

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

People at Trump National Golf Club in Bedminster, New Jersey, listen as US President Donald Trump speaks during a news conference on August 8, 2020. (Photo: Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images)
Wholly inadequate. Illegal. Misleading. "A failure." "A disgrace." "A sham." "A cruel joke."
Progressive critics and Democratic lawmakers did not need the help of even the Republican U.S. senator who used the phrase "unconstitutional slop" to describe President Donald Trump's slate of executive orders--signed Saturday at his private golf club in New Jersey--to rack up ferocious condemnation of the presidential actions as "legally dubious," shortsighted, wholly inadequate, and final proof that Trump does not understand the scale of the economic devastation his Republican Party is unleashing on the nation with its refusal to join Democrats to pass a far-reaching Covid-19 rescue package.
"By bypassing Congress on major budget and tax decisions and trying to override federal laws on the use of federal funds, they weaken our democracy by shredding longstanding norms of governance and potentially violating the Constitution." --Robert Greenstein, CBPPIn response to the four executive orders, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) said if the president truly "cared about helping Americans, he would have demanded Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell start negotiating as soon as the House passed the HEROES act almost two months ago. These legally dubious actions aren't real relief for states and families--they're a cruel joke."
In a thread on Twitter, Warren explained why each of the orders--put forth by the White House as a payroll tax holiday (which many employers will find no reason to utilize), a rental protection effort (which actually leaves many millions out), student loan reprieve for some borrowers (which is only temporary), and a federal unemployment boost (which is actually a cut from what had been available and "terrible economics")--are each problematic in their own right, a judgement shared broadly by experts, her fellow Democrats, and progressive observers.
On the payroll tax holiday--which defenders of Medicare and Social Security have warned is a backdoor assault on the key safety net programs--Warren said: "I've led the fight in the Senate for years to protect and expand Social Security. I promise you, Mr. President: if you want to gut Social Security and break our promises to seniors, veterans, and Americans with disabilities, you're going to lose that fight."
On Trump's supposed unemployment fix--which critics called an "administrative nightmare" and includes the expectation that state governments, now suffering budget shortages, must kick in a share--Warren suggested the plan is ridiculous compared to what Democrats have been demanding and fighting for all summer long. "Cutting unemployment benefits by $200 and sticking cash-strapped states that desperately need relief with the tab," Warren argued, "will hurt families, limit our economic recovery, & cost us 1.7 million jobs. Congress must fully extend the $600 checks right now."
Denouncing the rental protections Trump has put forth--a plan Politico reports "would leave most renters in peril"--Warren argued: "Renters don't need empty words about protection from eviction and rental assistance --they need guarantees. The President's Executive Order does nothing meaningful to stop the evictions that are taking place right now. We need a universal eviction ban and rental assistance."
On the student debt relief--an order that only includes those with federal, not private loans, and only lasts as a deferment of repayment until the end of the year--Warren said the relief is paltry in the face of a complete student loan debt jubilee that progressives, including Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), have been championing. "Congress should do more--a lot more--for people struggling with student loan debt," Warren declared. "We need to #CancelStudentDebt for federal and private student loan borrowers to help boost our economy."
Far from alone in her criticisms, Warren was backed up by economic experts like Robert Greenstein, president of the left-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP).
Taken as a whole, Greenstein said the slate of executive orders by Trump "should be should deeply concern all Americans."
All of the orders--for various but very specific reasons--he said, "fall dramatically short of responding effectively to the enormous need across the country due to Covid-19 and the deep recession. And, by bypassing Congress on major budget and tax decisions and trying to override federal laws on the use of federal funds, they weaken our democracy by shredding longstanding norms of governance and potentially violating the Constitution."
Other progressive Democrats also weighed in on the various failures of what Trump has put forth:
In a joint statement released after Trump's press conference on Saturday, Democratic Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi said the "meager announcements" show the president "still does not comprehend the seriousness or the urgency of the health and economic crises facing working families. We're disappointed that instead of putting in the work to solve Americans' problems, the president instead chose to stay on his luxury golf course to announce unworkable, weak and narrow policy announcements to slash the unemployment benefits that millions desperately need and endanger seniors' Social Security and Medicare."
