SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Demonstrators rally at the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C. on April 23, 2019 to protest a proposal to add a citizenship question in the 2020 census. (Photo: Mandel Ngan/AFP/Getty Images)
'Flagrantly Unconstitutional': Trump Issues Order to Block Undocumented Immigrants From Being Counted in Census
"This is another attempt by Trump to use scaremongering against immigrants and rig the system," said Sen. Elizabeth Warren.
Jul 21, 2020
President Donald Trump issued a memorandum on Tuesday seeking to exclude undocumented immigrants from being counted in the census--a move being criticized as "flagrantly unconstitutional" and as another effort "to weaponize the census for an attack on immigrant communities."
"After losing the battle to include a citizenship question on the 2020 census, the Trump administration seeks to resurrect this fight through a memorandum that runs contrary to the Constitution, Supreme Court precedent, and historical practice," said Kristen Clarke, president and executive director of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law.
"For the purpose of the reapportionment of Representatives following the 2020 census, it is the policy of the United States to exclude from the apportionment base aliens who are not in a lawful immigration status under the Immigration and Nationality Act," Trump's memo states.
"Excluding these illegal aliens from the apportionment base is more consonant with the principles of representative democracy underpinning our system of government," the order claims, though the 14th Amendment makes clear that "Representatives shall be apportioned... counting the whole number of persons in each state."
The memo, likely to spur legal challenges, prompted swift criticism from Democrats and voting rights advocates.
"It is flagrantly unconstitutional to exclude people from the Census count based on their immigration status," tweeted Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.). "The Constitution requires that every person be counted. This is another attempt by Trump to use scaremongering against immigrants and rig the system," Warren said.
According to Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), "Trump is once again trying to weaponize the Census to scare immigrant communities for his own political purposes."
Further, as NPR noted, it is not the president but Congress that has authority over carrying out the "actual enumeration" of the country's population in "such manner as they shall by law direct."
"A presidential memorandum cannot rewrite the Constitution," Karen Hobert Flynn, president of Common Cause, said in a statment.
The president's memo, USA Today reported, "will almost certainly draw legal challenges just as an earlier effort by Trump to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census prompted a court battle that went to the Supreme Court, an effort the president lost." And with census workers not allowed to ask people's legal status, how the administration would obtain that data is unclear.
"Even the process for using administrative records to determine who is a citizen and who is not is deeply flawed and inaccurate at best, especially for noncitizen households that rarely interact with government agencies," said Flynn.
"Counting households through administrative data would only disproportionately undercount Black and Brown households," she added.
Dale Ho, director of the ACLU's Voting Rights Project, who successfully argued the case blocking the Trump administration from adding a citizenship question on the 2020 census, expressed certainty the new memo would suffer a similar fate.
"The Constitution requires that everyone in the U.S. be counted in the census," he said. "President Trump can't pick and choose. He tried to add a citizenship question to the census and lost in the Supreme Court."
"His latest attempt to weaponize the census for an attack on immigrant communities will be found unconstitutional," said Ho. "We'll see him in court, and win, again."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
President Donald Trump issued a memorandum on Tuesday seeking to exclude undocumented immigrants from being counted in the census--a move being criticized as "flagrantly unconstitutional" and as another effort "to weaponize the census for an attack on immigrant communities."
"After losing the battle to include a citizenship question on the 2020 census, the Trump administration seeks to resurrect this fight through a memorandum that runs contrary to the Constitution, Supreme Court precedent, and historical practice," said Kristen Clarke, president and executive director of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law.
"For the purpose of the reapportionment of Representatives following the 2020 census, it is the policy of the United States to exclude from the apportionment base aliens who are not in a lawful immigration status under the Immigration and Nationality Act," Trump's memo states.
"Excluding these illegal aliens from the apportionment base is more consonant with the principles of representative democracy underpinning our system of government," the order claims, though the 14th Amendment makes clear that "Representatives shall be apportioned... counting the whole number of persons in each state."
The memo, likely to spur legal challenges, prompted swift criticism from Democrats and voting rights advocates.
"It is flagrantly unconstitutional to exclude people from the Census count based on their immigration status," tweeted Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.). "The Constitution requires that every person be counted. This is another attempt by Trump to use scaremongering against immigrants and rig the system," Warren said.
According to Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), "Trump is once again trying to weaponize the Census to scare immigrant communities for his own political purposes."
Further, as NPR noted, it is not the president but Congress that has authority over carrying out the "actual enumeration" of the country's population in "such manner as they shall by law direct."
"A presidential memorandum cannot rewrite the Constitution," Karen Hobert Flynn, president of Common Cause, said in a statment.
The president's memo, USA Today reported, "will almost certainly draw legal challenges just as an earlier effort by Trump to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census prompted a court battle that went to the Supreme Court, an effort the president lost." And with census workers not allowed to ask people's legal status, how the administration would obtain that data is unclear.
"Even the process for using administrative records to determine who is a citizen and who is not is deeply flawed and inaccurate at best, especially for noncitizen households that rarely interact with government agencies," said Flynn.
"Counting households through administrative data would only disproportionately undercount Black and Brown households," she added.
Dale Ho, director of the ACLU's Voting Rights Project, who successfully argued the case blocking the Trump administration from adding a citizenship question on the 2020 census, expressed certainty the new memo would suffer a similar fate.
"The Constitution requires that everyone in the U.S. be counted in the census," he said. "President Trump can't pick and choose. He tried to add a citizenship question to the census and lost in the Supreme Court."
"His latest attempt to weaponize the census for an attack on immigrant communities will be found unconstitutional," said Ho. "We'll see him in court, and win, again."
President Donald Trump issued a memorandum on Tuesday seeking to exclude undocumented immigrants from being counted in the census--a move being criticized as "flagrantly unconstitutional" and as another effort "to weaponize the census for an attack on immigrant communities."
"After losing the battle to include a citizenship question on the 2020 census, the Trump administration seeks to resurrect this fight through a memorandum that runs contrary to the Constitution, Supreme Court precedent, and historical practice," said Kristen Clarke, president and executive director of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law.
"For the purpose of the reapportionment of Representatives following the 2020 census, it is the policy of the United States to exclude from the apportionment base aliens who are not in a lawful immigration status under the Immigration and Nationality Act," Trump's memo states.
"Excluding these illegal aliens from the apportionment base is more consonant with the principles of representative democracy underpinning our system of government," the order claims, though the 14th Amendment makes clear that "Representatives shall be apportioned... counting the whole number of persons in each state."
The memo, likely to spur legal challenges, prompted swift criticism from Democrats and voting rights advocates.
"It is flagrantly unconstitutional to exclude people from the Census count based on their immigration status," tweeted Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.). "The Constitution requires that every person be counted. This is another attempt by Trump to use scaremongering against immigrants and rig the system," Warren said.
According to Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), "Trump is once again trying to weaponize the Census to scare immigrant communities for his own political purposes."
Further, as NPR noted, it is not the president but Congress that has authority over carrying out the "actual enumeration" of the country's population in "such manner as they shall by law direct."
"A presidential memorandum cannot rewrite the Constitution," Karen Hobert Flynn, president of Common Cause, said in a statment.
The president's memo, USA Today reported, "will almost certainly draw legal challenges just as an earlier effort by Trump to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census prompted a court battle that went to the Supreme Court, an effort the president lost." And with census workers not allowed to ask people's legal status, how the administration would obtain that data is unclear.
"Even the process for using administrative records to determine who is a citizen and who is not is deeply flawed and inaccurate at best, especially for noncitizen households that rarely interact with government agencies," said Flynn.
"Counting households through administrative data would only disproportionately undercount Black and Brown households," she added.
Dale Ho, director of the ACLU's Voting Rights Project, who successfully argued the case blocking the Trump administration from adding a citizenship question on the 2020 census, expressed certainty the new memo would suffer a similar fate.
"The Constitution requires that everyone in the U.S. be counted in the census," he said. "President Trump can't pick and choose. He tried to add a citizenship question to the census and lost in the Supreme Court."
"His latest attempt to weaponize the census for an attack on immigrant communities will be found unconstitutional," said Ho. "We'll see him in court, and win, again."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.