Petition Calls on Federal Government to End Fast-Tracking of Offshore Oil Drilling Projects in Gulf of Mexico

Six environmental groups submitted a petition today to the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management calling on the agency to end a routine practice of fast-tracking approval for offshore oil and gas projects. The Interior Department first adopted a “categorical exclusion” for oil and gas activities in 1981, allowing exploration and development plans to win approval for much of the Gulf of Mexico without undergoing the site-specific analysis normally required by the National Environmental Policy Act.

For more than 40 years, the repeated invocation of this exclusion has contributed to lax governmental oversight and a failure to grapple with the harmful effects of long-term oil and gas extraction in the Gulf.

BOEM relied on this exclusion to approve BP’s exploration plans for the Deepwater Horizon oil-drilling project, which caused the largest oil spill in U.S. history. Although the National Commission that investigated the disaster concluded that use of categorical exclusions contributed to a systemic breakdown in BOEM’s environmental review process, the agency has not stopped invoking them on a routine basis. In the past five years, BOEM approved about 560 out of the 600 development plans submitted using the exclusion and about 90 out of the 400 exploration plans submitted.

The groups — Healthy Gulf, Center for Biological Diversity, Bayou City Waterkeeper, Sierra Club, Friends of the Earth, and Earthjustice — are requesting that BOEM immediately take steps to repeal or eliminate the use of categorical exclusions for oil and gas exploration and development in the Gulf.

Expedited approvals of oil and gas activity have taken a heavy toll on the Gulf of Mexico. Given the intensification of climate change and the known risks of deepwater drilling in an era of more powerful hurricanes, BOEM has no rationale for the continued use of exclusions.

“In addition to environmental analysis, NEPA processes such as environmental impact statements also allow for critical public engagement through public notices and comment periods,” said Andrew Whitehurst, water programs director for Healthy Gulf. “This use of a categorical exclusion ensures that people concerned with or impacted by oil and gas activities do not have a voice, nor do they have information available to them about predicted impacts from these fast-tracked projects. It's time BOEM ends this exclusion and follows NEPA guidelines intended to protect our environment and the people that depend on it.”

“BOEM's use of the categorical exemption has given the petrochemical industry a pass to extract and pollute for far too long,” said Kristen Schlemmer, the legal director of Houston-based Bayou City Waterkeeper. “The federal government's priorities are all wrong; they have forced those of us living in Houston and along the Gulf Coast to yield our health and ecosystems for generations so that polluting industries may profit over the short-term. This petition gives the Biden administration the opportunity to end this practice and value what matters most: the health of our environment and our people.”

“It’s way past time to stop giving oil and gas operations in the Gulf of Mexico a free pass. We should be phasing out offshore drilling entirely,” said Kristen Monsell, oceans legal director at the Center for Biological Diversity. “But in the meantime, Gulf operations should get more scrutiny, not a fast-tracked approval. The oil and gas industry has proven it poses a huge risk to ocean ecosystems. The sea turtles, manatees, Rice’s whales and other animals that live in the Gulf deserve better protection.”

“The federal government has been rubber-stamping new oil and gas activity in the Gulf of Mexico for far too long,” said Hallie Templeton, legal director for Friends of the Earth. “Federal officials must stop their nonsensical approval process and instead consider the clear environmental and socioeconomic harms before greenlighting dangerous projects. Assessing the damages of expanded fossil fuel extraction in the Gulf is the very least BOEM can do to protect this sacrifice zone and its communities.”

“There is no justification for the existence of the categorical exclusion, which has essentially been used as a NEPA workaround since the ’80s,” said Brettny Hardy, a senior attorney at Earthjustice. “We’ve already witnessed the harrowing consequences of what happens when the government cuts corners on behalf of the fossil fuel industry. This is an easy decision and one that’s long overdue.”

“NEPA has been one of our bedrock environmental laws for more than half a century. Allowing categorical exclusions for offshore oil and gas extraction undercuts that critical law,” said Devorah Ancel, a senior attorney at the Sierra Club Environmental Law Program. “It also deprives the public — and the communities affected by drilling — from weighing in on disruptive projects that could have significant environmental, economic, and social consequences for the people, ecosystems, and wildlife of the Gulf. The Biden administration has the chance to protect these places by ending this practice.”