The Democratic leaders called on their Republican counterparts to "return to the table, meet us halfway, and work together to deliver immediate relief to the American people. Lives are being lost, and time is of the essence."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Wholly inadequate. Illegal. Misleading. "A failure." "A disgrace." "A sham." "A cruel joke."
Progressive critics and Democratic lawmakers did not need the help of even the Republican U.S. senator who used the phrase "unconstitutional slop" to describe President Donald Trump's slate of executive orders--signed Saturday at his private golf club in New Jersey--to rack up ferocious condemnation of the presidential actions as "legally dubious," shortsighted, wholly inadequate, and final proof that Trump does not understand the scale of the economic devastation his Republican Party is unleashing on the nation with its refusal to join Democrats to pass a far-reaching Covid-19 rescue package.
"By bypassing Congress on major budget and tax decisions and trying to override federal laws on the use of federal funds, they weaken our democracy by shredding longstanding norms of governance and potentially violating the Constitution." --Robert Greenstein, CBPPIn response to the four executive orders, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) said if the president truly "cared about helping Americans, he would have demanded Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell start negotiating as soon as the House passed the HEROES act almost two months ago. These legally dubious actions aren't real relief for states and families--they're a cruel joke."
In a thread on Twitter, Warren explained why each of the orders--put forth by the White House as a payroll tax holiday (which many employers will find no reason to utilize), a rental protection effort (which actually leaves many millions out), student loan reprieve for some borrowers (which is only temporary), and a federal unemployment boost (which is actually a cut from what had been available and "terrible economics")--are each problematic in their own right, a judgement shared broadly by experts, her fellow Democrats, and progressive observers.
On the payroll tax holiday--which defenders of Medicare and Social Security have warned is a backdoor assault on the key safety net programs--Warren said: "I've led the fight in the Senate for years to protect and expand Social Security. I promise you, Mr. President: if you want to gut Social Security and break our promises to seniors, veterans, and Americans with disabilities, you're going to lose that fight."
On Trump's supposed unemployment fix--which critics called an "administrative nightmare" and includes the expectation that state governments, now suffering budget shortages, must kick in a share--Warren suggested the plan is ridiculous compared to what Democrats have been demanding and fighting for all summer long. "Cutting unemployment benefits by $200 and sticking cash-strapped states that desperately need relief with the tab," Warren argued, "will hurt families, limit our economic recovery, & cost us 1.7 million jobs. Congress must fully extend the $600 checks right now."
Denouncing the rental protections Trump has put forth--a plan Politico reports "would leave most renters in peril"--Warren argued: "Renters don't need empty words about protection from eviction and rental assistance --they need guarantees. The President's Executive Order does nothing meaningful to stop the evictions that are taking place right now. We need a universal eviction ban and rental assistance."
On the student debt relief--an order that only includes those with federal, not private loans, and only lasts as a deferment of repayment until the end of the year--Warren said the relief is paltry in the face of a complete student loan debt jubilee that progressives, including Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), have been championing. "Congress should do more--a lot more--for people struggling with student loan debt," Warren declared. "We need to #CancelStudentDebt for federal and private student loan borrowers to help boost our economy."
Far from alone in her criticisms, Warren was backed up by economic experts like Robert Greenstein, president of the left-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP).
Taken as a whole, Greenstein said the slate of executive orders by Trump "should be should deeply concern all Americans."
All of the orders--for various but very specific reasons--he said, "fall dramatically short of responding effectively to the enormous need across the country due to Covid-19 and the deep recession. And, by bypassing Congress on major budget and tax decisions and trying to override federal laws on the use of federal funds, they weaken our democracy by shredding longstanding norms of governance and potentially violating the Constitution."
Other progressive Democrats also weighed in on the various failures of what Trump has put forth:
In a joint statement released after Trump's press conference on Saturday, Democratic Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi said the "meager announcements" show the president "still does not comprehend the seriousness or the urgency of the health and economic crises facing working families. We're disappointed that instead of putting in the work to solve Americans' problems, the president instead chose to stay on his luxury golf course to announce unworkable, weak and narrow policy announcements to slash the unemployment benefits that millions desperately need and endanger seniors' Social Security and Medicare."
The Democratic leaders called on their Republican counterparts to "return to the table, meet us halfway, and work together to deliver immediate relief to the American people. Lives are being lost, and time is of the essence."
Wholly inadequate. Illegal. Misleading. "A failure." "A disgrace." "A sham." "A cruel joke."
Progressive critics and Democratic lawmakers did not need the help of even the Republican U.S. senator who used the phrase "unconstitutional slop" to describe President Donald Trump's slate of executive orders--signed Saturday at his private golf club in New Jersey--to rack up ferocious condemnation of the presidential actions as "legally dubious," shortsighted, wholly inadequate, and final proof that Trump does not understand the scale of the economic devastation his Republican Party is unleashing on the nation with its refusal to join Democrats to pass a far-reaching Covid-19 rescue package.
"By bypassing Congress on major budget and tax decisions and trying to override federal laws on the use of federal funds, they weaken our democracy by shredding longstanding norms of governance and potentially violating the Constitution." --Robert Greenstein, CBPPIn response to the four executive orders, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) said if the president truly "cared about helping Americans, he would have demanded Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell start negotiating as soon as the House passed the HEROES act almost two months ago. These legally dubious actions aren't real relief for states and families--they're a cruel joke."
In a thread on Twitter, Warren explained why each of the orders--put forth by the White House as a payroll tax holiday (which many employers will find no reason to utilize), a rental protection effort (which actually leaves many millions out), student loan reprieve for some borrowers (which is only temporary), and a federal unemployment boost (which is actually a cut from what had been available and "terrible economics")--are each problematic in their own right, a judgement shared broadly by experts, her fellow Democrats, and progressive observers.
On the payroll tax holiday--which defenders of Medicare and Social Security have warned is a backdoor assault on the key safety net programs--Warren said: "I've led the fight in the Senate for years to protect and expand Social Security. I promise you, Mr. President: if you want to gut Social Security and break our promises to seniors, veterans, and Americans with disabilities, you're going to lose that fight."
On Trump's supposed unemployment fix--which critics called an "administrative nightmare" and includes the expectation that state governments, now suffering budget shortages, must kick in a share--Warren suggested the plan is ridiculous compared to what Democrats have been demanding and fighting for all summer long. "Cutting unemployment benefits by $200 and sticking cash-strapped states that desperately need relief with the tab," Warren argued, "will hurt families, limit our economic recovery, & cost us 1.7 million jobs. Congress must fully extend the $600 checks right now."
Denouncing the rental protections Trump has put forth--a plan Politico reports "would leave most renters in peril"--Warren argued: "Renters don't need empty words about protection from eviction and rental assistance --they need guarantees. The President's Executive Order does nothing meaningful to stop the evictions that are taking place right now. We need a universal eviction ban and rental assistance."
On the student debt relief--an order that only includes those with federal, not private loans, and only lasts as a deferment of repayment until the end of the year--Warren said the relief is paltry in the face of a complete student loan debt jubilee that progressives, including Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), have been championing. "Congress should do more--a lot more--for people struggling with student loan debt," Warren declared. "We need to #CancelStudentDebt for federal and private student loan borrowers to help boost our economy."
Far from alone in her criticisms, Warren was backed up by economic experts like Robert Greenstein, president of the left-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP).
Taken as a whole, Greenstein said the slate of executive orders by Trump "should be should deeply concern all Americans."
All of the orders--for various but very specific reasons--he said, "fall dramatically short of responding effectively to the enormous need across the country due to Covid-19 and the deep recession. And, by bypassing Congress on major budget and tax decisions and trying to override federal laws on the use of federal funds, they weaken our democracy by shredding longstanding norms of governance and potentially violating the Constitution."
Other progressive Democrats also weighed in on the various failures of what Trump has put forth:
In a joint statement released after Trump's press conference on Saturday, Democratic Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi said the "meager announcements" show the president "still does not comprehend the seriousness or the urgency of the health and economic crises facing working families. We're disappointed that instead of putting in the work to solve Americans' problems, the president instead chose to stay on his luxury golf course to announce unworkable, weak and narrow policy announcements to slash the unemployment benefits that millions desperately need and endanger seniors' Social Security and Medicare."
The Democratic leaders called on their Republican counterparts to "return to the table, meet us halfway, and work together to deliver immediate relief to the American people. Lives are being lost, and time is of the essence."