February, 02 2015, 03:30pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Lindsay Koshgarian, lkoshgarian@nationalpriorities.org, 571-318-9114
Jasmine Tucker, jtucker@nationalpriorities.org, 240-529-4158
National Priorities Project Reacts to President's Fiscal Year 2016 Budget
$4 Trillion Proposal Emphasizes Jobs, Education, Pentagon, New Taxes on Wealthy
WASHINGTON
by Doug Hall, Ph.D., Lindsay Koshgarian, and Jasmine Tucker
President Obama today released his budget proposal for fiscal year 2016 (which runs October 1, 2015 to September 30, 2016), his first on-time proposal since 2011. The $4 trillion spending and tax proposal includes funding that would provide two years of tuition-free community college for students, investments in job training and early education, as well as substantial increases in military spending.
The new budget contains initiatives that would be widely popular with the American people based on opinion polling. With an emphasis on job training and job creation, education, and a reduction in corporate and other tax loopholes, the president has released a budget that reflects Americans' priorities.
Here are highlights of what the Obama budget contains:
Total Spending, and What's New
President Obama proposed a total of $4 trillion in spending in fiscal 2016, an inflation-adjusted increase of around 1 percent relative to 2015 enacted spending levels.
The budget includes new spending of $60 billion over 10 years to allow students to attend community college tuition-free and would expand access to prekindergarten education, funded by new taxes on tobacco products. It also includes $478 billion over six years for infrastructure repairs, and other job creation measures. According to opinion polls, expanding education funding and improving the job situation are initiatives that enjoy strong support among the American public.
Notably, the President's proposal calls for funding above the levels called for in the 2011 Budget Control Act. Under current law, spending above those levels would trigger across-the-board spending cuts known as "sequestration." Congress' two-year deal that replaced Budget Control Act spending limits with higher amounts expires this year.
Jobs: Infrastructure and Manufacturing
Job creation and training is a central theme of the president's budget. The plan would spend $16 billion over 10 years to double the number of workers who receive training through the workforce development system.
The proposal would also dedicate substantial investment in infrastructure, partially as a job creation measure. Among other infrastructure initiatives, the plan would provide $478 billion over six years for improvements to surface transportation such as roads and bridges, to be funded by tax reforms.
The budget supports job creation through business investment, providing $5 billion in start-up funding through a public-private partnership to support technology manufacturing in the U.S.
The budget also calls for a 5.5 percent increase in research and development funding over 2015, to $146 billion, which includes the president's much-touted precision medicine initiative to improve the ability to target medical therapies, which would cost $215 million in 2016. This funding is intended in part to spur additional job creation opportunities.
Education: Community College, Preschool and More
Several of the president's proposed major new initiatives center around education - something Americans consistently say is a major priority for government investment. The budget provides $70.7 billion in education funding, an increase of $3.6 billion over the 2015 enacted level.
The president's budget proposal includes a key provision that would allow students to attend community college tuition-free for up to two years, which would help make a college education more accessible to millions of Americans. The proposal would cost the federal government $60 billion over 10 years.
The president also requests $1 billion in new funding for Title I, the federal program that provides aid to schools that serve disadvantaged students, as well as $3 billion for teacher training programs.
As in recent years, the budget also calls for funding the president's signature Preschool for All initiative, beginning with $750 million in Preschool development grants in 2016, an increase of $500 million over the 2015 enacted level, and $15 billion over 10 years to continue and expand the existing home visiting program for young children, both to be paid for through increased tobacco taxes. The plan also calls for an additional $1.5 billion investment in the Head Start program.
Climate Change
The budget proposal's measures to address climate change include an investment of $7.4 billion in clean energy technology programs, an area that received reduced funding under the fiscal year 2015 budget, and $1.29 billion for the Global Climate Change Initiative. The 2015 "CRomnibus" budget that passed Congress explicitly denied funding for the global Green Climate Fund.
The budget calls for a $4 billion Clean Power State Incentive Fund to provide funding to states that achieve faster or greater than planned reductions in carbon emissions.
In addition, the budget requests smaller investments in "climate resilience and preparedness," including funds for new mapping efforts for flood zones, drought and wildfire resilience, and more.
