June, 12 2019, 12:00am EDT
Social Media Platforms Increase Transparency About Content Removal Requests, But Many Keep Users in the Dark When Their Speech Is Censored, EFF Report Shows
Who Has Your Back Spotlights Good, and Not So Good, Content Moderation Policies
WASHINGTON
San Francisco and Tunis, Tunisia--While social media platforms are increasingly giving users the opportunity to appeal decisions to censor their posts, very few platforms comprehensively commit to notifying users that their content has been removed in the first place, raising questions about their accountability and transparency, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) said today in a new report.
How users are supposed to challenge content removals that they've never been told about is among the key issues illuminated by EFF in the second installment of its Who Has Your Back: Censorship Edition report. The paper comes amid a wave of new government regulations and actions around the world meant to rid platforms of extremist content. But in response to calls to remove objectionable content, social media companies and platforms have all too often censored valuable speech.
EFF examined the content moderation policies of 16 platforms and app stores, including Facebook, Twitter, the Apple App Store, and Instagram. Only four companies--Facebook, Reddit, Apple, and GitHub--commit to notifying users when any content is censored and specifying the legal request or community guideline violation that led to the removal. While Twitter notifies users when tweets are removed, it carves out an exception for tweets related to "terrorism," a class of content that is difficult to accurately identify and can include counter-speech or documentation of war crimes. Notably, Facebook and GitHub were found to have more comprehensive notice policies than their peers.
"Providing an appeals process is great for users, but its utility is undermined by the fact that users can't count on companies to tell them when or why their content is taken down," said Gennie Gebhart, EFF associate director of research, who co-authored the report. "Notifying people when their content has been removed or censored is a challenge when your users number in the millions or billions, but social media platforms should be making investments to provide meaningful notice."
In the report, EFF awarded stars in six categories, including transparency reporting of government takedown requests, providing meaningful notice to users when content or accounts are removed, allowing users to appeal removal decisions, and public support of the Santa Clara Principles, a set of guidelines for speech moderation based on a human rights framework. The report was released today at the RightsCon summit on human rights in the digital age, held in Tunis, Tunisia.
Reddit leads the pack with six stars, followed by Apple's App Store and GitHub with five stars, and Medium, Google Play, and YouTube with four stars. Facebook, Reddit, Pinterest and Snap each improved their scores over the past year since our inaugural censorship edition of Who Has Your Back in 2018. Nine companies meet our criteria for transparency reporting of takedown requests from governments, and 11 have appeals policies, but only one--Reddit--discloses the number of appeals it receives. Reddit also takes the extra step of disclosing the percentage of appeals resolved in favor of or against the appeal.
Importantly, 12 companies are publicly supporting the Santa Clara Principles, which outline a set of minimum content moderation policy standards in three areas: transparency, notice, and appeals.
"Our goal in publishing Who Has Your Back is to inform users about how transparent social media companies are about content removal and encourage improved content moderation practices across the industry," said EFF Director of International Free Expression Jillian York. "People around the world rely heavily on social media platforms to communicate and share ideas, including activists, dissidents, journalists, and struggling communities. So it's important for tech companies to disclose the extent to which governments censor speech, and which governments are doing it."
For the report:
https://www.eff.org/wp/who-has-your-back-2019
For more on platform censorship:
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2019/05/
The Electronic Frontier Foundation is the leading nonprofit organization defending civil liberties in the digital world. Founded in 1990, EFF champions user privacy, free expression, and innovation through impact litigation, policy analysis, grassroots activism, and technology development. EFF's mission is to ensure that technology supports freedom, justice, and innovation for all people of the world.
(415) 436-9333LATEST NEWS
Trump 'Took a Hatchet' to Major US Climate Report by Dismissing All Its Authors
"The only beneficiaries of disrupting or killing this report are the fossil fuel industry and those intent on boosting oil and gas profits," said one person who was working on the 6th National Climate Assessment.
Apr 29, 2025
Hundreds of scientists and experts working on the National Climate Assessment were dismissed by the Trump administration via email on Monday, casting doubt on the future of the federal government's flagship climate report, which was slated to come out by 2028.
On Monday, those working on the 6th version of the report received an email from the Trump administration that the scope of the assessment is being "reevaluated in accordance with the Global Change Research Act of 1990"—in reference to the legislation that mandated the creation of the National Climate Assessment.
"We are now releasing all current assessment participants from their roles," continued the email, the text of which was included in a Monday statement from the group the Union of Concerned Scientists.
"Today, the Trump administration senselessly took a hatchet to a crucial and comprehensive U.S. climate science report by dismissing its authors without cause or a plan," said Dr. Rachel Cleetus, a senior policy director at the Union of Concerned Scientists and an author for the 6th National Climate Assessment (NCA) on the coasts chapter, said on Monday. "People around the nation rely on the NCA to understand how climate change is impacting their daily lives already and what to expect in the future. While not policy prescriptive, the findings of previous reports underscore the importance of cutting heat-trapping emissions and investing in climate resilience to protect communities and the economy."
"The only beneficiaries of disrupting or killing this report are the fossil fuel industry and those intent on boosting oil and gas profits at the expense of people's health and the nation's economic well-being," added Cleetus.
Since entering office, Trump has signed executive orders aimed at bolstering oil, gas, and coal and installed Cabinet members with ties to the fossil fuel industry.
The assessment, which is required by Congress, has been released every few years since 2000 and gives a rundown of how global warming is impacting different sectors of the economy, ecosystems, and communities. The energy and environment focused outlet E&E Newsreported Tuesday that the report is "seen by experts as the definitive body of research about how global warming is transforming the country."
The report last came out in 2023. That National Climate Assessment established that the "effects of human-caused climate change are already far-reaching and worsening across every region" of the United States. The report's authors warned that absent deeper cuts in fossil fuel emissions and accelerated adaption efforts compared to what's currently underway, "severe climate risks to the United States will continue to grow."
Earlier in April, the Trump administration enacted cuts to the U.S. Global Change Research Program, which oversees the production of the National Climate Assessment.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Coalition of Nonprofits, Unions Launch Challenge to Trump's 'Unlawful' Attack on Government
"Americans did not vote for a power grab, nor did they vote for a federal government so hollowed out it cannot deliver the services we all rely on," said one advocate.
Apr 29, 2025
U.S. President Donald Trump's dismantling of federal agencies and government programs has been a centerpiece of his second-term agenda, but as labor unions and nonprofits launched a legal challenge Monday against the president's attacks, they emphasized how the lawsuit reflects widespread public disapproval of Trump's tactics.
"Enough, already—Americans did not vote for a power grab, nor did they vote for a federal government so hollowed out it cannot deliver the services we all rely on," said Michael Wall, chief litigation officer for the National Resources Defense Council (NRDC), one of nearly two dozen organizations in a coalition that filed the lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
The groups said the suit is the "largest and most significant challenge to Trump's authority to remake the government without congressional approval."
The lawsuit was filed days after a Washington Post-ABC News-Ipsos poll found that only 35% of Americans approve of tech billionaire Elon Musk's role in the Trump administration, in which he has led the so-called Department of Government Efficiency and spearheaded efforts to dismantle agencies including the Department of Education and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), cut more than 280,000 jobs, and use government data to advance baseless claims about fraud in federal programs like Social Security—supporting Republicans' push to privatize the crucial anti-poverty program.
Fifty-seven percent said they disapprove of how DOGE has proceeded, up from 49% in February.
The long list of plaintiffs in the lawsuit filed Monday reflect Trump's wide-scale attack on public services, with the Coalition to Protect America's National Parks, the Western Watershed Project, and the Alliance for Retired Americans joining three of the country's largest labor unions and several local governments in arguing that Trump lacks the authority to reorganize the government without congressional approval.
The coalition, which also includes the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), the American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), and the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), is calling on the court to intervene to stop the implementation of Trump's Executive Order 14210, titled "Implementing the President's 'Department of Government Efficiency' Workforce Optimization Initiative."
The order violates the U.S. Constitution's separation of powers principles, the coalition is arguing.
"The Trump administration's reckless attempt to dismantle our government without congressional approval threatens vital services Americans depend on every day—from caring for veterans and safeguarding public health, to protecting our environment and maintaining national security," said AFGE national president Everett Kelley. "This illegal power grab would gut federal agencies, disrupt communities nationwide, and put critical public services at risk. AFGE is proud to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with this coalition to protect not just the patriotic public servants we represent, but the integrity of American government and the essential services that our nation deserves."
A federal judge in Maryland last month barred DOGE from taking "any actions relating" to USAID and said Musk had likely acted unconstitutionally by moving to shut down the international aid agency, and another judge temporarily blocked the advisory body from accessing sensitive data, but several federal courts, including the Supreme Court, have declined to rein in DOGE.
