For Immediate Release
Sam Husseini, (202) 347-0020; or David Zupan, (541) 484-9167
Public on Budget: Tax the Rich, Cut Military Spending
WASHINGTON - TEVEN KULL, skull at pipa.org
Kull is director of the Program for Public Consultation, a joint program of the Center on Policy Attitudes and the School of Public Policy at the University of Maryland, which released the study “Public Proposes Federal Budget Dramatically Different Than House or White House.” The study found: “When a representative sample of the American public was presented the federal budget, they proposed changes far different from those the Obama administration or the Republican-led House have proposed. The biggest difference in spending is that the public favored deep cuts in defense spending, while the administration and the House propose modest increases. However, the public also favored more spending on job training, education, and pollution control than did either the administration or the House. On average the public made a net reduction of $146 billion — far more than either the administration or the House called for. …
“On average respondents increased revenues by $292 billion. The largest portion was from income taxes: majorities increased taxes on incomes over $100,000 by 5 percent or more and increased them by 10 percent or more for incomes over $500,000. Majorities also increased corporate taxes and other excise taxes.”
DAVID SWANSON, david at davidswanson.org
Swanson is a campaigner with Roots Action, an online activist network, which today posted a series of polls examining public opinion on the budget: http://rootsaction.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=171
Among the polls the group cites:
In order to reduce the national debt, would you support or oppose [ITEM]?:
72% tax the rich (with incomes over $250,000 a year)
42% cut the military
30% cut Medicaid
21% cut Medicare
Washington Post-ABC News Poll, conducted April 14-17, 2011
Expression of first choice policy:
55% cut the military
21% cut Medicare
13% cut Social Security
CBS-New York Times, Conducted January 15-19, 2011
This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.
Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do.
A nationwide consortium, the Institute for Public Accuracy (IPA) represents an unprecedented effort to bring other voices to the mass-media table often dominated by a few major think tanks. IPA works to broaden public discourse in mainstream media, while building communication with alternative media outlets and grassroots activists.