SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
At every stage in U.S. history--beginning with the brutal dispossession of Native Americans and continuing through modern methods of injustice from redlining to mass incarceration and private prisons--U.S. racism has been inextricably embedded in the system of profiteering. (Photo: Jorg Kantel/flickr/cc)
Just Saying "Systemic Racism" Doesn't Expose Systemic Racism
Let us name the system: "racial capitalism."
Jun 17, 2020
If you've been watching mainstream TV news programs lately, you've probably noticed that a number of corporate journalists--prodded by the marvelous protests against police violence--seem to have learned a new phrase, which they invoke regularly: "systemic racism."
That's an improvement from a dozen years ago, when some in establishment media were hailing our society as "post-racial" because of the election of President Obama.
While anti-racist activists have been explaining for decades that the problem of racism goes beyond the bigoted attitudes of individual elected officials (like Rep. Steve King) or law enforcement chiefs (like Sheriff Joe Arpaio) or Fox News hosts (take your pick), mainstream TV news has always preferred to focus on individual racists rather than address the systemic racism embedded in housing, policing, schooling, employment and healthcare policies--institutionalized racism going back to the foundations of our country.
Corporate liberal news outlets were aggressive in policing the Democratic primaries for structural reforms that went "too far" in addressing systemic racism and classism.
So it's oddly disconcerting nowadays to hear regular mentions of the phrase "systemic racism" from mainstream journalists who adamantly refuse to criticize (or even name) the system that U.S. racism is entrenched in. That system is "CAPITALISM."
Or as historian Khalil Gibran Muhammad calls it: "racial capitalism."
The sad and deadly history began with the savage exploitation of African people as slaves. What history books euphemistically refer to as "Southern plantations" were really "slave labor camps" benefitting financial elites from New England to old England. After "emancipation" came the capitalist exploitation of African American workers in the worst and dirtiest jobs - not just as sharecroppers.
In the 1930s, when labor and socialist activism forced some concessions from U.S. capitalism, the two groups of workers excluded from the landmark National Labor Relations Act of 1935 were farm workers and domestic workers. The exclusions subjected millions of Black and Latinx workers to super-exploitation and mistreatment. (Although agricultural workers today from California to Florida are largely Latinx, farm workers in Florida were heavily African American when Edward R. Murrow produced his acclaimed "Harvest of Shame" documentary in 1960. Watch it here.)
At every stage in U.S. history--beginning with the brutal dispossession of Native Americans and continuing through modern methods of injustice from redlining to mass incarceration and private prisons--U.S. racism has been inextricably embedded in the system of profiteering.
So it's fascinating to see pundits on CNN, MSNBC and other networks now discussing "systemic racism" after they'd spent months during the Democratic presidential primaries in panicked overdrive propping up "the system." Reforms aimed at reducing the wealth/poverty extremes of neoliberal capitalism--whether proposed by Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren--were relentlessly dismissed as unrealistic, unaffordable, extreme. These were "shoot-the-moon policy ideas" (Washington Post) threatening to push Democrats "over a liberal cliff." (New York Times)
- Medicare for All? "Too expensive." Except it isn't. For months, mainstream media pundits vehemently defended a system that ties one's (private) health insurance to one's job . . . and then COVID-19 threw tens of millions out of those jobs.
- Green New Deal, providing millions of high-wage jobs while transforming our economy? Unaffordable.
- A wealth tax on ultra-millionaires to provide universal childcare and better schools--or a Wall Street transaction tax to provide free public college? Unworkable.
Corporate liberal news outlets were aggressive in policing the Democratic primaries for structural reforms that went "too far" in addressing systemic racism and classism.
Despite the media naysaying, the good news is that progressive reforms remain popular with the public.
The bad news is that too many people still rely on media outlets entrenched in the corporate system for news on "systemic" racism.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Jeff Cohen
Jeff Cohen is an activist and author. Cohen was an associate professor of journalism and the director of the Park Center for Independent Media at Ithaca College, founder of the media watch group FAIR, and former board member of Progressive Democrats of America. In 2002, he was a producer and pundit at MSNBC. He is the author of "Cable News Confidential: My Misadventures in Corporate Media" - and a co-founder of the online action group, www.RootsAction.org. His website is jeffcohen.org.
bernie sanderscapitalismcorporate mediademocratic socialismgreen new dealmedicare for allprisonsracismworkers
If you've been watching mainstream TV news programs lately, you've probably noticed that a number of corporate journalists--prodded by the marvelous protests against police violence--seem to have learned a new phrase, which they invoke regularly: "systemic racism."
That's an improvement from a dozen years ago, when some in establishment media were hailing our society as "post-racial" because of the election of President Obama.
While anti-racist activists have been explaining for decades that the problem of racism goes beyond the bigoted attitudes of individual elected officials (like Rep. Steve King) or law enforcement chiefs (like Sheriff Joe Arpaio) or Fox News hosts (take your pick), mainstream TV news has always preferred to focus on individual racists rather than address the systemic racism embedded in housing, policing, schooling, employment and healthcare policies--institutionalized racism going back to the foundations of our country.
Corporate liberal news outlets were aggressive in policing the Democratic primaries for structural reforms that went "too far" in addressing systemic racism and classism.
So it's oddly disconcerting nowadays to hear regular mentions of the phrase "systemic racism" from mainstream journalists who adamantly refuse to criticize (or even name) the system that U.S. racism is entrenched in. That system is "CAPITALISM."
Or as historian Khalil Gibran Muhammad calls it: "racial capitalism."
The sad and deadly history began with the savage exploitation of African people as slaves. What history books euphemistically refer to as "Southern plantations" were really "slave labor camps" benefitting financial elites from New England to old England. After "emancipation" came the capitalist exploitation of African American workers in the worst and dirtiest jobs - not just as sharecroppers.
