October, 29 2008, 01:08pm EDT
ACLU Executive Director Makes Personal Plea Opposing California Proposition 8
Ballot Initiative Would Outlaw Same-Sex Marriage
NEW YORK
Anthony
D. Romero, Executive Director of the American Civil Liberties Union,
sent a personal plea Tuesday urging people to encourage their friends
and family in California to fight the passage of Proposition 8. The
ballot initiative on the California general election ballot on November
4 would amend the state constitution to strip same-sex couples of the
right to marry.
In the note, Romero describes his
personal journey coming out as a gay man and his, and the ACLU's,
mission to fight discrimination. The note says: "We recognize that
injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere ... Given what's
at stake in the outcome of this election, I am personally appealing to
you for help to fight the forces of intolerance from carrying the day
in California next Tuesday."
The full letter is as follows:
Dear ACLU Supporter,
I'm angry and heartsick about what may happen in California on November 4th.
In the most personal way possible, I'm writing to ask you for a favor:
help us ensure that gay couples all across California keep their
fundamental right to marriage - the basic right to be treated just like
anybody else.
I hope you will forgive the indulgence when I speak from the heart and tell you my personal story.
You see, I grew up in a loving and supportive household, where my
family believed I could be anything I chose - anything except being an
openly gay man. Neither of my parents finished high school, and yet,
they believed I could accomplish all I set out to do as I went off to
Princeton University and Stanford Law School.
They got me through the toughest of times, scrimped and saved, and
always believed that failure wasn't in the cards for me. They had more
faith in me than I often had in myself. Whenever my parents visited me
at Princeton, my Dad would slip a $20 bill in my pocket when my Mom
wasn't looking. I never had the courage to tell him that the $20
wouldn't go very far towards my bills, books and tuition. But, it was
his support and belief in me that sustained me more than the tens of
thousands of dollars I received in scholarships.
When I finished college, they were hugely proud of my - and their -
accomplishments. That was until I told them I was gay and wanted to
live life as an openly gay man.
Though I always knew I was gay, I didn't come out to them for many
years, as I was afraid of losing the love and support that had allowed
me to succeed against all odds. When I did tell them, they cried and
even shouted. I ended up leaving their home that night to spend a
sleepless night on a friend's sofa. We were all heartbroken.
When my Mom and I spoke later, my Mom said, "But, Antonio (that's the
name she uses with me), hasn't your life been hard enough? People will
hurt you and hate you because of this." She, of course, was right - as
gay and lesbian people didn't only suffer discrimination from working
class, Puerto Rican Catholics, but from the broader society. She felt
that I had escaped the public housing projects in the Bronx, only to
suffer another prejudice - one that might be harder to beat - as the
law wasn't on my side. At the time, it felt like her own homophobia.
Now I see there was also a mother's love and a real desire to protect
her son. She was not wrong at a very fundamental level. She knew that
treating gay and lesbian people like second class citizens - people who
may be worthy of "tolerance, " as Sarah Palin asserts, but not of
equality - was and still is the last socially-acceptable prejudice.
Even before I came out to them, I struggled to accept myself as a gay
man. I didn't want to lose the love of my family, and I wanted a family
of my own - however I defined it. I ultimately chose to find my own way
in life as a gay man. This wasn't as easy as it sounds even though it
was the mid-1980s. I watched loved ones and friends die of AIDS. I was
convinced I would never see my 40th birthday, much less find a partner
whom I could marry.
As years passed, my Mom, Dad and I came to a peace, and they came to
love and respect me for who I am. They even came to defend my right to
live with equality and dignity - often fighting against the homophobia
they heard among their family and friends and in church.
The right to be equal citizens and to marry whomever we wish -
unimaginable to me when I first came out - is now ours to lose in
California unless we stand up for what's right. All of us must fight
against what's wrong. In my 43 short years of life, I have seen gay and
lesbian people go from pariahs and objects of legally-sanctioned
discrimination to being on the cusp of full equality. The unimaginable
comes true in our America if we make it happen. But, it requires effort
and struggle.
One of the things I love about the ACLU is that it's an organization
that understands we are all in this together. We recognize that
injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.
Given what's at stake in the outcome of this election, I am personally
appealing to you for help to fight the forces of intolerance from
carrying the day in California next Tuesday.
If you have friends and family in California, please contact them right now, and ask them to vote NO on Proposition 8. You can send them a message here.
We need to make sure people keep in mind that gay people are part of
every family and every community - that like everyone else, gay people
want the same rights to commit to their partners, to take care of each
other and to take responsibility for each other. We shouldn't deny
that, and we shouldn't write discrimination into any constitution in
any state. Certainly, we can't let that happen in California after the
highest court in the state granted gay and lesbian people their full
equality.
Unfortunately, due to a vicious, deceitful $30 million advertising
blitz, the supporters of Prop 8 may be within days of taking that
fundamental right away.
To stop the forces of discrimination from succeeding, we have to win
over conflicted voters who aren't sure they're ready for gay marriage
but who are also uncomfortable going into a voting booth and stripping
away people's rights. With the ACLU contributing time, energy and
millions of dollars to the effort, we're working hard to reach those
key voters before next Tuesday.
If you have friends and family in California, please contact them right
now, and ask them to vote NO on Proposition 8. Share this email with
them. Call them. Direct them to our website for more information.
Don't let other young people grow up to be afraid to be who they are
because of the discrimination and prejudice they might face. Let them
see a future that the generation before them couldn't even dream of - a
future as full and equal citizens of the greatest democracy on earth.
As Martin Luther King, Jr. reminded us, "The arc of the moral universe
is long, but it bends toward justice." As we strive to defeat Prop 8
and the injustice it represents, the ACLU is trying to make that arc a
little shorter.
On behalf of my Mom and family, and on behalf of all the people who
will never face legally-sanctioned discrimination, I thank you for
being part of this struggle and for doing everything you can to help.
It is a privilege and honor to have you as allies in this fight for dignity and equality.
With enormous appreciation,
Anthony D. Romero
Executive Director
ACLU
P.S. All the polls show that the
vote on Prop 8 could go either way. By making just a few calls or
sending just a few emails, you could help make the difference. Please,
don't let this fundamental right be taken away. Send an eCard to everyone you know in California.
The American Civil Liberties Union was founded in 1920 and is our nation's guardian of liberty. The ACLU works in the courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to all people in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States.
(212) 549-2666LATEST NEWS
New Progressive Caucus Chair Ready to 'Fight Billionaires, Grifters, and Republican Frauds'
"Our caucus will make sure the Democratic Party stands up to corporate interests for working people," said Rep. Greg Casar.
Dec 05, 2024
The Congressional Progressive Caucus on Thursday elected its leaders for the next term, including Rep. Greg Casar as chair.
"The members of the Progressive Caucus know how to fight billionaires, grifters, and Republican frauds in Congress. Our caucus will make sure the Democratic Party stands up to corporate interests for working people," said Casar (D-Texas), who will replace term-limited Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.).
"I'm honored to build on the legacy of Chair Jayapal," Casar continued. "I've fought back against extremist, egocentric autocrats in Texas for my entire adult life. The Democratic Party must directly take on Trump, and it'll be CPC members boldly leading the way and putting working people first."
Casar, who is currently the CPC whip and ran unopposed, will be joined for the 119th Congress by Reps. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) as deputy chair and Jesús "Chuy" García (D-Ill.) as whip.
"The Congressional Progressive Caucus has always served as an incredible vehicle for transformative change, justice, and movement building," noted Omar. "I am honored to have the support of my colleagues to serve another term as the deputy chair of the Progressive Caucus. Over the next term, we are going to fight to build an inclusive movement that meets the moment."
García said that "I am proud to join incoming Chair Casar, Deputy Chair Omar, and all members of the newly elected executive board as we prepare for the 119th Congress—in which I believe the role the CPC plays will be more critical than ever."
"We are a caucus that gives platform to ideas deeply popular across the political spectrum, and a caucus that builds diverse coalitions to get things done," he continued. "I look forward to working with my colleagues in Congress and partners across the country who believe in people-centered policies rooted in equity and justice for all."
The CPC, first led by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) in 1991, when he was still in the U.S. House of Representatives, has nearly 100 members. The new caucus leaders are set to begin their terms on January 3 and will face not only a Republican-controlled House and Senate, but also U.S. President-elect Donald Trump, who is set to be sworn in on January 20.
"It is my great honor to pass the torch to the next class of elected leadership of the Progressive Caucus: My dear friends and trusted colleagues Reps. Greg Casar, Ilhan Omar, and Chuy García," said Jayapal.
"I was proud to establish term limits when I became chair in 2018, and have full confidence in the abilities of our new class to lead this caucus in the fight against the worst of the incoming Trump administration while rebuilding our party with a focus on economic justice for working people," she added. "I will be cheering these three new leaders and our new vice chairs at every turn as chair emerita come next year, and my heart is very full knowing we will have them at the helm of the CPC."
Speaking with NBC News on Wednesday, 35-year-old Casar said that "the progressive movement needs to change. We need to re-emphasize core economic issues every time some of these cultural war issues are brought up."
"So when we hear Republicans attacking queer Americans again, I think the progressive response needs to be that a trans person didn't deny your health insurance claim, a big corporation did—with Republican help," he explained. "We need to connect the dots for people that the Republican Party obsession with these culture war issues is driven by Republicans' desire to distract voters and have them look away while Republicans pick their pocket."
According to NBC:
That means the Democratic Party needs to "shed off some of its more corporate elements," to sharpen the economic-populist contrast with Republicans and not let voters equate the two parties, he said. He predicted Trump and the Republican-led Congress will offer plenty of opportunities to drive that distinction, including when it pursues an extension of tax cuts for upper earners.
"The core of the Republican Party is about helping Wall Street and billionaires. And I think we have to call out the game," Casar said. "The Democratic Party, at its best, can hold people or can have inside of its tent people across geography, across race and across ideology. Because we're all in the same boat when it comes to making sure that you can retire with dignity, that your kids can go to school, that you can buy a house."
Others—including Sanders, who sought the Democratic nomination for president in 2016 and 2020—have issued similar calls since Democrats lost the White House and Senate in last month's elections.
"In the recent elections, just 150 billionaire families spent nearly $2 billion to get their candidates elected," Sanders said Saturday. "Our job in the coming months and years is clear. We must defeat the oligarchs and create an economy and government that works for all, not just the few."
On Thursday, both Sanders and Jayapal, who have led the congressional fight for Medicare for All, reiterated calls for a single-payer healthcare program in response to a social media post by Elon Musk, who is set to co-lead Trump's forthcoming Department of Government Efficiency with fellow billionaire Vivek Ramaswamy.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Billionaire Jeff Bezos Wants to 'Help' Trump Gut Regulations
"Shockingly another one of the richest guys on Earth wants to defund our government and scrap regulations."
Dec 05, 2024
Billionaire Amazon founder Jeff Bezos on Wednesday expressed his optimism about U.S. President-elect Donald Trump's next term and suggested he would "help" the Republican gut regulations.
"If we're talking about Trump, I think it's very interesting, I'm actually very optimistic this time around... I'm very hopeful about this—he seems to have a lot of energy around reducing regulation," Bezos told The New York Times' Andrew Ross Sorkin during the newspaper's DealBook Summit.
"And my point of view, if I can help him do that, I'm gonna help him, because we do have too much regulation in this country. This country is so set up to grow," he continued, suggesting that regulatory cuts would solve the nation's economic problems.
After complaining about the burden of regulations, Bezos added, "I'm very optimistic that President Trump is serious about this regulatory agenda and I think he has a good chance of succeeding."
The comments came during a discussion about Bezos' ownership of The Washington Post, which also addressed the billionaire's recent controversial decisions to block the newspaper's drafted endorsement of Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris and have it stop endorsing presidential candidates.
Bezos said Wednesday that he is "very proud" of the move, that the Post "is going to continue to cover all presidents very aggressively," and the decision did not result from fears about Trump targeting his companies.
As Inc.reported Thursday: "Trump had railed against Bezos and his companies, including Amazon and The Washington Post, during his first term. In 2019, Amazon argued in a court case that Trump's bias against the company harmed its chances of winning a $10 billion Pentagon contract. The Biden administration later pursued a contract with both Amazon and Microsoft."
Bezos owns Blue Origin, an aerospace company and a competitor to Elon Musk's SpaceX. Musk—the world's richest person, followed by Bezos, according to the Bloomberg and Forbes trackers—has been appointed to lead Trump's forthcoming Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) with fellow billionaire Vivek Ramaswamy.
Bezos' remarks at the Times summit led Fortune's Brooke Seipel to suggest that he may be the next billionaire to join DOGE.
Musk and Ramaswamy headed to Capitol Hill on Thursday to speak with GOP lawmakers about their plans for the government.
"Despite its name, the Department of Government Efficiency is neither a department nor part of the government, which frees Musk and Ramaswamy from having to go through the typical ethics and background checks required for federal employment," The Associated Pressnoted. "They said they will not be paid for their work."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Jayapal, Sanders Offer Answer to Elon Musk's Healthcare Cost Question
"The most efficiently run healthcare systems in the world," said National Nurses United, "have been proven time and time again to be single-payer systems."
Dec 05, 2024
Two of the United States' most outspoken critics of the for-profit health system welcomed billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk's criticism of the country's sky-high healthcare spending—and suggested that Musk, a potential Cabinet member in the incoming Trump administration, join the call for Medicare for All.
A social media post by Musk drew the attention of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), who reintroduced legislation to expand Medicare coverage to every American last year and have long called for the for-profit healthcare system to be replaced by a government-run program, or single-payer system, like those in every other wealthy country in the world.
"Shouldn't the American people be getting getting their money's worth?" asked Musk, posting a graph from the nonpartisan Peter G. Peterson Foundation that showed how per capita administrative healthcare costs in the U.S. reached $1,055 in 2020—hundreds of dollars more than countries including Germany, Canada, and the United Kingdom.
"Yes," said Sanders, repeating statistics he has frequently shared while condemning the country's $4.5 trillion health system in which private, for-profit health insurance companies increasingly refuse to pay for healthcare services and Americans pay an average of $1,142 in out-of-pocket expenses each year.
"We waste hundreds of billions a year on healthcare administrative expenses that make insurance CEOs and wealthy stockholders incredibly rich while 85 million Americans go uninsured or underinsured," the senator added. "Healthcare is a human right. We need Medicare for All."
Jayapal added that she has "a solution" to exorbitant healthcare costs in the U.S.: "It's called Medicare for All."
Musk has been nominated by President-elect Donald Trump to lead a new federal agency that he wants to create called the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Sanders has expressed support for some of the agency's mission, saying its plan to "cut wasteful expenditures" could be put to use at the Department of Defense, which has repeatedly failed audits of its annual spending.
But Sanders has sharply criticized the economic system and business practices that have helped make Musk the richest person in the world, with a net worth of $343.8 billion.
Another progressive, David Sirota of The Lever, suggested last month that DOGE could be used to eliminate the nation's vast health insurance bureaucracy and replace it with Medicare for All, pointing to a 2020 report from the Republican-controlled Congressional Budget Office that showed that a government-run healthcare program would save the country an estimated $650 billion each year.
"Such a system could achieve this in part because Medicare's 2% administrative costs are so much lower than the 17% administrative costs of the bureaucratic, profit-extracting private health insurance industry," wrote Sirota.
Musk drew the attention of Medicare for All advocates amid online discussion about the greed of for-profit insurance giants.
The killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson on Wednesday prompted discussion about widespread anger over the U.S. healthcare system, and following public outcry, Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield on Thursday backtracked on a decision to stop paying for surgical anesthesia if a procedure goes beyond a certain time limit. The American Society of Anesthesiologists said that if Anthem stopped fully paying doctors who provide pain management for complicated surgeries, patients would be left paying hundreds or thousands of dollars in out-of-pocket costs.
National Nurses United, which advocates for a government-run healthcare system, urged Musk and others who support the broadly popular proposal to "join the movement to win Medicare for All."
"The most efficiently run healthcare systems in the world," said the group, "have been proven time and time again to be single-payer systems."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular