

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Guinea-Bissau's National Assembly should act quickly to pass a law
criminalizing human trafficking, Human Rights Watch, SOS Talibe
Children, and the Association of the Friends of Children said today. The
draft law, which the Assembly recently placed on its agenda for its
October-November session, would empower police, judicial officials, and
civil society to improve protection of the country's children, thousands
of whom are trafficked from Guinea-Bissau to Senegal and other
countries each year.
Guinea-Bissau's National Assembly should act quickly to pass a law
criminalizing human trafficking, Human Rights Watch, SOS Talibe
Children, and the Association of the Friends of Children said today. The
draft law, which the Assembly recently placed on its agenda for its
October-November session, would empower police, judicial officials, and
civil society to improve protection of the country's children, thousands
of whom are trafficked from Guinea-Bissau to Senegal and other
countries each year.
Guinea-Bissau, a West African country of 1.5 million people,
currently has no law against human trafficking. Child trafficking is a
serious problem, which appears to be growing in Guinea-Bissau, where
thousands of children are moved each year both internally and across
borders for the purpose of exploitation, including for agricultural
labor and forced begging.
"This important piece of legislation is the first step to combat the
serious problem of child trafficking from Guinea-Bissau," said Corinne
Dufka, senior West Africa researcher at Human Rights Watch.
"Guinea-Bissau's National Assembly would finally send the right signal
to human traffickers that the country intends to protect its children."
The draft law would harmonize domestic law with the country's
international obligations, including the United Nations Protocol to
Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, which Guinea-Bissau
ratified in 2007. Past attempts to place the current draft law on the
National Assembly's agenda - and pass it into law - have repeatedly
stalled.
SOS Talibe Children (SOS Criancas Talibes) and the
Association of the Friends of Children (Associacao dos Amigos da
Crianca) are both Guinea-Bissau-based child-assistance
organizations with operations across the country. They have worked to
ensure passage of the anti-trafficking law.
Human Rights Watch documented in an April 2010 report how each year thousands
of boys are brought north from Guinea-Bissau to Senegal by their
teachers or an intermediary, purportedly to study in daaras, or
residential Quranic schools. Some boys described to Human Rights Watch
being taken by clandestine routes between border villages at night,
sometimes on foot, to evade detection.
Once in Senegal, most are forced to beg and suffer conditions akin to
slavery by their Quranic teachers in the daaras. Many of these boys
suffer severe physical and psychological abuse for failing to meet daily
quotas of money, rice, and sugar demanded by their teachers. They also
suffer from severe malnutrition and frequently from disease as a result
of long hours on the street, abysmal conditions in the daara, and a lack
of medical care.
Many of these cases clearly meet the international definition of
trafficking, the organizations said. Trafficking between Guinea-Bissau
and neighboring countries may also occur under other circumstances,
including taking children to work in cotton or cashew fields, and
transporting women to be forced into sexual exploitation.
The organizations have interviewed police and border officials
working to improve anti-trafficking efforts and have assisted in
training for border officials and forming community groups to monitor
clandestine border crossings involving children.
Those working to stem trafficking suffer from a crippling lack of
resources. In each of the two main border regions in eastern
Guinea-Bissau, police and border officials have only one car and one
motorbike to monitor a combined 250-kilometer stretch of border with
Senegal and Guinea-Conakry.
"Improved training and resources for border officials could help
reduce the flow of children at risk of being taken across the border,
and we need that," said Malam Baio, director of Bafata-based SOS Talibe
Children. "But passing this law is essential. The lack of a domestic
legal framework to address trafficking prevents officials from tackling
the root problem."
At present, traffickers from Guinea-Bissau face minimal consequences,
if any. Even when suspects are stopped and lack the necessary documents
for moving a child across the border, there are no laws that enable the
government to charge or prosecute them effectively. Without fear of
penalty, traffickers often make repeated attempts until they succeed,
police officials and children have told the organizations. If the
proposed law is passed, law enforcement and judicial authorities would
at least be able to arrest, charge, and prosecute suspects for acts of
trafficking.
Police officers, prosecutors, and children's rights advocates have
told the groups that current laws that might apply to trafficking - the
crimes of "abuse of confidence" or "harming the welfare of another" -
are too vaguely worded to prosecute trafficking effectively.
A police commissioner in an eastern region of Guinea-Bissau from
which many children are trafficked to Senegal described the problem to
Human Rights Watch in June: "We can't do our jobs because there isn't a
law against trafficking ...We can stop the movement of children across
the border, but to charge the offender, it's impossible. It's also
difficult to sensitize families, because we can't clearly point to a law
against what is happening."
SOS Talibe Children and the Association of the Friends of Children
indicated that the problem of trafficking continues to grow and that
more children in particular are being forced into abusive or
exploitation situations in Senegal and other neighboring countries every
year.
"Well-intentioned law enforcement authorities trying to combat
trafficking in Guinea-Bissau currently have their hands tied," said
Fernando Ca of the Association of the Friends of Children. "Traffickers
left at liberty to ply their ugly trade cannot be held accountable until
this law is passed."
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
More than 7 million borrowers booted from a Biden-era loan forgiveness program will have to quickly switch to a new plan using a system that's been backed up for months.
After axing a Biden-era student loan repayment program, the Trump administration is threatening to kick its millions of mostly low-income beneficiaries onto the government's most expensive plan unless they switch to a new one quickly.
The Washington Post reported on Friday that the Department of Education was beginning to email the more than 7 million people enrolled in the Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) program, telling them they needed to change their plan within the next 90 days.
Around 4.5 million of those borrowers earn incomes between 150% and 225%, allowing them to qualify for zero-dollar monthly payments under SAVE, which the Trump administration effectively killed in December after settling with Republican states who'd brought lawsuits against the program under former President Joe Biden.
Anonymous officials told The Post that those who do not switch plans within three months of receiving the email will automatically be re-enrolled in the Standard Plan. Unlike SAVE, which is income-based, the Standard plan has borrowers pay a fixed rate over 10 years.
Standard typically carries the highest monthly payments, and those transitioning to it from SAVE could pay more than $300 extra per month in some cases, with the poorest borrowers seeing the sharpest increases.
While 90 days may seem like plenty of time to switch to a less expensive repayment plan, it's not nearly that simple.
Due to the large exodus of borrowers, the Department of Education has struggled to process all the forms, processing only about 250,000 per month. Many borrowers who have tried to transition have found themselves waiting months for a reply.
To make matters more confusing, many of these borrowers will have to switch programs again soon, since all but one repayment program will be dissolved on July 1, 2028 as a result of last year's Republican budget law. The remaining plan will also be income-driven, though it is still expected to cost borrowers more each month.
According to a report released last month by the Century Foundation and Protect Borrowers, two groups that support loan forgiveness, nearly 9 million student loan borrowers are in default. During Trump's first year back in office, the student loan delinquency rate jumped from roughly zero to 25%, which it called "precedent-shattering."
"Much of the rise in delinquencies can be linked to the Trump administration’s actions aimed at increasing student loan payments," the report said. “The US Department of Education blocked borrowers from accessing more affordable payments through income-driven plans, having ordered a stoppage in application processing for three months and mass-denying 328,000 applications in August 2025. As of December 31, 2025, a warehouse’s worth of 734,000 applications sat unprocessed.”
Being in default has major ramifications for borrowers' finances. Those with delinquent loans saw their credit scores decrease by an average of 57 points during the first three quarters of 2025, dragging around 2 million of them into "subprime" territory, which forces them to pay thousands of dollars more for auto and personal loans and makes them more likely to have difficulty finding housing and employment.
The report estimated that if those booted from SAVE defaulted at the same rate as other borrowers, the number of student loan borrowers in distress could rise as high as 17 million.
According to Protect Borrowers, the typical family will pay more than $3,000 per year in additional costs as a result of the end of SAVE.
The end of SAVE comes as oil shocks caused by Trump's war in Iran have spiked gas prices and threaten to raise them throughout the economy, adding to the already elevated costs of food, housing, and transportation resulting from the president's aggressive tariff regime.
"In the middle of an affordability crisis driven by Donald Trump," said Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), "Trump is killing a plan that lowers student loan costs. It's shameful."
"The United States and Iran are trapped in a conflict in which each new escalation only deepens a shared, losing predicament... Sooner rather than later, both will confront the urgency of finding an off-ramp."
Multiple reports published in the last two days have indicated that President Donald Trump is seeking to wrap up his illegal war in Iran, which has significantly hurt his domestic political standing—partially by raising gas prices at a time when polls show US voters are primarily concerned about the cost of living.
While ending the Iran war will not be simple, some foreign policy experts believe that it can be done if both the US and Iran truly understand that deescalation is in both nations' best interests.
George Beebe, director of grand strategy at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft and former director of the CIA’s Russia analysis, and Trita Parsi, executive vice president of the Quincy Institute, have written an essay published on Thursday by Foreign Policy outlining what an achievable Iran "exit plan" would look like.
The authors acknowledged the immense challenges in getting both sides to meet one another halfway, but said this option is preferable to a drawn-out war that will leave both nations poorer and bloodied.
On Iran's side, argued Beebe and Parsi, a deal would involve renewing "its stated commitment to never pursue nuclear weapons," re-opening the Strait of Hormuz to all shipping vessels, and making a commitment "to denominating at least half of its oil sales in US dollars rather than the Chinese yuan."
The US, meanwhile, would "grant sanctions exemptions to countries prepared to finance Iran’s reconstruction" and "would also permit a specified group of states—such as China, India, South Korea, Japan, Turkey, Iraq, and others in the Gulf—to resume trade with Tehran and the purchase of Iranian oil, thereby easing global energy prices."
Beebe and Parsi emphasized that this deal would only be a first step, and they said the next step would be restarting negotiations to establish a nuclear weapons agreement similar to the one previously negotiated by the Obama administration that Trump tore up during his first term.
"The United States and Iran are trapped in a conflict in which each new escalation only deepens a shared, losing predicament," they wrote. "Neither can compel the other’s surrender. Sooner rather than later, both will confront the urgency of finding an off-ramp—one that does not hinge on the other’s humiliation."
Even if Trump takes this course of action, however, there is no guarantee it will succeed, in part because of how much he has already damaged US alliances across the world.
In an analysis published Thursday, Sarah Yerkes, senior fellow at the Carnegie International Endowment for Peace's Middle East Program, argued that even nations in the Middle East that stand to benefit from a weakened Iran are now thinking twice about their dependence on the US for their security needs, given that Trump's war has resulted in Iran launching retaliatory strikes throughout the region.
Yerkes also highlighted how Trump's handling of European allies is making it less likely that they will play a significant part in helping him end the conflict.
"Europe, which is not eager to enter what it sees as a war of choice, has refrained from proactively joining US and Israeli strikes," Yerkes explained. "One of the clearest examples of the transatlantic rift was over the initial reaction to closures in the Strait of Hormuz, the shipping channel for approximately 20% of the world’s seaborne oil and LNG traffic. Multiple European countries refused to cow to Trump’s demand that they send warships to help keep the strait open, inviting public ire from Trump."
The bottom line, warned Yerkes, is that "each day the war continues, without explicit goals or a clear exit strategy, opposition to the United States—from friends and foes, inside and outside—is also likely to grow, making America less safe and less secure."
"We should attract the best and brightest in our country to become teachers and pay them the decent wages that they deserve."
US Sen. Bernie Sanders on Friday rejected First Lady Melania Trump's vision of a near-future in which artificial intelligence-powered humanoid robots do the work of human school teachers, arguing that society should instead do better by its human educators.
The wife of President Donald Trump entered Wednesday's gathering of the Global First Ladies Alliance accompanied by Figure 03, an AI-powered "general purpose humanoid robot" developed by the Sunnyvale, California-based company Figure.
“The future of AI is personified," Trump told attendees, who included Brigitte Macron of France, Sara Netanyahu of Israel, and Olena Zelenska of Ukraine. “It will be formed in the shape of humans. Very soon artificial intelligence will move from our mobile phones to humanoids that deliver utility.”
“Imagine a humanoid educator named Plato," she said. “Access to the classical studies is now instantaneous: literature, science, art, philosophy, mathematics, and history. Humanity’s entire corpus of information is available in the comfort of your home.”
Responding to Trump's remarks, Sanders (I-Vt.) said Friday on social media: "Call me a radical, but NO."
"We should not be replacing teachers in America with robots," the senator added. "We should attract the best and brightest in our country to become teachers and pay them the decent wages that they deserve."
Trump and Macron also warned about the dangers technology poses to children in remarks that came the same week that a New Mexico jury ordered tech titan Meta to pay a $375 million penalty for endangering youth and jurors in a landmark social media addiction trial found that Meta and YouTube harmed a child user of their platforms.
The office of California Gov. Gavin Newsom—who is believed to be a likely contender for the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination—also slapped down the idea of robot teachers, as did ordinary social media users.
"They want to replace human beings. Where will we work? How do we make money?" asked one X account with tens of thousands of followers. "No one wants this. We did not ask for it. Fuck all of this shit."