierno, las familias no deberian tener que elegir entre pagar facturas o sufrir escalofrios. Estoy agradecido de que el Congresista Bowman y yo estemos luchando para asegurarnos de que los fondos de energia para el hogar, un salvavidas fundamental para las familias en todo el pais, esten disponibles para todos aquellos que lo necesiten. Nuestra Ley de Asistencia para Calefaccion y Refrigeracion proporciona fondos al plan LIHEAP que beneficiaria a millones de estadounidenses mas y garantiza que el programa tenga todo el apoyo necesario para mejorar los esfuerzos de divulgacion y servir a todos los hogares elegibles. El proyecto de ley tambien toma medidas para reducir los gastos energeticos de los beneficiarios de LIHEAP y reducir nuestro uso de combustibles fosiles al aumentar las inversiones en climatizacion. La Ley de Asistencia para Calefaccion y Refrigeracion es la legislacion ambiciosa e integral que necesitamos para ayudar a garantizar la salud y la seguridad de las familias estadounidenses y apoyar una transicion justa para reducir el consumo de combustibles fosiles".
La Ley de Asistencia para Calefaccion y Refrigeracion, especificamente:
"La Ley de Asistencia para Calefaccion y Refrigeracion terminaria con la pobreza energetica en los EE. UU. al establecer que ninguna familia gastaria mas del 3 por ciento de su presupuesto familiar en energia para el hogar y brindaria a los estados la flexibilidad para climatizar hasta 1 millon de hogares por ano", dijo Mark Wolfe, Dir. Ejecutivo de la Asociacion Nacional de Directores de Asistencia Energetica (NEADA). "El resultado neto sera el fin de los obstinadamente altos retrasos y cortes de servicios publicos con los que las familias de bajos ingresos han estado luchando durante muchos anos".
El Congresista Bowman y el Senador Markey han sido defensores de justicia energetica y de servicios publicos ante los problemas causados por la pandemia de COVID-19. El 5 de enero de 2022, el Congresista Bowman, el Senador Markey y el Rep. Schakowsky lideraron el envio de una carta a la Comision Federal Reguladora de Energia (FERC) instando a la Administracion Biden a proteger a los consumidores de los precios injustamente altos de calefaccion y energia. El ano pasado, el Congresista Bowman presento la Resolucion para un Sistema Publico de Energia, con la Congresista Bush para convertir el sistema electrico en un servicio publico, y tambien presento la Ley de Justicia de Banda Ancha que hacer del sistema de banda ancha uno accesible y gratuito para todos los hogares subsidiados de la nacion. Como parte del Plan de Rescate Estadounidense, el Senador Markey abogo por $20 mil millones en fondos para el programa de Ayuda de Emergencia para el Alquiler (ERA) y $4.5 mil millones en fondos adicionales para LIHEAP. En el ultimo periodo de sesiones legislativas, tambien presento un proyecto de ley bajo el cual el Congreso hubiese exhortado a los estados y a las empresas de servicios publicos a emitir una moratoria sobre las desconexiones de los servicios de gas y electricidad, cargos por mora, cargos por reconexion, aumentos de tarifas y otras sanciones para todos los consumidores como resultado de la pandemia de COVID-19.
Los co-patrocinadores de esta propuesta son los Senadores Kirsten Gillibrand (NY) y Elizabeth Warren (MA), y los Reps. Andre Carson (IN), Emanuel Cleaver II (MO), Adriano Espaillat (NY), Jesus G. "Chuy" Garcia (IL) , Pramila Jayapal (WA), Mondaire Jones (NY), Barbara Lee (CA), Carolyn B. Maloney (NY), Grace Meng (NY), Gwen S. Moore (WI), Eleanor Holmes Nortton (DC), Alexandria Ocasio -Cortez (NY), Mark Pocan (WI), Ayanna Pressley (MA), Jan Schakowsky (IL), Mark Takano (CA), Rashida Tlaib (MI), Nydia M. Velazquez (NY), Bonnie Watson Coleman (NJ) y Frederica S. Wilson (FL).
Entre las organizaciones que respaldan la Ley de Asistencia para Calefaccion y Refrigeracion estan la Asociacion Nacional de Directores de Asistencia Energetica (NEADA), el Centro Nacional de Derecho del Consumidor (NCLC), el Proyecto de Nacional de Derecho de Vivienda, Public Citizen, Sunrise Movement, Iniciativa de Hogares Verdes y Saludables (GHHI), Sierra Club, Coalicion de Apoyo a Iniciativas Locales (LISC), Food and Water Watch, Rocky Mountain Institute, Centro para la Diversidad Biologica, Iniciativa de Justicia Ecologica, Elevate, Dandelion Energy, Building Electrification Institute, Rewiring America, Association for Energy Affordability, Sustainable Westchester, Abogados de Nueva York para el Interes Publico (NYLPI), Bloc Power, Organizacion de Energia Geotermica de Nueva York (NY-GEO), Alianza de Justicia Ambiental de la Ciudad de Nueva York, Asociacion para la Accion Comunitaria de Massachusetts (MASSCAP) y NY Renews.
Jamaal Anthony Bowman is an American politician and educator serving as the U.S. representative for New York's 16th congressional district since 2021.
(202) 225-2464"If an opposition party votes like this, it's not in opposition. It may not even be a party."
Despite months of warnings from party members up and down the caucus that President Donald Trump has been "lawless," "destructive, and "authoritarian" in his wielding of power both domestically and abroad, 149 Democratic members of the US House of Representatives on Thursday night joined with 192 Republicans to pass a sweeping military spending bill—a vote that progressive critics say exposes the fecklessness and hypocrisy of what claims to be an opposition party.
The 341-88 passage of the $828.7 billion fiscal 2026 military spending bill came over the objections of progressives who warned that the bill—now headed to the US Senate for final passage as soon as next week—is a tacit endorsement of the president's policies, even as he has ordered federal agents to terrorize US cities, deployed US soldiers on domestic soil in the face of lawful protests, threatened to annex Greenland and other nations by force, and conducted overseas military operations—including overt acts of war over the last year against both Iran and Venezuela—without congressional notification, authorization, or oversight.
"If an opposition party votes like this, it's not in opposition. It may not even be a party," said Stephen Semler, a senior non resident fellow at the Center for International Policy, a foreign policy think tank in Washington, DC.
Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.), ranking member of the House Rules Committee who voted naye on the appropriations bill, said ahead of the vote that he looked "at the defense appropriations bill as maybe the last opportunity to prevent this administration from doing something crazy in Greenland or attacking NATO or doing something that we all know is a bad thing to do."
Earlier on Thursday, the committee Republican-controlled committee blocked an attempt by Democrats to secure a vote on an amendment to the military spending bill that would have explicitly prohibited the invasion of a NATO ally.
Passage of the military spending bill followed an early House vote for funding of the Department of Homeland Security in which seven Democrats joined Republicans in order to get it over the line.
While 149 Democrats voted for the $840 military spending bill, 64 Democrats voted against it.
"Republicans want money for unchecked, unaccountable, unconstitutional military action around the world," said Rep. Delia C. Ramirez (D-Il.), explaining her vote against the bill. "And over half of the Pentagon budget goes to corporations that profit from pain, war, and genocide."
"You know how they get this done?" Ramirez continued. "By using working families' needs as a bargaining chip, tying the minimum funding working families need to survive to the maximum funding they can give their billionaire friends."
"As long as we are funding imperialism and authoritarianism while working people can't afford the high cost of living," she said, "I will stand opposed."
"This is a blatant and dangerous abuse of power," said a Democratic senator representing one of the targeted states. "Trump does not care how many people he hurts to score cheap political points."
The Trump White House has reportedly ordered federal agencies to conduct a sweeping review of funding to more than a dozen states carried by former Vice President Kamala Harris in the 2024 election, a move that lawmakers from the targeted states condemned as unlawful political retaliation.
The review, first reported by RealClearPolitics, was outlined in a data request that the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) sent out on Tuesday. Every federal department and agency was included in the request except for the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs.
California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington state, and Washington, DC are the jurisdictions targeted by the OMB.
The OMB memo, according to the Washington Post, "requests agencies provide detailed information on all funds to those states, including money routed for state and local governments, nonprofit organizations, and higher education institutions." OMB claims it is trying to root out fraud.
"This is authoritarianism, plain and simple," said Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), whose state is the only one on the list with a Republican governor.
"The Trump administration is targeting states that didn’t vote for him—including my home state of Vermont," Sanders added. "Using federal power to punish political opponents is anti-democratic and blatantly illegal."
US Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) similarly condemned the funding investigation as "more political retribution from Trump, the authoritarian strongman, and his crony Russ Vought," the head of OMB.
"This is a blatant and dangerous abuse of power," Merkley wrote on social media. "Trump does not care how many people he hurts to score cheap political points."
The OMB data request is just the latest instance of the Trump administration specifically targeting federal funds to Democratic-led states.
The White House budget office previously tried to cut off clean energy funds to Democratic-run states before being blocked in court. Earlier this month, the Trump administration froze $10 billion in childcare and social services funding for low-income families in five Democratic-led states, claiming fraud.
Sharon Parrott, president of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, said the administration's new funding investigation "follows a clear pattern" and marks "a harmful and shameful escalation of the administration's corrupt politicization of basic governance."
"Withholding federal funding can have grave consequences," said Parrott. "Just take the five-state freeze on childcare. In just those states, those funds are used to provide care to nearly 340,000 children. Without funding, childcare providers close, kids don’t get care, and parents can’t go to work."
"The billions in funding in this bill will only embolden ICE and CBP to continue arresting our neighbors—immigrant and US citizen alike," warned one ACLU attorney.
Seven Democrats in the US House of Representatives voted with nearly all Republicans on Thursday to pass a Department of Homeland Security funding bill despite growing calls from across the country for Congress to rein in the Trump administration's deadly immigration operations, which are led by DHS agents.
Democratic Reps. Henry Cuellar (Texas), Don Davis (NC), Laura Gillen (NY), Jared Golden (Maine), Vicente Gonzalez (Texas), Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (Wash.), and Tom Suozzi (NY) joined all Republicans but Rep. Thomas Massie (KY) for the 220-207 vote that sent the legislation to the Senate—where the GOP also has a majority, but it's so narrow that most bills need some Democratic support to pass.
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) notably refused to pressure members of his caucus to oppose the bill, even though voters clearly oppose federal operations featuring violence and lawlessness by agents with Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) everywhere from California and Illinois, to Minnesota and Maine.
Jeffries and other Democratic leaders have faced growing public pressure to use a rapidly approaching deadline—if Congress doesn't pass legislation by January 30, the federal government shuts down again—to freeze ICE funding. The bill that advanced out of the House on Thursday would give ICE $10 billion and CBP $18.3 billion.
"I just voted HELL NO to giving ICE a single penny," declared Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.), who's part of the progressive Squad. "Congress should not be funding an agency that has terrorized our communities, kidnapped our neighbors, and killed people on the street with impunity. We must abolish ICE and end qualified immunity for ICE agents NOW."
Two weeks ago, ICE officer Jonathan Ross fatally shot Renee Good, a 37-year-old US citizen and mother of three, in the Twin Cities, where President Donald Trump has sent thousands of federal agents. Videos, eyewitness accounts, analyses of the shooting, and an independent autopsy have fueled calls for Ross' arrest and prosecution.
Squad member Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), whose district includes Minneapolis, said ahead of the vote: "Deporting children with cancer. Using a 5-year-old as bait. Shooting moms. ICE is beyond reform. And today the House is voting to bankroll more terror. Hell no."
Another Squad member, Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), said: "DHS is using our tax dollars to terrorize our neighbors and detain 5-year-olds. It's shameful. ICE must be abolished. Kristi Noem must be impeached. And not one more penny should go to this rogue agency."
The entire Congressional Progressive Caucus opposed the bill. CPC Chair Greg Casar (D-Texas) said in a video posted to social media after the vote that "this mass deportation machine is out of control: detaining and deporting US citizens and veterans, arresting little kids, ripping up families, killing innocent people. It's got to stop."
"Our taxpayer money does not need to got to Donald Trump's out-of-control mass deportation machine," Casar added. "We should be sending it to our schools and to childcare, and to bringing down the cost of living for everyday people."
MoveOn Civic Action spokesperson Britt Jacovich said in a Thursday statement that "Americans want healthcare and lower costs, not masked ICE agents kidnapping kids from playgrounds and schools. The House just failed their latest test to hold Trump and his dangerous ICE street gang accountable for killing innocent people like Renee Nicole Good and many others. Senate Democrats need to step up for the American people and block any funding bill that gives another dime for ICE to abduct 5-year olds and kill citizens."
Kate Voigt, senior policy counsel at the ACLU—which has been involved in multiple lawsuits over recent DHS operations—similarly stressed that "the House vote in favor of excessive funding for ICE with no meaningful accountability measures is wildly out of touch with polling that shows the majority of voters oppose ICE and Border Patrol's attacks on our communities."
"The bill fails to rein in ICE and Border Patrol at a time when they are engaged in an unprecedented assault on our rights, safety, and democratic way of life," she continued. "The billions in funding in this bill will only embolden ICE and CBP to continue arresting our neighbors—immigrant and US citizen alike—no matter the costs to our communities, economy, and integrity of our Constitution.
"While the House narrowly passed this bill, we thank the members of Congress who held the line and voted against this harmful legislation," Voigt added. "Now we need our senators to hold firm and refuse to be complicit in fueling ICE's reckless abuses in our communities."
Every representative who voted yes voted for more brutalization of our neighbors, more kidnapping of our children, more trampling of our rights, and more murder from this government.
[image or embed]
— Indivisible ❌👑 (@indivisible.org) January 22, 2026 at 6:53 PM
The group Indivisible emphasized that "the House had an opportunity to impose meaningful restrictions on ICE and it failed. As the regime terrorizes our communities with masked federal agents and unchecked violence, Congress stood quietly by and passed a DHS funding bill that continues to funnel taxpayer dollars into ICE's slush fund."
"Passing this bill without any meaningful check on this lawless agency is beyond the pale," Indivisible added. "In an egregious failure of leadership, House Democratic 'leaders' personally opposed the bill while declining to whip against it."
The DHS legislation advanced alongside a three-bill appropriations package, which passed by a vote of 341-88. According to the Hill: "The House will combine the four bills with a two-bill minibus it passed last week and send the full package to the Senate. The upper chamber is expected to take up the bills when it returns from recess next week ahead of a January 30 deadline."