Residents of the District of Columbia and their supporters rally for statehood near the U.S. Capitol on June 22, 2021 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
Jun 22, 2021
While lawmakers convened for an historic hearing on establishing statehood for Washington, D.C., a study by the Gender Equity Policy Institute demonstrated how giving full federal representation to the district's roughly 700,000 residents is a matter of racial and gender justice.
As a number of advocacy groups pointed out on social media as the hearing of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs got underway--only the second Senate hearing on the matter and the first since the current momentum regarding D.C. statehood began--the GEPI's report (pdf) highlighted how the system of taxation without full representation for the district's residents disproportionately affects people of color and women.
"Lack of D.C. statehood creates healthcare disparities--worsening the twin pandemics of Covid-19 and systemic racism, denying residents reproductive freedom, and creating real harm."
--Dr. Laura Meyers, Planned Parenthood
Washington, D.C.'s population is 52% female and 47% Black, while Black women and girls make up the largest single demographic group in the district, said GEPI in its report, Capital Injustice: An Analysis of Statehood for Washington D.C. and its Projected Impacts on Disenfranchised Women and Black Americans.
"In this moment of racial reckoning, in the midst of a burgeoning movement to protect the fundamental right to vote, it should not escape notice that the nation's worst violation of civil rights falls heaviest on Black women," reads the report.
Republicans who oppose D.C. statehood have suggested the district is too small to qualify as its own congressional district, let alone a state--despite the fact that its population is larger than that of every district in Maine, New Hampshire, Nebraska, West Virginia, and Rhode Island, and of two states: Wyoming and Vermont, which have two of the highest percentages of white residents in the country.
\u201cWyoming\nPopulation: 578,759\n\nVermont\nPopulation: 623,989\n\nWashington, DC\nPopulation: 692,638\n\nThree of these groups pay taxes. ONE of these groups has zero representation in Congress.\n\n#DCStatehood\u201d— Patriotic Millionaires (@Patriotic Millionaires) 1624374030
"Passage of the Washington, D.C. Admission Act would eliminate the source of one of the nation's most egregious violations of democratic rights," said GEPI's vice president of external affairs, Mona Shah, referring to the legislation passed by the Democratic-led U.S. House in April. "By restoring full self-determination and representation to a jurisdiction that is predominantly Black and majority women, statehood for D.C. would both rectify systemic discrimination and immediately and powerfully advance gender and racial justice."
The group's report pointed to attacks on women's reproductive rights as clear evidence that D.C. statehood is a matter of gender equity, noting that states can use their own funds to pay for abortion services through the Medicaid program, which is partially funded by the federal government.
"Yet, every year Congress bans D.C. from using its own funds for abortion care for people in their Medicaid program," the report reads.
Planned Parenthood called statehood for the district "a public health and reproductive freedom issue," adding that D.C.'s status forces "many people with low incomes to pay out-of-pocket for essential healthcare services."
"Planned Parenthood of Metropolitan Washington, D.C. sees firsthand how lack of D.C. statehood creates healthcare disparities--worsening the twin pandemics of Covid-19 and systemic racism, denying residents reproductive freedom, and creating real harm," said Dr. Laura Meyers, president and CEO of the organization's chapter in the district.
"Now the members of the Senate must stand up for the principle of equal representation that is a core tenet of our union," added Meyers. "It is time to end the disenfranchisement, and to place those who live in the nation's capital on equal footing with the rest of the nation by voting for D.C. statehood."
Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.)--who represents the district in the U.S. House and introduced the Washington, D.C. Admission Act (H.R. 51) but can't vote on final legislation--noted at the hearing that momentum is building across the nation for D.C. statehood.
"D.C. statehood now has 54% support nationwide, according to a recent detailed poll, and I expect that support to grow even more after the Senate hearing, as it has after the House hearings," Holmes Norton said. "As only the second Senate hearing ever on the D.C. statehood bill, today is historic."
Holmes Norton first introduced D.C. statehood legislation in 1993, but her bill failed with a vote of 153-277 and 105 Democrats opposing the proposal. The legislation which passed in the House in April has 225 co-sponsors, and the Senate's version of the legislation, introduced by Sen. Tom Carper (D-Del.) has 45 co-sponsors.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just hours away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
While lawmakers convened for an historic hearing on establishing statehood for Washington, D.C., a study by the Gender Equity Policy Institute demonstrated how giving full federal representation to the district's roughly 700,000 residents is a matter of racial and gender justice.
As a number of advocacy groups pointed out on social media as the hearing of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs got underway--only the second Senate hearing on the matter and the first since the current momentum regarding D.C. statehood began--the GEPI's report (pdf) highlighted how the system of taxation without full representation for the district's residents disproportionately affects people of color and women.
"Lack of D.C. statehood creates healthcare disparities--worsening the twin pandemics of Covid-19 and systemic racism, denying residents reproductive freedom, and creating real harm."
--Dr. Laura Meyers, Planned Parenthood
Washington, D.C.'s population is 52% female and 47% Black, while Black women and girls make up the largest single demographic group in the district, said GEPI in its report, Capital Injustice: An Analysis of Statehood for Washington D.C. and its Projected Impacts on Disenfranchised Women and Black Americans.
"In this moment of racial reckoning, in the midst of a burgeoning movement to protect the fundamental right to vote, it should not escape notice that the nation's worst violation of civil rights falls heaviest on Black women," reads the report.
Republicans who oppose D.C. statehood have suggested the district is too small to qualify as its own congressional district, let alone a state--despite the fact that its population is larger than that of every district in Maine, New Hampshire, Nebraska, West Virginia, and Rhode Island, and of two states: Wyoming and Vermont, which have two of the highest percentages of white residents in the country.
\u201cWyoming\nPopulation: 578,759\n\nVermont\nPopulation: 623,989\n\nWashington, DC\nPopulation: 692,638\n\nThree of these groups pay taxes. ONE of these groups has zero representation in Congress.\n\n#DCStatehood\u201d— Patriotic Millionaires (@Patriotic Millionaires) 1624374030
"Passage of the Washington, D.C. Admission Act would eliminate the source of one of the nation's most egregious violations of democratic rights," said GEPI's vice president of external affairs, Mona Shah, referring to the legislation passed by the Democratic-led U.S. House in April. "By restoring full self-determination and representation to a jurisdiction that is predominantly Black and majority women, statehood for D.C. would both rectify systemic discrimination and immediately and powerfully advance gender and racial justice."
The group's report pointed to attacks on women's reproductive rights as clear evidence that D.C. statehood is a matter of gender equity, noting that states can use their own funds to pay for abortion services through the Medicaid program, which is partially funded by the federal government.
"Yet, every year Congress bans D.C. from using its own funds for abortion care for people in their Medicaid program," the report reads.
Planned Parenthood called statehood for the district "a public health and reproductive freedom issue," adding that D.C.'s status forces "many people with low incomes to pay out-of-pocket for essential healthcare services."
"Planned Parenthood of Metropolitan Washington, D.C. sees firsthand how lack of D.C. statehood creates healthcare disparities--worsening the twin pandemics of Covid-19 and systemic racism, denying residents reproductive freedom, and creating real harm," said Dr. Laura Meyers, president and CEO of the organization's chapter in the district.
"Now the members of the Senate must stand up for the principle of equal representation that is a core tenet of our union," added Meyers. "It is time to end the disenfranchisement, and to place those who live in the nation's capital on equal footing with the rest of the nation by voting for D.C. statehood."
Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.)--who represents the district in the U.S. House and introduced the Washington, D.C. Admission Act (H.R. 51) but can't vote on final legislation--noted at the hearing that momentum is building across the nation for D.C. statehood.
"D.C. statehood now has 54% support nationwide, according to a recent detailed poll, and I expect that support to grow even more after the Senate hearing, as it has after the House hearings," Holmes Norton said. "As only the second Senate hearing ever on the D.C. statehood bill, today is historic."
Holmes Norton first introduced D.C. statehood legislation in 1993, but her bill failed with a vote of 153-277 and 105 Democrats opposing the proposal. The legislation which passed in the House in April has 225 co-sponsors, and the Senate's version of the legislation, introduced by Sen. Tom Carper (D-Del.) has 45 co-sponsors.
