

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Joe Shansky
(414) 218-3331
The introduction of the bill represents a pivotal moment for the immigrant rights movement, and is a serious legislative effort to both legalize millions of workers and their families, and reform an outdated and dysfunctional system. But the proposal is not good enough in ensuring that it is both comprehensive and fair, and reforms a broken system in ways that build democracy and prosperity for all.
Voces de la Frontera and our youth arm Youth Empowered in the Struggle, commit to work with our US senators to ensure that in the amendment process the bill is improved to uphold the following principles:
- A path to citizenship for 11 million: While the bill does provide a path to citizenship to millions, it threatens to exclude 375,000 immigrants by establishing an arbitrary cutoff date of December 31, 2011. If the intent is to bring the maximum number out of the shadows and establish legal avenues, then this date will leave a significant number of people out of status, vulnerable to abuse.
- The waiting period of 13 years for US citizenship is too long. It should be aligned with other categories, such as Ag and Dreamers, to achieve US citizenship in 5 years. Second class status is not an option. Karla De Jesus, a 17 year old DREAMer and member of Youth Empowered in the Struggle, says, "My parents have worked hard at minimum wage jobs, but we would not be allowed to move forward as a family. What can they do for 13 years?"
- Removing unfair barriers to US citizenship. These include making the path to citizenship conditional on border enforcement and the flawed E-verify program. Workers would be required to establish "regular employment" to stay on the path to citizenship, putting an unfair burden on workers who have already been waiting decades for reform, and establishing a vulnerable relationship between employer and worker.
Omar Damien-Ortega, a Voces member who is facing deportation after his immigration status was used against him by Went Bend Mutual Insurance after Damien-Ortega filed a worker's compensation claim, is concerned about this vulnerability.
"There will be a continuation of exploitation of working people if you give employers too much power," says Damien-Ortega.
- Elimination of programs such as the so-called "Secure Communities" or the criminalization of future immigrants by treating re-entry charges as a criminal offense, when the individual presents no threat to society, and in fact has meaningful ties and no criminal record.
- Protecting our family-based immigration system: The bill provides important increases in family visas in some categories, such as removing the green card cap for spouses and minors of Lawful Permanent Residents, accelerates the processing of those in the backlog, helps refugees and asylum seekers reunite with family members, and reunites parents, children and Dreamers who were deported or are facing separation. But further reforms are necessary to:
- Not excluding siblings' ability to petition their brothers and sisters, nor parents' ability to petition their adult children over 31 years of age
Sofia Anguiano, a Voces member, is the eldest of nine children. Sixteen years ago, she peitioned for her all of her brothers and sisters to come to join her in the US legally. "They said it would take 10 years, but I've been waiting for 16 years. It's my dream to have my siblings by my side."
- Protecting the diversity visas that allow countries that do not have high numbers of migration to come to the US, and recognizing the rights of bi-national LGBT families to petition permanent partners.
Finally, while the bill would not deport those that qualify, every day 1,100 families go through the trauma of family separation and economic hardship. The President can use his executive authority to immediately protect families that qualify for this reform.
Voces de la Frontera is Wisconsin's leading immigrant rights group - a grassroots organization that believes power comes from below and that people can overcome injustice to build a better world.
"The high number of head injuries... suggests a pattern of force directed towards the head. Whether intentionally or recklessly, this violates virtually all use-of-force guidelines."
Federal, state, and local law enforcement agents' brutal attacks on protesters across the US have caused blindings, traumatic brain injuries, permanent disabilities, and other maladies, according to a report released Monday by researchers at Physicians for Human Rights and the Human Rights Center at the University of California at Berkeley.
In an examination of actions taken by authorities in response to demonstrations against US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) actions over the span of a year, the report documents 412 instances of misuse of force against protesters, journalists, and bystanders.
Just over half of the misuses of force were directed at demonstrators, while 43% were directed at journalists, the report finds.
This misuse of force led to 203 documented injuries affecting 119 individuals, including 44 incidents of laceration, 19 traumatic brain injuries, 10 ocular injuries, seven permanent disabilities, and one instance each of amputation and hearing loss.
The report adds that the actual number of injuries inflicted upon anti-ICE demonstrators "is likely far greater" given researchers' limitations in documenting "invisible injuries" such as chronic pain or hearing loss.
What is particularly troubling, the report emphasizes, is the number of injuries impacting people's heads.
"The high number of head injuries (19 brain, 10 eye, 1 hearing loss) suggests a pattern of force directed towards the head," the researchers write. "Whether intentionally or recklessly, this violates virtually all use-of-force guidelines and results in significant harm."
The report documents 97 incidents of law enforcement officials shooting crowd control projectiles at people's heads, making it the second-most frequent type of improper force used, following shots taken at close range.
Dr. Rohini Haar, the lead author of the report, said in an interview with The Guardian that she started tracking misuse of force in response to anti-ICE protests after a federal agent shot a pastor in the face at close range during a demonstration in Oakland last year.
"Those weapons can cause harm,” said Haar, who for years has been researching the health impacts of crowd control weapons. "It’s just when they’re used, how they’re used, and if they’re used."
Tactics used by ICE and other law enforcement agencies have come back into focus over the last week after the fatal ICE shootings of Lorenzo Salgado Araujo in Texas and Joan Sebastian Guerrero in Maine over the span of less than a week.
Salgado Araujo, 52, was an undocumented immigrant from Mexico who had lived in the US for more than three decades and ran a small construction business. Sebastian Guerrero, 26, was a Colombian national who was authorized to work in the US and was shot and killed by ICE in front of his three-year-old daughter.
"All states and people who care for freedom must rise up in defense of the ICC and international justice now, before it's too late," the UN Palestine expert implored.
More defenders of human rights and the rule of law weighed on Tuesday after US Secretary of State Marco Rubio's announcement of a "campaign to dismantle" the International Criminal Court, many of whose judges and prosecutors have already been sanctioned by the administration of President Donald Trump.
Rubio raised eyebrows around the world by accusing the International Criminal Court—which is based in The Hague, Netherlands—of “waging a war against our country—not with bullets or missiles, but with statutes, compacts, and the force of so-called international law," and cryptically vowing that the Trump administration “will teach the ICC the full meaning of American resolve.”
On Tuesday, Francesca Albanese, the United Nations special rapporteur for the occupied Palestinian territories, called Rubio's announcement "utterly shocking but not a surprise."
"All states and people who care for freedom must rise up in defense of the ICC and international justice now, before it's too late," added Albanese, who is under legally contested sanctions imposed by the Trump administration for her outspoken criticism of Israel's genocidal war on Gaza. "It's rule of law or barbarism."
Responding Monday to the secretary of state's remarks, Congresswoman Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) said on social media that "Rubio's announcement that he will dismantle the International Criminal Court is reckless and dangerous. It undermines the rule of law, weakens global accountability, and turns America's back on the values we claim to champion."
"The ICC is an international court of last resort, intended to prosecute only the most horrific crimes—war crimes, genocide, and crimes against humanity—when countries are unable or unwilling to do so themselves," Omar added. "The best way to avoid ICC scrutiny is simple: Don't commit atrocity crimes, and if credible allegations arise, investigate them transparently and hold those responsible accountable."
The Trump administration has already hit ICC judges with sanctions, including asset freezes, travel bans, and other penalties for ordering the arrest of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant for alleged crimes against humanity and war crimes in Gaza, as well as for seeking to investigate US atrocities in Afghanistan.
ICC Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan and two deputy prosecutors, as well as eight judges, have been sanctioned by the US.
While the US and Israel are not parties to the Rome Statute governing the ICC and do not recognize the tribunal's legitimacy, the treaty states that individuals from nonsignatory nations can be held liable for crimes committed in the territory of a member state.
State Department spokesperson Tommy Piggott echoed Rubio's remarks, telling Newsmax on Tuesday morning that "if the ICC continues to try to threaten our sovereignty, they will know the full power of American resolve."
Responding to the interview, independent journalist Aaron Rupar asked, "Are we going to, like, bomb the International Criminal Court?"
Astute observers noted that the American Service Members’ Protection Act—passed during the George W. Bush administration and known colloquially as the "Hague Invasion Act"—authorizes the president to use “all means necessary and appropriate,” including military intervention, to secure the release of American or allied personnel held by or on behalf of the ICC.
"The ICC is not doing great. There's a lot to complain about. But this, we cannot allow. We cannot allow these hegemons and bullies to run this project into the ground because there is something worthy of protection and improvement in it," Iva Vukušić, an assistant professor of international history at Utrecht University in the Netherlands, said Tuesday on Bluesky in response to Rubio's threat.
I cannot stress this enough: If this institution is destroyed, we will have nothing new at the international level negotiated for a generation, if ever. I don't believe the ICC is amazing, and there's a lot going on on the domestic level, but we need an ICC. A better one. #Accountability #Justice
— Iva Vukušić (@vukusiciva.bsky.social) July 14, 2026 at 12:54 AM
"The arrogance of this man, his boss, and their corrupt administration is insufferable," Vukušić said in a separate Bluesky post. "The empire must fall for a thousand reasons, but this childish arrogance is among the most important ones."
Journalist Thor Benson also took to Bluesky, writing: "I hope Marco Rubio eventually gets tried before the ICC. That would be a good way for this to go."
"The one thing I know is they don't want us coming together to stop this bullshit, and that is what we have to do."
Democratic Senate candidate Troy Jackson was among the Mainers and progressives nationwide placing blame on Republican Sen. Susan Collins after US Immigration and Customs Enforcement shot and killed a 26-year-old Colombian man in the small southern Maine city of Biddeford Monday morning.
"Enough is enough. Susan Collins voted to send $70 billion dollars to ICE with no reforms. I'd abolish it altogether," Jackson said on social media Monday, sharing footage of the ICE Out rally in Biddeford after the fatal shooting of Joan Sebastian Guerrero.
A former candidate for governor and Maine state Senate president, Jackson is among several Democrats vying to replace primary winner Graham Platner on the November ballot and unseat Collins, who chairs the Senate Appropriations Committee. Maine residents descended on her office in Biddeford after the shooting.
"Susan Collins must be held accountable for funding this terror," Jackson reiterated Tuesday, sharing his remarks from Monday night's rally in Portland, about 18 miles northeast of where Guerrero—who was authorized to work in the United States and had a Social Security number, according to locate advocates—was gunned down by ICE agents reportedly looking for another man.
"This has got to end, and we have to abolish ICE," the Democratic candidate said. "And as sad as I am, I'm also very angry... I'm angry that Mr. Guerrero's not coming home tonight. I'm angry that he has a wife and a kid that will never see him again."
"I truly, truly believe in power of solidarity—and we have to stand together," he continued. "It is tough. It's hard, I know it. They want to make it hard. But the one thing I know is they don't want us coming together to stop this bullshit, and that is what we have to do. We have to remain vigilant. We have to stand up. We have to push back. We have to protect each other so that no more of these things happen."
"I don't want to see this happen again, and the only way we can do that is by pushing back and making sure that we don't have any more rallies like this, because it's damn depressing, it's damn heartbreaking, and it pisses me off to no end that we have to be in a world like this, but we can change it by standing together," Jackson added, also urging donations to the Maine Solidarity Fund to help Guerrero's family.
Collins on Monday called for "a full and impartial investigation" into Guerrero's killing and shared that Department of Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin told her that "the Boston office of the DHS inspector general has taken over the investigation of the Biddeford shooting in cooperation with the FBI."
In addition to Jackson, various critics in Maine and across the country—including Nirav Shah and Jordan Wood, other Democrats running to replace Platner—have responded to the shooting by called out Collins for helping the GOP give ICE billions more in funding without reforms.
The fatal shooting has also spurred fresh calls from across the country to abolish ICE, which has injured and killed a growing number of US citizens and immigrants during President Donald Trump's mass detention and deportation campaign.
New York City's democratic socialist mayor, Zohran Mamdani, said late Monday: "This morning in Biddeford, Maine, a 26-year-old man said goodbye to his wife and daughter and left for work. Moments later he was dead, shot in the head by ICE agents, the second man ICE has killed in six days. ICE is killing our neighbors. ICE cannot be reformed. Abolish ICE."
Guerrero's killing came after ICE fatally shot Lorenzo Salgado Araujo in Houston, Texas last week. The 52-year-old was from Mexico. Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum said Monday that her government is seeking criminal charges in his and other deaths.
When asked about the recent killings in Texas and Maine on Monday, US Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY)—a progressive facing some pressure to run for the Senate or even president in future cycles—pointed to Republican funding for ICE.
While Mullin supposedly told Sen. Angus King (I-Maine) that Guerrero had "weaponized" a car he was driving—similar to DHS claims after previous shootings that were ultimately discredited by video footage—in this case, the department said on social media that "the vehicle attempted to flee the scene and, fearing for public safety, an officer discharged his weapon."
Multiple critics read the DHS statement as "a murder confession."
Congresswoman Yassamin Ansari (D-Ariz.) responded that "ICE murdered a 26-year-old in front of his wife and daughter. It’s just pure evil. This statement makes clear there was no threat whatsoever. Our taxpayer dollars are funding a fascist murder machine. Abolish ICE, and prosecute anyone who carried out, ordered, or enabled crimes."
Collins announced Tuesday morning that "while the investigation of the Biddeford shooting is not yet complete, it raises sufficient critical questions that I spoke with DHS Secretary Mullin last night and urged him to cease all non-urgent vehicle stops."
Amid reporting that the Trump administration has given that order to ICE, Shah quickly fired back: "Sen. Collins voted to fully fund ICE without any guardrails. A single late-night phone call isn't going to cut it."