SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Democratic presidential candidate, former Vice President Joe Biden delivers remarks on the Trump administration's recent actions in Iraq on January 07, 2020 in New York City. Biden criticized Trump for not having a clear policy regarding Iran after the killing of Qasem Soleimani ratcheted up tensions between Iran and the United States. (Photo: Spencer Platt/Getty Images)
While peace advocates and his more progressive 2020 rivals remain outspoken in their demand for deescalation and telling President Donald Trump to end his reckless march to war, former Vice President Joe Biden is being chided for issuing a weak-tea response after Iranian missiles hit U.S. military bases in Iraq Tuesday night--a direct retaliatory strike following last week's U.S. assassination of top military leader Qasem Soleimani.
"The American people do not want war with Iran... Congress cannot stand by. It must act now to pass our legislation to uphold the Constitution and prevent Trump from spending trillions more on endless war." --Sen. Bernie Sanders"I'm going to hold off on commenting on the news tonight until we know more," Biden tweeted shortly after the Iranian attack was reported, "but there is one thing I will say: Jill and I are keeping our troops and Americans overseas in our prayers. We hope you'll keep them in yours."
Compared to Sens. Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, who have both spoken out repeatedly and forcefully in recent days against Trump's aggression and the threat of war, Biden's remarks were taken as a troubling signal that he has yet to learn key lessons since he voted in favor of the 2003 invasion of Iraq while serving in the U.S. Senate.
\u201cIf your candidate right now is saying anything other than "the US cannot go to war with Iran and should de-escalate immediately," they shouldn't be your candidate\u201d— Kate Aronoff (@Kate Aronoff) 1578452380
"May I suggest 'No war with Iran'," said progressive radio show host Sam Seder in response to Biden's tweet.
At a campaign rally in New York, Biden's advice to Trump was not to immediately halt hostilities but rather to express hope that the president is "listening to his military commanders for the first time because so far that's not been the case."
\u201cIt is this Democratic timidness that lead people like Joe Biden to vote for the war in Iraq.\u201d— Ernesto Falcon @Efalcon@sfba.social (@Ernesto Falcon @Efalcon@sfba.social) 1578453093
While calling for a vague deescalation, Biden suggested the president's biggest issue was not the war crimes he is committing or threatening to commit, but that Trump "refuses to level with the American people" about the dangers he has created. As numerous critics have noted, Biden--as well as former South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg--have largely criticized Trump not for his war-mongering, but for being not very good at it.
"Biden would like you to believe that he has seen the light when it comes to the folly of imperialist adventures abroad, that he has found redemption post-Iraq. But his response to the assassination of Soleimani suggests that the old Biden is alive and well." --Meagan Day, Jacobin magazineAs Meagan Day wrote for Jacobin magazine last week, "Biden would like you to believe that he has seen the light when it comes to the folly of imperialist adventures abroad, that he has found redemption post-Iraq. But his response to the assassination of Soleimani suggests that the old Biden is alive and well."
"No," Day concluded, "Joe Biden cannot be relied upon to make the case against Trump's war."
On Tuesday night, meanwhile, just before the Iran missile attack on two military bases where U.S. forces are stationed took place, Sanders appeared on the "PBS NewsHour" and said that the push for war by Trump and top officials in his administration "feels to me exactly what I saw in 2002 and 2003, and that was the leadup and justification for the war in Iraq."
"I opposed that war vigorously and it turned out to be one of the worst foreign policy blunders in the history of United States," Sanders continued. "A war with Iran would likely be even worse."
\u201cLive on @NewsHour: Sen. Bernie Sanders comments on the escalated tensions between the U.S. and Iran https://t.co/0iNghsXuQU\u201d— PBS NewsHour (@PBS NewsHour) 1578438869
In his role as a U.S. Senator, Sanders last week joined with Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) to introduce legislation that would prevent any funding for a military offensive against Iran without prior congressional authorization.
At a rally taking place in Brooklyn Tuesday night as the news arrived of the Iranian strikes, Warren told the crowd that "the American people do not want a war with Iran"--words that received a standing ovation.
"The American people do not want a war with Iran." --Sen. Elizabeth WarrenAppearing on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" Wednesday morning, Warren said the war in Iraq "was a mistake and I think it was a mistake for anyone to vote for that war."