While lawmakers convened for an historic hearing on establishing statehood for Washington, D.C., a study by the Gender Equity Policy Institute demonstrated how giving full federal representation to the district's roughly 700,000 residents is a matter of racial and gender justice.
As a number of advocacy groups pointed out on social media as the hearing of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs got underway--only the second Senate hearing on the matter and the first since the current momentum regarding D.C. statehood began--the GEPI's report (pdf) highlighted how the system of taxation without full representation for the district's residents disproportionately affects people of color and women.
"Lack of D.C. statehood creates healthcare disparities--worsening the twin pandemics of Covid-19 and systemic racism, denying residents reproductive freedom, and creating real harm."
--Dr. Laura Meyers, Planned Parenthood
Washington, D.C.'s population is 52% female and 47% Black, while Black women and girls make up the largest single demographic group in the district, said GEPI in its report, Capital Injustice: An Analysis of Statehood for Washington D.C. and its Projected Impacts on Disenfranchised Women and Black Americans.
"In this moment of racial reckoning, in the midst of a burgeoning movement to protect the fundamental right to vote, it should not escape notice that the nation's worst violation of civil rights falls heaviest on Black women," reads the report.
Republicans who oppose D.C. statehood have suggested the district is too small to qualify as its own congressional district, let alone a state--despite the fact that its population is larger than that of every district in Maine, New Hampshire, Nebraska, West Virginia, and Rhode Island, and of two states: Wyoming and Vermont, which have two of the highest percentages of white residents in the country.
\u201cWyoming\nPopulation: 578,759\n\nVermont\nPopulation: 623,989\n\nWashington, DC\nPopulation: 692,638\n\nThree of these groups pay taxes. ONE of these groups has zero representation in Congress.\n\n#DCStatehood\u201d— Patriotic Millionaires (@Patriotic Millionaires) 1624374030
"Passage of the Washington, D.C. Admission Act would eliminate the source of one of the nation's most egregious violations of democratic rights," said GEPI's vice president of external affairs, Mona Shah, referring to the legislation passed by the Democratic-led U.S. House in April. "By restoring full self-determination and representation to a jurisdiction that is predominantly Black and majority women, statehood for D.C. would both rectify systemic discrimination and immediately and powerfully advance gender and racial justice."
The group's report pointed to attacks on women's reproductive rights as clear evidence that D.C. statehood is a matter of gender equity, noting that states can use their own funds to pay for abortion services through the Medicaid program, which is partially funded by the federal government.
"Yet, every year Congress bans D.C. from using its own funds for abortion care for people in their Medicaid program," the report reads.
Planned Parenthood called statehood for the district "a public health and reproductive freedom issue," adding that D.C.'s status forces "many people with low incomes to pay out-of-pocket for essential healthcare services."
"Planned Parenthood of Metropolitan Washington, D.C. sees firsthand how lack of D.C. statehood creates healthcare disparities--worsening the twin pandemics of Covid-19 and systemic racism, denying residents reproductive freedom, and creating real harm," said Dr. Laura Meyers, president and CEO of the organization's chapter in the district.
"Now the members of the Senate must stand up for the principle of equal representation that is a core tenet of our union," added Meyers. "It is time to end the disenfranchisement, and to place those who live in the nation's capital on equal footing with the rest of the nation by voting for D.C. statehood."
Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.)--who represents the district in the U.S. House and introduced the Washington, D.C. Admission Act (H.R. 51) but can't vote on final legislation--noted at the hearing that momentum is building across the nation for D.C. statehood.
"D.C. statehood now has 54% support nationwide, according to a recent detailed poll, and I expect that support to grow even more after the Senate hearing, as it has after the House hearings," Holmes Norton said. "As only the second Senate hearing ever on the D.C. statehood bill, today is historic."
Holmes Norton first introduced D.C. statehood legislation in 1993, but her bill failed with a vote of 153-277 and 105 Democrats opposing the proposal. The legislation which passed in the House in April has 225 co-sponsors, and the Senate's version of the legislation, introduced by Sen. Tom Carper (D-Del.) has 45 co-sponsors.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.