July, 20 2010, 10:35am EDT
Guinea-Bissau: Pass Anti-Trafficking Law
Guinea-Bissau's National Assembly should act quickly to pass a law
criminalizing human trafficking, Human Rights Watch, SOS Talibe
Children, and the Association of the Friends of Children said today. The
draft law, which the Assembly recently placed on its agenda for its
October-November session, would empower police, judicial officials, and
civil society to improve protection of the country's children, thousands
of whom are trafficked from Guinea-Bissau to Senegal and other
countries each year.
DAKAR
Guinea-Bissau's National Assembly should act quickly to pass a law
criminalizing human trafficking, Human Rights Watch, SOS Talibe
Children, and the Association of the Friends of Children said today. The
draft law, which the Assembly recently placed on its agenda for its
October-November session, would empower police, judicial officials, and
civil society to improve protection of the country's children, thousands
of whom are trafficked from Guinea-Bissau to Senegal and other
countries each year.
Guinea-Bissau, a West African country of 1.5 million people,
currently has no law against human trafficking. Child trafficking is a
serious problem, which appears to be growing in Guinea-Bissau, where
thousands of children are moved each year both internally and across
borders for the purpose of exploitation, including for agricultural
labor and forced begging.
"This important piece of legislation is the first step to combat the
serious problem of child trafficking from Guinea-Bissau," said Corinne
Dufka, senior West Africa researcher at Human Rights Watch.
"Guinea-Bissau's National Assembly would finally send the right signal
to human traffickers that the country intends to protect its children."
The draft law would harmonize domestic law with the country's
international obligations, including the United Nations Protocol to
Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, which Guinea-Bissau
ratified in 2007. Past attempts to place the current draft law on the
National Assembly's agenda - and pass it into law - have repeatedly
stalled.
SOS Talibe Children (SOS Criancas Talibes) and the
Association of the Friends of Children (Associacao dos Amigos da
Crianca) are both Guinea-Bissau-based child-assistance
organizations with operations across the country. They have worked to
ensure passage of the anti-trafficking law.
Human Rights Watch documented in an April 2010 report how each year thousands
of boys are brought north from Guinea-Bissau to Senegal by their
teachers or an intermediary, purportedly to study in daaras, or
residential Quranic schools. Some boys described to Human Rights Watch
being taken by clandestine routes between border villages at night,
sometimes on foot, to evade detection.
Once in Senegal, most are forced to beg and suffer conditions akin to
slavery by their Quranic teachers in the daaras. Many of these boys
suffer severe physical and psychological abuse for failing to meet daily
quotas of money, rice, and sugar demanded by their teachers. They also
suffer from severe malnutrition and frequently from disease as a result
of long hours on the street, abysmal conditions in the daara, and a lack
of medical care.
Many of these cases clearly meet the international definition of
trafficking, the organizations said. Trafficking between Guinea-Bissau
and neighboring countries may also occur under other circumstances,
including taking children to work in cotton or cashew fields, and
transporting women to be forced into sexual exploitation.
The organizations have interviewed police and border officials
working to improve anti-trafficking efforts and have assisted in
training for border officials and forming community groups to monitor
clandestine border crossings involving children.
Those working to stem trafficking suffer from a crippling lack of
resources. In each of the two main border regions in eastern
Guinea-Bissau, police and border officials have only one car and one
motorbike to monitor a combined 250-kilometer stretch of border with
Senegal and Guinea-Conakry.
"Improved training and resources for border officials could help
reduce the flow of children at risk of being taken across the border,
and we need that," said Malam Baio, director of Bafata-based SOS Talibe
Children. "But passing this law is essential. The lack of a domestic
legal framework to address trafficking prevents officials from tackling
the root problem."
At present, traffickers from Guinea-Bissau face minimal consequences,
if any. Even when suspects are stopped and lack the necessary documents
for moving a child across the border, there are no laws that enable the
government to charge or prosecute them effectively. Without fear of
penalty, traffickers often make repeated attempts until they succeed,
police officials and children have told the organizations. If the
proposed law is passed, law enforcement and judicial authorities would
at least be able to arrest, charge, and prosecute suspects for acts of
trafficking.
Police officers, prosecutors, and children's rights advocates have
told the groups that current laws that might apply to trafficking - the
crimes of "abuse of confidence" or "harming the welfare of another" -
are too vaguely worded to prosecute trafficking effectively.
A police commissioner in an eastern region of Guinea-Bissau from
which many children are trafficked to Senegal described the problem to
Human Rights Watch in June: "We can't do our jobs because there isn't a
law against trafficking ...We can stop the movement of children across
the border, but to charge the offender, it's impossible. It's also
difficult to sensitize families, because we can't clearly point to a law
against what is happening."
