SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Waitress taking orders
(Photo: Guian Bolisay / Flickr)
The GOP's Two-Pronged Assault on Women
The GOP isn't just taking aim at reproductive rights — it's after our very economic survival.
Apr 27, 2016
We heard a lot about the "war on women" during the 2012 election cycle -- mostly over Republican attacks on abortion rights and birth control.
While the phrase has faded in this election year-round, the war on women has not. The only change is that now we're fighting on two fronts -- reproductive rights and economic survival.
To a man, the three Republicans still in the nomination race oppose abortion rights.
No surprise there. But Ted Cruz has upped the ante and come out against exceptions for rape and incest. John Kasich would allow the exceptions but says there's no point in talking to him about choice.
The formerly pro-choice Trump is now not only against abortion but blurted out recently what others undoubtedly believe but are too dishonest to say out loud -- that the government should punish the women who have abortions. And probably the girls, too.
While reproductive rights are fundamental to women's well-being and autonomy, the right to fair pay and benefits is no less so.
After all, adult women are by far the majority of those working for the federal minimum wage. It's parked at $7.25 per hour because the feds haven't raised it since 2009.
The legal base pay for tipped workers lags even further behind -- it's been a measly $2.13 since 1991.
Women make up 70 percent of tipped servers, and most of them don't work in those high-dollar, white-tablecloth restaurants. They're working in low-level hash houses and places like Denny's and Red Lobster.
A Census report last year showed that the poverty risk for women spikes once they enter the workforce. For women with kids, the poverty rate is almost double that of men in the 25-34 age range -- prime working years.
Some experts say the growing gap may be partly due to continuing high unemployment rates among single mothers. Could be -- but I'm betting a bigger factor is the poverty-level minimum wage, which disproportionally affects women of color.
Every presidential candidate has weighed in on the minimum wage. While Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders argue over how much is enough -- $12 for her, $15 for him -- Cruz says $0 is the right number. He'd do away with the federal minimum altogether, having deemed it a "bad policy."
In typical Trump fashion, the GOP front-runner has said America needs "good paying jobs" while declaring a preference for leaving the minimum at $7.25. Not to be outdone on the contradiction front, Kasich says it's "very important that we don't raise the minimum wage willy-nilly" but then adds that Uncle Sam should let the 50 states set 50 different minimums if that's what they want.
All this adds up to a multi-pronged attack on low-wage working women, who are the least able to fight back. They're trapped by the ironclad partisanship on Capitol Hill, where Republicans have promised not to raise wages as long as they control Congress. And pushing back on those abortion restrictions states have been rolling out? Forget it.
Between Congress and the nut-case wing of the GOP calling the shots in the presidential race, the war on women promises to be a long one indeed.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
This column was distributed by OtherWords.
Martha Burk
Martha Burk is a political psychologist, women's issues expert, and director of the Corporate Accountability Project for the National Council of Women's Organizations (NCWO) and the author of the "Your Voice, Your Vote" (2020). Follow Martha on Twitter @MarthaBurk.
abortion rightsbernie sandersbirth controldonald trumpelection 2016hillary clintonjohn kasichmsnbcrachel maddowreproductive rightsrepublican partyted cruzwomenwomen's rights
We heard a lot about the "war on women" during the 2012 election cycle -- mostly over Republican attacks on abortion rights and birth control.
While the phrase has faded in this election year-round, the war on women has not. The only change is that now we're fighting on two fronts -- reproductive rights and economic survival.
To a man, the three Republicans still in the nomination race oppose abortion rights.
No surprise there. But Ted Cruz has upped the ante and come out against exceptions for rape and incest. John Kasich would allow the exceptions but says there's no point in talking to him about choice.
The formerly pro-choice Trump is now not only against abortion but blurted out recently what others undoubtedly believe but are too dishonest to say out loud -- that the government should punish the women who have abortions. And probably the girls, too.
While reproductive rights are fundamental to women's well-being and autonomy, the right to fair pay and benefits is no less so.
After all, adult women are by far the majority of those working for the federal minimum wage. It's parked at $7.25 per hour because the feds haven't raised it since 2009.
The legal base pay for tipped workers lags even further behind -- it's been a measly $2.13 since 1991.
Women make up 70 percent of tipped servers, and most of them don't work in those high-dollar, white-tablecloth restaurants. They're working in low-level hash houses and places like Denny's and Red Lobster.
A Census report last year showed that the poverty risk for women spikes once they enter the workforce. For women with kids, the poverty rate is almost double that of men in the 25-34 age range -- prime working years.
Some experts say the growing gap may be partly due to continuing high unemployment rates among single mothers. Could be -- but I'm betting a bigger factor is the poverty-level minimum wage, which disproportionally affects women of color.
Every presidential candidate has weighed in on the minimum wage. While Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders argue over how much is enough -- $12 for her, $15 for him -- Cruz says $0 is the right number. He'd do away with the federal minimum altogether, having deemed it a "bad policy."
In typical Trump fashion, the GOP front-runner has said America needs "good paying jobs" while declaring a preference for leaving the minimum at $7.25. Not to be outdone on the contradiction front, Kasich says it's "very important that we don't raise the minimum wage willy-nilly" but then adds that Uncle Sam should let the 50 states set 50 different minimums if that's what they want.
All this adds up to a multi-pronged attack on low-wage working women, who are the least able to fight back. They're trapped by the ironclad partisanship on Capitol Hill, where Republicans have promised not to raise wages as long as they control Congress. And pushing back on those abortion restrictions states have been rolling out? Forget it.
Between Congress and the nut-case wing of the GOP calling the shots in the presidential race, the war on women promises to be a long one indeed.
Martha Burk
Martha Burk is a political psychologist, women's issues expert, and director of the Corporate Accountability Project for the National Council of Women's Organizations (NCWO) and the author of the "Your Voice, Your Vote" (2020). Follow Martha on Twitter @MarthaBurk.
We heard a lot about the "war on women" during the 2012 election cycle -- mostly over Republican attacks on abortion rights and birth control.
While the phrase has faded in this election year-round, the war on women has not. The only change is that now we're fighting on two fronts -- reproductive rights and economic survival.
To a man, the three Republicans still in the nomination race oppose abortion rights.
No surprise there. But Ted Cruz has upped the ante and come out against exceptions for rape and incest. John Kasich would allow the exceptions but says there's no point in talking to him about choice.
The formerly pro-choice Trump is now not only against abortion but blurted out recently what others undoubtedly believe but are too dishonest to say out loud -- that the government should punish the women who have abortions. And probably the girls, too.
While reproductive rights are fundamental to women's well-being and autonomy, the right to fair pay and benefits is no less so.
After all, adult women are by far the majority of those working for the federal minimum wage. It's parked at $7.25 per hour because the feds haven't raised it since 2009.
The legal base pay for tipped workers lags even further behind -- it's been a measly $2.13 since 1991.
Women make up 70 percent of tipped servers, and most of them don't work in those high-dollar, white-tablecloth restaurants. They're working in low-level hash houses and places like Denny's and Red Lobster.
A Census report last year showed that the poverty risk for women spikes once they enter the workforce. For women with kids, the poverty rate is almost double that of men in the 25-34 age range -- prime working years.
Some experts say the growing gap may be partly due to continuing high unemployment rates among single mothers. Could be -- but I'm betting a bigger factor is the poverty-level minimum wage, which disproportionally affects women of color.
Every presidential candidate has weighed in on the minimum wage. While Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders argue over how much is enough -- $12 for her, $15 for him -- Cruz says $0 is the right number. He'd do away with the federal minimum altogether, having deemed it a "bad policy."
In typical Trump fashion, the GOP front-runner has said America needs "good paying jobs" while declaring a preference for leaving the minimum at $7.25. Not to be outdone on the contradiction front, Kasich says it's "very important that we don't raise the minimum wage willy-nilly" but then adds that Uncle Sam should let the 50 states set 50 different minimums if that's what they want.
All this adds up to a multi-pronged attack on low-wage working women, who are the least able to fight back. They're trapped by the ironclad partisanship on Capitol Hill, where Republicans have promised not to raise wages as long as they control Congress. And pushing back on those abortion restrictions states have been rolling out? Forget it.
Between Congress and the nut-case wing of the GOP calling the shots in the presidential race, the war on women promises to be a long one indeed.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.