SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
NAACP's Call for Charter School Moratorium Invites Corporate Criticism
'Our decision today is driven by a long held principle and policy of the NAACP that high quality, free, public education should be afforded to all children'
Oct 17, 2016
Despite pressure from corporate media and education reformers, the nation's largest civil rights organization voted on Saturday to approve a resolution calling for a moratorium on charter school expansion at least until issues of non-transparency and inequity are meaningfully addressed.
Saturday's vote codified one taken by delegates to the NAACP's national convention in July, and demands a moratorium until:
- Charter schools are subject to the same transparency and accountability standards as public schools
- Public funds are not diverted to charter schools at the expense of the public school system
- Charter schools cease expelling students that public schools have a duty to educate and
- Charter schools cease to perpetuate de facto segregation of the highest performing children from those whose aspirations may be high but whose talents are not yet as obvious.
"The NAACP's resolution is not inspired by ideological opposition to charter schools but by our historical support of public schools--as well as today's data and the present experience of NAACP branches in nearly every school district in the nation," said NAACP president and CEO Cornell William Brooks in a statement.
Added Roslyn M. Brock, chairman of the National NAACP Board of Directors: "Our decision today is driven by a long held principle and policy of the NAACP that high quality, free, public education should be afforded to all children."
To that end, the NAACP also on Saturday announced the creation of a special task force on education, with the goal of achieving the points laid out in the newly approved resolution.
But while such developments should be seen as good news, as historian and teacher John Thompson argued in an op-ed on Sunday, "[t]he bad news is that the call is not universally seen for what it is--a balanced effort to deescalate the education civil war which is disproportionately hurting poor children of color."
In fact, the NAACP's resolution seems to have ramped up that war.
Before and after the vote, major American newspapers including the New York Times, Washington Post, and Wall Street Journal came out against the resolution--as did a slew of corporate education reform organizations.
The Times called the NAACP "misguided" for its stance, while the Post urged the group to "do its homework" and the Journal said voting yes would be "a sellout of the NAACP's founding principles."
But such criticism suggests the newspapers themselves are "misguided and uninformed about what the charter school industry is doing to America's public schools," Steven Rosenfeld wrote for AlterNet.
Media outlets' "attempt to influence the NAACP board's vote this weekend reveals that they don't understand or care to understand how the industry is dominated by corporate franchises with interstate ambitions to privatize K-12 schools."
He continued:
What do the drafters of the NAACP resolution understand that these editorial boards do not? They know that the charter industry was the creation of some of the wealthiest billionaires in America, from the Walton family heirs of the Walmart fortune, to Microsoft's Bill Gates, to Eli Broad, Michael Bloomberg, Reed Hastings, Mark Zuckerberg, and others, including hedge fund investors. These billionaires have pumped billions into creating a new privatized school system where those running schools can profit and evade government oversight. These very rich Americans aren't trying to fix traditional public schools, but create a parallel, privately run system that's operating in a separate and unequal world inside local school districts.
Furthermore, wrote public school teacher and education activist Mercedes Schneider on Sunday:
The NAACP charter moratorium is not an "attack." It is accountability.
It is not good enough to note that when charters excel, they're great, or tossing off the charters "are far from universally perfect" line (which the NYT does in its op-ed) and that failing charter schools "should be shut down"--another pro-charter, cliched non-solution that only leads to unnecessary community disruption--disruption that could be curbed if there were stronger controls in place to begin with.
As is proven by its "misguided" editorial, the NYT editorial board is reinforcing an out of touch impression, not the NAACP.
Noting, as did the NAACP, that traditional public schools are in sore need of improvement, National Education Association president Lily Eskelsen Garcia said the resolution offered a chance to "pause and reassess" with regard to public education.
