April, 13 2009, 01:43pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Renee Willis, Vice President for Field and Communications,media@nlihc.org,Ph.,202-662-1530 x. 247
Study Finds That Rents for Modest Studio and 1-Bedroom Housing Units Are Higher Than Monthly Income or People With Disabilities
TAC and CCD Housing Task Force release new study documenting extreme housing affordability crisis for the most vulnerable people with disabilities
WASHINGTON
Across the United States in 2008, people with
disabilities with the lowest incomes faced an extreme housing affordability
crisis as rents for moderately priced studio and one-bedroom apartments soared
above their entire monthly income. The national average rent for a one-bedroom
unit climbed to $749 per month in 2008 - higher than $667, the average monthly
income of over 4 million people with disabilities.
These shocking statistics are some
of the important findings included in Priced
Out in 2008 - a study of the severe housing affordability
problems of people with disabilities who must survive on incomes far below the
federal poverty line. The study compares the federal Supplemental Security Income
(SSI) payments of people with serious and long-term disabilities to U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Fair Market Rents for modestly
priced rental units. Priced Out
is published every two years by the Technical Assistance Collaborative (TAC)
and the Consortium for Citizens with Disabilities (CCD) Housing Task Force to
shine a spotlight on our nation's most compelling - and least
understood - housing affordability crisis.
In 2008, 219 housing market areas
across 41 states had modest one-bedroom rents that exceeded 100 percent of
monthly SSI, including 25 communities with rents over 150 percent. Between
2006-2008, the number of market areas with modest rents higher than SSI rose
from 164 to 219 - a 34 percent increase. For the first time, there were 3
housing market areas - Honolulu (HI), Columbia City (MD), and Nantucket
County (MA) - where SSI recipients needed to spend over 200 percent of
their income for a modest 1-bedroom housing unit - not only an
impossibility, but absurd.
Perhaps the most shocking
revelation in Priced Out in 2008
is the precipitous and relentless decline in housing affordability for SSI
recipients since 1998 when the first edition of Priced Out was developed. The amount of monthly SSI income
needed to rent a modest one-bedroom unit has risen an astonishing 62 percent from
69 percent of SSI in 1998 to 112.1 percent of SSI in 2008. The root cause of
the nation's most severe - and most hidden - housing crisis
is clearly revealed in the painful statistics included in the 2008 edition of Priced Out.
As stated by Congressman Barney
Frank in the Foreword to Priced Out,
"The lack of adequate housing is a serious obstacle to a decent life for
anyone. It can be particularly troublesome for people dealing with
disabilities, for whom the physical and emotional stress of a lack of decent
shelter are added burdens for people already doing their best to deal with
difficulty."
Discretionary state SSI
supplements provided by states are not the solution to the housing
affordability problems experienced by people with disabilities living on SSI
payments. Even in the State of Alaska - which had the highest state SSI
supplement in 2008 of $362 and a total monthly SSI payment of $999 -
people with disabilities receiving SSI still needed to pay 80.6 percent of
their monthly income to rent a modest one-bedroom unit.
While some progress has been made
by Federal officials responding to creating additional affordable housing
resources, a bolder action is essential to inaugurate a new era in housing
policy that places the housing needs of people with disabilities within the
mainstream of national housing policy. TAC and the CCD Housing Task Force urge
the federal government to take the following actions:
-
Enact Section 811 legislation
that will create at least 5,000 new units of permanent supportive housing each
year. -
Provide 10,000 new Housing Choice
Vouchers for People with Disabilities in HUD's annual budget. -
Support the
Administration's proposal to appropriate at least $1 billion in funding
for the National Affordable Housing Trust Fund. -
Remove Barriers to Permanent
Supportive Housing in the LIHTC Program. -
Facilitate a Coordinated
Disability Housing Policy Across the Federal Government. -
Reinvigorate Fair Housing
Enforcement.
By implementing these
recommendations, the federal government will send a powerful message of
inclusion to state and local communities, along with the housing resources
necessary to finally begin to achieve the vision of community integration for
people with disabilities first articulated almost 20 years ago through the ADA.
A copy of Priced Out in 2008 can be found online at https://www.tacinc.org/pubs/pricedout/2008.html. For
more information about Priced Out,
please contact Emily Cooper at ecooper@tacinc.org
or (617) 266-5657 x123.
The National Low Income Housing Coalition is dedicated solely to ending America's affordable housing crisis. Established in 1974 by Cushing N. Dolbeare, NLIHC educates, organizes and advocates to ensure decent, affordable housing within healthy neighborhoods for everyone. NLIHC provides up-to-date information, formulates policy and educates the public on housing needs and the strategies for solutions.
LATEST NEWS
Asked If He Must Uphold the US Constitution, Trump Says: 'I Don't Know'
"I'm not a lawyer," the president said in a newly aired interview.
May 04, 2025
U.S. President Donald Trump refused in an interview released Sunday to affirm that the nation's Constitution affords due process to citizens and noncitizens alike and that he, as president, must uphold that fundamental right.
"I don't know, I'm not a lawyer," Trump told NBC's Kristen Welker, who asked if the president agrees with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio's statement that everyone on U.S. soil is entitled to due process.
When Welker pointed to the Fifth Amendment—which states that "no person shall be... deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law"—Trump again replied that he's unsure and suggested granting due process to the undocumented immigrants he wants to deport would be too burdensome.
"We'd have to have a million or 2 million or 3 million trials," Trump said, echoing a sentiment that his vice president expressed last month.
Asked whether he needs to "uphold the Constitution of the United States as president," Trump replied, "I don't know."
Watch:
WELKER: The 5th Amendment says everyone deserves due process
TRUMP: It might say that, but if you're talking about that, then we'd have to have a million or two million or three million trials pic.twitter.com/FMZQ7O9mTP
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) May 4, 2025
Trump, who similarly deferred to "the lawyers" when asked recently about his refusal to bring home wrongly deported Maryland resident Kilmar Abrego Garcia, has unlawfully cited the Alien Enemies Act to swiftly remove undocumented immigrants from the U.S. without due process. Federal agents have also arrested and detained students, academics, and a current and former judge in recent weeks, heightening alarm over the administration's authoritarian tactics.
CNNreported Friday that the administration has "been examining whether it can label some suspected cartel and gang members inside the U.S. as 'enemy combatants' as a possible way to detain them more easily and limit their ability to challenge their imprisonment."
"Trump has expressed extreme frustration with federal courts halting many of those migrants' deportations, amid legal challenges questioning whether they were being afforded due process," the outlet added. "By labeling the migrants as enemy combatants, they would have fewer rights, the thinking goes."
Some top administration officials have publicly expressed disdain for the constitutional right to due process. Stephen Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff, wrote in a social media post last month that "the judicial process is for Americans" and "immediate deportation" is for undocumented immigrants.
The New Republic's Greg Sargent wrote in a column Saturday that "Miller appears to want Trump to have the power to declare undocumented immigrants to be terrorists and gang members by fiat; to have the power to absurdly decree them members of a hostile nation's invading army, again by fiat; and then to have quasi-unlimited power to remove them, unconstrained by any court."
"The more transparency we have gained into the rot of corruption and bad faith at the core of this whole saga, the worse it has come to look," Sargent continued. "Trump himself is exposing it all for what it truly is: the stuff of Mad Kings."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Republicans Set to Give Self-Described 'DOGE Person' Keys to Social Security Agency
"A vote for Trump's Social Security Commissioner is a vote to destroy Social Security," warned one advocacy group.
May 04, 2025
The U.S. Senate on Tuesday is set to hold a confirmation vote for President Donald Trump's pick to lead the Social Security Administration—an ultra-rich former Wall Street executive who has aligned himself with the Elon Musk-led slash-and-burn effort at agencies across the federal government.
"I am fundamentally a DOGE person," Frank Bisignano told CNBC in March, amplifying concerns that he would take his experience in the financial technology industry—where he was notorious for inflicting mass layoffs while raking in a huge compensation package—to SSA, which is already facing large-scale staffing cuts that threaten the delivery of benefits for millions of Americans.
In an email on Saturday, the progressive advocacy group Social Security Works warned that Bisignano "is not the cure to the DOGE-manufactured chaos at the Social Security Administration."
"In fact, he is part of it, and, if confirmed, would make it even worse," the group added. "We're not going down without a fight. Republicans may have a majority in the Senate, but we're going to rally to send a message: A vote for Trump's Social Security Commissioner is a vote to destroy Social Security!"
"If Mr. Bisignano can get away with lying before he's even in place as commissioner, who knows what else he'll be able to get away with once he's in office."
Bisignano, the CEO of payment processing giant Fiserv, has been accused during his confirmation process of lying under oath about his ties to DOGE, which has worked to seize control of Social Security data as part of a purported effort to root out "fraud" that advocates say is virtually nonexistent.
As The Washington Post reported in March, Bisignano testified to the Senate Finance Committee that "he has had no contact" with DOGE.
"But Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), the top Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, said the claim is 'not true,' citing an account the senator said he received from a senior Social Security official who recently left the agency," the Post noted. "The former official... described 'numerous contacts Mr. Bisignano made with the agency since his nomination,' including 'frequent' conversations with senior executives."
Wyden pointed again to the former SSA official's statement in a floor speech Thursday in opposition to Bisignano, saying that "according to the whistleblower, Mr. Bisignano personally appointed his Wall Street buddy, Michael Russo, to be the leader of DOGE's team at Social Security."
The Oregon Democrat said Republicans on the Senate Finance Committee refused his request for a bipartisan meeting with the whistleblower to evaluate their accusations unless "we agreed to hand over any information received from the whistleblower directly to the nominee and the Trump administration."
"All Americans should be concerned that a nominee for a position of public trust like commissioner of Social Security is accused of lying about his actions at the agency and that efforts to bring this important information to light are being thwarted," Wyden said Thursday. "If Mr. Bisignano can get away with lying before he's even in place as commissioner, who knows what else he'll be able to get away with once he's in office."
"He could lie by denying any American who paid their Social Security taxes the benefits they've earned, claiming some phony pretense," the senator warned. "He could lie about how sensitive personal information is being mishandled—or worse, exploited for commercial use."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Chilling Attempt to Normalize Fascism': Groups Decry Trump Official's Arrest Threats
"We must not allow intimidation and authoritarian tactics to take root in our political system."
May 04, 2025
A coalition of advocacy organizations on Saturday expressed support for Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers and warned that the Trump border czar's threat against the Democratic leader marks a "dangerous escalation" of the administration's assault on the rule of law across the United States.
The groups—including All Voting Is Local and the ACLU of Wisconsin—said in a joint statement that Evers' guidance to state officials on how to handle being confronted by federal agents was "a prudent measure aimed at ensuring compliance with state and federal laws while protecting the rights of state employees."
The suggestion by Tom Homan, a leader of President Donald Trump's mass deportation campaign, that Evers could be arrested for issuing such guidance undermines "the foundational principles of our democracy, including the separation of powers, the rule of law, and the right of state governments to operate without undue federal interference," the groups said Saturday.
"To threaten our governor over his legal directive is gross overreach by our federal government, and it is not occurring in a vacuum," they continued, warning that the administration's rhetoric and actions represent a "chilling attempt to normalize fascism."
"Similar occurrences are happening across the nation, including within our academic systems," the groups added. "If we do not reject these actions now, states and other institutions will only lose more and more of their autonomy and power. This is exactly why we underscore Gov. Evers' claim that this event is 'chilling.'"
The threats against Gov. Evers in Wisconsin undermine the foundational principles of our democracy: the separation of powers, the rule of law, and the right of state governments to operate without undue federal interference. We must reject this overreach. allvotingislocal.org/statements/w...
[image or embed]
— All Voting is Local (@allvotingislocal.bsky.social) May 3, 2025 at 9:58 AM
Trump administration officials and the president himself have repeatedly threatened state and local officials as the White House rushes ahead with its lawless mass deportation campaign, which has ensnared tens of thousands of undocumented immigrants and at least over a dozen U.S. citizens—including children.
In an executive order signed late last month, Trump accused "some state and local officials" of engaging in a "lawless insurrection" against the federal government by refusing to cooperate with the administration's deportation efforts.
But as Temple University law professor Jennifer Lee recently noted, localities "can legally decide not to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement."
"Cities, like states, have constitutional protections against being forced to administer or enforce federal programs," Lee wrote. "The Trump administration cannot force any state or local official to assist in enforcing federal immigration law."
Administration officials have also leveled threats against members of Congress, with Homan suggesting earlier this year that he would refer Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) to the U.S. Justice Department for holding a webinar informing constituents of their rights.
During a town hall on Friday, Ocasio-Cortez dared Homan to do so.
"To that I say: Come for me," she said to cheers from the audience. "We need to challenge them. So don't let them intimidate you."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular