For Immediate Release
Good News and Bad News for the American People from President Obama’s 2013 Budget, According to Experts at the Institute for Policy Studies
WASHINGTON - “The good news in Obama's 2013 budget is that he proposes ambitious initiatives on public transit, clean vehicles, energy efficiency, and renewable energy issues, and has proposed to eliminate $4 billion in subsidies to the fossil fuel industry. The bad news is that he doesn’t go far enough on all fronts to ensure that the dirty energy industries of the past — including offshore oil and gas drilling, nuclear power and coal—are taken off the dole and made to clean up their messes, thereby allowing truly clean energy to compete on a level playing field.”- Daphne Wysham, Co-Director, Sustainable Energy and Economy Network, Institute for Policy Studies, email@example.com
"On the domestic side, the President's budget has some good proposals for investments and some progressive revenue-raisers. It works well as populist campaign document and is important as such. However, some programs for low-income families would suffer further unnecessary cuts and the President proposes, over 10 years, to reduce non-security discretionary spending from its current 3.1 percent of GDP to a 50-year low of 1.7 percent. We have to do better." - Karen Dolan, Fellow, Cities for Progress, Institute for Policy Studies, firstname.lastname@example.org
“President Obama's proposed budget for the Environmental Protection Agency of $8.3 Billion, while reduced from the previous year by $105 million, also reflects some important increases to states and Indian tribes to better enforce the Clean Air and Clear Water Acts. About 60 percent of the Department of Energy's budget is going mostly for nuclear weapons and the cleanup of nuclear weapons sites. The single largest expenditure in DOE is for nuclear weapons, which commands 27 percent of DOE's entire budget.” - Robert Alvarez, Senior Scholar, Nuclear Policy, Institute for Policy Studies, email@example.com
“The preventive medicine in our security budget — including diplomacy, peacekeeping, economic development, climate stabilization — has been shortchanged for years as military spending has surged. Though the President has talked about investing more in prevention, his budget fails to do so. It leaves the extreme imbalance between military and non-military spending virtually unchanged through 2016.” - Miriam Pemberton, Research Fellow, Foreign Policy in Focus, Institute for Policy Studies, firstname.lastname@example.org
Institute for Policy Studies turns Ideas into Action for Peace, Justice and the Environment. We strengthen social movements with independent research, visionary thinking, and links to the grassroots, scholars and elected officials. I.F. Stone once called IPS "the think tank for the rest of us." Since 1963, we have empowered people to build healthy and democratic societies in communities, the US, and the world. Click here to learn more, or read the latest below.