Military and War
The budget proposal would spend $612 billion on national defense, including funding for the Pentagon, the war budget, nuclear weapons and other related expenses. This represents a $26 billion, or 4.5 percent, increase over the 2015 enacted level. This spending also exceeds the caps set by the Budget Control Act by $38 billion, setting Congress up for showdowns that pin defense hawks against deficit hawks.
The budget includes $534 billion for the Department of Defense base budget, a figure that does not include war costs of nuclear weapons activities at the Department of Energy. That represents $38 billion more -- a more than 7 percent increase -- relative to 2015 Pentagon spending. Among other things, it includes funding for 57 F-35s fighter jets - a big increase over the 38 F-35s authorized in fiscal year 2015, despite the fact that the planes are billions over budget, years behind schedule, and not yet battle ready.
In addition, the Department of Defense would receive a separate budget for war activities known as Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO). The president requests $51 billion for Department of Defense war spending, even as troop levels in Afghanistan decline - and only $5.3 billion of that is set aside for operations against Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS, or the Islamic State of Iraq and Levant, ISIL). The war budget is not subject to funding caps or sequestration cuts, and billions of dollars in the war budget have been widely referred to as a "slush fund."
This represents a high-water mark for Pentagon spending - the proposed base budget of $534 billion would be the highest in history, and the proposed total Pentagon spending level is higher than any under President Reagan.
Taxes and Revenue: Capital Gains, Financial Institutions, and EITC
Increased Tax Revenue
The budget projects $3.5 trillion in total tax revenue in fiscal 2016. The president's tax plan includes mechanisms for raising new tax revenues, and for providing new tax breaks as well.
The plan aims to bring in new revenues by changing how capital gains (income earned from investments in stocks, real estate etc.) are taxed, and by introducing a new fee on financial institutions. The budget proposed two major changes to the capital gains tax that would bring in $320 billion over the next 10 years. It also closes loopholes for high-income individuals' contributions to Social Security, which would provide the program with about $10 billion more per year by the end of the decade.
These initiatives would sit well with the majority of Americans, as polling shows the public believes wealthy individuals and corporations do not pay enough in taxes. The new fee on financial institutions would apply to big institutions that engage in "excessive borrowing," as a means to both raise revenue and discourage risky financial transactions.
Working and Middle Class Tax Breaks
The budget would expand the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), a successful anti-poverty program, for low-income childless workers, as well as expanding eligibility based on income and age. The change would benefit an estimated 13.2 million additional Americans. It would also provide a new $500 tax credit to families with two earners, expand availability for the American Opportunity Tax Credit to help students pay for college, and triple the maximum child care tax credit to $3,000 per child, making it easier for 5.1 million working families to afford child care. Proposed changes to the capital gains tax and financial services fees would offset the cost of these new tax breaks.
Social Security
The president's budget supports a transfer of funds from Social Security's retirement, or Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI), program to its Disability Insurance (DI) program to ensure the continued viability of the disability benefits program until further changes can be made. This contradicts a rule proposed by House lawmakers in January that would prevent such transfers. Reallocating funds from one trust fund to another, which Congress has done 11 times in the past, has historically been a non-controversial measure that prevents cuts to Social Security benefits.
Budget Deficit Holds Steady
The president's budget proposal would run a deficit of $474 billion in 2016. The proposal calls for raising revenues of $638 billion specifically for deficit reduction in 2016, resulting in a deficit reduction of $1.8 trillion over the next 10 years. Deficit reduction under the plan comes from a combination of new revenue from closing loopholes, and spending cuts, primarily through health savings from changes to the Medicare Trust Fund and Affordable Care Act (Obamacare), and positive economic consequences of immigration reform.
As a share of the economy, the deficit is expected to be 2.5 percent in 2016, down from a high of 10 percent in 2009 following the Great Recession. The president's plan would keep deficits at approximately that level over the next ten years. Over the past 50 years, budget deficits have averaged around 2.8 percent of the economy.
The National Priorities Project (NPP) is a 501(c)(3) research organization that analyzes and clarifies federal data so that people can understand and influence how their tax dollars are spent. Located in Northampton, MA, since 1983, NPP focuses on the impact of federal spending and other policies at the national, state, congressional district and local levels. For more information, go to https://nationalpriorities.org.
LATEST NEWS
Florida Republicans Ripped for Advancing Show-Me-Your-Papers Voter ID Bill
"This wave of anti-voter legislation is advancing amid ongoing abuses of power that pose unprecedented threats to American democracy," said the ACLU of Florida's executive director.
Feb 25, 2026
With 251 days until the US general election, Florida Republicans on Wednesday passed a show-me-your-papers bill that opponents warn could prevent thousands of eligible state voters from registering if they don't have a valid birth certificate or passport, or their documents don't reflect a name change.
"Midterm elections are coming later this year—and they're a crucial test of our democracy," ACLU of Florida executive director Bacardi Jackson said in a Wednesday statement. "Moments like this bring new voters into the process and give communities the power to hold leaders accountable—exactly what a healthy democracy demands. But right now, some lawmakers are pushing an anti-voter bill that could shut thousands of eligible people out of our elections and discourage the enrollment of new eligible voters."
The Florida House of Representatives on Wednesday voted 83-31 on HB 991, sponsored by Rep. Jenna Persons-Mulicka (R-78).
"The Florida House version of the bill would only go into effect in January 2027. But under a similar bill set for consideration in the Florida Senate, the new rules would take effect this July, before the November midterm elections," Democracy Docket detailed. "A House committee already gave preliminary approval to the bill earlier this month."
Jackson highlighted that "many eligible voters don't have ready access to an unexpired passport or an original or certified copy of their birth certificate because of logistical and financial barriers. More than 8 million Floridians do not have a valid passport, and because many women legally change their name upon marriage, more than 4.7 million women in Florida do not have a birth certificate reflecting their current legal name—documents this bill would require."
"At the same time, this proposal would eliminate current, valid forms of ID proving eligibility at the polls, including student IDs, retirement center IDs, and public assistance IDs," she warned. "Taken together, these changes are not neutral or harmless—they would fall hardest on low-income voters, students, seniors, women, and Black and brown Floridians."
The ACLU leader also argued that "context matters. This wave of anti-voter legislation is advancing amid ongoing abuses of power that pose unprecedented threats to American democracy." She specifically pointed to the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) America Act that the GOP-controlled US House of Representatives passed earlier this month.
"We're seeing parallel efforts nationally to make it harder for eligible voters to cast their ballots—including the SAVE Act being debated in Congress right now—and Florida is leading the way down this authoritarian path," she said. The federal bill is less likely to get through the US Senate, whose filibuster rule requires the GOP to get some Democratic support to advance most legislation.
"What makes this even more galling is that lawmakers don't have to do any of this at all—they are choosing to," said Jackson. "They could enact reforms making it easier for eligible Floridians to vote and have their voices be heard, like the Harry T. and Harriette V. Moore Florida Voting Rights Act, HB 1419/SB 1598. Instead, they are fast-tracking legislation that would make voting harder for eligible Floridians and silence communities that deserve to be heard."
"We will not stand by while politicians in power seek to entrench their power at the expense of the people's rights," she vowed. "We will keep organizing and fighting to reclaim and defend our democracy—because every eligible Floridian deserves to vote."
Meanwhile, at the federal level, Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) plans to hold a vote on the SAVE America Act this week. President Donald Trump used his State of the Union address on Tuesday night to increase pressure on Congress to send the bill to his desk.
"I'm asking you to approve the SAVE America Act to stop illegal aliens and others who are unpermitted persons from voting in our sacred American elections—that cheating is rampant in our elections," Trump said. "It's very simple: All voters must show voter ID. All voters must show proof of citizenship in order to vote. And no more crooked mail-in ballots except for illness, disability, military, or travel. None."
Experts have long countered such GOP claims by emphasizing that, as the Brennan Center for Justice put it in a pair of blog posts, "noncitizen voting is already illegal" and "extensive research reveals that fraud is very rare."
Michelle Kanter Cohen, policy director and senior counsel for the national voting rights group Fair Elections Center, told Democracy Docket on Wednesday that Florida's voter suppression bill "would do a lot of the same things," as the SAVE America Act, "in terms of preventing American citizens from voting who don't have access to documentary proof of citizenship documents."
"The last thing someone who is on a path to citizenship would want to do is to jeopardize their naturalization by voting illegally," Kanter Cohen said. "And so people don't do that. That's not something that's happening because it has such dire consequences."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Despicable': Vance, Oz Announce Freeze on Some Medicaid Funding for Minnesota
"The Constitution clearly gives Congress the power to spend taxpayer funds, and no law allows the president to halt if he feels some US states aren’t being 'good stewards' of the money," said one critic.
Feb 25, 2026
US Vice President JD Vance said Wednesday that the Trump administration will pause some Medicaid funding for Minnesota over fraud concerns—without offering any guarantees that the suspension will not adversely impact the more than 1 million Minnesotans who depend upon the key healthcare program.
"We're announcing today that we have decided to temporarily halt certain amounts of Medicaid funding that is going to the state of Minnesota in order to ensure that the state of Minnesota takes its obligations seriously to be good stewards of the American people's tax money," Vance said at a White House press conference with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Administrator Mehmet Oz.
"Now what is this gonna mean?" Vance continued. "What this means is that, first of all, the providers on the ground in Minnesota have actually already been paid... What we're doing is we are stopping the federal payments that will go to the state government until the state government takes it obligations seriously to stop the fraud that's being perpetrated."
They already targeted SNAP in Minnesota. They’ve killed two Minnesotans and injured or kidnapped hundreds more. Now they’re stealing their Medicaid. They’re going to deny people healthcare because of a YouTube video about a Somali daycare scam that wasn’t even true.
[image or embed]
— Kelly (@broadwaybabyto.bsky.social) February 25, 2026 at 3:05 PM
Oz demanded that Democratic Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz determine "who these providers are; make sure they're not already in trouble for doing bad stuff, and then reevaluate all the current providers to make sure they're supposed to be able to provide these services."
Responding to Oz's remarks, Gaia Leadership Project founder Elizabeth Cronise McLaughlin said on Bluesky, "So Minnesota is supposed to review every appointment by a Medicaid recipient with every doctor to get funds already lawfully allocated to the state?"
Asked by a reporter how he intends to ensure that the funding pause "doesn't impact the people who are enrolled in Medicaid," Vance said he is "worried about the justice of it all."
"I think it's offensive that American taxpayers pay into these programs and they're defrauded... and it's really sad that American children who need these services are unable to get them, because they're going to fraudsters," Vance replied.
"Look, we're certainly gonna make sure that our anti-fraud efforts go after the fraudsters and not after anybody who actually benefits from these services," he continued. "But I actually think the question is a little off, in a way, because the problem is not going after the fraud, the problem is that these programs are being defrauded to begin with."
"Our social safety net will disappear unless we take fraud more seriously," added the vice president, whose boss, President Donald Trump, last year signed into law the biggest cuts to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, in the nation's history as part of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
Medicaid is the primary healthcare safety net for lower-income Americans, with nearly 70 million people enrolled nationwide at the end of last year.
While federal prosecutors are investigating Minnesota’s Medicaid system—specifically, 14 high-risk service programs such as housing support and personal-care services—on suspicion of billions of dollars in fraudulent billings since 2018, and dozens of people have been convicted of stealing public money through the state’s social services system, critics noted that Congress, not the president, has the power of the purse.
Some observers noted that Trump has already targeted Minnesota—which voted against him all three times he ran for president—with his deadly crackdown on undocumented immigrants and their defenders and racist attacks on Somali immigrants, including Congresswoman Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.).
The Medicaid freeze follows the Trump administration's $10 billion cut in federal childcare funding to five Democrat-led states, including Minnesota, last month—a move that opponents argue punishes working families who committed no fraud.
University of Illinois professor Nicholas Grossman called the Medicaid pause "taxation without representation."
"The Constitution clearly gives Congress the power to spend taxpayer funds, and no law allows the president to halt if he feels some US states aren’t being 'good stewards' of the money," he said on Bluesky. "In case there’s any confusion on this, the Impoundment Control Act forbids it."
"The people of Minnesota vote for representatives to Congress," Grossman added. "Minnesota representatives and senators were in DC, representing their constituents, when Congress passed laws using proper procedure that allocated Medicaid funding. The president breaking those laws violates the fundamental compact of the republic."
Oz on Wednesday also announced "a six-month national moratorium blocking all new enrollments for durable medical equipment—prosthesis, orthotics—supplies across the board" in the name of fighting fraud. The move targets suppliers, not individual Medicaid beneficiaries.
This from Oz, a promoter of privatized Medicare Advantage programs, which are notorious for overcharging taxpayers and denying patients necessary care. The CMS under Oz increased federal funding for Medicare Advantage plans by more than $25 billion for 2026.
As Common Dreams recently reported, United Health Group (UHG), one of the country's largest for-profit health insurance companies, has been the leading beneficiary of a long-running Medicare Advantage fraud scheme that the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission—an independent, nonpartisan legislative branch agency—warned could cost US taxpayers $1.2 trillion over the next decade.
Some critics said that if Trump really cared about fraud, he'd go after companies like UHG—and stop pardoning so many convicted criminals who committed billions of dollars worth of fraud.
"These guys are despicable," Michigan State University professor Brendan Cantwell said Wednesday in response to Vance and Oz's announcement.
Robert Weissman, co-president of the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, said in a statement Wednesday that “Medicaid fraud is a serious problem that requires cracking down on fraudsters—not patients."
Weissman continued:
This administration’s anti-fraud rhetoric is itself a fraud. In fact, the administration has gutted anti-fraud government agencies and programs and let fraudsters off the hook. It has issued record-breaking pardons to fraudsters; sought to eliminate the most important anti-consumer fraud agency, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau; eviscerated the corps of inspectors general whose job is to root out waste, fraud, and abuses; and dropped dozens of fraud and fraud-related investigations against large corporations.
“The Trump administration suspension of Medicaid funding in Minnesota is a bad-faith, punitive, and shameful measure that will punish people in Minnesota as part of the same deceptive story that the Trump administration has told to justify the outrageous [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] invasion of the state," Weissman added.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Former Brazilian Political Officials Found Guilty of Plotting Murder of Marielle Franco
"What the killers did not expect is that her legacy would become greater than all of this," said Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Carmen Lúcia.
Feb 25, 2026
A five-judge panel on Brazil's Supreme Court on Wednesday voted unanimously to convict former Congressman Chiquinho Brazão and his brother, politician Domingos Brazão, of ordering the 2018 murder of Rio de Janeiro City Councilwoman Marielle Franco and her driver, Anderson Gomes.
As reported by Reuters, the court sentenced the Brazão brothers to each serve 76 years in prison for plotting to assassinate the 38-year-old Franco because they feared she and her allies in the Socialism and Liberty Party would be an impediment to their illegal scheme that involved taking public lands to develop private real estate projects.
Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who oversaw the trial of the brothers, said that the two men did not think they would be held accountable for killing Franco because she was a Black woman who represented a poor neighborhood in Rio.
"Inside the misogynistic, prejudiced minds of those who ordered and carried out the crime, who would care about that?" Moraes said. “They did not expect such wide repercussions."
Justice Carmen Lúcia also said that the Brazão brothers seemed to believe that they would be allowed to get away with murder.
"What the killers did not expect," said Lúcia, "is that her legacy would become greater than all of this."
The court also sentenced former Rio de Janeiro Police Chief Rivaldo Barbosa to an 18-year prison sentence for obstructing the investigation into Franco's murder.
Franco's widow, current Rio City Councilwoman Mônica Benício, told Payday Report that the court's conviction of the plotters was a landmark decision for Brazilian democracy.
"For the country, this is an opportunity to demonstrate its capacity to break with the selective penal system that protects criminal structures and their political ties," Benício said. "We must learn a lesson from what the assassination of Marielle and Anderson reveals about Brazil: the obscure connections between crime, politics, and the police."
Anielle Franco, a sister of Marielle Franco who currently serves as Brazil's Minister of Racial Equality, hailed the verdict as "justice" in a social media post, vowing that "our fight continues for all victims of violence."
Agnes Callamard, secretary general of Amnesty International, said that justice for Franco and Gomes was "a long time coming," and added that "their killings are emblematic of the broader and highly alarming trend of lethal violence and structural racism against human rights defenders in Brazil."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


