June, 22 2010, 08:17am EDT

For Immediate Release
Contact:
Melinda St. Louis, Deputy Director, 202-441-7579, melinda@jubileeusa.org,
or
Hayley Hathaway, Communications Coordinator, 860-205-6078, hayley@jubileeusa.org
G20 Gets "D" Grade for Breaking Commitments to the World's Poorest
New Report Analyzes Progress on Past Commitments; Offers Recommendations Ahead of Summit
WASHINGTON
Today the Jubilee USA Network, an alliance of 75 religious
denominations and faith communities, labor, environmental, and human
rights groups, and development agencies, issued a progress report titled
"Making the Grade? The G20's Commitment to the World's Poorest." The
report finds that G20 leaders have made shockingly little progress since
their last summit on development commitments and calls on leaders to
take bold action to support the world's poorest at a gathering of world
leaders this week.
The report's release comes just ahead of the
upcoming G20 summit in Toronto, Canada on June 26-27th with leaders from
countries representing 85 percent of the world's economy.
upcoming G20 summit in Toronto, Canada on June 26-27th with leaders from
countries representing 85 percent of the world's economy.
The scorecard evaluates the G20's progress toward key commitments made
at the conclusion of its first summit on the global economic crisis in
April 2009. New analysis shows that, in the past nine months since the
G-20's September summit in Pittsburgh, only $1.2 billion in additional
money has been clearly accounted for and delivered to low-income
countries - an amount equivalent to money spent by the Canadian
government for the upcoming three-day G8/G20 summits.
at the conclusion of its first summit on the global economic crisis in
April 2009. New analysis shows that, in the past nine months since the
G-20's September summit in Pittsburgh, only $1.2 billion in additional
money has been clearly accounted for and delivered to low-income
countries - an amount equivalent to money spent by the Canadian
government for the upcoming three-day G8/G20 summits.
"There is something wrong when more political will
exists for the U.S. to mobilize $285 billion to bailout the top 20
too-big-to-fail Wall Street companies within a few months than for the
entire G20 to deliver on $50 billion in promises to the 78 poorest
countries in the world. In more than a year, only $24.7 billion has
been delivered, and nearly all of that has been new loans, which could
provoke a renewed debt crisis - the last thing our global economy
needs." says Eric LeCompte, Executive Director of Jubilee USA Network.
exists for the U.S. to mobilize $285 billion to bailout the top 20
too-big-to-fail Wall Street companies within a few months than for the
entire G20 to deliver on $50 billion in promises to the 78 poorest
countries in the world. In more than a year, only $24.7 billion has
been delivered, and nearly all of that has been new loans, which could
provoke a renewed debt crisis - the last thing our global economy
needs." says Eric LeCompte, Executive Director of Jubilee USA Network.
On Tuesday, faith leaders will meet with U.S.
Treasury Under Secretary for International Affairs Lael Brainard before
she attends the summit. They will share the findings of the report and
encourage the U.S. to be a leader within the G20 in support of the
world's poorest.
Treasury Under Secretary for International Affairs Lael Brainard before
she attends the summit. They will share the findings of the report and
encourage the U.S. to be a leader within the G20 in support of the
world's poorest.
"Last year the G20 took responsibility for the economic crisis and
committed to help those most affected: the world's most impoverished.
Now, in the face of deepening poverty and debt, we need to ensure that
leaders at the third G20 Summit do not sweep the reality of the world's
poor under the rug. They need to commit to providing debt relief and
grant support," says Ruth Messenger, President of the American Jewish
World Service, a member of the Jubilee USA Network.
committed to help those most affected: the world's most impoverished.
Now, in the face of deepening poverty and debt, we need to ensure that
leaders at the third G20 Summit do not sweep the reality of the world's
poor under the rug. They need to commit to providing debt relief and
grant support," says Ruth Messenger, President of the American Jewish
World Service, a member of the Jubilee USA Network.
The report gives the G20 a failing grade on its
commitments to fulfilling past aid pledges and working toward the
achievement of the Millennium Development Goals.
commitments to fulfilling past aid pledges and working toward the
achievement of the Millennium Development Goals.
"The tragic
reality is that if G20 countries do not meet their commitments to the
world's poorest, we may see a reversal in past progress made in fighting
extreme poverty," says Sering Falu Njie, Deputy Director of the United
Nations Millennium Campaign. "By failing to provide grant assistance to
poor countries, the G20 is contributing to a renewed debt crisis for
poor countries. At this upcoming summit, we are calling on the U.S. to
lead within the G20 to take bold action to ensure that the most
vulnerable are not forgotten."
reality is that if G20 countries do not meet their commitments to the
world's poorest, we may see a reversal in past progress made in fighting
extreme poverty," says Sering Falu Njie, Deputy Director of the United
Nations Millennium Campaign. "By failing to provide grant assistance to
poor countries, the G20 is contributing to a renewed debt crisis for
poor countries. At this upcoming summit, we are calling on the U.S. to
lead within the G20 to take bold action to ensure that the most
vulnerable are not forgotten."
The report finds that the G20 has fallen short of
several more of its commitments to benefit the poorest - from stemming
the illicit flight of capital through tax havens to governance reform of
the international financial institutions to addressing the urgent
threat posed by climate change. Accountability, transparency, and
governance reforms all are lagging in implementation.
several more of its commitments to benefit the poorest - from stemming
the illicit flight of capital through tax havens to governance reform of
the international financial institutions to addressing the urgent
threat posed by climate change. Accountability, transparency, and
governance reforms all are lagging in implementation.
Some of the report's key policy recommendations for
the G20 meeting in Toronto include:
the G20 meeting in Toronto include:
- Ensure
that promises to fully deliver $50 billion in assistance to the poorest
are delivered without further delay, without harmful conditions, and on
grant terms. - Institute a two-year moratorium
on debt service payments by low income countries, and commit to deliver
expanded debt cancellation to all poor countries whose debt levels
currently prevent them from meeting their people's basic needs and which
struggle under a burden of odious and illegitimate debt. - Demand that the IMF use its
windfall profit of over $2.5 billion from gold sales for debt relief and
non-debt-creating financial assistance to low-income countries. - Insist upon far-reaching reforms
in IMF and World Bank economic policy conditionality before delivering
any further funding to these institutions. - Take ambitious steps help finance
the fight against climate change, which has disproportionate impacts on
the poorest countries, by committing to dramatic increases in
additional funds they will mobilize for mitigation and adaptation,
utilizing innovative sources such as a currency transaction levy. - Broaden the discussion on
international economic cooperation beyond the 20 most powerful economies
to include low-income countries and smaller economies.
The progress report is available here.
Jubilee USA Network is an interfaith, non-profit alliance of religious, development and advocacy organizations. We are 75 U.S. institutions and more than 750 faith groups working across the United States and around the globe. We address the structural causes of poverty and inequality in our communities and countries around the world.
(202) 783-3566LATEST NEWS
Anthropic CEO 'Cannot in Good Conscience Accede' to Pentagon's AI Demand
"Anthropic and Dario deserve credit for standing up for two very basic and obvious principles: no mass surveillance and no autonomous killer robots," said one progressive commentator.
Feb 26, 2026
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth gave Anthropic until Friday evening to agree to let the Pentagon use the company's artificial intelligence technology however it wants, or else. Roughly 24 hours ahead of the deadline, CEO Dario Amodei announced that "we cannot in good conscience accede to their request," and reiterated opposition to enabling autonomous weapons or surveillance of US citizens.
Anthropic's Claude was the first AI model allowed to handle classified US military data. While the Department of Defense (DOD) has now signed an agreement with Elon Musk's xAI and "is getting close to making a deal with Google," as the New York Times reported Monday, Hegseth demanded "unfettered" access to Claude during a Tuesday meeting with Amodei.
Hegseth threatened to declare the Anthropic a "supply chain risk," effectively blacklisting it for military use and ending its current contract, or invoke the Defense Production Act, which would force Anthropic to tailor the product to the DOD’s needs, if Amodei refused to drop the company's guardrails.
The CEO responded publicly with a Thursday blog post. Using President Donald Trump's preferred name for the Pentagon, he wrote that "Anthropic understands that the Department of War, not private companies, makes military decisions. We have never raised objections to particular military operations nor attempted to limit use of our technology in an ad hoc manner."
"However, in a narrow set of cases, we believe AI can undermine, rather than defend, democratic values. Some uses are also simply outside the bounds of what today's technology can safely and reliably do," Amodei continued. He explained the company's position that "using these systems for mass domestic surveillance is incompatible with democratic values."
"AI-driven mass surveillance presents serious, novel risks to our fundamental liberties. To the extent that such surveillance is currently legal, this is only because the law has not yet caught up with the rapidly growing capabilities of AI," he wrote. "For example, under current law, the government can purchase detailed records of Americans' movements, web browsing, and associations from public sources without obtaining a warrant, a practice the Intelligence Community has acknowledged raises privacy concerns, and that has generated bipartisan opposition in Congress. Powerful AI makes it possible to assemble this scattered, individually innocuous data into a comprehensive picture of any person's life—automatically and at massive scale."
The CEO also argued that "frontier AI systems are simply not reliable enough to power fully autonomous weapons. We will not knowingly provide a product that puts America's warfighters and civilians at risk." He noted that Anthropic offered to work directly with the department on research and development to "improve the reliability of these systems, but they have not accepted this offer."
Amodei concluded by expressing hope that the Pentagon revises its position, writing that "our strong preference is to continue to serve the department and our warfighters—with our two requested safeguards in place. Should the department choose to offboard Anthropic, we will work to enable a smooth transition to another provider, avoiding any disruption to ongoing military planning, operations, or other critical missions."
Amodei's blog post followed CBS News reporting earlier Thursday that "Pentagon officials on Wednesday night sent Anthropic their best and final offer in negotiations for use of the company's artificial intelligence technology."
It also came just hours after Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell responded to a related post from a Google scientist on Musk's social media platform X. The DOD official claimed that "the Department of War has no interest in using AI to conduct mass surveillance of Americans (which is illegal) nor do we want to use AI to develop autonomous weapons that operate without human involvement. This narrative is fake and being peddled by leftists in the media."
"Here's what we're asking: Allow the Pentagon to use Anthropic's model for all lawful purposes. This is a simple, commonsense request that will prevent Anthropic from jeopardizing critical military operations and potentially putting our warfighters at risk. We will not let ANY company dictate the terms regarding how we make operational decisions," Parnell added, noting the Friday deadline and the threat to "terminate our partnership with Anthropic and deem them a supply chain risk."
While Amodei and observers await the Pentagon's next move, several Anthropic employees, other tech experts, and critics of the Trump administration praised the CEO for "standing on principle" and choosing "war with the Department of War."
"Anthropic and Dario deserve credit for standing up for two very basic and obvious principles: no mass surveillance and no autonomous killer robots," said progressive commentator Krystal Ball. "Perhaps this is a low bar but it isn’t clear any of the other leading AI companies would put principle above profits in ANY scenario. The Pentagon is sure to make Anthropic pay for daring to defy them."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Trump's Revived Anti-Worker Rules Condemned as 'Outright Grift'
"Every day, little by little, the Trump administration is rigging the system to benefit giant corporations and shortchange workers," said one senator.
Feb 26, 2026
President Donald Trump's "barrage of attacks on workers" continued on Thursday with announcements about two key labor rules.
The US Department of Labor (DOL) proposed an independent contractor rule that the National Employment Law Project (NELP) called "yet another example of the administration siding with major corporations and stacking the deck against working people" by "effectively allowing employers to strip workers of federal minimum wage and overtime protections."
The DOL's Wage and Hour Division proposal would replace the Biden administration's widely celebrated 2024 policy for when employers can treat workers as independent contractors under the Fair Labor Standards Act with business-friendly guidance that resembles a rule adopted just before the end of Trump's first term.
"This rule will have profound real-world consequences for working people," warned NELP. "Misclassification is common in many labor-intensive, poorly paid jobs—jobs like home healthcare, janitorial work, landscaping, personal services, and increasingly, app-dispatched ride-hail and delivery—where people of color and immigrants are overrepresented, and workers lack the bargaining power to negotiate higher wages and better working conditions."
NELP pointed to research showing that low-paid independent contractors "lag behind their employee counterparts," and some "do not even earn the federal minimum wage." The organization stressed that "this rule threatens to enshrine a two-tiered labor system where similarly situated workers receive vastly different rights and protections based on the classification chosen by the business employing them."
The new rule—which now faces a 60-day public comment period—focuses on two "core factors" to determine an employee's classification: the nature and degree of control over the work, and the worker's opportunity for profit or loss based on initiative or investment.
NELP argued that "by elevating two factors above other equally important factors, the Trump administration's test fails to account for the economic realities of many working relationships. Many workers labeled as independent contractors are not really in business for themselves because they are integrated into the operations of a larger business structure that sets most of the terms of the work."
"In app-dispatched ride-hail and delivery jobs, for example, corporations like Uber, Lyft, DoorDash, and Amazon use apps and algorithms to offer shifts or assignments to so-called independent contractors doing the core work of the business, set the wages these workers receive, surveil and assess their performance, and determine if they are offered future assignments or get 'deactivated,'" the group noted. "App-based ride-hail and delivery workers perform difficult and dangerous work without basic employment protections like the right to minimum wage and overtime, workers' compensation, and unemployment insurance."
As NELP and other critics sounded the alarm over the DOL proposal on Thursday, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) also revived an effort from Trump's first term, reinstating that administration's 2020 rule on joint employers.
During Trump's initial administration, the NLRB required joint employers to "possess and exercise substantial direct and immediate control" over at least one aspect of the workers' employment. In 2023, under former President Joe Biden, the board decided that two or more entities could be considered joint employers if they had an employment relationship with the workers and helped to determine their terms and conditions of employment. However, the latter was blocked by a Trump-appointed judge the next year.
Unlike the DOL proposal, the board's rule is final. The NLRB—which has two Trump appointees, one Biden appointee, and two vacancies—said in the Federal Register that "the 2023 rule was vacated by the district court, and the action the board takes today merely implements the court's decision. Our action is ministerial and therefore will have no separate economic effect."
US Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), a senior member and former chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, declared in a Thursday statement that "every day, little by little, the Trump administration is rigging the system to benefit giant corporations and shortchange workers—it's an outright grift and working people should be furious."
"The joint employer rule is nothing more than a return to Trump's anti-worker policies that let giant corporations skirt their basic obligations to employees—Trump is giving the biggest corporations cover to deny workers their ability to band together for better wages and working conditions and leaving millions of workers in the lurch, vulnerable to egregious violations of their rights," she said.
"At the same time, today, the Trump administration announced they're working to rescind the independent contractor rule," Murray continued. "Trump wants to let giant corporations classify workers as contractors so that they don't have to pay them minimum wage and overtime—these workers deserve fair pay."
The senator then took aim at the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act that congressional Republicans passed and the president signed last summer, saying that "under the Trump administration, giant corporations get giant tax breaks paid for by cutting Medicaid—the healthcare that the poorest workers are forced to rely on."
"Now, Trump wants those same corporations off the hook for every benefit, protection, and dollar they'd otherwise owe to millions of workers—it's a shakedown," she asserted. "Republicans are proving time and again, they don't care about workers—they don't want to even let workers have crumbs, but billionaires can get trillions in tax breaks that will blow up our national debt."
Murray isn't up for reelection in November's closely watched midterms, but could lead the Senate Appropriations Committee if Democrats reclaim the chamber. On Thursday, she vowed that "I am going to keep fighting for laws on the books that protect workers and build an economy that grows the middle-class, not just profit margins for the largest corporations on Earth."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Israel Responsible for Two-Thirds of Journalist Deaths in 2025: Press Freedom Group
The number of journalists killed by Israel is remarkably high even when compared to the number of journalists killed in other conflict zones.
Feb 26, 2026
A new report from a major press freedom group has found that a record 129 journalists were killed in 2025, and that Israel was responsible for two-thirds of the worldwide total.
The Tuesday report from the Committee to Protect Journalists says that the Israeli military has cumulatively killed more journalists than any other government since CPJ started tracking reporter deaths in 1992, with the vast majority being Palestinian media workers in Gaza.
The report also finds an increase in the use of drones to attack journalists, with Israel accounting for more than 70% of the 39 documented instances of reporters killed by drone strikes.
The number of journalists killed by Israel is remarkably high even when compared to the number of journalists killed in other conflict zones.
Only nine journalists were killed in Sudan, for example, while just four journalists were killed in Ukraine, despite both countries being in the midst of brutal conflicts that have collectively killed hundreds of thousands of people.
A report issued in December by Reporters Without Borders similarly found that Israel was responsible for the most journalists deaths in 2025, the third consecutive year that the country had held that distinction.
The CPJ report also points the finger at governments for not taking their responsibilities to protect journalists seriously.
"The rising number of journalist deaths globally is fueled by a persistent culture of impunity," the report states. "Very few transparent investigations have been conducted into the 47 cases of targeted killings (classified as 'murder' in CPJ’s longstanding methodology) documented by CPJ in 2025—the highest number of journalists deliberately killed for their work in the past decade—and no one has been held accountable in any of the cases."
CPJ CEO Jodie Ginsberg said that attacks on the media are "a leading indicator of attacks on other freedoms, and much more needs to be done to prevent these killings and punish the perpetrators," adding that "we are all at risk when journalists are killed for reporting the news.”
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


