

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
For 17 years our colleagues Jeff
Cohen and Norman Solomon have worked with FAIR to present the
P.U.-Litzers, a year-end review of some of the stinkiest examples of
corporate media malfeasance, spin and just plain outrageousness.
Starting this year, FAIR has the somewhat dubious honor of reviewing
the nominees and selecting the winners. It's a dirty job, but someone
has to do it. So, without further ado, we present the 2009
P.U.-Litzers.
--The Remembering Reagan Award
WINNER: Joe Klein, Time
Time columnist Joe Klein (12/3/09), not altogether impressed by
Obama's announcement of a troop escalation in Afghanistan, wrote that a
president "must lead the charge--passionately and, yes, with a touch of
anger."
He described the better way to do this:
Ronald Reagan would have done it differently.
He would have told a story. It might not have been a true story, but it
would have had resonance. He might have found, or created, a grieving
spouse--a young investment banker whose wife had died in the World
Trade Center--who enlisted immediately after the attacks...and then
gave his life, heroically, defending a school for girls in Kandahar.
Reagan would have inspired tears, outrage, passion, a rush to
recruiting centers across the nation.
Ah, Reagan--now there was a president who could inspire people to fight and die based on lies.
--The Cheney 2012 Award
WINNER: Jon Meacham, Newsweek
Newsweek editor Jon Meacham declared (12/7/09) that Dick Cheney
running for president in 2012 would be "good for the Republicans and
good for the country." He explained that "Cheney is a man of
conviction, has a record on which he can be judged, and whatever the
result, there could be no ambiguity about the will of the people.... A
campaign would also give us an occasion that history denied us in 2008:
an opportunity to adjudicate the George W. Bush years in a direct way."
While the 2008 election might have seemed a sufficient judgment of the
Bush years, it's worth pointing out that at beginning of the year
(1/19/09), Meacham was adamantly opposed to re-hashing Cheney's record,
calling it "the rough equivalent of pornography--briefly engaging,
perhaps, but utterly predictable and finally repetitive." The
difference? That was in response to the idea that Cheney should be held
accountable for lawbreaking. Apparently a few months later, the same
record is grounds for a White House run.
--The Them Not Us Award
WINNER: Martin Fackler, New York Times
The New York Times (11/21/09) describes the severe problems
with Japan's elite media--a horror show where "reporters from major
news media outlets are stationed inside government offices and enjoy
close, constant access to officials. The system has long been
criticized as antidemocratic by both foreign and Japanese analysts, who
charge that it has produced a relatively spineless press that feels
more accountable to its official sources than to the public. In their
apparent reluctance to criticize the government, the critics say, the
news media fail to serve as an effective check on authority."
The mind reels.
--Thin-Skinned Pundits Award
WINNER: Dana Milbank, Washington Post
Washington Post reporters Dana Milbank and Chris Cilizza got
into trouble when, in an episode of their "Mouthpiece Theater" web
video series, they suggested brands of beer that would be appropriate
for various politicians. What would Hillary Clinton drink? Apparently
something called "Mad Bitch." The video, unsurprisingly, was roundly
criticized, and was pulled from the Post site. So what lesson was
learned? Milbank complained (8/6/09) that "it's a brutal world out
there in the blogosphere.... I'm often surprised by the ferocity out
there, but I probably shouldn't be."
Yes, the problem with calling someone a "bitch" is the "ferocity" of your critics.
--The Sheer O'Reillyness Award
WINNER: Bill O'Reilly, Fox News Channel--TWICE!
1) Asked by a Canadian viewer, "Has anyone noticed that life expectancy
in Canada under our health system is higher than the USA?," Fox's
O'Reilly (7/27/09) responded: "Well, that's to be expected, Peter,
because we have 10 times as many people as you do. That translates to
10 times as many accidents, crimes, down the line."
2) Drumming up fear of Democrats' tax plans: "Nancy Pelosi and her
far-left crew want to raise the top federal tax rate to 45 percent.
That's not capitalism. That's Fidel Castro stuff, confiscating wages
that people honestly earn."
Perhaps Castro was president of the United States in 1982-86, when the
top rate was 50 percent. Or maybe all of the 1970s, when it was 70
percent. Or from 1950-63, when it was 91 percent.
--The Less Talk, More Bombs Award
WINNER: David Broder, Washington Post
Post columnist Broder expressed the conventional wisdom on
Barack Obama's deliberations on the Afghanistan War, writing under the
headline "Enough Afghan Debate" (11/15/09):
It is evident from the length of this
deliberative process and from the flood of leaks that have emerged from
Kabul and Washington that the perfect course of action does not exist.
Given that reality, the urgent necessity is to make a decision--whether
or not it is right.
--The Racism Is Dead Award
WINNER: Richard Cohen, Washington Post
Post columnist Richard Cohen wrote (5/5/09): "The justification
for affirmative action gets weaker and weaker. Maybe once it was
possible to argue that some innocent people had to suffer in the name
of progress, but a glance at the White House strongly suggests that
things have changed. For most Americans, race has become supremely
irrelevant. Everyone knows this. Every poll shows this."
For the record, "every poll" does not actually show this; the vast
majority of Americans continues to recognize that racism is still a
problem. Cohen went on to write months later--still presumably living
in his racism-free world--that he did not believe Iran's claims about
its nuclear program, because "these Persians lie like a rug."
--The When in Doubt, Talk to the Boss Award
WINNER: Matt Lauer, NBC News
Today show host Lauer announced a special guest on April 15: "If
you really want to know how the economy is affecting the average
American, he's the guy to talk to." Who was Lauer talking about?
Wal-Mart CEO Mike Duke. The ensuing interview touched on the Employee
Free Choice Act, which Lauer noted was supported by many unions but
opposed by some large corporations--leading him to ask Duke, "What's
the truth?" Yes, look for "the truth" about a proposed pro-labor bill
from the new CEO of an adamantly anti-labor corporation.
--The Socialist Menace Award
WINNER: Michael Freedman, Newsweek
Newsweek's "We Are All Socialists Now" cover (2/16/09) certainly
turned heads, but one of the stories inside explained in more detail
the real threat. As senior editor Michael Freedman asked: "Have you
noticed that Barack Obama sounds more like the president of France
every day?"
The real problem, though, is what that's going to do to us Americans,
says Freedman: "If job numbers continue to look dismal, or get even
worse, an ever-greater number of people will start looking to the
government for support.... It's very easy to imagine a chorus of former
American individualists demanding cushy French-style pensions and free
British-style healthcare if their private stock funds fail to recover
and unemployment inches upward toward 10 percent and remains there."
Pensions and healthcare for all--this is worse than we thought!
--The Iraq All Over Again Award
WINNER: Too Many to Name
After the invasion of Iraq, countless journalists who had treated
allegations about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction as facts were
embarrassed when there were no such weapons to be found. So you'd think
they'd be more careful about thinly sourced claims that Iran is seeking
nuclear weapons. But in 2009, many journalists are still willing to
treat such allegations as facts.
-NBC's Chris Matthews (10/4/09): "As if Afghanistan were not enough, now there's Iran's move to get nuclear weapons."
-NBC's David Gregory (10/4/09). "Iran--will talks push that country to give up its nuclear weapons program?"
-Fox News Channel's Bill O'Reilly (9/25/09): "All hell
breaking loose as a new nuclear weapons facility is discovered in Iran,
proving the mullahs have been lying for years.... Iran's nuclear
weapons program has now reached critical mass. And worldwide conflict
is very possible. Friday, President Obama, British Prime Minister Brown
and French President Sarkozy revealed a secret nuclear weapons facility
located inside Iran."
Some even went further, turning allegations of a nuclear weapons program into the discovery of actual nuclear weapons:
-ABC's Good Morning America host Bill Weir (9/26/09):
"President Obama and a united front of world leaders charge Iran with
secretly building nuclear weapons."
--The Talking Like a Terrorist Award
WINNER: Thomas Friedman, New York Times
In a January 14 column, New York Times
superstar pundit Tom Friedman explained Israel's war on Lebanon as an
attempt to "educate" the enemy by killing civilians: The Israeli
strategy was to "inflict substantial property damage and collateral
casualties on Lebanon at large. It was not pretty, but it was logical."
Friedman added, "The only long-term source of deterrence was to exact
enough pain on the civilians--the families and employers of the
militants--to restrain Hezbollah in the future." That strategy of
targeting civilians to advance a political agenda is usually known as
terrorism; Osama bin Laden couldn't have explained it much better.
--The It Only Bothers Us Now Award
WINNER: Wall Street Journal editorial page
When Barack Obama only called on journalists from a list during a press conference, the Wall Street Journal
did not like the new protocol (2/12/09):"We doubt that President Bush,
who was notorious for being parsimonious with follow-ups, would have
gotten away with prescreening his interlocutors."
Actually, Bush was famous for calling only on reporters on an approved
list; as he joked at a press conference on the eve of the Iraq War
(3/6/03), "This is scripted."
--The No Comment Award
WINNERS: MSNBC's Mika Brzezinski and Rush Limbaugh
When asked by Politico (10/16/09) to name her favorite
guest, MSNBC host Mika Brzezinski named arch-conservative Pat Buchanan
"because he says what we are all thinking."
Rush Limbaugh on Obama (Fox News Channel, 1/21/09): "We are
being told that we have to hope he succeeds, that we have to bend over,
grab the ankles...because his father was black."
FAIR, the national media watch group, has been offering well-documented criticism of media bias and censorship since 1986. We work to invigorate the First Amendment by advocating for greater diversity in the press and by scrutinizing media practices that marginalize public interest, minority and dissenting viewpoints.
Data released by the University of Michigan and Gallup this week showed US consumer sentiment cratering even as stock markets hit record highs.
Multiple polls and surveys released in recent days have shown US consumer sentiment cratering—and all the while, the US stock market keeps hitting record highs.
The Kobeissi Letter, a financial newsletter, posted a graphic Saturday that matched consumer sentiment as measured by the University of Michigan's Surveys of Consumers with the performance of the S&P 500 stock index over a 30-year span.
The graphic shows that, up until around 2020, consumer sentiment matched stock market performance closely, although there was a large divergence between the two leading up to the 2008 financial crisis, where stocks briefly outperformed consumer sentiment before crashing downward as the housing bubble burst.
But throughout the last six years, the graphic shows, the S&P 500 has produced an almost continuous upward surge even as consumer sentiment spirals downward.
Absolutely incredible:
Over the last 6 years, the S&P 500 has risen +130% while US Consumer Sentiment has collapsed by -55%, to its lowest since data began in 1952.
We are witnessing the formation of the biggest wealth divide in modern history. https://t.co/XGMR6DfuNc pic.twitter.com/2w7cRvn7ok
— The Kobeissi Letter (@KobeissiLetter) May 23, 2026
"Absolutely incredible," commented Kobeissi Letter. "Over the last six years, the S&P 500 has risen +130% while US Consumer Sentiment has collapsed by -55%, to its lowest since data began in 1952. We are witnessing the formation of the biggest wealth divide in modern history."
Kobeissi Letter produced the graphic one day after the University of Michigan's latest survey found consumer sentiment hitting the lowest level on record.
Joanne Hsu, director of the survey, observed that "the cost of living continues to be a first-order concern, with 57% of consumers spontaneously mentioning that high prices were eroding their personal finances, up from 50% last month."
On the same day, Gallup published new data showing that Americans' economic confidence has fallen to its lowest level since October 2022, with just 16% of Americans rating the economy as excellent or good, and nearly half describing it as poor.
Axios reported on Saturday that even Republicans have been growing sour on the US economy, citing a recent poll from The Associated Press showing GOP approval of President Donald Trump on the economy to be at around 60%, down from 80% just three months ago.
"The growing GOP gloom could hardly come at a worse time for Trump and the party," Axios noted, "less than six months out from a midterm election that's likely to turn on the economy."
The gap between overall consumer sentiment and stock market performance also lines up with recent consumer spending trends. Data published by The Financial Times earlier this year showed that the top 10% of earners in the US now account for nearly half of all consumer spending, while the bottom 80% of earners now account for less than 40% of all consumer spending.
A February report from TD Economics economist Ksenia Bushmeneva noted that “the economic divide between America’s households at the top of the income spectrum and everyone else continued to widen last year,” as “upper-income households benefited from the still-robust wage growth, strong gains in equity markets, and better access to consumer credit.”
