October, 13 2008, 10:10am EDT
Collateral Damage: Organic Farmers Being Squeezed Out
Corporate Takeover Threatens Farmers, Mission
CORNUCOPIA, Wis.
Groups representing
organic farmers and their customers are calling on consumers to help save the organic
industry by exclusively patronizing dairies, and other brands, that uphold the
spirit and letter of the federal organic law. They claim the acquisition
of major brands by corporate agribusiness, and their dependence on factory
farms, threatens to force families off the land and deprive consumers of the
superior nutritional food they think they are paying for.
"This
could be the end of the organic industry as we know it," said Mark A.
Kastel, codirector of The Cornucopia Institute, widely recognized as the
organic industry's most aggressive farming watchdog. The Institute
reports that the proliferation of industrial-scale dairies has bloated the
organic milk supply, inflated the price of feed for dairy cows, and resulted in
a financial crisis for family farmers, even as the market continues to
grow-defying the general economic downturn.
The
Wisconsin-based Cornucopia Institute announced today that it has filed formal
legal complaints, seeking USDA enforcement, against two more operators of giant
industrial dairies. The farm policy research group claims they are
"masquerading as organic." Cornucopia also announced that it
has released an update to its popular organic scorecard helping consumers make
informed choices in the marketplace in selecting dairy brands that represent
the highest level of organic practices.
The
dairy segment, second only behind fresh fruits and vegetables, represents
nearly $4 billion worth of annual revenue or about 15 to 20% of the organic
industry.
For
eight years, participants in the organic community-farmers, consumers,
retailers, and other stakeholders-have fought the industrialization of
organic milk by giant corporations and factory farms milking as many as 10,000
animals. Although the National Organic Standards Board, the expert panel
set up by Congress to advise the Secretary of Agriculture, has voted to crack
down on industry scofflaws five times since 2000, Bush administration officials
have refused to act.
"This
cynical corporate takeover of organic farming, an agriculture segment that is
held in high regard by consumers, resulting in a highly successful and growing
market, has been aided and abetted by the gross disregard of the USDA's
enforcement responsibilities," said Merrill Clark, a certified organic livestock
producer and former member of the USDA's National Organic Standards Board.
Cornucopia's
legal complaints to the USDA targeted Phoenix-based Shamrock Farms, which
operates an industrial dairy milking approximately 11,000 cows in the desert 54
miles south of their plant, and the Rockview Farms Dairy of Downey, California,
the operator of another giant industrial dairy in the desert north of Las
Vegas, Nevada.
"When
Cornucopia staff visited Shamrock's operation we found inadequate,
overgrazed pasture adjacent to their milking facility, and we were told by
Shamrock employees that the confined cows had not been out in weeks,"
Kastel stated. Federal organic regulations require that cows be grazed.
"Not
only do these confinement operations create an unfair competitive playing
field, discriminating against all the family farmers who work hard to fulfill
both the letter and intent of the national organic standards, they also are
denying the consumer the extra healthful nutrients that university studies have
verified as being present in the milk of cows that graze fresh green
grass," said Kathie Arnold, president of the Northeast Organic Dairy
Producers Alliance.
Cornucopia's
filing of a legal action against Rockview Farms Dairy chronicled similar
alleged violations of organic livestock management rules. Rockview Farms,
of Downey, California,
produces their organic milk at a giant industrial farm in the Nevada
desert near Amargosa Valley, just northwest of Las Vegas. Its milk is marketed under
the Good Heart label.
"Just
like Shamrock, Rockview's phony-baloney organic farm primarily confines their
cattle in a massive feedlot milking both organic and conventional cows,"
Kastel affirmed. "This outfit is everything that organics
isn't -- in addition to confining their cattle, Rockview has been accused of
environmental damage and even irrigates some of their land with waste products
from a municipal sewage plant."
One
way that Cornucopia is fighting unethical corporate players like Shamrock,
Rockview, and the industry's largest dairy, Dean Foods, which markets
organic milk under the Horizon label, is to educate and engage consumers.
Cornucopia
just updated their organic dairy scorecard, which ranks every brand in the
country-large and small-based on their ethical approach to their
milk production. It contains 107 organic brands covering fluid milk,
yogurt, cheese, butter, and ice cream.
"We
have encouraged our 900,000 members and collaborators to use Cornucopia's
research when making their purchasing decisions for organic dairy
products," said Ronnie Cummins, director of the Organic Consumers
Association (OCA). In the past, OCA has called on its membership to
boycott the Horizon brand and milk produced by Aurora Dairy, the nation's
largest manufacturer of private-label organic milk.
"We
are carefully examining Cornucopia's new findings and are likely to ramp up our
pressure campaign to force these bad actors to change their business models or
to exit the industry," Cummins added.
The
good news for consumers, according to the Cornucopia study, is that 85% of all
name-brand marketers are respecting both the letter and spirit of the federal
organic law.
Besides
farmers concerned with their livelihoods, consumers have also voiced dissatisfaction
with the USDA's lack of enforcement by the alleged organic scofflaws.
A
growing body of scientific literature clearly indicates that legitimately
produced organic milk, from pasture-based animals, offers distinct nutritional
advantages. This year Newcastle
University reported that
milk from grazing cows on organic farms contains significantly higher amounts
of beneficial fatty acids, antioxidants, and vitamins.
According
to Gillian Butler, livestock project manager for the Newcastle University
study, their research "clearly shows that on organic farms, letting cows
graze naturally, using forage-based diet, is the most important reason for the
differences in the composition between organic and conventional milk."
"I know I'm not the only consumer who
would feel ripped off to know that when I spend extra money on organic milk for
my family that it comes from giant factory farms," said Andrea
Rae of San Diego, Calif.
The
Cornucopia Institute's updated organic dairy survey and scorecard can be
found at www.cornucopia.org. And
photo galleries containing images of the Rockview and Shamrock factory farm
dairies can also be viewed on the Cornucopia web page.
The Cornucopia Institute, a Wisconsin-based nonprofit farm policy research group, is dedicated to the fight for economic justice for the family-scale farming community. Their Organic Integrity Project acts as a corporate and governmental watchdog assuring that no compromises to the credibility of organic farming methods and the food it produces are made in the pursuit of profit.
LATEST NEWS
Israeli Settlers, Soldiers 'Wiping Palestinian Communities Off the Map' in the West Bank
"While the attention of the world is focused on Gaza, abuses in the West Bank, fueled by decades of impunity and complacency among Israel's allies, are soaring."
Apr 17, 2024
Israeli soldiers have either passively watched or participated in the uprooting of at least seven communities in the West Bank since October of last year, Human Rights Watch said Wednesday in a new report documenting surging settler violence in the occupied Palestinian territory.
The rights group interviewed dozens of eyewitnesses and examined video footage showing harassment and other abuse of Palestinians in the West Bank "by men in Israeli military uniforms carrying M16 assault rifles."
Following the Hamas-led October 7 attack on southern Israel, the Israeli military drafted more than 5,000 settlers into "regional defense" units in the West Bank, Haaretzreported earlier this year. The Israeli newspaper noted that "alongside this large-scale mobilization, the [Israel Defense Forces] has distributed some 7,000 weapons to the battalions as well as to settlers who were not recruited into the army but received them as civilians whom the army considers eligible to carry military arms."
HRW's investigation found that "armed settlers, with the active participation of army units, repeatedly cut off road access and raided Palestinian communities, detained, assaulted, and tortured residents, chased them out of their homes and off their lands at gunpoint or coerced them to leave with death threats, and blocked them from taking their belongings."
"Israeli settlers and soldiers are literally wiping Palestinian communities off the map," said Omar Shakir, HRW's Israel and Palestine director.
"While the attention of the world is focused on Gaza, abuses in the West Bank, fueled by decades of impunity and complacency among Israel’s allies, are soaring."
The new report comes days after Israeli settlers—escorted by IDF soldiers—went on their latest destructive and deadly rampage in the West Bank, killing at least two Palestinians, injuring dozens, and setting homes and vehicles ablaze. At least 20 households were displaced after Israeli settlers burned down their homes.
The wave of settler violence came after a missing 14-year-old Israeli boy was found dead in the area around the West Bank city of Ramallah. The Israeli military said the boy was killed in a "terrorist attack."
Since October 7, according to the United Nations, Israeli settlers have launched more than 720 attacks on Palestinians in the West Bank, displacing at least 206 households comprised of 1,244 people—including 603 children. Israeli soldiers in uniform have been present at many of the attacks.
"Settlers and soldiers have displaced entire Palestinian communities, destroying every home, with the apparent backing of higher Israeli authorities," Bill Van Esveld, associate children's rights director at HRW, said in a statement Wednesday. "While the attention of the world is focused on Gaza, abuses in the West Bank, fueled by decades of impunity and complacency among Israel's allies, are soaring."
HRW's new report examines five West Bank communities that have come under attack by Israeli settlers, including one in which uniformed Israeli men armed with assault rifles entered tents and destroyed or stole people's belongings, abused residents, and threatened to kill them if they didn't leave the area.
"One man in uniform kicked me in the back of my neck," a Palestinian mother told HRW. "They said, 'Go to the valley, and if you come back, we will kill you.'"
None of the families forcibly evicted from the five communities examined in the HRW report have been allowed to return home.
"Palestinian children have seen their families brutalized, and their homes and schools destroyed, and the Israeli authorities are ultimately to blame," Van Esveld said Wednesday. "Senior state officials are fueling or failing to prevent these attacks, and Israel's allies are not doing enough to stop that."
Following the latest wave of settler violence in the West Bank this past weekend, a coalition of human rights organizations said in a joint statement Wednesday that "the international community must swiftly and decisively pressure the government of Israel to halt these attacks and urgently de-escalate the situation."
"With international attention centered on Gaza, the government of Israel has not only allowed settler violence to spiral but also persisted in the expansion of Israeli settlements built on Palestinian land and unlawfully seized Palestinian territory by designating it as 'state land,' blatantly violating international law," the groups noted. "Concerted efforts are needed to tackle the root cause of settler violence by permanently dismantling settlement outposts and ensuring the safe return of displaced Palestinians to their lands."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Wyden Says Spying Bill Would Force Americans to Become an 'Agent for Big Brother'
"If you have access to any communications, the government can force you to help it spy," said Sen. Ron Wyden.
Apr 17, 2024
Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden took to the floor of the U.S. Senate on Tuesday to speak out against a chilling mass surveillance bill that lawmakers are working to rush through the upper chamber and send to President Joe Biden's desk by the end of the week.
The measure in question would reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) for two years and massively expand the federal government's warrantless surveillance power by requiring a wide range of businesses and individuals to cooperate with spying efforts.
"If you have access to any communications, the government can force you to help it spy," said Wyden (Ore.), referring to an amendment that was tacked on to the legislation by the U.S. House last week with bipartisan support. "That means anyone with access to a server, a wire, a cable box, a Wi-Fi router, a phone, or a computer. So think for a moment about the millions of Americans who work in buildings and offices in which communications are stored or pass through."
"After all, every office building in America has data cables running through it," the senator continued. "The people are not just the engineers who install, maintain, and repair our communications infrastructure; there are countless others who could be forced to help the government spy, including those who clean offices and guard buildings. If this provision is enacted, the government can deputize any of these people against their will, and force them in effect to become what amounts to an agent for Big Brother—for example, by forcing an employee to insert a USB thumb drive into a server at an office they clean or guard at night."
Wyden said the process "can all happen without any oversight whatsoever: The FISA Court won't know about it, Congress won't know about it. Americans who are handed these directives will be forbidden from talking about it. Unless they can afford high-priced lawyers with security clearances who know their way around the FISA Court, they will have no recourse at all."
Wyden's remarks came after the Senate narrowly approved a motion Tuesday to proceed to the FISA reauthorization bill ahead of Section 702's expiration at the end of the week. The Oregon senator, an outspoken privacy advocate, was among the seven members of the Democratic caucus who voted against the procedural motion.
Despite its grave implications for civil liberties, the bill has drawn relatively little vocal opposition in the Senate. A final vote could come as soon as Thursday.
Titled Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act (RISAA), the legislation passed the Republican-controlled House last week after lawmakers voted down an amendment that would have added a search warrant requirement to Section 702.
The authority allows U.S. agencies to spy on non-citizens located outside of the country, but it has been abused extensively by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and National Security Agency to collect the communications of American lawmakers, activists, journalists, and others without a warrant.
Privacy advocates warn RISAA would dramatically expand the scope of Section 702 by broadening the kinds of individuals and businesses required to participate in government spying. A key provision of the bill would mandate cooperation from "electronic communications service providers" such as Google, Verizon, and AT&T as well as "any other service provider who has access to equipment that is being or may be used" to transmit or store electronic communications.
That would mean U.S. intelligence agencies could, without a warrant, compel gyms, grocery stores, barber shops, and other businesses to hand over communications data.
"In the face of the pervasive past misuse of Section 702, the last thing Americans need is a large expansion of government surveillance," Caitlin Vogus, deputy director of advocacy at Freedom of the Press Foundation, wrote in an op-ed for The Guardian on Tuesday. "The Senate should reject the House bill and refuse to reauthorize Section 702 without a warrant requirement. Lawmakers must demand reforms to put a stop to unjustified government spying on Americans."
Wyden said during his floor speech Tuesday that some of his colleagues "say they aren't worried about President Biden abusing these authorities."
"In that case, how about [former President Donald] Trump? Imagine these authorities in his hands," said Wyden. "If you're worried about having a president who lives to target vulnerable Americans, to pit Americans against each other, to find every conceivable way to punish perceived enemies, you ought to find this bill terrifying."
Keep ReadingShow Less
House Dems Voice 'Deep Concern' Over Biden Claim That Israel Is Legally Using US Arms
A letter from 26 lawmakers notes the "stark differences and gaps" between what Biden administration officials say and the opinions of "prominent experts and global institutions" accusing Israel of genocide.
Apr 16, 2024
More than two dozen House Democrats on Tuesday challenged the Biden administration's claim that Israel is using U.S.-supplied weapons in compliance with domestic and international law—an assertion made amid an ongoing World Court probe of "plausibly" genocidal Israeli policies and practices in Gaza.
Citing "mounting credible and deeply troubling reports and allegations" of human rights crimes committed by Israeli troops in Gaza and soldiers and settlers in the occupied West Bank, 26 congressional Democrats led by Texas Reps. Veronica Escobar—who co-chairs President Joe Biden's reelection campaign—and Joaquin Castro asked U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, Secretary of State Antony Blinken, and Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines "whether and how" their agencies determined Israel is lawfully using arms provided by Washington.
"We write to express our deep concern regarding the U.S. Department of State's recent comments regarding assurances from the Israeli government, under National Security Memorandum (NSM) 20, that the Israeli government is using U.S.-origin weapons in full compliance with relevant U.S. and international law and is not restricting the delivery of humanitarian assistance," the lawmakers wrote in a letter to the Cabinet members.
The letter acknowledges the "grave concerns" of institutions and experts around the world regarding Israel's "conduct throughout the war in Gaza, its policies regarding civilian harm and military targeting, unauthorized expansion of settlements and settler violence in the West Bank, and potential use of U.S. arms by settlers, in additional to limitations on humanitarian aid supported by the U.S."
The legislators noted Israeli attacks on aid convoys, workers, and recipients—like the February 29 "
Flour Massacre" in which nearly 900 starving Palestinians were killed or wounded at a food distribution site—and "the closure of vital border crossings" as Gazan children starve to death as causes for serious concern.
While the lawmakers didn't mention the International Court of Justice's January 26
preliminary finding that Israel is "plausibly" committing genocide in Gaza, their letter highlights the "stark differences and gaps in the statements" made by Biden administration officials and "those made by prominent experts and global institutions"—many of whom accuse Israel of genocide.
The lawmakers' letter came amid reports of fresh Israeli atrocities, including a drone strike on a playground in the Maghazi refugee camp in northern Gaza that killed at least 11 children. Eyewitnesses described a "horrific scene of children torn apart."
While Biden has called out Israel's "indiscriminate bombing" in Gaza—much of it carried out using U.S.-supplied warplanes and munitions including 2,000-pound bombs that can level whole city blocks—his administration has approved more than 100 arms sales to Israel, has repeatedly sidestepped Congress to fast-track emergency armed aid, and is seeking to provide the key ally with billions of dollars in addition weaponry atop the nearly $4 billion it gets annually from Washington.
This, despite multiple federal laws—and the administration's own rules— prohibiting U.S. arms transfers to human rights violators.
According to Palestinian and international officials, more than 110,000 Palestinians have been killed or wounded by Israeli forces since October 7. Most of the dead are women and children. At least 7,000 Palestinians are also missing and presumed dead and buried beneath the rubble of hundreds of thousands of bombed-out homes and other buildings.
Around 90% of Gaza's 2.3 million people have been forcibly displaced in what many Palestinians are calling a second Nakba, a reference to the ethnic cleansing of over 750,000 Arabs from Palestine during the establishment of the modern state of Israel in 1948.
A growing number of not only progressive lawmakers but also mainstream Democrats are calling for a suspension of U.S. military aid to Israel.
On Tuesday, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.)—who was criticized earlier in the war for not calling for a cease-fire—stood beside a photo of a starving Gazan girl while declaring "no more money for" the far-right government of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his "war machine."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular