

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Protesters gathered in Washington, D.C. in June 2016 to demonstrate against restrictions on abortion access in Texas. (Photo: Pete Marovich/Getty Images)
A federal appeals court on Tuesday upheld Texas Gov. Greg Abbott's executive order banning abortion care during the coronavirus pandemic, making the procedure illegal in most cases in the state for the first time since before Roe vs. Wade was decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1973.
Federal judges have overturned similar anti-choice orders in Ohio, Oklahoma, and Alabama. A prior decision rejecting the Texas rule handed down by U.S. District Judge Lee Yeakel late last month was thrown out by the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.
"You cannot get an abortion right now in Texas," tweeted CBS News reporter Caitlin Huey-Burns Tuesday.
Abbott's executive order, announced March 22, classifies abortions as non-essential procedures, which have been cancelled across the country as hospitals confront the coronavirus pandemic. Patients in Texas are currently only permitted to obtain abortion care if their lives or health would be threatened by continuing their pregnancy.
"Governor Abbott's order ensures that hospital beds remain available for coronavirus patients and personal protective equipment reaches the hardworking medical professionals who need it the most during this crisis," Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said in response to Tuesday's ruling.
The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to weigh in on Abbott's executive order.
Reproductive rights advocates have accused right-wing lawmakers and courts of exploiting the coronavirus crisis to curb abortion rights, arguing that abortion care is usually not provided at hospitals and that providers generally don't need the personal protective equipment (PPE) which is currently being used by doctors and nurses treating coronavius patients.
"How cruel and out of touch with reality do you have to be to exploit a global health pandemic to further your own political agenda?" Dyana Limon-Mercado, executive director of Planned Parenthood Texas Votes, told the Texas Tribune.
Yeakel challenged Abbott's order last month by saying it "prevents Texas women from exercising what the Supreme Court has declared is their fundamental constitutional right," but the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that constitutional rights can be suspended as the country fights the coronavirus.
"Rights could be reasonably restricted during [a public health crisis]," U.S. Circuit Judge Kyle Duncan said in his opinion.
The ruling and the order are examples of "a state government using the pandemic to violate the individual rights of women to seek abortion and for physicians to provide them," tweeted infectious disease physician Dr. Amesh Adalja.
Advocates are concerned that even after the pandemic is over, the restrictions being pushed now could permanently make abortion care harder to access in states across the country. As TIME magazine reported:
Reproductive rights advocates are used to fighting state laws and court battles to preserve abortion access. But this is different. By using executive orders and other emergency measures, a handful of governors and state attorneys general have managed, at least temporarily, to all but shut down legal abortions. Abortion providers say these new restrictions will likely have lasting impacts, not only on the patients in search of abortions, but also on independent abortion clinics' ability to survive financially in the months ahead.
"The challenges that independent clinics and their patients have had to contend with have not disappeared," Jay Thibodeau, communications director for the Abortion Care Network, told TIME. "Medically unnecessary restrictions on abortion raised enormous barriers before the pandemic and those barriers are becoming increasingly insurmountable now."
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
A federal appeals court on Tuesday upheld Texas Gov. Greg Abbott's executive order banning abortion care during the coronavirus pandemic, making the procedure illegal in most cases in the state for the first time since before Roe vs. Wade was decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1973.
Federal judges have overturned similar anti-choice orders in Ohio, Oklahoma, and Alabama. A prior decision rejecting the Texas rule handed down by U.S. District Judge Lee Yeakel late last month was thrown out by the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.
"You cannot get an abortion right now in Texas," tweeted CBS News reporter Caitlin Huey-Burns Tuesday.
Abbott's executive order, announced March 22, classifies abortions as non-essential procedures, which have been cancelled across the country as hospitals confront the coronavirus pandemic. Patients in Texas are currently only permitted to obtain abortion care if their lives or health would be threatened by continuing their pregnancy.
"Governor Abbott's order ensures that hospital beds remain available for coronavirus patients and personal protective equipment reaches the hardworking medical professionals who need it the most during this crisis," Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said in response to Tuesday's ruling.
The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to weigh in on Abbott's executive order.
Reproductive rights advocates have accused right-wing lawmakers and courts of exploiting the coronavirus crisis to curb abortion rights, arguing that abortion care is usually not provided at hospitals and that providers generally don't need the personal protective equipment (PPE) which is currently being used by doctors and nurses treating coronavius patients.
"How cruel and out of touch with reality do you have to be to exploit a global health pandemic to further your own political agenda?" Dyana Limon-Mercado, executive director of Planned Parenthood Texas Votes, told the Texas Tribune.
Yeakel challenged Abbott's order last month by saying it "prevents Texas women from exercising what the Supreme Court has declared is their fundamental constitutional right," but the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that constitutional rights can be suspended as the country fights the coronavirus.
"Rights could be reasonably restricted during [a public health crisis]," U.S. Circuit Judge Kyle Duncan said in his opinion.
The ruling and the order are examples of "a state government using the pandemic to violate the individual rights of women to seek abortion and for physicians to provide them," tweeted infectious disease physician Dr. Amesh Adalja.
Advocates are concerned that even after the pandemic is over, the restrictions being pushed now could permanently make abortion care harder to access in states across the country. As TIME magazine reported:
Reproductive rights advocates are used to fighting state laws and court battles to preserve abortion access. But this is different. By using executive orders and other emergency measures, a handful of governors and state attorneys general have managed, at least temporarily, to all but shut down legal abortions. Abortion providers say these new restrictions will likely have lasting impacts, not only on the patients in search of abortions, but also on independent abortion clinics' ability to survive financially in the months ahead.
"The challenges that independent clinics and their patients have had to contend with have not disappeared," Jay Thibodeau, communications director for the Abortion Care Network, told TIME. "Medically unnecessary restrictions on abortion raised enormous barriers before the pandemic and those barriers are becoming increasingly insurmountable now."
A federal appeals court on Tuesday upheld Texas Gov. Greg Abbott's executive order banning abortion care during the coronavirus pandemic, making the procedure illegal in most cases in the state for the first time since before Roe vs. Wade was decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1973.
Federal judges have overturned similar anti-choice orders in Ohio, Oklahoma, and Alabama. A prior decision rejecting the Texas rule handed down by U.S. District Judge Lee Yeakel late last month was thrown out by the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.
"You cannot get an abortion right now in Texas," tweeted CBS News reporter Caitlin Huey-Burns Tuesday.
Abbott's executive order, announced March 22, classifies abortions as non-essential procedures, which have been cancelled across the country as hospitals confront the coronavirus pandemic. Patients in Texas are currently only permitted to obtain abortion care if their lives or health would be threatened by continuing their pregnancy.
"Governor Abbott's order ensures that hospital beds remain available for coronavirus patients and personal protective equipment reaches the hardworking medical professionals who need it the most during this crisis," Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said in response to Tuesday's ruling.
The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to weigh in on Abbott's executive order.
Reproductive rights advocates have accused right-wing lawmakers and courts of exploiting the coronavirus crisis to curb abortion rights, arguing that abortion care is usually not provided at hospitals and that providers generally don't need the personal protective equipment (PPE) which is currently being used by doctors and nurses treating coronavius patients.
"How cruel and out of touch with reality do you have to be to exploit a global health pandemic to further your own political agenda?" Dyana Limon-Mercado, executive director of Planned Parenthood Texas Votes, told the Texas Tribune.
Yeakel challenged Abbott's order last month by saying it "prevents Texas women from exercising what the Supreme Court has declared is their fundamental constitutional right," but the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that constitutional rights can be suspended as the country fights the coronavirus.
"Rights could be reasonably restricted during [a public health crisis]," U.S. Circuit Judge Kyle Duncan said in his opinion.
The ruling and the order are examples of "a state government using the pandemic to violate the individual rights of women to seek abortion and for physicians to provide them," tweeted infectious disease physician Dr. Amesh Adalja.
Advocates are concerned that even after the pandemic is over, the restrictions being pushed now could permanently make abortion care harder to access in states across the country. As TIME magazine reported:
Reproductive rights advocates are used to fighting state laws and court battles to preserve abortion access. But this is different. By using executive orders and other emergency measures, a handful of governors and state attorneys general have managed, at least temporarily, to all but shut down legal abortions. Abortion providers say these new restrictions will likely have lasting impacts, not only on the patients in search of abortions, but also on independent abortion clinics' ability to survive financially in the months ahead.
"The challenges that independent clinics and their patients have had to contend with have not disappeared," Jay Thibodeau, communications director for the Abortion Care Network, told TIME. "Medically unnecessary restrictions on abortion raised enormous barriers before the pandemic and those barriers are becoming increasingly insurmountable now."