"The chorus of those of us who have been sounding the alarm on the many long-standing structural and governance problems that have plagued charters in recent years is growing. The time is right to pause and reassess," Garcia said a statement. "We strongly support more inclusive and otherwise positive alternatives to charter schools. We should invest in proven strategies--strategies such as smaller class sizes, parental involvement, magnet and community schools--that we know help to improve the success of all of our students."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
Despite pressure from corporate media and education reformers, the nation's largest civil rights organization voted on Saturday to approve a resolution calling for a moratorium on charter school expansion at least until issues of non-transparency and inequity are meaningfully addressed.
Saturday's vote codified one taken by delegates to the NAACP's national convention in July, and demands a moratorium until:
- Charter schools are subject to the same transparency and accountability standards as public schools
- Public funds are not diverted to charter schools at the expense of the public school system
- Charter schools cease expelling students that public schools have a duty to educate and
- Charter schools cease to perpetuate de facto segregation of the highest performing children from those whose aspirations may be high but whose talents are not yet as obvious.
"The NAACP's resolution is not inspired by ideological opposition to charter schools but by our historical support of public schools--as well as today's data and the present experience of NAACP branches in nearly every school district in the nation," said NAACP president and CEO Cornell William Brooks in a statement.
Added Roslyn M. Brock, chairman of the National NAACP Board of Directors: "Our decision today is driven by a long held principle and policy of the NAACP that high quality, free, public education should be afforded to all children."
To that end, the NAACP also on Saturday announced the creation of a special task force on education, with the goal of achieving the points laid out in the newly approved resolution.
But while such developments should be seen as good news, as historian and teacher John Thompson argued in an op-ed on Sunday, "[t]he bad news is that the call is not universally seen for what it is--a balanced effort to deescalate the education civil war which is disproportionately hurting poor children of color."
In fact, the NAACP's resolution seems to have ramped up that war.
Before and after the vote, major American newspapers including the New York Times, Washington Post, and Wall Street Journal came out against the resolution--as did a slew of corporate education reform organizations.
The Times called the NAACP "misguided" for its stance, while the Post urged the group to "do its homework" and the Journal said voting yes would be "a sellout of the NAACP's founding principles."
But such criticism suggests the newspapers themselves are "misguided and uninformed about what the charter school industry is doing to America's public schools," Steven Rosenfeld wrote for AlterNet.
Media outlets' "attempt to influence the NAACP board's vote this weekend reveals that they don't understand or care to understand how the industry is dominated by corporate franchises with interstate ambitions to privatize K-12 schools."
He continued:
What do the drafters of the NAACP resolution understand that these editorial boards do not? They know that the charter industry was the creation of some of the wealthiest billionaires in America, from the Walton family heirs of the Walmart fortune, to Microsoft's Bill Gates, to Eli Broad, Michael Bloomberg, Reed Hastings, Mark Zuckerberg, and others, including hedge fund investors. These billionaires have pumped billions into creating a new privatized school system where those running schools can profit and evade government oversight. These very rich Americans aren't trying to fix traditional public schools, but create a parallel, privately run system that's operating in a separate and unequal world inside local school districts.
Furthermore, wrote public school teacher and education activist Mercedes Schneider on Sunday:
The NAACP charter moratorium is not an "attack." It is accountability.
It is not good enough to note that when charters excel, they're great, or tossing off the charters "are far from universally perfect" line (which the NYT does in its op-ed) and that failing charter schools "should be shut down"--another pro-charter, cliched non-solution that only leads to unnecessary community disruption--disruption that could be curbed if there were stronger controls in place to begin with.
As is proven by its "misguided" editorial, the NYT editorial board is reinforcing an out of touch impression, not the NAACP.
Noting, as did the NAACP, that traditional public schools are in sore need of improvement, National Education Association president Lily Eskelsen Garcia said the resolution offered a chance to "pause and reassess" with regard to public education.
"The chorus of those of us who have been sounding the alarm on the many long-standing structural and governance problems that have plagued charters in recent years is growing. The time is right to pause and reassess," Garcia said a statement. "We strongly support more inclusive and otherwise positive alternatives to charter schools. We should invest in proven strategies--strategies such as smaller class sizes, parental involvement, magnet and community schools--that we know help to improve the success of all of our students."
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
Despite pressure from corporate media and education reformers, the nation's largest civil rights organization voted on Saturday to approve a resolution calling for a moratorium on charter school expansion at least until issues of non-transparency and inequity are meaningfully addressed.
Saturday's vote codified one taken by delegates to the NAACP's national convention in July, and demands a moratorium until:
- Charter schools are subject to the same transparency and accountability standards as public schools
- Public funds are not diverted to charter schools at the expense of the public school system
- Charter schools cease expelling students that public schools have a duty to educate and
- Charter schools cease to perpetuate de facto segregation of the highest performing children from those whose aspirations may be high but whose talents are not yet as obvious.
"The NAACP's resolution is not inspired by ideological opposition to charter schools but by our historical support of public schools--as well as today's data and the present experience of NAACP branches in nearly every school district in the nation," said NAACP president and CEO Cornell William Brooks in a statement.
Added Roslyn M. Brock, chairman of the National NAACP Board of Directors: "Our decision today is driven by a long held principle and policy of the NAACP that high quality, free, public education should be afforded to all children."
To that end, the NAACP also on Saturday announced the creation of a special task force on education, with the goal of achieving the points laid out in the newly approved resolution.
But while such developments should be seen as good news, as historian and teacher John Thompson argued in an op-ed on Sunday, "[t]he bad news is that the call is not universally seen for what it is--a balanced effort to deescalate the education civil war which is disproportionately hurting poor children of color."
In fact, the NAACP's resolution seems to have ramped up that war.
Before and after the vote, major American newspapers including the New York Times, Washington Post, and Wall Street Journal came out against the resolution--as did a slew of corporate education reform organizations.
The Times called the NAACP "misguided" for its stance, while the Post urged the group to "do its homework" and the Journal said voting yes would be "a sellout of the NAACP's founding principles."
But such criticism suggests the newspapers themselves are "misguided and uninformed about what the charter school industry is doing to America's public schools," Steven Rosenfeld wrote for AlterNet.
Media outlets' "attempt to influence the NAACP board's vote this weekend reveals that they don't understand or care to understand how the industry is dominated by corporate franchises with interstate ambitions to privatize K-12 schools."
He continued:
What do the drafters of the NAACP resolution understand that these editorial boards do not? They know that the charter industry was the creation of some of the wealthiest billionaires in America, from the Walton family heirs of the Walmart fortune, to Microsoft's Bill Gates, to Eli Broad, Michael Bloomberg, Reed Hastings, Mark Zuckerberg, and others, including hedge fund investors. These billionaires have pumped billions into creating a new privatized school system where those running schools can profit and evade government oversight. These very rich Americans aren't trying to fix traditional public schools, but create a parallel, privately run system that's operating in a separate and unequal world inside local school districts.
Furthermore, wrote public school teacher and education activist Mercedes Schneider on Sunday:
The NAACP charter moratorium is not an "attack." It is accountability.
It is not good enough to note that when charters excel, they're great, or tossing off the charters "are far from universally perfect" line (which the NYT does in its op-ed) and that failing charter schools "should be shut down"--another pro-charter, cliched non-solution that only leads to unnecessary community disruption--disruption that could be curbed if there were stronger controls in place to begin with.
As is proven by its "misguided" editorial, the NYT editorial board is reinforcing an out of touch impression, not the NAACP.
Noting, as did the NAACP, that traditional public schools are in sore need of improvement, National Education Association president Lily Eskelsen Garcia said the resolution offered a chance to "pause and reassess" with regard to public education.
"The chorus of those of us who have been sounding the alarm on the many long-standing structural and governance problems that have plagued charters in recent years is growing. The time is right to pause and reassess," Garcia said a statement. "We strongly support more inclusive and otherwise positive alternatives to charter schools. We should invest in proven strategies--strategies such as smaller class sizes, parental involvement, magnet and community schools--that we know help to improve the success of all of our students."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.