October, 12 2021, 06:09pm EDT

Essential, Low-Wage Women Tell Congress: Look at the People Behind the Numbers in the Build Back Better Plan
The focus of debate about the Build Back Better plan should be on who is helped and not merely the cost, essential, low-wage women said Tuesday at a news conference with the Poor People's Campaign: A National Call for Moral Revival.
WASHINGTON
The focus of debate about the Build Back Better plan should be on who is helped and not merely the cost, essential, low-wage women said Tuesday at a news conference with the Poor People's Campaign: A National Call for Moral Revival.
"We are the ones who produce so much wealth in this nation, the ones who could not rest during the pandemic. We are the ones who don't have the right to get sick because we cannot miss work, those who run the risk of getting fired if we miss a day to be able to claim decent treatment during our movement," said Marcela Ramirez, a produce packer from Philadelphia and a mother.
She was one of eight women from across the country -- West Virginia, Kentucky, New York, Arizona, Mississippi and Maryland -- who spoke at the news conference held Tuesday on the steps of the U.S. Capitol. Joining them were the co-chairs of the PPC: NCMR, Rev. Dr. William J. Barber II and Rev. Dr. Liz Theoharis, along with economists and faith leaders.
"We shouldn't be talking about trillions of dollars and just in terms of cost," Rev. Barber said. "What we should be talking about is this question: it's now how much does Build Back Better cost but how much does it cost lives and hurt people not to build back better. ... The problem is we have gotten stuck in a numbers argument rather than a people argument."
Before COVID-19, 140 million people lived in poverty or were low-income, and 700 people died a day from poverty. The Build Back Better agenda costs $3.5 trillion over 10 years, or $350 billion a year. That's just an estimated 1.2% of the U.S. GDP over 10 years.
"What we know and what this pandemic has laid bare is that women, people of color, poor communities, have been disproportionately impacted," Rev. Theoharis said. "By stripping the provisions that help women, help people of color, help poor communities, help essential workers recover, that those are standing against us, (Sen. Joe) Manchin, (Sen. Kyrsten) Sinema, all of those folks that have the power in their hands to do something -- they're compromising the lives of essential workers and the poor. They're sending a message that people's lives and their work don't matter when we know that this is a lie."
Women from West Virginia and Arizona -- where Sens. Manchin and Sinema don't support Build Back Better as written and who oppose an end to the non-constitutional filibuster -- also spoke.
Joan Steede of Phoenix said she cares for people as they die, even working extra time without pay for veterans because they deserve her help.
"I hear all these women's stories and they all sound the same. We work much harder than what we get paid for," she said. "We will all some day get old and need care. And I will be there for you, and I will work for less than I'm worth because I care about other people. And I demand Congress back a bill that took so much work and time. Just do your job - build back America."
Kaylen Marie Parker of South Charleston, West Virginia, said she has a master's degree but still must scrounge for pennies in her couch cushions.
"Time has run out for the people in my state. We are literally starving. It's time for Congress to act," she said. "It's hard to see the realities of our lives when you live so comfortably in your ivory towers, but it is time to come down and listen to the people. We're no longer asking for help - we are demanding that you act now. The Build Back Better plan can finally stop the generational poverty that's been forced on Appalachia and people all across the country."
Pam Garrison, a lifelong low-wage worker and tri-chair of the West Virginia Poor People's Campaign, called on Sen. Manchin to recognize that Americans deserve the spending in Build Back Better.
"We will show you that when you invest in the people - that the people will rise and we will work! We are not lazy and we are not asking for a handout. Senator Manchin, do your job. Do your job! Take care of the people! Quit taking care of the corporations!"
Rep. Ro Khanna of Pennsylvania told the women that their voices are needed.
"For too long, this country has not treated people fairly for doing the hardest work, who are on the frontlines. And that must change," he said at the news conference. "There is too much frustration, too much anger out there saying (it's) time to actually be just. Time to pay people what they deserve, to treat people the way they deserve. And so your voices, your stories, in this movement are being heard not just by me but by many in the halls of the Congress to remind us about what is at stake and that is why we must deliver on the president's Build Back Better agenda."
Comments from others who spoke:
Katrina Corbell of New York, a low-wage worker on disability
"This legislation is about me - the legislation is about us. It is about real people, low-wage essential workers. It is shameful that Congress is debating that we cannot afford $350 billion a year for 10 years when we're spending so much more on war when so many of us are not approving of the wars that Congress keeps spending money on. So please listen to your constituents and actually pass the Build Back Better plan as it is."
Viola Lee of Silver Spring, Maryland, a gig worker and DoorDash driver. She is a mother of three, and they are unhoused.
She wants Congress to remember "people are struggling to make ends meet and (who are) threatened with eviction every day who sleep from house to house because they don't earn a living wage."
Emilee Johnson of Pearl, Mississippi, a low-wage worker and advocate for victims of human trafficking.
"I am here to tell Congress, we can no longer rely on states like Mississippi that just abolished slavery in 2013 to do the right thing. Mississippi has shown this country too many times that doing the right thing is not an option. We need laws changed on a federal level. I am a low-wage and essential worker, and I need Congress to address the needs of low-wage and essential workers now and invest in my fair chance. Because I deserve a fair chance."
Adriel Downing of Lexington, Kentucky, a game-day employee at the University of Kentucky.
She said she was there to call on Sen. Mitch McConnell to pass the Build Back Better act. "Please help us. We get tired of asking for help. We don't want to beg you. We shouldn't have to beg you."
Shailly Gupta Barnes, policy director for PPC: NCMR and an economist:
On Friday, PPC: NCMR will release a study of the 2020 presidential election showing the power of poor and low-income voters "whose main concerns are around health and economic well-being and who turned out in historic numbers to vote last year. What does all of this tell us? Economically, ethically, morally and politically, we cannot build back better without building back from the bottom."
Phyllis Bennis of the Institute for Policy Studies:
It's outrageous that "Congress resists spending $350 billion a year on things like children, housing, water, education and yet they don't even blink when we spend $753 billion a year on the military -- on wars that kill people and fail to achieve any of their so-called goals."
Sister Richelle Friedman of the Coalition on Human Needs:
"Build Back Better is an opportunity for us as a nation to do something significant for those who do not have enough to afford adequate food or a place to call home or what is necessary for them to work like affordable child care or who are afraid of losing their job because they have no paid leave and in some cases, no unpaid leave.
"We know what's at stake. Build Back Better is a once-in-a-generation opportunity to invest in low-income families, individuals and communities."
Rabbi Alana Suskin of the Maryland Poor People's Campaign:
"Jewish law asserts that community is responsible for maintaining and distributing resources for the poor. We as a nation are incredibly wealthy, it is a land from which bread comes and has the dust of gold -- just like Sodom. It is a scandal that 140 million poor and low-income people go unheard as they cry out to be heard. ... We are here with the voices of Americans crying out, and it is our responsibility to act.
Rev. Angela Martin of the Maryland Poor People's Campaign:
We've heard the voices of the poor. We've heard the voices crying out, demanding justice. All I want to know right now, Joe Manchin, is which side are you on? Whose side are you on? Are you on the side of poor and low-wealth persons who are crying out, who are suffering in the midst of this pandemic? Or are you here to represent your pockets? It's really just as simple as that.
"If you are a person of faith, you have a moral conscience and an obligation to respond right now."
The Poor People's Campaign: A National Call for Moral Revival, is building a generationally transformative digital gathering called the Mass Poor People's Assembly and Moral March on Washington, on June 20, 2020. At that assembly, we will demand that both major political parties address the interlocking injustices of systemic racism, poverty, ecological devastation, militarism and the distorted moral narrative of religious nationalism by implementing our Moral Agenda.
LATEST NEWS
'MAGA Power Grab': US Supreme Court OKs 2026 Map That Texas GOP Rigged for Trump
One journalist who covers voting rights called the decision upholding the new districts "yet another example" of how the high court "has greenlit the many undemocratic schemes of Trump and his party."