"Private equity is destroying our favorite baseball team, stripping them for parts," Democratic US Senate candidate Platner said in an ad that aired on the New England Sports Network.
Maine Democratic US Senate candidate Graham Platner on Saturday said that a campaign ad that aired during a Boston Red Sox game was "taken down" after it took aim at the team's ownership.
The ad in question features Platner discussing the role that private equity firms play in the US economy, including sports teams.
"Private equity is destroying our favorite baseball team, stripping them for parts," Platner says at the start of the ad. "Private equity is buying up our homes, our sports, and our lives. I will reverse the private equity curse."
Private equity is taking our homes. It's taking our hospitals. It's taking beloved local businesses and stripping them for parts.
And now private equity is running the Red Sox into the ground.
Our new ad ⬇️ pic.twitter.com/w7LapElpdA
— Graham Platner for Senate (@grahamformaine) May 22, 2026
Platner concludes the ad by saying that he approves this message "because I miss Mookie Betts," the star player whom the Red Sox traded to the Los Angeles Dodgers in 2020 in a deal that was widely decried by local fans as a salary dump.
According to Platner, his campaign began airing the ad Friday on the New England Sports Network (NESN), the cable TV station owned partially by Fenway Sports Group, the conglomerate that owns the Red Sox.
However, he said that "midway through the game the ad was taken down" by NESN, after which the Red Sox proceeded to blow a 4-0 lead, losing to the Minnesota Twins by a final score of 8-6.
Platner, an oyster farmer and upstart candidate who has never before held political office, became the Democratic Party's presumptive nominee for the 2026 US Senate race in Maine last month after his top rival, Democratic Maine Gov. Janet Mills, dropped out of the race.
In recent weeks, Platner has pivoted to challenging incumbent Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), who has held the seat since 1996 and is now running for her sixth term in office.
The policy change means "we could have families separated for months or years," said one expert.
Critics are slamming the Trump administration for implementing a new rule that foreigners who apply for green cards must do so from abroad.
US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) on Friday announced that foreigners currently in the US who want to establish permanent legal residency must first return to their countries of origin to apply for a green card.
This announcement broke with decades of US immigration policy, which made it possible for immigrants in the US to obtain green cards without having to leave the country.
Doug Rand, a former senior advisor at USCIS under President Joe Biden, said in an interview with The Associated Press that "the goal of this policy is very explicit," which is to block a path to citizenship "for as many people as possible."
Sarah Pierce, a former USCIS policy analyst, told The New York Times that the rule change could have particularly dire consequences to foreigners who are married to US citizens and will now have to apply for permanent residency from overseas.
"Our consular processing system through which they would have to apply is already overburdened," Pierce explained. "So that means we could have families separated for months or years."
Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, similarly noted that the new policy "could force people to leave their jobs, homes, and families for weeks or months, all at their own expense" just to stay in a country where they have already established roots.
Reichlin-Melnick said that the full scope of the policy isn't yet clear because there are several unknown details about how broadly it will be applied, but added that "in the meantime, hundreds of thousands of immigrants now have to worry about upending their lives to get a legal status that they are entitled to under our laws."
Drop Site News reporter Ryan Grim argued that the new policy rips the mask off Trump administration claims that they aren't opposed to all immigration, they simply want to reduce undocumented immigration.
"The talking point that we do want legal immigration, we just want people to get in line and follow the rules, is BS," Grim commented. "This is an attempt to blow up the line, blow up the rules, and make it insanely difficult to immigrate legally."
Rep. Chuy García (D-Ill.) echoed Grim's comments by pointing out that the new policy shows the Trump administration's disdain for immigration overall.
"This new policy will force thousands of LEGAL immigrants, including spouses of US citizens, to leave their homes, families, and jobs for weeks or even months to get their green card outside the US," said García. "This is an absurd and cruel policy."
Rep. Adriano Espaillat (D-NY), chairman of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, condemned the new policy for targeting "students, scientists, entrepreneurs, spouses of US citizens, and other individuals following legal immigration processes."
"Aspiring lawful permanent residents are valued members of our communities, workforce, and economy," Espaillat emphasized. "I will continue fighting to protect the rights of aspiring green card holders and immigrant families."