SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
EWG Public Affairs, (202) 667-6982
The National Institutes of Health's National Toxicology Program
(NTP) concluded today that bisphenol A (BPA), an artificial sex hormone and
chemical used in hard plastic products like baby bottles may alter brain
development and increase the risk of prostate cancer. The NIH review, which
contradicts a recent FDA assessment based on chemical industry science,
reflects the findings of dozens of independent scientists from around the
globe who have raised questions about the chemical's possible dangers for
more than a decade.
BPA Timeline: From Invention to Phase Out
NTP's assessment that BPA exposure is cause for concern directly refutes
last month's announcement by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which claimed exposure to BPA is
safe for humans. NTP reviewed over 100 independent scientific studies before
reaching its conclusion, while FDA relied solely on three chemical-industry
funded reports, which gave the toxic chemical the thumbs up for use in
consumer products.
"The FDA has no credibility when it comes to BPA safety. The NIH
announcement is yet more confirmation that the FDA is in the pocket of
industry. FDA ignored the nation's top public health scientists, and instead
lauded the benefits of a toxic, hormone disruptor found in virtually every
infant in America," added Wiles. "Now that wrong has been righted."
"Unlike the FDA, NTP has listened to the nation's premier scientists and has
concluded that the BPA threat to the brains, bodies and behavior of our
children must be taken seriously," EWG Executive Director Richard Wiles.
"The agency's stance is measured -- and courageous in the face of the slick,
relentless publicity campaign from the chemical industry, which seems to be
following the tobacco industry's playbook."
The U.S. chemical industry produces an estimated 2.3 billion pounds of BPA
annually to make polycarbonates and epoxy resins, tough, light materials
that are fabricated into a vast array of products, including airplanes,
computer and cell phone parts, paints and coatings, safety helmets and
goggles, dental bonding agents, toys, water and baby bottles and food
packaging. The global market for BPA is estimated at 6 billion pounds, which
translates roughly to $6 billion.
"Consumers deserve straight talk from the government," added Wiles. "The new
NTP assessment tells us that we are right to be concerned about BPA and the
industry1s ongoing chemistry experiment on our kids."
The Environmental Working Group is a community 30 million strong, working to protect our environmental health by changing industry standards.
(202) 667-6982"I live in fear of whether or not I will be able to afford my life saving treatment," one woman told Sanders' office.
As the federal government shutdown continued on Tuesday, Sen. Bernie Sanders released a report documenting Americans' fears about the impact of Republicans' healthcare policies will have on them in the coming months if the changes being demanded by Democrats are not implemented.
The report begins by discussing the impact of the Republican-passed cuts to Medicaid in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act earlier this year, as well as the expiring enhanced subsidies for people who buy health insurance through the Affordable Care Act, would have on Americans' ability to access healthcare.
"Starting this month, millions of Americans are going to get a letter from their insurance companies telling them that their premiums will double, on average," Sanders explains in the report's foreword. "Unless we reverse course, the Republican budget will throw 15 million Americans off of Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act (ACA)."
The Sanders report goes beyond listing numbers and statistics, however, and features personal stories from hundreds of Americans across the country detailing their anxieties on how GOP healthcare policy would affect them and their families.
"I live in fear of whether or not I will be able to afford my life saving treatment," explained a Wisconsin woman named Laura. "I have a rare kidney disease that requires immunotherapy every nine months. I’m terrified I’ll die."
A Texas woman named Bobbi, who is currently being treated for lung cancer, told Sanders' office that she likely won't be able to afford to keep her insurance coverage if ACA enhanced credits aren't renewed.
A Florida woman named Hayat said that she expects to suffer from painful migraines if she gets priced out of being able to afford insurance.
"If my health insurance costs go up, I won't be able to have health insurance at all," she said. "I'm a widow with 3 children and I work 48 hours per week. I suffer from migraines, and my health insurance was covering the $1040 per month cost for medication. I won't be able to get my medication any longer and will suffer."
Khorie, a woman from Texas, laid out just how much any further increase in insurance costs would upend her entire family.
"We struggle so much financially but yet make too much to receive any type of SNAP [Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program] or other government benefits," she said. "I have medication for my ulcerative colitis that cost $8,000 without insurance and even with insurance it’s $1,500 and the only way I’m able to afford it is due to a copay assistance from the company itself. My daughter has braces, glasses, ADHD, and asthma, and my son also has asthma and I’m so worried if insurance becomes so unaffordable myself and my husband will have to suffer for the sake of my children’s well being."
The report also detailed how the increased health insurance costs would have ripple effects that will hurt Americans' ability to afford food and housing.
"We will not be able to eat consistently," said an Illinois woman named Larissa, speaking of the prospect of having to pay nearly double for health insurance. "This will cut out more than 60% of our food budget for the month."
A California woman named Aisha also said that a spike in health insurance would put her in a position where she would have to choose between having access to healthcare and paying her mortgage.
"I think that will be a no-brainer because I need a roof over my head," she said. "That also means my child and I will be left without any healthcare and more than likely unable to survive."
With the stalemate in Washington, DC heading into its second week, Sanders said lawmakers in Congress must come together to solve the crisis and rescue American families like the ones detailed in the report from the suffering and death that Republican policies are set to unleash.
“No, I will not vote for a budget that doubles premiums, throws 15 million people off health care, and causes 50,000 preventable deaths every year,” Sanders said in a statement. “Democrats, Republicans, and independents must come together to protect health care for every American—not just the profits of the insurance and pharmaceutical industries.”
The Sanders report concludes by not only vowing to reverse the Republican healthcare cuts, but to "work to end the international embarrassment of the United States being the only major country on earth that does not guarantee health care for all."
"The livelihoods of the patriotic Americans serving their country in the federal government are not bargaining chips in a political game," said the president of the country's largest union of federal employees.
The American labor movement erupted in outrage Tuesday after President Donald Trump appeared to go back on the government's promises to provide back pay to all of the estimated 750,000 furloughed federal workers when the government shutdown ends.
Last month, as a shutdown loomed, the US Office of Personnel Management, an independent government agency that oversees the country's civil service, published guidance for federal agencies stating definitively that "after the lapse in appropriations has ended, employees who were furloughed as a result of the lapse will receive retroactive pay for those furlough periods."
This follows a federal law, the Government Employee Fair Treatment Act signed by Trump during the last shutdown in 2019, which requires that furloughed employees "shall be paid for the period of the lapse in appropriations.”
But the Trump administration has begun to walk back that promise. A memo from the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) obtained by Axios on Tuesday stated that the administration's position was that employees were not all entitled to back pay, and that the money would have to be specifically appropriated by Congress.
"Does this law cover all these furloughed employees automatically? The conventional wisdom is: Yes, it does. Our view is: No, it doesn't," a senior White House official said, adding that despite what guidance other agencies may have given, "OMB is in charge."
When asked by reporters Tuesday if furloughed employees would all be paid, Trump seemed to confirm the OMB position, saying that "it depends on who we’re talking about.”
“For the most part, we’re going to take care of our people," he said. “There are some people that really don’t deserve to be taken care of, and we’ll take care of them in a different way."
When asked why some workers would not get back pay, Trump told reporters to “ask the Democrats that question.”
The American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), a union representing over 820,000 federal workers, argued that by denying back pay to furloughed employees, the Trump administration was contradicting both the law and its own assurances to employees.
“The frivolous argument that federal employees are not guaranteed backpay under the Government Employee Fair Treatment Act is an obvious misinterpretation of the law," said Everett Kelley, the AFGE's national president. "It is also inconsistent with the Trump administration’s own guidance from mere days ago, which clearly and correctly states that furloughed employees will receive retroactive pay for the time they were out of work as quickly as possible once the shutdown is over."
Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), the top Democrat on the chamber's Appropriations Committee, said on social media that the White House memo was “another baseless attempt to try and scare and intimidate workers by an administration run by crooks and cowards."
“The letter of the law is as plain as can be," Murray said. "Federal workers, including furloughed workers, are entitled to their back pay following a shutdown."
The National Federation of Federal Employees (NFFE), which represents about 110,000 employees, also chimed in with outrage over the decision by House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) to send members of Congress home last week as shutdown negotiations stalled. Johnson has maintained that he will not negotiate on Democrats' demands to reverse cuts to a critical health insurance subsidy unless they agree to fund the government first.
"Congressional leaders should come back to Washington to negotiate an end to this shutdown immediately. Federal employees, our men and women in uniform, and the American people are all suffering. Skipping town in the middle of a crisis is unconscionable," said NFFE's national president Randy Erwin. "At this point, House Republicans have refused any meaningful negotiations. It appears to me that Speaker Johnson and his colleagues have no intention of ending this shutdown anytime soon. It seems they would rather sit back and play the blame game than undertake the necessary work to pass bipartisan spending legislation."
Last week, Trump suggested that, alongside OMB Director Russell Vought, he would use the government shutdown to set about "laying off a lot of people that are going to be very affected, and they’re Democrats. They’re gonna be Democrats.”
Trump added Tuesday that if the shutdown continues much longer, many government jobs would be on the chopping block “in four or five days" and that "a lot of those jobs will never come back."
On NBC's "Meet the Press" Sunday, Johnson has described the potential layoffs of thousands of workers as "regrettable," adding that it was "not a job that [Vought] relishes... But he’s being required to do it by [Senate Minority Leader] Chuck Schumer (D-NY).”
On Thursday, however, Trump had described the shutdown as an “unprecedented opportunity” to carry out Vought's proposals for cuts to programs and employees across federal agencies.
"The livelihoods of the patriotic Americans serving their country in the federal government are not bargaining chips in a political game," Kelley said. "It’s long past time for these attacks on federal employees to stop and for Congress to come together, resolve their differences, and end this shutdown."
"Not a single Republican in leadership... has given us a plan to help Americans deal with their health insurance premiums DOUBLING!!!" wrote MAGA firebrand Marjorie Taylor Greene.
Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Greg Casar said Tuesday that "reality" was finally starting to hit some Republicans in Congress about the catastrophic results of reopening the government without a plan to extend tax credits that help tens of millions of Americans afford healthcare.
The government shut down this past Wednesday after Democrats refused to vote for a GOP funding bill that did not extend Biden-era subsidies for the more than 24 million Americans who purchase health insurance on the Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplace.
Republicans did not vote to extend the subsidies in July's One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA). And if they are allowed to expire at the end of 2025, KFF estimates that the average recipient's insurance premiums will more than double, from $888 to $1,906 per year, which will result in about 4 million people losing their insurance due to unaffordability, according to the Congressional Budget Office.
This is on top of the roughly 10 million expected to lose insurance coverage due to the GOP's massive cuts to Medicaid and other ACA marketplace spending in the Republican budget law.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) and House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) have maintained that they would not negotiate on extending the subsidies unless Democrats vote to reopen the government, thereby sacrificing their main point of leverage.
But while many Republicans have hoped to divert attention from the wildly unpopular subsidy cuts to instead push the false narrative that Democrats are pushing for "free healthcare for illegal aliens," one of the most outspoken members of the MAGA coalition put her own party's leaders on blast Monday for their apparent willingness to let millions face higher healthcare costs.
In a blistering post on X, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) said that while she was "not a fan" of the ACA and blamed it for "skyrocketing premiums," she was "going to go against everyone on this issue because when the tax credits expire this year my own adult children's insurance premiums for 2026 are going to DOUBLE, along with all the wonderful families and hardworking people in my district."
"No, I'm not [toeing] the party line on this, or playing loyalty games," Greene continued. "I'm carving my own lane. And I'm absolutely disgusted that health insurance premiums will DOUBLE if the tax credits expire this year."
Greene lamented that "not a single Republican in leadership talked to us about this or has given us a plan to help Americans deal with their health insurance premiums DOUBLING!!!"
She then turned her attention to the tens of billions of dollars worth of military aid sent to Israel and Ukraine in recent years: "All our country does is fund foreign countries and foreign wars, and never does anything to help the American people!!!"
Johnson brushed off Greene's attack, noting that she "does not serve on the committees of jurisdiction to deal with those specialized issues, and she’s probably not read that in on some of that, because it’s still been sort of in their silos of the people who specialize in those issues."
But Casar described Greene's post as evidence that Republicans were beginning to recognize the hardship their policy may have wrought.
"Mike Johnson hasn't picked a fight with Democrats—he's picked a fight with reality," Casar said. "Here's reality breaking through."
While hardly toning down her conspiracy theorizing or her attacks on immigrants and transgender people, Greene has taken some notable stands against her party, as well as President Donald Trump, on some key issues in recent months. These have included opposing additional weapons aid for Israel's war in Gaza, which she has described as a "genocide," and the full release of the Epstein files, which Trump and other Republicans have seemed intent on burying.
But she may not be the only Republican for whom the reality of the GOP's healthcare cuts is "breaking through." On Monday, Trump told reporters gathered at the Oval Office: "We have a negotiation going on with the Democrats that could lead to good things... And I'm talking about good things with regard to healthcare."
Asked if he'd be willing to extend the expiring subsidies, Trump said: "If we made the right deal, I'd make a deal. Sure," adding that "we're talking to the Democrats."
The top House and Senate Democrats denied talking to Trump, and the president did not specify which party members he's allegedly talking to. But it nevertheless marked a notable shift in tone from the week before, when Trump responded to Democrats' healthcare demands with derisive, artificially generated sombrero memes and top congressional Republicans swore off any negotiations unless Democrats agreed to fund the government first.
Other Republicans have joined calls for the subsidies to be extended, including Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), who told reporters: "You've got to do something to make sure the premiums don't essentially double, which they will in my state for private insurance. I mean, we just can't allow that to happen. That's a lot of Missourians who will not be able to afford healthcare."
Hawley notably raised similar concerns about the OBBBA's cuts to Medicaid earlier this year but ultimately voted for the legislation.
Nevertheless, the rhetorical change from some Republicans may have something to do with public opinion on the tax credits.
A poll released Friday by KFF found that 78% of Americans want Congress to extend the credits, compared to just 22% of Americans who want to let the credits expire. These majorities extend across the political spectrum, including 92% of Democrats, 82% of independents, and even 57% of Republicans who identify themselves as part of Trump's MAGA movement.
The same poll found that if the tax credits are not extended, about 4 in 10 adults would blame Trump, while another 4 in 10 would blame Republicans in Congress. Just 2 in 10 would blame Democrats.
Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) said Tuesday that waiting to extend the subsidies until after the shutdown ends is not an option.
"Mike Johnson wants to kick the can down the road when it comes to addressing skyrocketing premiums—but this is a crisis right now," Jayapal said. "Now is the time to negotiate to lower costs—not after millions have been kicked off their healthcare."