For Immediate Release
Brett Hartl, (202) 817-8121, firstname.lastname@example.org
Opposition Mounts Over Obama Administration Proposal Making It Harder to Protect Species From Extinction
Proposed Regulations Set Dangerous Precedent for All Types of Citizen Petitions Seeking Stronger Environmental Standards
WASHINGTON - One hundred and seventy-five environmental and social justice organizations sent a letter to the Obama administration today opposing a set of proposed regulations that would place crippling burdens on citizens who petition to protect imperiled animals and plants under the Endangered Species Act.
“These new rules will put up massive roadblocks between wildlife teetering on the brink of extinction and the federal protections that will keep them alive,” said Brett Hartl, endangered species policy coordinator at the Center for Biological Diversity. “Most animals protected under the Endangered Species Act today are there because ordinary citizens petitioned to make it happen. These pro-industry rules will discourage that public participation, increase frivolous litigation, and prevent many of our most imperiled species from getting the protection they need to survive.”
The Endangered Species Act already has a fair and transparent commenting process that gives everyone, including state governments, ample opportunity for input. Despite this, the proposed regulations require petitioners to provide 30 days’ advance notice of the petition to all states in the range of the species; to append all information provided by states to the petition before it is filed; and to legally certify that all relevant information has been provided in the petition. Collectively the regulations shift the entire burden of information collection and analysis onto ordinary citizens, which will discourage petitions and allow more species to slip through the cracks on the way to extinction.
The groups’ letter lays out the far-reaching implications of the proposed regulations, stating: “There would be an enormous chilling effect on citizens’ fundamental right to petition their government if other federal agencies emulate the rules the Services are proposing here. State governments have enormous power compared to a citizen petitioner, and could quickly assemble thousands of pages of material that is intended to undermine and muddle the issues that a petition presents.”
The Endangered Species Act expressly provides citizens with the right to petition for protection of species, and a majority of the 1,500 species protected by the Act were the result of a citizen petition. The filing of a petition triggers what is supposed to be a two-year process, and includes three public comment periods. Despite these clear time limits, most species wait more than a decade to receive protection. These delays have had real consequences: More than 40 species having gone extinct waiting for Endangered Species Act protection.
“This foolish proposal is the exact opposite of what’s needed to get plants and animals timely protection under the Endangered Species Act,” said Hartl. “Hundreds of species still desperately need this safety net, yet this proposal makes it much more likely that species will go extinct due to pointless bureaucratic restrictions.”
The requirement to send an advance copy of the petition to state governments is unprecedented in the history of citizen petitions. In 1946 Congress established uniform, government-wide standards regarding the rights of citizens to file petitions and standards for the government to respond to those petitions. Prior to this proposal, no federal agency has ever required that ordinary citizens effectively give state governments the ability to provide a rebuttal to a petition request prior to its official filing with that agency. If similar requirements were adopted by other federal agencies, citizen petitions to strengthen air quality, protect clean water, address worker safety and protect human health would almost never succeed.
“In their drive to appease special interests that hate endangered species, the Obama administration is recklessly throwing under the bus the rights of ordinary people to participate in their government,” said Hartl. “Endangered species, clean water and our own health are under so many growing threats that we need the unrestricted power of citizen petitions now more than ever.”
This regulatory proposal is one of several policies put forward by the administration in the past three years seeking to limit the scope of the Endangered Species Act, solidifying the administration's reputation as no friend of wildlife or the environment. Other administration policies seek to limit protections for endangered species critical habitat; restrict which species get protection in the first place; and give federal agencies carte blanche to ignore the harm to endangered species that occur from the cumulative impacts of multiple agency actions.
At the Center for Biological Diversity, we believe that the welfare of human beings is deeply linked to nature - to the existence in our world of a vast diversity of wild animals and plants. Because diversity has intrinsic value, and because its loss impoverishes society, we work to secure a future for all species, great and small, hovering on the brink of extinction. We do so through science, law, and creative media, with a focus on protecting the lands, waters, and climate that species need to survive.