Asked specifically if Biden made a mistake by voting for the war, Warren simply replied: "Everybody."
Instead of escalating conflict and the growing threat of war, Warren said the goal should be to deescalate the situation and get Iran back to the negotiating table to end hostilities.
\u201cWATCH: Sen. Warren calls for negotiating with Iran following Wednesday's retaliation: "We should de-escalate here and try to get Iran back to the negotiating table." https://t.co/JxLip71aX7\u201d— MSNBC (@MSNBC) 1578488760
Exhibiting their anti-war leadership, both Sanders and Warren are participating in a national strategy call organized by lawmakers and progressive advocacy groups on Wednesday night:
\u201cTONIGHT. \n#NoWarWithIran strategy call w/ @BernieSanders @ewarren @RepBarbaraLee @RepRoKhanna. RSVP now: https://t.co/7aCHvMhnFP \n\nh/t @WinWithoutWar @VetsAboutFace @NIACAction\u201d— MoveOn (@MoveOn) 1578497100
"The American people do not want war with Iran," tweeted Sanders on Wednesday morning, just before Trump was scheduled to address the U.S. public in a televised address. "They want to invest in health care, education, housing, and good jobs. Congress cannot stand by. It must act now to pass our legislation to uphold the Constitution and prevent Trump from spending trillions more on endless war."
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
While peace advocates and his more progressive 2020 rivals remain outspoken in their demand for deescalation and telling President Donald Trump to end his reckless march to war, former Vice President Joe Biden is being chided for issuing a weak-tea response after Iranian missiles hit U.S. military bases in Iraq Tuesday night--a direct retaliatory strike following last week's U.S. assassination of top military leader Qasem Soleimani.
"The American people do not want war with Iran... Congress cannot stand by. It must act now to pass our legislation to uphold the Constitution and prevent Trump from spending trillions more on endless war." --Sen. Bernie Sanders"I'm going to hold off on commenting on the news tonight until we know more," Biden tweeted shortly after the Iranian attack was reported, "but there is one thing I will say: Jill and I are keeping our troops and Americans overseas in our prayers. We hope you'll keep them in yours."
Compared to Sens. Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, who have both spoken out repeatedly and forcefully in recent days against Trump's aggression and the threat of war, Biden's remarks were taken as a troubling signal that he has yet to learn key lessons since he voted in favor of the 2003 invasion of Iraq while serving in the U.S. Senate.
\u201cIf your candidate right now is saying anything other than "the US cannot go to war with Iran and should de-escalate immediately," they shouldn't be your candidate\u201d— Kate Aronoff (@Kate Aronoff) 1578452380
"May I suggest 'No war with Iran'," said progressive radio show host Sam Seder in response to Biden's tweet.
At a campaign rally in New York, Biden's advice to Trump was not to immediately halt hostilities but rather to express hope that the president is "listening to his military commanders for the first time because so far that's not been the case."
\u201cIt is this Democratic timidness that lead people like Joe Biden to vote for the war in Iraq.\u201d— Ernesto Falcon @Efalcon@sfba.social (@Ernesto Falcon @Efalcon@sfba.social) 1578453093
While calling for a vague deescalation, Biden suggested the president's biggest issue was not the war crimes he is committing or threatening to commit, but that Trump "refuses to level with the American people" about the dangers he has created. As numerous critics have noted, Biden--as well as former South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg--have largely criticized Trump not for his war-mongering, but for being not very good at it.
"Biden would like you to believe that he has seen the light when it comes to the folly of imperialist adventures abroad, that he has found redemption post-Iraq. But his response to the assassination of Soleimani suggests that the old Biden is alive and well." --Meagan Day, Jacobin magazineAs Meagan Day wrote for Jacobin magazine last week, "Biden would like you to believe that he has seen the light when it comes to the folly of imperialist adventures abroad, that he has found redemption post-Iraq. But his response to the assassination of Soleimani suggests that the old Biden is alive and well."
"No," Day concluded, "Joe Biden cannot be relied upon to make the case against Trump's war."
