For Immediate Release
Phone: (202) 546-9707
Statement in Response to the Resignation of Attorney General Eric Holder
WASHINGTON - Statement by Michelle Surka, Program Associate at the U.S. Public Interest Research Group, on the resignation of Eric H. Holder Jr. from his position as Attorney General
“Attorney General Holder’s tenure at the Department of Justice saw regular billion-dollar settlement agreements with corporations accused of wrongdoing. During this time, the Department also became a subject of controversy because most of these deals – unlike those negotiated at some other agencies like the EPA – allowed corporations to write off settlement payments as tax deductions, shifting much of the cost back onto ordinary taxpayers.
“Holder’s Justice Department typically failed to specify that settlement deals could not be treated as ordinary business expenses, leaving the door open for the companies to take tax windfalls from payments that thereby became weaker deterrents against future misdeeds.
“Attorney General Holder is leaving the Justice Department with tens of billions of dollars’ worth of corporate settlements under his belt, but unfortunately he does not leave behind much of a legacy of transparency regarding those settlements. Beyond the large dollar amounts announced in the Department’s press releases, it has often been difficult to determine the actual value of these settlements.
“Earlier in Holder’s tenure, the Justice Department almost never specified whether settlement payments that resolved allegations of wrongdoing could be treated by companies as ordinary tax deductible business expenses. In 2012, however, the Department of Justice’s agreement with BP was a watershed because it both held BP accountable for its actions in the Deepwater Horizon disaster, and also included language that denied the corporation any tax deductions from the settlement. The high-profile settlement with JP Morgan also specifically forbid $2 billion of the payment from becoming a tax deduction.
“But this was not a legacy that Holder’s Justice Department followed through on. The more recent mortgage-related settlements with Wall Street banks failed to include such safeguards. Last month’s $17 billion Bank of America settlement even specifically greenlighted such tax deductions, allowing the bank to claim at least $4 billion in write-offs. Unfortunately, ordinary taxpayers will end up picking up the tab for each dollar lost to these deductions, in the form of program cuts, higher taxes, or greater national debt.
“As Attorney General Holder leaves his position and a new Attorney General is appointed, the Justice Department should not only continue to negotiate tough settlements with corporations accused of misdeeds, but should also be clear about protecting taxpayers from footing the bill.”
U.S. PIRG has been watchdogging the tax implications of out-of-court settlements. You can read U.S. PIRG’s report on the topic here: “Subsidizing Bad Behavior: How Corporate Legal Settlements for Harming the Public Become Lucrative Tax Write-Offs.”
U.S. PIRG has also created a fact sheet on Wall Street settlement tax deductions.
Mid-Year Campaign: Your Support is Needed Now.
Common Dreams is a small non-profit - Over 90% of the Common Dreams budget comes from reader support. No advertising; no paywalls: our content is free. But our costs are real. Common Dreams needs your help today! If you're a regular reader—or maybe a new one—and you haven't yet pitched in, could you make a contribution today? Because this is the truth: Readers, like you, keep us alive. Please make a donation now so we can continue to work for you.
U.S. PIRG, the federation of state Public Interest Research Groups (PIRGs), stands up to powerful special interests on behalf of the American public, working to win concrete results for our health and our well-being. With a strong network of researchers, advocates, organizers and students in state capitols across the country, we take on the special interests on issues, such as product safety,political corruption, prescription drugs and voting rights,where these interests stand in the way of reform and progress.