SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Who's Pumping Money into 2016 Election? Hedge Fund Heads
New analysis by Reuters shows Clinton, Cruz biggest recipients of hedge fund managers' donations
Mar 10, 2016
A new analysis by Reuters offers a fresh look at the interests pouring money into the 2016 president election.
Hedge fund managers are upping their game in this election season, with Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton and Republican Ted Cruz the biggest beneficiaries, Reuters' review of Federal Election Commission filings found.
"About $47 million has been lavished on presidential candidates and lawmakers and the political action committees that support them by two dozen of the industry's top managers in the first 13 months of this election season," the news agency reports.
In fact, hedge fund managers are on track "to more than double the amount they gave in the 2012 election campaign."
That continues a trend--the Center for Responsive Politics (CRP) reports:
While individuals who work for hedge funds had been contributing to campaigns for years, the industry itself didn't emerge as a significant political player or campaign contributor until 2007, coinciding with the increased scrutiny the industry began to face from lawmakers. However, the industry has more than made up for lost time. Hedge funds contributed nearly $40 million during the 2012 election cycle -- more than double their contributions during the 2008 election cycle.
Robert Mercer, co-chief executive of Renaissance Technologies, has been a big backer for Cruz, Reuters found, giving $11 million to the Keep the Promise Super PAC, which supports him.
Clinton, meanwhile, is taking in big bucks from George Soros. He "alone is responsible for $7.3 million of the $11.7 million that has gone to Super PACs and other committees supporting Clinton."
Fueling this input of cash may be due in part to Donald Trump, Reuters reports. The billionaire Republican front-runner supports closing the "carried interest" tax loophole, which, as the Citizens for Tax Justice explains, "allows wealthy investment fund managers to pay taxes at lower rates than middle-income people." One Boston Globe reporter dubbed it "the tax break that won't die." Clinton supports closing it as well.
Reuters adds that Columbia University political science professor Gregory Wawro
speculated that Trump's popularity with blue-collar and middle-class voters could prompt the Republican Party to reassess an approach to taxes and economic issues that has favored top earners and major corporations in recent years.
The Bernie Sanders campaign has repeatedly pointed to the Clinton's backing by Wall Street interests to contrast the two presidential hopefuls. He previously told CNN, "To a significant degree, her campaign is funded by Wall Street and big money interests." Clinton, for her part, has dismissed any "undue influence" from such backing.
CRP reported last week:
Clinton and the super PACs supporting her have raised over $18 million from the securities and investment industry, which includes Goldman Sachs and other titans of Wall Street. For Priorities USA alone, the number is about $14.7 million -- although when Sanders spoke [on Feb. 4], the most recent reported figure was only $13.7 million. During Clinton's career in the Senate, she raised $14.7 million from that industry.
A CRP analysis also shows that hedge funds were generally donating far more to Democrats than Republicans through the 2008 campaign season. Since 2012, however, that's flipped. Reuters reports that their donations "to 2016 presidential candidates and lawmakers and the PACs supporting them favored Republicans over Democrats by about 3 to 2."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A new analysis by Reuters offers a fresh look at the interests pouring money into the 2016 president election.
Hedge fund managers are upping their game in this election season, with Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton and Republican Ted Cruz the biggest beneficiaries, Reuters' review of Federal Election Commission filings found.
"About $47 million has been lavished on presidential candidates and lawmakers and the political action committees that support them by two dozen of the industry's top managers in the first 13 months of this election season," the news agency reports.
In fact, hedge fund managers are on track "to more than double the amount they gave in the 2012 election campaign."
That continues a trend--the Center for Responsive Politics (CRP) reports:
While individuals who work for hedge funds had been contributing to campaigns for years, the industry itself didn't emerge as a significant political player or campaign contributor until 2007, coinciding with the increased scrutiny the industry began to face from lawmakers. However, the industry has more than made up for lost time. Hedge funds contributed nearly $40 million during the 2012 election cycle -- more than double their contributions during the 2008 election cycle.
Robert Mercer, co-chief executive of Renaissance Technologies, has been a big backer for Cruz, Reuters found, giving $11 million to the Keep the Promise Super PAC, which supports him.
Clinton, meanwhile, is taking in big bucks from George Soros. He "alone is responsible for $7.3 million of the $11.7 million that has gone to Super PACs and other committees supporting Clinton."
Fueling this input of cash may be due in part to Donald Trump, Reuters reports. The billionaire Republican front-runner supports closing the "carried interest" tax loophole, which, as the Citizens for Tax Justice explains, "allows wealthy investment fund managers to pay taxes at lower rates than middle-income people." One Boston Globe reporter dubbed it "the tax break that won't die." Clinton supports closing it as well.
Reuters adds that Columbia University political science professor Gregory Wawro
speculated that Trump's popularity with blue-collar and middle-class voters could prompt the Republican Party to reassess an approach to taxes and economic issues that has favored top earners and major corporations in recent years.
The Bernie Sanders campaign has repeatedly pointed to the Clinton's backing by Wall Street interests to contrast the two presidential hopefuls. He previously told CNN, "To a significant degree, her campaign is funded by Wall Street and big money interests." Clinton, for her part, has dismissed any "undue influence" from such backing.
CRP reported last week:
Clinton and the super PACs supporting her have raised over $18 million from the securities and investment industry, which includes Goldman Sachs and other titans of Wall Street. For Priorities USA alone, the number is about $14.7 million -- although when Sanders spoke [on Feb. 4], the most recent reported figure was only $13.7 million. During Clinton's career in the Senate, she raised $14.7 million from that industry.
A CRP analysis also shows that hedge funds were generally donating far more to Democrats than Republicans through the 2008 campaign season. Since 2012, however, that's flipped. Reuters reports that their donations "to 2016 presidential candidates and lawmakers and the PACs supporting them favored Republicans over Democrats by about 3 to 2."
A new analysis by Reuters offers a fresh look at the interests pouring money into the 2016 president election.
Hedge fund managers are upping their game in this election season, with Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton and Republican Ted Cruz the biggest beneficiaries, Reuters' review of Federal Election Commission filings found.
"About $47 million has been lavished on presidential candidates and lawmakers and the political action committees that support them by two dozen of the industry's top managers in the first 13 months of this election season," the news agency reports.
In fact, hedge fund managers are on track "to more than double the amount they gave in the 2012 election campaign."
That continues a trend--the Center for Responsive Politics (CRP) reports:
While individuals who work for hedge funds had been contributing to campaigns for years, the industry itself didn't emerge as a significant political player or campaign contributor until 2007, coinciding with the increased scrutiny the industry began to face from lawmakers. However, the industry has more than made up for lost time. Hedge funds contributed nearly $40 million during the 2012 election cycle -- more than double their contributions during the 2008 election cycle.
Robert Mercer, co-chief executive of Renaissance Technologies, has been a big backer for Cruz, Reuters found, giving $11 million to the Keep the Promise Super PAC, which supports him.
Clinton, meanwhile, is taking in big bucks from George Soros. He "alone is responsible for $7.3 million of the $11.7 million that has gone to Super PACs and other committees supporting Clinton."
Fueling this input of cash may be due in part to Donald Trump, Reuters reports. The billionaire Republican front-runner supports closing the "carried interest" tax loophole, which, as the Citizens for Tax Justice explains, "allows wealthy investment fund managers to pay taxes at lower rates than middle-income people." One Boston Globe reporter dubbed it "the tax break that won't die." Clinton supports closing it as well.
Reuters adds that Columbia University political science professor Gregory Wawro
speculated that Trump's popularity with blue-collar and middle-class voters could prompt the Republican Party to reassess an approach to taxes and economic issues that has favored top earners and major corporations in recent years.
The Bernie Sanders campaign has repeatedly pointed to the Clinton's backing by Wall Street interests to contrast the two presidential hopefuls. He previously told CNN, "To a significant degree, her campaign is funded by Wall Street and big money interests." Clinton, for her part, has dismissed any "undue influence" from such backing.
CRP reported last week:
Clinton and the super PACs supporting her have raised over $18 million from the securities and investment industry, which includes Goldman Sachs and other titans of Wall Street. For Priorities USA alone, the number is about $14.7 million -- although when Sanders spoke [on Feb. 4], the most recent reported figure was only $13.7 million. During Clinton's career in the Senate, she raised $14.7 million from that industry.
A CRP analysis also shows that hedge funds were generally donating far more to Democrats than Republicans through the 2008 campaign season. Since 2012, however, that's flipped. Reuters reports that their donations "to 2016 presidential candidates and lawmakers and the PACs supporting them favored Republicans over Democrats by about 3 to 2."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.