In the 1930s, when labor and socialist activism forced some concessions from U.S. capitalism, the two groups of workers excluded from the landmark National Labor Relations Act of 1935 were farm workers and domestic workers. The exclusions subjected millions of Black and Latinx workers to super-exploitation and mistreatment. (Although agricultural workers today from California to Florida are largely Latinx, farm workers in Florida were heavily African American when Edward R. Murrow produced his acclaimed "Harvest of Shame" documentary in 1960. Watch it here.)
At every stage in U.S. history--beginning with the brutal dispossession of Native Americans and continuing through modern methods of injustice from redlining to mass incarceration and private prisons--U.S. racism has been inextricably embedded in the system of profiteering.
So it's fascinating to see pundits on CNN, MSNBC and other networks now discussing "systemic racism" after they'd spent months during the Democratic presidential primaries in panicked overdrive propping up "the system." Reforms aimed at reducing the wealth/poverty extremes of neoliberal capitalism--whether proposed by Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren--were relentlessly dismissed as unrealistic, unaffordable, extreme. These were "shoot-the-moon policy ideas" (Washington Post) threatening to push Democrats "over a liberal cliff." (New York Times)
- Medicare for All? "Too expensive." Except it isn't. For months, mainstream media pundits vehemently defended a system that ties one's (private) health insurance to one's job . . . and then COVID-19 threw tens of millions out of those jobs.
- Green New Deal, providing millions of high-wage jobs while transforming our economy? Unaffordable.
- A wealth tax on ultra-millionaires to provide universal childcare and better schools--or a Wall Street transaction tax to provide free public college? Unworkable.
Corporate liberal news outlets were aggressive in policing the Democratic primaries for structural reforms that went "too far" in addressing systemic racism and classism.
Despite the media naysaying, the good news is that progressive reforms remain popular with the public.
The bad news is that too many people still rely on media outlets entrenched in the corporate system for news on "systemic" racism.
Jeff Cohen
Jeff Cohen is an activist and author. Cohen was an associate professor of journalism and the director of the Park Center for Independent Media at Ithaca College, founder of the media watch group FAIR, and former board member of Progressive Democrats of America. In 2002, he was a producer and pundit at MSNBC. He is the author of "Cable News Confidential: My Misadventures in Corporate Media" - and a co-founder of the online action group, www.RootsAction.org. His website is jeffcohen.org.
If you've been watching mainstream TV news programs lately, you've probably noticed that a number of corporate journalists--prodded by the marvelous protests against police violence--seem to have learned a new phrase, which they invoke regularly: "systemic racism."
That's an improvement from a dozen years ago, when some in establishment media were hailing our society as "post-racial" because of the election of President Obama.
While anti-racist activists have been explaining for decades that the problem of racism goes beyond the bigoted attitudes of individual elected officials (like Rep. Steve King) or law enforcement chiefs (like Sheriff Joe Arpaio) or Fox News hosts (take your pick), mainstream TV news has always preferred to focus on individual racists rather than address the systemic racism embedded in housing, policing, schooling, employment and healthcare policies--institutionalized racism going back to the foundations of our country.
Corporate liberal news outlets were aggressive in policing the Democratic primaries for structural reforms that went "too far" in addressing systemic racism and classism.
So it's oddly disconcerting nowadays to hear regular mentions of the phrase "systemic racism" from mainstream journalists who adamantly refuse to criticize (or even name) the system that U.S. racism is entrenched in. That system is "CAPITALISM."
Or as historian Khalil Gibran Muhammad calls it: "racial capitalism."
The sad and deadly history began with the savage exploitation of African people as slaves. What history books euphemistically refer to as "Southern plantations" were really "slave labor camps" benefitting financial elites from New England to old England. After "emancipation" came the capitalist exploitation of African American workers in the worst and dirtiest jobs - not just as sharecroppers.
In the 1930s, when labor and socialist activism forced some concessions from U.S. capitalism, the two groups of workers excluded from the landmark National Labor Relations Act of 1935 were farm workers and domestic workers. The exclusions subjected millions of Black and Latinx workers to super-exploitation and mistreatment. (Although agricultural workers today from California to Florida are largely Latinx, farm workers in Florida were heavily African American when Edward R. Murrow produced his acclaimed "Harvest of Shame" documentary in 1960. Watch it here.)
At every stage in U.S. history--beginning with the brutal dispossession of Native Americans and continuing through modern methods of injustice from redlining to mass incarceration and private prisons--U.S. racism has been inextricably embedded in the system of profiteering.
So it's fascinating to see pundits on CNN, MSNBC and other networks now discussing "systemic racism" after they'd spent months during the Democratic presidential primaries in panicked overdrive propping up "the system." Reforms aimed at reducing the wealth/poverty extremes of neoliberal capitalism--whether proposed by Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren--were relentlessly dismissed as unrealistic, unaffordable, extreme. These were "shoot-the-moon policy ideas" (Washington Post) threatening to push Democrats "over a liberal cliff." (New York Times)
- Medicare for All? "Too expensive." Except it isn't. For months, mainstream media pundits vehemently defended a system that ties one's (private) health insurance to one's job . . . and then COVID-19 threw tens of millions out of those jobs.
- Green New Deal, providing millions of high-wage jobs while transforming our economy? Unaffordable.
- A wealth tax on ultra-millionaires to provide universal childcare and better schools--or a Wall Street transaction tax to provide free public college? Unworkable.
Corporate liberal news outlets were aggressive in policing the Democratic primaries for structural reforms that went "too far" in addressing systemic racism and classism.
Despite the media naysaying, the good news is that progressive reforms remain popular with the public.
The bad news is that too many people still rely on media outlets entrenched in the corporate system for news on "systemic" racism.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.