On Tuesday night, meanwhile, just before the Iran missile attack on two military bases where U.S. forces are stationed took place, Sanders appeared on the "PBS NewsHour" and said that the push for war by Trump and top officials in his administration "feels to me exactly what I saw in 2002 and 2003, and that was the leadup and justification for the war in Iraq."
"I opposed that war vigorously and it turned out to be one of the worst foreign policy blunders in the history of United States," Sanders continued. "A war with Iran would likely be even worse."
\u201cLive on @NewsHour: Sen. Bernie Sanders comments on the escalated tensions between the U.S. and Iran https://t.co/0iNghsXuQU\u201d— PBS NewsHour (@PBS NewsHour) 1578438869
In his role as a U.S. Senator, Sanders last week joined with Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) to introduce legislation that would prevent any funding for a military offensive against Iran without prior congressional authorization.
At a rally taking place in Brooklyn Tuesday night as the news arrived of the Iranian strikes, Warren told the crowd that "the American people do not want a war with Iran"--words that received a standing ovation.
"The American people do not want a war with Iran." --Sen. Elizabeth WarrenAppearing on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" Wednesday morning, Warren said the war in Iraq "was a mistake and I think it was a mistake for anyone to vote for that war."
Asked specifically if Biden made a mistake by voting for the war, Warren simply replied: "Everybody."
Instead of escalating conflict and the growing threat of war, Warren said the goal should be to deescalate the situation and get Iran back to the negotiating table to end hostilities.
\u201cWATCH: Sen. Warren calls for negotiating with Iran following Wednesday's retaliation: "We should de-escalate here and try to get Iran back to the negotiating table." https://t.co/JxLip71aX7\u201d— MSNBC (@MSNBC) 1578488760
Exhibiting their anti-war leadership, both Sanders and Warren are participating in a national strategy call organized by lawmakers and progressive advocacy groups on Wednesday night:
\u201cTONIGHT. \n#NoWarWithIran strategy call w/ @BernieSanders @ewarren @RepBarbaraLee @RepRoKhanna. RSVP now: https://t.co/7aCHvMhnFP \n\nh/t @WinWithoutWar @VetsAboutFace @NIACAction\u201d— MoveOn (@MoveOn) 1578497100
"The American people do not want war with Iran," tweeted Sanders on Wednesday morning, just before Trump was scheduled to address the U.S. public in a televised address. "They want to invest in health care, education, housing, and good jobs. Congress cannot stand by. It must act now to pass our legislation to uphold the Constitution and prevent Trump from spending trillions more on endless war."
While peace advocates and his more progressive 2020 rivals remain outspoken in their demand for deescalation and telling President Donald Trump to end his reckless march to war, former Vice President Joe Biden is being chided for issuing a weak-tea response after Iranian missiles hit U.S. military bases in Iraq Tuesday night--a direct retaliatory strike following last week's U.S. assassination of top military leader Qasem Soleimani.
"The American people do not want war with Iran... Congress cannot stand by. It must act now to pass our legislation to uphold the Constitution and prevent Trump from spending trillions more on endless war." --Sen. Bernie Sanders"I'm going to hold off on commenting on the news tonight until we know more," Biden tweeted shortly after the Iranian attack was reported, "but there is one thing I will say: Jill and I are keeping our troops and Americans overseas in our prayers. We hope you'll keep them in yours."
Compared to Sens. Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, who have both spoken out repeatedly and forcefully in recent days against Trump's aggression and the threat of war, Biden's remarks were taken as a troubling signal that he has yet to learn key lessons since he voted in favor of the 2003 invasion of Iraq while serving in the U.S. Senate.
\u201cIf your candidate right now is saying anything other than "the US cannot go to war with Iran and should de-escalate immediately," they shouldn't be your candidate\u201d— Kate Aronoff (@Kate Aronoff) 1578452380
"May I suggest 'No war with Iran'," said progressive radio show host Sam Seder in response to Biden's tweet.
At a campaign rally in New York, Biden's advice to Trump was not to immediately halt hostilities but rather to express hope that the president is "listening to his military commanders for the first time because so far that's not been the case."
\u201cIt is this Democratic timidness that lead people like Joe Biden to vote for the war in Iraq.\u201d— Ernesto Falcon @Efalcon@sfba.social (@Ernesto Falcon @Efalcon@sfba.social) 1578453093
While calling for a vague deescalation, Biden suggested the president's biggest issue was not the war crimes he is committing or threatening to commit, but that Trump "refuses to level with the American people" about the dangers he has created. As numerous critics have noted, Biden--as well as former South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg--have largely criticized Trump not for his war-mongering, but for being not very good at it.
"Biden would like you to believe that he has seen the light when it comes to the folly of imperialist adventures abroad, that he has found redemption post-Iraq. But his response to the assassination of Soleimani suggests that the old Biden is alive and well." --Meagan Day, Jacobin magazineAs Meagan Day wrote for Jacobin magazine last week, "Biden would like you to believe that he has seen the light when it comes to the folly of imperialist adventures abroad, that he has found redemption post-Iraq. But his response to the assassination of Soleimani suggests that the old Biden is alive and well."
"No," Day concluded, "Joe Biden cannot be relied upon to make the case against Trump's war."
On Tuesday night, meanwhile, just before the Iran missile attack on two military bases where U.S. forces are stationed took place, Sanders appeared on the "PBS NewsHour" and said that the push for war by Trump and top officials in his administration "feels to me exactly what I saw in 2002 and 2003, and that was the leadup and justification for the war in Iraq."
"I opposed that war vigorously and it turned out to be one of the worst foreign policy blunders in the history of United States," Sanders continued. "A war with Iran would likely be even worse."
\u201cLive on @NewsHour: Sen. Bernie Sanders comments on the escalated tensions between the U.S. and Iran https://t.co/0iNghsXuQU\u201d— PBS NewsHour (@PBS NewsHour) 1578438869
In his role as a U.S. Senator, Sanders last week joined with Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) to introduce legislation that would prevent any funding for a military offensive against Iran without prior congressional authorization.
At a rally taking place in Brooklyn Tuesday night as the news arrived of the Iranian strikes, Warren told the crowd that "the American people do not want a war with Iran"--words that received a standing ovation.
"The American people do not want a war with Iran." --Sen. Elizabeth WarrenAppearing on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" Wednesday morning, Warren said the war in Iraq "was a mistake and I think it was a mistake for anyone to vote for that war."
Asked specifically if Biden made a mistake by voting for the war, Warren simply replied: "Everybody."
Instead of escalating conflict and the growing threat of war, Warren said the goal should be to deescalate the situation and get Iran back to the negotiating table to end hostilities.
\u201cWATCH: Sen. Warren calls for negotiating with Iran following Wednesday's retaliation: "We should de-escalate here and try to get Iran back to the negotiating table." https://t.co/JxLip71aX7\u201d— MSNBC (@MSNBC) 1578488760
Exhibiting their anti-war leadership, both Sanders and Warren are participating in a national strategy call organized by lawmakers and progressive advocacy groups on Wednesday night:
\u201cTONIGHT. \n#NoWarWithIran strategy call w/ @BernieSanders @ewarren @RepBarbaraLee @RepRoKhanna. RSVP now: https://t.co/7aCHvMhnFP \n\nh/t @WinWithoutWar @VetsAboutFace @NIACAction\u201d— MoveOn (@MoveOn) 1578497100
"The American people do not want war with Iran," tweeted Sanders on Wednesday morning, just before Trump was scheduled to address the U.S. public in a televised address. "They want to invest in health care, education, housing, and good jobs. Congress cannot stand by. It must act now to pass our legislation to uphold the Constitution and prevent Trump from spending trillions more on endless war."
"Trans people have served this country with honor," said Rep. Pramila Jayapal. "They deserve dignity—not betrayal."
The families of transgender service members in the U.S. Air Force could lose hundreds of thousands of dollars in denied retirement benefits due to a memo sent by the military branch this week.
As Reuters reported Thursday, an official at the Air Force informed transgender members with 15-18 years of military service that they would no be eligible for early retirement and would instead be forced to leave the Air Force without retirement benefits. Some transgender troops had previously been told they could retire early.
"After careful consideration of the individual applications, I am disapproving all Temporary Early Retirement Authority (TERA) exception to policy requests in Tabs 1 and 2 for members with 15-18 years of service," wrote Brian Scarlett, the acting assistant secretary of the Air Force for manpower and reserve affairs.
The memo means that many service members whose applications for early retirement had already been approved will have those approvals rescinded.
The decision follows the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in June that cleared the way for the U.S. Department of Defense to ban openly transgender Americans from serving in the military. President Donald Trump signed an executive order earlier this year to impose such a ban.
"This is just betrayal of a direct commitment made to these service members."
Last week, in a court filing related to transgender service members' lawsuit against the administration, the Department of Justice denied that the plaintiffs are transgender, instead calling them "trans-identifying individuals."
Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said there would be "no more pronouns" and "no more dudes in dresses" permitted in the military at a press conference in May, and transgender service members have recently reported facing bigotry as they've departed the service.
Military.com reported last month that one 20-year transgender veteran of the Army was told by an instructor of a mandatory pre-retirement course that she and her classmates should cross out the words "pronoun, gender, diversity, and inclusion" from their workbooks.
The incident, she said, was "yet another reminder that it doesn't matter how much they say, 'Thank you for all the effort you put in and that your contributions are valuable'... because at the end of the day, they're having us manually go in and remove our own contributions from all the documentation."
The attempted "removal" of any record of transgender people's service now extends to their retirement benefits, according to the memo sent August 4, with service members who have served for close to two decades being given the option to quit or be forced out, with lump-sum payments instead of benefits.
Shannon Minter of the National Center for LGBTQ Rights told Reuters the memo was "devastating."
"This is just betrayal of a direct commitment made to these service members," said Minter.
Reuters reported that the memo included a question-and-answer section, with one question reading, "How do I tell family we're not getting retirement benefits?"
The Air Force suggested long-serving transgender members tell their loved ones to "focus on the benefits you do retain," such as Department of Veterans Affairs benefits and "experience," and to seek counseling services.
"The Air Force told transgender service members to prepare for early retirement—then changed course and is now forcing them out with no benefits at all," said U.S. Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.). "Trans people have served this country with honor. They deserve dignity—not betrayal. We must speak out and fight back, always."
Paul Schwiep, the attorney representing the plaintiffs, described the judge's ruling as "a temporary but appropriate pause on any further destruction of a sensitive area."
A federal judge on Thursday ordered a temporary halt to the construction of an immigrant detention center being built in the Florida Everglades dubbed "Alligator Alcatraz."
The Associated Press reports that U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida has order that all construction at the facility be halted for the next 14 days, although the government can continue to operate the center and detain immigrants there.
The judge's ruling was in response to a lawsuit filed by the local Miccosukee Tribe and some environmental organizations who had argued that further construction at the site risked damage to protected wetlands nearby.
"The crux of the plaintiffs' argument is that the detention facility violates the National Environmental Policy Act, which requires federal agencies to assess the environmental effects of major construction projects," wrote the AP.
Florida attorney Jesse Panuccio, representing the state, argued that the facility shouldn't be subject to this federal law because it is entirely under the control of the Florida state government. However, Williams rejected this argument and said that the detention center was at the very least a joint operation between Florida and the federal government given that it was handling people detained by the federal government.
Florida officials have outlined ambitions to double the capacity of the current facility, according to The New York Times.
Paul Schwiep, the attorney representing the plaintiffs, described the judge's ruling as "a temporary but appropriate pause on any further destruction of a sensitive area, to allow the parties to present their evidence and arguments on the preliminary injunction request" that would potentially permanently halt construction at the site.
The facility was first announced earlier this summer when Republican Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier unveiled a plan to renovate the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport and transform it into a mass detention center for immigrants. During a press event touting the new facility last month, Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis boasted that detainees being held there had little hope of ever escaping given that it was surrounded by miles of alligator-infested swamps.
The center has drawn criticism from human rights groups as well as from Democrats who visited the facility last month. Rep. Maxwell Frost (D-Fla.), one of the lawmakers to visit the facility, said afterward that "what I saw made my heart sink," referring to the conditions where detainees are being held.
"Corporate polluters that created this problem must not be allowed to stop the world from solving it," argued one Greenpeace campaigner.
With representatives from 175 nations gathered in Geneva, Switzerland for the final round of talks on a global plastics treaty, Greenpeace campaigners on Thursday created a symbolic trail of black oil and hung massive banners over the entrance to the event venue demanding the expulsion of fossil fuel industry lobbyists from the summit.
Greenpeace said 22 activists from 10 European nations climbed to the roof of the Palais des Nations, where the United Nations conference is taking place, to unfurl banners reading "Big Oil Polluting Inside" and "Plastics Treaty Not for Sale."
The environmental advocacy group said that fossil fuel and chemical industry lobbyists outnumbered scientists 4-to-1 at the talks.
"Each round of negotiations brings more oil and gas lobbyists into the room," Graham Forbes, who is leading Greenpeace's delegation to the summit, said in a statement. "Fossil fuel and petrochemical giants are polluting the negotiations from the inside, and we're calling on the U.N. to kick them out."
"Governments must not let a handful of backwards-looking fossil fuel companies override the clear call from all of civil society—including Indigenous peoples, frontline communities, youth activists, and many responsible businesses—demanding a strong agreement that cuts plastic production," Forbes added.
The huge presence of these plastic-loving lobbyists threatens the Global Plastics Treaty.They don’t want real solutions, all they want is more profits.Tell the UN to kick them out of the plastics talks now👇act.gp/4licpMq
[image or embed]
— Greenpeace UK (@greenpeaceuk.bsky.social) August 7, 2025 at 8:55 AM
In 2022, participating nations agreed to draft a legally binding global treaty to reduce waste and toxic chemicals in some plastics contain; however, no such agreement has been reached.
"It is clear that the plastics treaty negotiators have a mountain to climb to reach an agreement by August 14th," Friends of the Earth International said Tuesday, referring to the summit's end date. "There remain substantive differences between the vast majority of states that want action and the few blockers looking to prolong the era of plastics."
There is strong opposition to curbing plastic production from the fossil fuel industry—99% of plastic is made from petrochemicals—and oil-producing countries including Russia, Saudi Arabia, and the United States.
Reuters reported Wednesday that the Trump administration sent letters to some countries participating in the Geneva talks urging them to reject "impractical global approaches such as plastic production targets or bans and restrictions on plastic additives or plastic products."
Oil producer pressure, Trump rollbacks threaten global treaty on plastics pollution. Plastics are derived from fossil fuels. www.reuters.com/sustainabili...
[image or embed]
— Antonia Juhasz (@antoniajuhasz.bsky.social) August 5, 2025 at 6:46 AM
Greenpeace noted that "the fossil fuel industry and its political allies are pushing hard to weaken the treaty's ambition."
According to the group:
If they succeed, plastic production could triple by 2050, fueling more environmental destruction, climate chaos, and harm to human health. A recent report from Greenpeace U.K. revealed that companies like Dow, ExxonMobil, BASF, Chevron Phillips, Shell, SABIC, and INEOS continue to ramp up plastic production. Since the global plastics treaty process began in November 2022, these seven companies have expanded plastic production capacity by 1.4 million tons. Over the same time period, they have also produced enough plastic to fill an estimated 6.3 million garbage trucks, or five-and-a-half trucks every minute. These companies also reaped enormous profits, with Dow alone earning an estimated US$5.1 billion from plastics, while sending at least 21 lobbyists into treaty negotiations.
A study published this week in the British medical journal The Lancet estimated that plastics are responsible for more than $1.5 trillion in "health-related economic losses" worldwide annually.
"These impacts fall disproportionately upon low-income and at-risk populations," the study's authors wrote. "The principal driver of this crisis is accelerating growth in plastic production—from 2 megatons (Mt) in 1950, to 475 Mt in 2022; that is projected to be 1,200 Mt by 2060."
Friends of the Earth International campaigner Sam Cossar-Gilbert noted that "coastlines across the Global South are drowning in plastic waste that isn't ours."
"Shipped in from wealthy nations under the guise of 'recycling,' the plastic waste trade forces marginalized communities to absorb the consequences of someone else's convenience," he added. "This is not just environmental degradation—it's environmental injustice. We refuse to accept false solutions that sacrifice frontline communities and the environment."
Forbes asserted that "this is a battle for our survival."
"Corporate polluters that created this problem must not be allowed to stop the world from solving it," he added. "Governments must show courage and deliver a strong treaty that puts people and planet first, not short-term corporate profits."