Dec 04, 2025
The US Supreme Court's right-wing supermajority on Thursday gave Texas Republicans a green light to use a political map redrawn at the request of President Donald Trump to help the GOP retain control of Congress in the 2026 midterm elections.
Since Texas lawmakers passed and GOP Gov. Greg Abbott signed the gerrymandering bill in August, Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom and his constituents have responded with updated congressional districts to benefit Democrats, while Republican legislators in Indiana, Missouri, and North Carolina—under pressure from the president—have pursued new maps for their states.
With Texas' candidate filing period set to close next week, a majority of justices on Thursday blocked a previous decision from two of three US district court judges who had ruled against the state map. The decision means that, at least for now, the state can move ahead with the new map, which could ultimately net Republicans five more seats, for its March primary elections.
"Texas is likely to succeed on the merits of its claim that the district court committed at least two serious errors," the Supreme Court's majority wrote. "First, the district court failed to honor the presumption of legislative good faith by construing ambiguous direct and circumstantial evidence against the Legislature."
"Second, the district court failed to draw a dispositive or near-dispositive adverse inference against respondents even though they did not produce a viable alternative map that met the state's avowedly partisan goals," the majority continued. "The district court improperly inserted itself into an active primary campaign, causing much confusion and upsetting the delicate federal-state balance in elections."
Texas clearly did a racial gerrymander, which is illegal.A district court found that Texas did a racial gerrymander, rejecting the new map because it is illegal.But the Supreme Court reversed it.Because? Must assume the gerrymanderers were acting in good faith (despite the evidence otherwise).
[image or embed]
— Nicholas Grossman (@nicholasgrossman.bsky.social) December 4, 2025 at 6:18 PM
The court's three liberals—Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson, Elena Kagan, and Sonia Sotomayor—dissented. Contrasting the three-month process that led to the map initially being struck down and the majority's move to reverse "that judgment based on its perusal, over a holiday weekend, of a cold paper record," Kagan wrote for the trio that "we are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision."
"Today's order disrespects the work of a district court that did everything one could ask to carry out its charge—that put aside every consideration except getting the issue before it right," Kagan asserted. "And today's order disserves the millions of Texans whom the district court found were assigned to their new districts based on their race."
"This court's stay guarantees that Texas' new map, with all its enhanced partisan advantage, will govern next year's elections for the House of Representatives. And this court's stay ensures that many Texas citizens, for no good reason, will be placed in electoral districts because of their race," she warned. "And that result, as this court has pronounced year in and year out, is a violation of the Constitution."
Simply amazing that the Supreme Court declared an end to legal race discrimination in the affirmative action case two years ago and now allows overt racism in both immigration arrests and redistricting.Using race to help minorities? Bad. Using it to discriminate against them? Very, very good.
[image or embed]
— Mark Joseph Stern (@mjsdc.bsky.social) December 4, 2025 at 6:52 PM
Top Democrats in the state and country swiftly condemned the court's majority. Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin called it "wrong—both morally and legally," and argued that "once again, the Supreme Court gave Trump exactly what he wanted: a rigged map to help Republicans avoid accountability in the midterms for turning their backs on the American people."
"But it will backfire," Martin predicted. "Texas Democrats fought every step of the way against these unlawful, rigged congressional maps and sparked a national movement. Democrats are fighting back, responding in kind to even the playing field across the country. Republicans are about to be taught one valuable lesson: Don't mess with Texas voters."
Texas House Minority Leader Gene Wu (D-137) declared that "the Supreme Court failed Texas voters today, and they failed American democracy. This is what the end of the Voting Rights Act looks like: courts that won't protect minority communities even when the evidence is staring them in the face."
"I'm angry about this ruling. Every Texan who testified against these maps should be angry. Every community that fought for generations to build political power and watched Republicans try to gerrymander it away should be angry. But anger without action is just noise, and Democrats are taking action to fight back," he continued, pointing to California's passage of Proposition 50 and organizing in other states, including Illinois, New York, and Virginia. "A nationwide movement is being built that says if Republicans want to play this game, Democrats will play it better."
SCOTUS conservative justices upholding Texas gerrymander is yet another example of how Roberts court has greenlit the many undemocratic schemes of Trump and his partyThey’ve now ruled for Trump and his allies in 90 percent of shadow docket opinions www.motherjones.com/politics/202...
[image or embed]
— Ari Berman (@ariberman.bsky.social) December 4, 2025 at 6:52 PM
Christina Harvey, executive director of the progressive advocacy group Stand Up America, said in a statement that "the right-wing majority on the Supreme Court just handed Republicans five new seats in Congress, rubber-stamping Texas Republicans' MAGA power grab. Make no mistake: This isn't about fair representation for Texans. It is about sidelining voters of color and helping Trump and Republican politicians dodge accountability for their unpopular agenda."
"In America, voters get to choose their representatives, not the other way around," she stressed. "But this captured court undermines this basic democratic principle at every turn. We deserve a Supreme Court that protects the freedom to vote and strengthens democracy instead of enabling partisan politics. It's time for Democrats in Congress to get serious about plans for Supreme Court reform once Trump leaves office, including term limits, an enforceable code of ethics, and expanding the court."
Various journalists and political observers also suggested that, despite Thursday's decision in favor of politically motivated mid-decade redistricting, the high court's right-wing majority may ultimately rule against the California map—which, if allowed to stand, could cancel out the impact of Texas gerrymandering by likely erasing five Republican districts.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Demands to Release Full Video of Deadly US Boat Strike Grow After Congressional Briefing
"The Department of Defense has no choice but to release the complete, unedited footage," said Sen. Jack Reed.
Dec 04, 2025
Calls mounted Thursday for the Trump administration to release the full video of a September US airstrike on a boat allegedly transporting drugs in the Caribbean Sea following a briefing between Pentagon officials and select lawmakers that left some Democrats with more questions than answers.
“I am deeply disturbed by what I saw this morning," Sen. Jack Reed (D-RI), the ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said after the briefing. "The Department of Defense has no choice but to release the complete, unedited footage of the September 2 strike, as the president has agreed to do."
Reed's remarks came after Adm. Frank Bradley and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chair Gen. Dan Caine briefed some members of the Senate and House Armed Services and Intelligence committees on the so-called "double-tap" strike, in which nine people were killed in the initial bombing and two survivors clinging to the burning wreckage of the vessel were slain in second attack.
Lawmakers who attended the briefing said that US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth allegedly did not give an order to "kill everyone" aboard the boat. However, legal experts and congressional critics contend that the strikes are inherently illegal under international law.
“This did not reduce my concerns at all—or anyone else’s,” Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.), who attended the briefing, told the New Republic's Greg Sargent in response to the findings regarding Hegseth's actions. “This is a big, big problem, and we need a full investigation.”
"I think that video should be public," Smith added.
The Trump administration has tried to justify the strikes to Congress by claiming that the US is in an "armed conflict" with drug cartels, which some legal scholars and lawmakers have disputed.
Cardozo Law School professor of international law Rebecca Ingbe told Time in a Thursday interview that "there is no actual armed conflict here, so this is murder."
Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), a member of the Foreign Relations Committee, said Thursday that “clearly, in my view, very likely a war crime was committed here."
“We don't use our military to help intervene when it comes to drug running, and what the Trump administration has done is manufactured cause for conflict with respect to going after drug boats and engaging in extrajudicial killing when the real aim is clearly regime change in Venezuela," he added, alluding to President Donald Trump's massive military deployment and threats to invade the oil-rich South American nation.
At least 83 people have been killed in 21 disclosed strikes on boats the Trump administration claims—without releasing evidence—were transporting drugs in the Caribbean Sea and Pacific Ocean. South American leaders and relatives of survivors say that at least some of the victims of the US bombings were fishermen with no ties to narco-trafficking.
Reed said that Thursday's briefing "confirmed my worst fears about the nature of the Trump administration’s military activities, and demonstrates exactly why the Senate Armed Services Committee has repeatedly requested—and been denied—fundamental information, documents, and facts about this operation."
"This must, and will be, only the beginning of our investigation into this incident," he vowed.
After the briefing, US Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.)—the ranking member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence—called the footage “one of the most troubling things I’ve seen in my time in public service.”
“Any American who sees the video that I saw will see its military attacking shipwrecked sailors,” he added.
Thursday's calls followed similar demands from skeptical Democrats, some of whom accused the Trump administration of withholding evidence.
"Pete Hegseth should release the full tapes of the September 2 attack," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) said on the upper chamber floor on Tuesday. "Both the first and second strike. Not a clip. Not some edited or redacted snippet. The full unedited tapes of each strike must be released so the American people can see what happened with their own eyes."
"Pete Hegseth said he did nothing wrong," he added. "So prove it."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Microplastics Make Up Majority of National Park Trash, Waste Audit Finds
“Even in landscapes that appeared untouched,” volunteers found “thousands of plastic pellets and fragments that pose a clear threat to the environment, wildlife, and human health,” said a 5 Gyres Institute spokesperson.
Dec 04, 2025
More than half the trash polluting America's national parks and federal lands contains hazardous microplastics, according to a waste audit published Thursday.
As part of its annual "TrashBlitz" effort to document the scale of plastic pollution in national parks and federal lands across the US, volunteers with the 5 Gyres Institute collected nearly 24,000 pieces of garbage at 59 federally protected locations.
In each of the four years the group has done the audit, they've found that plastic has made up the vast majority of trash in the sites.
They found that, again this year, plastic made up 85% of the waste they logged, with 25% of it single-use plastics like bottle caps, food wrappers, bags, and cups.
But for the first time, they also broke down the plastics category to account for microplastics, the small fragments that can lodge permanently in the human body and cause numerous harmful health effects.
As a Stanford University report from January 2025 explained:
In the past year alone, headlines have sounded the alarm about particles in tea bags, seafood, meat, and bottled water. Scientists have estimated that adults ingest the equivalent of one credit card per week in microplastics. Studies in animals and human cells suggest microplastics exposure could be linked to cancer, heart attacks, reproductive problems, and a host of other harms.
Microplastics come in two main forms: pre-production plastic pellets, sometimes known as "nurdles," which are melted down to make other products; and fragments of larger plastic items that break down over time.
The volunteers found that microplastic pellets and fragments made up more than half the trash they found over the course of their survey.
"Even in landscapes that appeared untouched, a closer look at trails, riverbeds, and coastlines revealed thousands of plastic pellets and fragments that pose a clear threat to the environment, wildlife, and human health,” said Nick Kemble, programs manager at the 5 Gyres Institute.
Most of the microplastics they found came in the form of pellets, which the group's report notes often "spill in transit from boats and trains, entering waterways that carry them further into the environment or deposit them on shorelines."
The surveyors identified the Altria Group—a leading manufacturer of cigarettes—PepsiCo, Anheuser-Busch InBev, the Coca-Cola Company, and Mars as the top corporate polluters whose names appeared on branded trash.
But the vast majority of microplastic waste discovered was unbranded. According to the Coastal & Estuarine Research Federation, petrochemical companies such as Dow, ExxonMobil, Shell, and Formosa are among the leading manufacturers of pellets found strewn across America's bodies of water.
The 5 Gyres report notes that "at the federal level in the United States, there is no comprehensive regulatory framework that specifically holds these polluters accountable, resulting in widespread pollution that threatens ecosystems and wildlife."
The group called on Congress to pass the Reducing Waste in National Parks Act, introduced in 2023 by Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), which would reduce the sale of single-use plastics in national parks. It also advocated for the Plastic Pellet Free Waters Act, introduced last year by Rep. Mike Levin (D-Calif.) and then-Rep. Mary Peltola (D-Alaska), which would prohibit the discharge of pre-production plastic pellets into waterways, storm drains, and sewers.
"It’s time that our elected officials act on the warnings we’ve raised for years—single-use plastics and microplastics pose an immediate threat to our environment and public health," said Paulita Bennett-Martin, senior strategist of policy initiatives at 5 Gyres. "TrashBlitz volunteers uncovered thousands of microplastics in our nation’s most protected spaces, and we’re urging decisive action that addresses this issue at the source."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


