SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Lawyers 'Ready to Litigate' Muslim Ban 2.0 as UN Warns of Impact on Refugees
'The only way to actually fix the Muslim ban is not to have a Muslim ban'
Mar 07, 2017
U.S. immigration lawyers are ready to take President Donald Trump to court--again--for his latest executive order on immigration, which civil rights experts say is just a Muslim ban by another name, and which the United Nations warned Tuesday would exacerbate the refugee crisis.
"While the White House may have made changes to the ban, the intent to discriminate against Muslims remains clear. This doesn't just harm the families caught in the chaos of President Trump's draconian policies--it's diametrically opposed to our values, and makes us less safe," New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman said Monday.
"I stand ready to litigate--again--in order to protect New York's families, institutions, and economy," he said.
The new order bans entry to the U.S. for 90 days for travelers from Sudan, Syria, Iran, Libya, Somalia, and Yemen, targeting those who did not already have a valid visa by January 27, 2017. It also blocks all refugees from entering the country for 120 days, which U.N. high commissioner for refugees Filippo Grandi warned would "compound the anguish" for those fleeing deadly violence and persecution around the world.
Those six majority-Muslim countries were all targeted in Trump's first executive order--which he dropped after it was suspended in a court ruling last month--along with Iraq, which was left off the list this time.
But rights advocates said none of the tweaks change the fact that the memo is unconstitutional.
"By rescinding his earlier executive order, President Trump makes one thing perfectly clear: His original travel ban was indefensible--legally, constitutionally, and morally," said Washington state Attorney General Bob Ferguson, who was key in striking down the original memo after his lawsuit was upheld by federal Judge James Robart.
"We are carefully reviewing the new executive order to determine its impacts on Washington state and our next legal steps," Ferguson said Monday.
A Department of Homeland Security (DHS) document leaked just days before the new order was unveiled showed that most foreign-born, U.S.-based violent extremists were radicalized years after their entry to the U.S.--which many said discredited Trump's justification for the original memo.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) said Monday that the "scaled-back version...shares the same fatal flaws" as the first ban.
"What's more, the changes the Trump administration has made, and everything we've learned since the original ban rolled out, completely undermine the bogus national security justifications the president has tried to hide behind and only strengthen the case against his unconstitutional executive orders," said Omar Jadwat, director of the ACLU's Immigrants' Rights Project.
Jadwat added, "The only way to actually fix the Muslim ban is not to have a Muslim ban."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
U.S. immigration lawyers are ready to take President Donald Trump to court--again--for his latest executive order on immigration, which civil rights experts say is just a Muslim ban by another name, and which the United Nations warned Tuesday would exacerbate the refugee crisis.
"While the White House may have made changes to the ban, the intent to discriminate against Muslims remains clear. This doesn't just harm the families caught in the chaos of President Trump's draconian policies--it's diametrically opposed to our values, and makes us less safe," New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman said Monday.
"I stand ready to litigate--again--in order to protect New York's families, institutions, and economy," he said.
The new order bans entry to the U.S. for 90 days for travelers from Sudan, Syria, Iran, Libya, Somalia, and Yemen, targeting those who did not already have a valid visa by January 27, 2017. It also blocks all refugees from entering the country for 120 days, which U.N. high commissioner for refugees Filippo Grandi warned would "compound the anguish" for those fleeing deadly violence and persecution around the world.
Those six majority-Muslim countries were all targeted in Trump's first executive order--which he dropped after it was suspended in a court ruling last month--along with Iraq, which was left off the list this time.
But rights advocates said none of the tweaks change the fact that the memo is unconstitutional.
"By rescinding his earlier executive order, President Trump makes one thing perfectly clear: His original travel ban was indefensible--legally, constitutionally, and morally," said Washington state Attorney General Bob Ferguson, who was key in striking down the original memo after his lawsuit was upheld by federal Judge James Robart.
"We are carefully reviewing the new executive order to determine its impacts on Washington state and our next legal steps," Ferguson said Monday.
A Department of Homeland Security (DHS) document leaked just days before the new order was unveiled showed that most foreign-born, U.S.-based violent extremists were radicalized years after their entry to the U.S.--which many said discredited Trump's justification for the original memo.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) said Monday that the "scaled-back version...shares the same fatal flaws" as the first ban.
"What's more, the changes the Trump administration has made, and everything we've learned since the original ban rolled out, completely undermine the bogus national security justifications the president has tried to hide behind and only strengthen the case against his unconstitutional executive orders," said Omar Jadwat, director of the ACLU's Immigrants' Rights Project.
Jadwat added, "The only way to actually fix the Muslim ban is not to have a Muslim ban."
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
U.S. immigration lawyers are ready to take President Donald Trump to court--again--for his latest executive order on immigration, which civil rights experts say is just a Muslim ban by another name, and which the United Nations warned Tuesday would exacerbate the refugee crisis.
"While the White House may have made changes to the ban, the intent to discriminate against Muslims remains clear. This doesn't just harm the families caught in the chaos of President Trump's draconian policies--it's diametrically opposed to our values, and makes us less safe," New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman said Monday.
"I stand ready to litigate--again--in order to protect New York's families, institutions, and economy," he said.
The new order bans entry to the U.S. for 90 days for travelers from Sudan, Syria, Iran, Libya, Somalia, and Yemen, targeting those who did not already have a valid visa by January 27, 2017. It also blocks all refugees from entering the country for 120 days, which U.N. high commissioner for refugees Filippo Grandi warned would "compound the anguish" for those fleeing deadly violence and persecution around the world.
Those six majority-Muslim countries were all targeted in Trump's first executive order--which he dropped after it was suspended in a court ruling last month--along with Iraq, which was left off the list this time.
But rights advocates said none of the tweaks change the fact that the memo is unconstitutional.
"By rescinding his earlier executive order, President Trump makes one thing perfectly clear: His original travel ban was indefensible--legally, constitutionally, and morally," said Washington state Attorney General Bob Ferguson, who was key in striking down the original memo after his lawsuit was upheld by federal Judge James Robart.
"We are carefully reviewing the new executive order to determine its impacts on Washington state and our next legal steps," Ferguson said Monday.
A Department of Homeland Security (DHS) document leaked just days before the new order was unveiled showed that most foreign-born, U.S.-based violent extremists were radicalized years after their entry to the U.S.--which many said discredited Trump's justification for the original memo.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) said Monday that the "scaled-back version...shares the same fatal flaws" as the first ban.
"What's more, the changes the Trump administration has made, and everything we've learned since the original ban rolled out, completely undermine the bogus national security justifications the president has tried to hide behind and only strengthen the case against his unconstitutional executive orders," said Omar Jadwat, director of the ACLU's Immigrants' Rights Project.
Jadwat added, "The only way to actually fix the Muslim ban is not to have a Muslim ban."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.