SOS Talibe Children and the Association of the Friends of Children
indicated that the problem of trafficking continues to grow and that
more children in particular are being forced into abusive or
exploitation situations in Senegal and other neighboring countries every
year.
"Well-intentioned law enforcement authorities trying to combat
trafficking in Guinea-Bissau currently have their hands tied," said
Fernando Ca of the Association of the Friends of Children. "Traffickers
left at liberty to ply their ugly trade cannot be held accountable until
this law is passed."
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
LATEST NEWS
"Not a 'Joke.' It's Fascism": Trump Says He Wouldn't Mind Journalists Getting Shot
The Republican nominee also said during the same rally in Pennsylvania that he "shouldn't have left" the White House after losing the 2020 election.
Nov 04, 2024
During a rally on the final Sunday before the presidential election, Republican nominee Donald Trump told an audience gathered in the battleground state of Pennsylvania that he wouldn't mind if a gunman shot through the group of reporters covering the event.
After discussing the protective glass surrounding him, the former president said a would-be assassin "would have to shoot through the fake news" to get to him.
"I don't mind that so much," Trump said, drawing laughter and applause from his supporters. "I don't mind."
Watch:
Trump says he doesn't mind if someone shoots the press.
He repeatedly encourages violence against anyone who challenges his narrative.
That's what a dictator does — and Trump's Supreme Court gave him immunity to do whatever he wants if re-elected.
Votepic.twitter.com/W0dUWro2g9
— Melanie D'Arrigo (@DarrigoMelanie) November 3, 2024
Journalist Jeff Sharlet wrote in response that during his time covering "the fascism beat," he's met "men who've been itching for that encouragement, who openly fantasize about beating or killing reporters."
"It's not a joke," Sharlet wrote. "It's fascism."
Trump has long reveled in attacking members of the press, vilifying them as "the enemy of the people" and directing the ire of his supporters in their direction. Kash Patel, a Trump confidant who's expected to get a senior national security post if the former president wins Tuesday's election, suggested earlier this year that a second Trump administration would go after "the people in the media" with criminal or civil charges, underscoring the threat the Republican nominee poses to press freedom.
Facing backlash over Trump's latest attack on the press, his campaign issued an absurd statement claiming the former president was "actually looking out for [reporters'] welfare" by "stating that the media was in danger."
The Atlantic's Helen Lewis noted Sunday that "journalists are only some of the many 'enemies from within' whom Trump has name-checked at his rallies and on his favored social network, Truth Social."
Lewis continued:
He has suggested that Mark Zuckerberg should face "life in prison" if Facebook's moderation policies penalize right-wingers. He has suggested using the National Guard or the military against "radical-left lunatics" who disrupt the election. He believes people who criticize the Supreme Court "should be put in jail." A recent post on Truth Social stated that if he wins on Tuesday, Trump would hunt down "lawyers, Political Operatives, Donors, Illegal Voters, & Corrupt Election Officials" who had engaged in what he called "rampant Cheating and Skullduggery." Just last week, he fantasized in public about his Republican critic Liz Cheney facing gunfire, and he previously promoted a post calling for her to face a "televised military tribunal" for treason. In all, NPRfound more than 100 examples of Trump threatening to prosecute or persecute his opponents. One of his recent targets was this magazine.
Trump also said during Sunday's rally in Pennsylvania—where he and Democratic nominee Kamala Harris are in a dead heat—that he "shouldn't have left" the White House after losing the 2020 election.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'This Is What We're Funding': At Least 50 Children Killed in Israeli Strikes on Jabalia
"Civilians and civilian structures... must always be protected in accordance with international humanitarian law," said the head of UNICEF. "Yet these principles are being flouted over and over again."
Nov 03, 2024
The United Nations children's agency on Saturday condemned the Israel Defense Forces' "indiscriminate strikes on civilians in the Gaza Strip" after at least 50 children were reportedly among those killed in attacks on Jabalia refugee camp in the northern part of the enclave.
Northern Gaza has been under siege since early October, when Israel resumed its attacks there, claiming it was targeting Hamas militants.
The current situation in northern Gaza has been called "apocalyptic" by leading humanitarian groups in recent days, with women and children making up the majority of the hundreds of people killed, and Israel imposing a near-total blockade on humanitarian aid.
Now, said Catherine Russell, executive director of the U.N. Children's Fund (UNICEF), "the entire Palestinian population in North Gaza, especially children, is at imminent risk of dying from disease, famine, and the ongoing bombardments."
In addition to the attacks on residential buildings this weekend in Jabalia, the World Health Organization (WHO) reported that an attack on a healthcare center in Gaza City injured at least six people, including four children. The facility was participating in a polio vaccination drive, the second round of inoculations for children across Gaza.
"The Sheikh Radwan primary healthcare center in northern Gaza was struck today while parents were bringing their children to [get] the life-saving polio vaccination in an area where a humanitarian pause was agreed to allow vaccination to proceed," WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said. "These vital humanitarian-area-specific pauses must be absolutely respected. Ceasefire!"
Russell said the vehicle of a UNICEF staffer who was working on the vaccination campaign was attacked by "what we believe to be a quadcopter while driving through Jabalia—Elnazla."
The staff member was not injured, but Russell said "the attacks on Jabalia, the vaccination clinic, and the UNICEF staff member are yet further examples of the grave consequences of the indiscriminate strikes on civilians in the Gaza Strip."
"Civilians and civilian structures, including residential buildings, as well as humanitarian workers and their vehicles, must always be protected in accordance with international humanitarian law," said Russell. "Yet these principles are being flouted over and over again, leaving tens of thousands of children killed, injured, and deprived of essential services needed for survival."
The Gaza Health Ministry reports that at least 43,341 people have been killed in Gaza and at least 102,105 have been injured since Israel began its assault on the enclave more than a year ago in retaliation for a Hamas-led attack. Women and children make up most of those killed, even as Israel and the United States, the largest international supporter of the IDF, have insisted the military is targeting Hamas.
"How can this inhumane situation be tolerated by the Biden-Harris administration?" asked Nina Lahoud, who has served as a special adviser and peacekeeping officer at the U.N., after the death toll among children in Jabalia over the weekend was reported. "How many more Palestinian kids need to die to take urgent action?"
Keep ReadingShow Less
'It's the Abortion Ban': Final Iowa Poll Shows Harris Leading Trump 47-44
Rights advocates were energized by the "gold standard" poll results, but called on progressives to continue working to turn out voters.
Nov 03, 2024
Political observers expressed shock Saturday evening as the Des Moines Register released its final poll before Election Day showing Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris leading Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump by three points.
Harris was supported by 47% of respondents compared to 44% who backed Trump.
The newspaper's poll, conducted by pollster J. Ann Selzer, is widely regarded as the "gold standard" survey of voters in the state and has been recognized as "predicting" numerous election results in Iowa and giving a potential preview of how candidates could fare in other Midwestern states with similar demographics.
Progressive advocates cautioned against placing too much faith in a single poll—even a widely respected one—and urged Harris supporters to continue canvassing, phone-banking, and taking action to defeat Trump and the far-right MAGA movement.
But the unexpected result in a state that hasn't been considered a swing state in this election, and was widely assumed to be a Trump-supporting state, led political observers to look closely at the poll, which showed significant shifts toward Harris among women.
Women aged 65 and older supported Harris over Trump, 63% to 28%, in the poll. Women who identify as political independents also backed her, 57% to 29%.
Overall, women in the state are backing Harris in the poll by a margin of 20 points, according to the survey.
Lyz Lenz, a journalist based in Iowa, said she believed the poll could be linked to one major change in Iowa since the last presidential election: the six-week abortion ban that took effect in July, banning abortion care after fetal cardiac activity can be detected. Similar abortion bans have been blamed for at least four deaths of pregnant women in Texas and Georgia.
"It's the abortion ban," said Lenz. "Women are furious."
Daniel Nichanian, editor-in-chief and founder of the digital magazine Bolts, said the result could preview losses for state Supreme Court justices who have upheld abortion bans in a number of states, including Iowa.
In 10 states this year, voters will make their voices heard on ballot initiatives regarding the right to abortion care. In traditionally red states including Kansas and Kentucky since Roe was overturned, people have voted to protect the right to obtain an abortion.
"It's the Dobbs election," said Helaine Olen of the American Economic Liberties Project. "The Iowa poll is just the latest proof."
Selzer herself told the BBC that many respondents talked about abortion rights.
"The people who say they're supporting Kamala Harris, the issue they say they're thinking about most is democracy, about half of them saying that's the most important thing," she said. "But then half of that, about 25% roughly, say abortion. And Iowa has one of the strictest abortion laws in place... and that may well have played a part in this."
Sean Trende, senior elections analyst for RealClearPolitics, said it would be "foolish to dismiss [Selzer's] poll," but cautioned election watchers against abandoning "all of [their] prior views about the state of the race."
Dan Pfeiffer, a former adviser to President Barack Obama and co-host of "Pod Save America," said one possible interpretation among several is that "Harris isn't really winning Iowa but the poll is capturing late-stage momentum that bodes well for Wisconsin, Michigan, [and] Pennsylvania."
Advocacy group Indivisible on Sunday morning advised supporters to "send this Iowa poll to all your group chats. Then, sign up to talk to some voters. With your help, we're going to win this thing in two days."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular