

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Leslie Anderson, (703) 276-3256 or landerson@hastingsgroup.com
Green America today called on all Americans to
take "The Green Economy Challenge" to celebrate the 40th Anniversary of
Earth Day.
The Green Economy Challenge asks all
American households to shift 10 percent of their current spending to
green purchases. American households spend approximately $3 trillion per
year on expenditures that could easily be greened. If Americans
directed just one tenth of these expenditures to purchasing from a green
or local business, it would steer $300 billion towards more sustainable
consumption.
"Going green saves money, creates
jobs, and supports local communities. Green is the new red, white and
blue," said Green America Executive Director Alisa Gravitz. "One
thing all Americans can do to help the environment on Earth Day and
everyday is to direct their money towards greener purchases."
Gravitz said: "By 'green' we mean
products that are good for both people and the planet. Shifting
purchases to green is often surprisingly easy to do, and what may also
surprise people is that buying green often saves money, which is on the
minds of so many households during the recession. Going green saves
money, creates jobs, and supports local communities."
10 TIPS FOR GOING GREEN
1. Borrow, Trade or Buy Used:
The greenest thing consumers can do is to not buy new things at all.
You can find books, cds and movies (including the latest bestsellers)
for free at the local library. People across the country are setting up
clothing swaps to give away old clothes and get "new" ones in return.
Online services like Craigslist, Freecycle and Ebay make it easy to find
quality used goods locally and nationally, including first-rate used
furniture that is often higher quality than new. Green America has more
resources available at: https://www.greenamericatoday.org/programs/
shopunshop/unshopping/getandgive.cfm
2. Grow Your Own Food:
When you plant your own garden you can ensure that your food is organic
and healthy, and since there is no transportation involved, there are no
climate change emissions. You'll also save money and you can spend
time with family in the garden. A recent National Gardening Association
study found that the average family spends $70 a year on maintaining a
vegetable garden, and grows about $600 worth of produce. When you sit
down to eat your harvest, pour some delicious Fair Trade or organic wine
or beer to go along with it. When you do shop for food, look for local,
organic and Fair Trade CertifiedTM products. If you can't find them,
ask your supermarket to stock them. Green America has more resources
available at
https://www.greenamericatoday.org/programs/
climate/facts/food.cfm
3. Green Your Energy at Home:
Start with energy efficiency: using less energy is the best way to
green your power consumption - and enjoy big savings. There are many
simple actions you can take.
Green America has more resources available
at: https://www.greenamericatoday.org/pdf/CAQ75.pdf
4. Give Your Car a Break:
If only 1 percent of car owners in the US did not drive for one day a
week, we would save an estimated 42 million gallons of gas per year and
keep 840 million pounds of CO2 out of the atmosphere. Less driving
means savings on gas, and less wear and tear - and you can qualify for
lower auto insurance rates. Instead of driving to do errands, consider
walking or riding a bike, both of which are great exercise. Green
America has more resources available at:
https://www.greenamericatoday.org/pubs/greenamerican/
articles/Fall2009/worksheet.cfm
5. Buy Used, Organic, or
Sweat-free Clothes: Many clothes are made from cotton treated
with pesticides, dyed in harsh chemicals, and then assembled in
sweatshops. Cotton accounts for more than 10 percent of the world's
pesticide use and nearly 25 percent of the world's insecticide use.
Instead of buying clothes at the mall, you can buy stylish clothes at
thrift and resale shops, and purchase new clothes that are
sweatshop-free, organic, and/or Fair Trade. Plus, if you buy natural
fibers, you can save on dry cleaning. The typical dry cleaning bill for a
dress or suit is three times more than the cost of the garment - and
you avoid exposure to toxic dry cleaning chemicals. Green America has
more resources available at:
https://www.greenamericatoday.org/pubs/
realgreen/articles/nosweatshops.cfm
6. Buy Organic and Fair Trade
Personal Care Products: Make-up and body care products have
been linked to allergic reactions, birth defects, and even cancer. In
addition, many products contain oils and extracts that are harvested and
produced in a way that harms the environment and exploits workers.
Look for organic and Fair Trade body care products instead. Green
America has more resources available at:
https://www.greenamericatoday.org/pubs/
realgreen/articles/cosmetics.cfm
7. Buy Green Home Products: Household
cleaners, paints and stains, furniture, carpets, and many other items
contain volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which have been linked to
cancer, endocrine disruption, and eye irritants. Instead, make your own
cleaners from safe, household ingredients or purchase green cleaning
products. You can also purchase no-VOC carpets, paints and stains, and
furniture. Green America has more resources available at: https://www.greenamericatoday.org/pubs/greenamerican/
articles/spring2008/HealYourHome.cfm
8. Support Local Green Businesses:
Spending money at locally owned businesses keeps more money in your
community, with some research demonstrating over three times as much
money staying in the community, and a growing number of local businesses
are going green. Instead of chains, eat out at locally-owned
restaurants (a growing number of which are sourcing local and organic
meats and produce). Purchase foods, books, clothes and furnishings at
locally-owned stores and co-ops. Support local musicians and artists at
locally owned performance spaces in your town. Green America can help
you find local green businesses at www.greenpages.org,
which has a zipcode search.
9. With the Money You Save, Invest
in a Greener Future: A growing number of Americans are
investing for their future; while doing so, they can also invest in a
better future for the planet. You can invest in socially responsible
mutual funds that earn competitive returns and promote corporate
responsibility. You can also put your savings into community
development banks and credit unions that invest in jobs, housing and
social services in local communities. Green America has more resources
available at: https://www.greenamericatoday.org/socialinvesting/
10. Turn to Green America's National
Green Pages TM to get started. Start greening your
purchases everyday by using the National Green PagesTM (www.greenpages.org), the largest
listing of business in the US screened for their social and
environmental responsibility. The National Green PagesTM has
thousands of green products and services, including:
BACKGROUND: MONEY US HOUSEHOLDS
COULD DIRECT TO GREEN
Green America determined how much money
Americans households could direct to green spending by first using US
Department of Labor statistics from 2009 to determine how much the
average US household spends on various purchases. Green America then
determined which of these purchases could be wholly or partly "greened"
in the short term (in the long term all purchases can be greened), as
detailed in the chart below:
Item | Amount | Percentage | Easily Greened? |
Food at Home | $3,465 | 7% | Yes |
Food Away From Home | $2,668 | 5.40% | Yes |
Alcoholic beverage | $457 | 0.90% | Yes |
Insurance | $5,027 | 10.80% | No |
Education | $945 | 1.90% | Yes |
Apparel | $1,881 | 3.80% | Yes |
Personal Care | $588 | 1.20% | Yes |
$2,853 | 5.70% | No | |
Miscellaneous | $808 | 1.60% | Yes |
Household Furnishings | $1,797 | 3.60% | Yes |
Housekeeping supplies | $639 | 1.30% | Yes |
Household operations | $984 | 2% | Yes |
Utilities, fuels, public services | $3,477 | 7% | Yes |
Shelter | $10,023 | 20.20% | No |
Tobacco | $323 | 0.70% | No |
Transportation | $8,758 | 17.60% | Some |
Reading | $118 | 0.20% | Yes |
Cash Contributions | $1,821 | 3.70% | Yes |
Entertainment | $2,698 | 5.40% | Yes |
Total | $49,330 | 100% |
Green America determined that the amount
of expenditures available to be easily greened for the average household
is $25,324, representing 51 percent of total expenditures. If, on
average, the average American household "greened" ten percent of the
expenditures that can easily be greened, it would account for $2,532.37
per household.
The US Census estimates that there are
114,825,428 households in the US. Therefore the entire amount spent by
all American households is nearly $3 trillion that could easily be
"greened," and if 10 percent of that were greened, it would represent
$300 billion. By shifting to green products and services, many locally
produced, American's will not only be creating a greener world, but also
creating more jobs and keeping more money in their local communities.
Green America is a not-for-profit membership organization founded in 1982 and known until January 1, 2009 as "Co-op America." Green America's mission is to harness economic power--the strength of consumers, investors, businesses, and the marketplace--to create a socially just and environmentally sustainable society.
"People can't afford childcare," said Sen. Bernie Sanders. "And this guy, in addition to giving tax breaks to billionaires, now wants to spend another $200 billion on a war that should never have been fought."
US Sen. Bernie Sanders said Thursday that it is absurd for the Trump administration to demand another $200 billion from Congress for an illegal war on Iran after lawmakers already approved $1 trillion in military spending for the year—and while millions of people across the nation are struggling to afford basic necessities.
"You got people all over this country, 20% of households, spending 50% of their income on housing," Sanders (I-Vt.) said in an appearance on MS NOW. "People can't afford healthcare. People can't afford childcare. And this guy, in addition to giving tax breaks to billionaires, now wants to spend another $200 billion on a war that should never have been fought."
The senator's remarks came as President Donald Trump, who has not yet formally requested the funds from Congress, suggested another $200 billion would be a "small price to pay" as the US-Israeli war on Iran heads toward its fourth week with no end in sight.
"I think the Trump people are in a bit of panic," Sanders said Thursday. "They're losing ground. Gas prices are soaring. There is massive discontent against this war. It's got to end, and we've got to make sure that Trump is neutered in 2026."
With the Trump administration considering a plan to deploy thousands of additional troops to the Middle East amid widespread fears of a ground invasion of Iran—which would explode the price tag of an already costly war—the National Priorities Project (NPP) released an analysis highlighting where the $200 billion requested by the Pentagon could be better spent.
The group estimated that $200 billion would be enough for all of the following this year:
"Pete Hegseth would rather the US bomb Iranian families than feed American families," wrote NPP's Lindsay Koshgarian, referring to the Pentagon secretary. "We should remember the lies that led us into war in Iraq a generation ago. That war ultimately cost nearly $3 trillion. We must not go down that path again. Our tax dollars should be helping struggling Americans, not feeding new forever wars."
One advocacy group leader highlighted that "$200 billion is enough to materially change the lives of Americans," from establishing universal pre-K education to building over 100,000 housing units.
As US President Donald Trump on Thursday confirmed reporting that he's seeking $200 billion more from Congress to continue waging his unpopular war of choice on Iran, Rep. Ilhan Omar was among those forcefully pushing back.
"We're told there's no money for universal healthcare or to end hunger in this country. But somehow $200 billion more for war will likely move through Congress without question," said the progressive Minnesota Democrat, who fled civil war in Somalia as a child. "Not another penny for another endless war."
Since Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu started bombing Iran late last month—creating a spiraling crisis that has now killed and injured thousands of people across the Middle East, plus damaged civilian infrastructure in multiple countries—anti-war lawmakers and organizations have delivered similar messages.
"While they kick 17 million Americans off their healthcare, Republicans want to spend billions on Trump's reckless war of choice," Rep. Greg Casar (D-Texas), chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, said in early March. "Hell no."
Last week, shortly after Pentagon officials told Congress that just the first six days cost Americans more than $11.3 billion, over 250 groups collectively told lawmakers on Capitol Hill to "vote against any additional funding for Trump's unconstitutional war."
At the time, the reported figure was a quarter of what it is now: $50 billion. The coalition noted that the funding "would be enough to restore food assistance for 4 million Americans that was taken away in the tax and budget reconciliation bill, establish universal pre-K education, and pay for the annual construction of more than 100,000 units of housing, among other possible priorities."
After Trump confirmed that he wants four times more than expected, one coalition member, the Institute for Middle East Understanding (IMEU) Policy Project, took to social media to highlight other ways the money could be spent to improve the lives of working Americans, from school meals and paid leave to funding all levels of education.
Another coalition member, Public Citizen, released a Thursday statement in which co-president Robert Weissman ripped Trump's spending request as "grotesque beyond words."
According to Weissman:
It should properly be understood not just as a request to replenish supplies, but to expand, escalate, and perpetuate the illegal, unconstitutional, unpopular and devastating war on Iran. Congress should understand that approving any portion of this funding opens the gates for one, two, and potentially many more war funding requests in the future.
How dare the administration propose this gargantuan sum to expand an illegal war of choice at the same time it has rammed through deep cuts in healthcare and food assistance, refuses to spend foreign assistance at a cost of millions of lives, and has cut spending on protecting clean air, maintaining our national parks, investing in health research, protecting consumers from fraud, and so much more.
$200 billion is enough to materially change the lives of Americans and truly make our country stronger. It would be enough to restore food assistance to the 4 million Americans and Medicaid to the 15 million Americans who will lose those crucial supports under the Republican reconciliation bill; establish universal pre-K education; pay for the annual construction of more than 100,000 units of housing; double the budget of the Environmental Protection Agency; and expand Medicare to cover dental, vision, and hearing.
Weissman argued that "every member of Congress should announce, right now, that they will reject this monstrous war funding proposal, before it is formalized."
Despite rising casualties across the Middle East and polls showing that the US assault on Iran is unpopular, even with Trump voters, a few Democrats voted with nearly all Republicans in the Senate and House of Representatives earlier this month to reject war powers resolutions intended to end Trump's Operation Epic Fury. The upper chamber blocked a similar effort late Wednesday.
Berlin says it needs to focus on its defense in a separate ICJ case in which Nicaragua accuses Germany of supporting Israel's genocidal war on Gaza.
Germany said Wednesday that it will drop its planned intervention in the International Court of Justice genocide against Israel so that it can better focus on its own defense in a separate ICJ case filed by Nicaragua accusing Berlin of enabling Israel's genocidal assault on Gaza via arms sales.
Deputy German Foreign Minister Josef Hinterseher said during a press conference in Berlin that his country "will not intervene" on Israel's side in the South Africa v. Israel genocide case filed at the Hague-based tribunal in December 2023.
This is a marked departure from Germany's January 2024 announcement that it would intervene on behalf of Israel in the case, arguing that the genocide allegation made by South Africa had "no basis whatsoever."
Nearly two dozen nations, most recently the Netherlands, Namibia, and Iceland, have either formally intervened on the side of South Africa or announced their intent to do so. The Herero and Nama peoples of modern-day Namibia suffered a genocide during the region's colonization by Germany in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
A handful of countries including the United States, Hungary, and Fiji have also intervened on behalf of Israel.
In 2024, Nicaragua filed a case against Germany at the ICJ, arguing that the European nation “has not only failed to fulfill its obligation to prevent the genocide committed and being committed against the Palestinian people... but has contributed to the commission of genocide in violation" of the Genocide Convention.
Germany has provided financial, military, diplomatic, and political support to Israel. It also temporarily halted financial contributions to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) based on unsubstantiated Israeli claims that a dozen of its worjers were involved in the Hamas-led attack of October 7, 2023.
Unlike Germany, the US and Israel are not members of the ICJ. The US quit the tribunal after it ruled against the Reagan administration in Nicaragua v. United States, a 1984 ruling that determined the US illegally supported Contra terrorists and mined Nicaraguan harbors.
However, under the court's territorial jurisdiction powers, countries that are not members of the court can still be brought before it for crimes committed in member states.
Further complicating matters, Germany is one of numerous countries which have intervened in Gambia v. Myanmar, which the African nation filed at the ICJ in 2019 amid the Burmese junta's ongoing genocide against Rohingya Muslims.
The ICJ has issued several provisional orders in South Africa v. Israel, including directives to prevent genocidal acts and allow aid into the besieged Gaza Strip amid a burgeoning famine. Israel has been accused of ignoring these orders.
The US under the Biden and Trump administrations pressured ICJ members to refrain from intervening on behalf of South Africa. The Trump administration has also sanctioned members of the International Criminal Court (ICC)‚ which in 2024 issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant for alleged crimes against humanity and war crimes in Gaza.
In Germany, as in several other Western nations, authorities have cracked down on pro-Palestine protests, free expression of support for Palestinian rights, and criticism of Israel. Critics say the persistent framing of German national identity around enduring guilt for the Nazis' wholesale slaughter of 6 million Jews during the Holocaust is driving overzealous policing of dissent and conflation of pro-Palestinian activism with antisemitism.
This perceived moral burden, say observers, risks stifling legitimate political debate, curtailing free speech, and criminalizing solidarity with Palestinians under the pretext of historical responsibility. This has driven German actions from secretly funding Israel's development of nuclear weapons over half a century ago to brutally assaulting and arresting pro-Palestine protesters—including women, elders, minors, and people with disabilities—after the October 2023 attack.
German police punch an anti-genocide woman in front of the cameras.
[image or embed]
— Antifa_Ultras (@antifa-ultras.bsky.social) October 7, 2025 at 2:20 PM
Amnesty International's latest annual human rights report on Germany notes "excessive use of force by police during peaceful protests by climate activists and supporters of Palestinians’ rights," as well as Berlin's "irresponsible arms transfers" to not only Israel but also Saudi Arabia.