The coalition said the filing made clear that Congress must approve any president's efforts to remake the government.
"When the president takes for himself the legislative power of Congress to recreate federal agencies in the manner he sees fit, he violates the Constitution," reads the lawsuit, which cited Supreme Court cases including Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer and Bowsher v. Synar. "And when the president does so across every federal agency, he threatens the very constitutional foundation of this nation: 'There can be no liberty where the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person.' ... Thus, for nearly 100 years, when presidents have wanted to restructure the government by reorganizing both between and within federal agencies, they have obtained congressional authorization to do so."
Democracy Forward, which is representing the coalition, said "the impact of the reckless decisions that have been made in an attempt to unlawfully reorganize the federal government without Congress and is being felt in communities across our nation, in red states and blue states."
Lee Saunders, president of AFSCME, said the coalition was "filing this lawsuit to challenge the hostile takeover of government by billionaires and anti-union extremists."
"From the mass firings of federal employees to effectively shutting down agencies formed by Congress, this White House has repeatedly broken the law and violated the Constitution to advance their extremist Project 2025 agenda," said Saunders. "Working people deserve to know the public services they depend on will be delivered—that their food will be safe to eat and drinking water clean, that kids in school will have the resources they need to thrive, and that our communities will be able to fight public health epidemics. All these things and more are at stake if this power grab goes unchecked."
The Alliance for Retired Americans said Trump's attacks have threatened senior citizens' "right to the guaranteed benefits they have earned as well as to a fully staffed, well-functioning Social Security Administration," while Phil Francis, chair of the executive council of the Coalition to Protect America's National Parks, said the loss of about 1,500 National Park Service staffers is "making an already dire situation at many national parks and program offices far worse."
"The people who have been removed by this administration help to ensure our parks are safe and accessible, and our irreplaceable resources are protected for future generations," said Francis. "Additional mass firings mean safety at parks could be compromised and visitors should expect longer lines, reduced hours of operation at facilities, trails that are not maintained, limited access to some park amenities, and far fewer park rangers to help ensure they have a safe and memorable visit to their national parks."
Skye Perryman, president and CEO of Democracy Forward, said "the size and breadth of the coalition behind this case demonstrates the wide-ranging implications of the president's unlawful behavior."
Keep ReadingShow Less
National Climate Group Endorses 'Working-Class Champion' Zohran Mamdani for NYC Mayor
"Zohran embodies the kind of bold, people-powered leadership that Sunrise was built to fight for," said the head of the national Sunrise Movement.
Apr 29, 2025
In a first for the national branch of the youth climate group, the Sunrise Movement announced Tuesday that they have endorsed state Assemblymember and democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani in the New York City mayoral race, citing his "bold vision" for confronting the climate emergency and his campaign's focus on making the city more affordable for working people.
The national Sunrise Movement has not previously offered a mayoral endorsement, according to a spokesperson for the group. Their support for Mamdani follows an earlier endorsement of him by Sunrise Movement NYC in March.
"Zohran embodies the kind of bold, people-powered leadership that Sunrise was built to fight for," said Aru Shiney-Ajay, executive director of the Sunrise Movement, on Tuesday. "He's shown us what it looks like to take on the fossil fuel industry, offer a transformative vision for climate policy, and stand unapologetically with working-class communities. This is the leadership New York City—and our whole movement—needs to meet the climate crisis head-on."
Michael Magazine, elected partnerships lead of Sunrise NYC added that "Zohran is a true climate, youth, and working-class champion."
While affordability, not climate, has been the central focus of Mamdani's campaign, the candidate recently toldThe Nation that "climate and quality of life are not two separate concerns. They are, in fact, one and the same."
His campaign proposes a plan called Green Schools for a Healthier New York City, which pledges to rehab hundreds of public school buildings with renewable energy infrastructure and HVAC upgrades, remake hundreds of asphalt schoolyards into green spaces, and create at least 15,000 union jobs for people who build, maintain, and run New York City schools. It also proposes using 50 schools to serve as resilience hubs, a year-round resource for community members who can use the space during extreme weather events for shelter and to receive aid.
Mamdani has also made free, fast city buses a core plank of his campaign.
Mamdani, who began the race with relatively little name recognition, has risen in polls to the number two spot. He has garnered endorsements from New York City's largest public employee union AFSCME District Council 37, the NYC chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America, Jewish Voice for Peace Action, and the Muslim Democratic Club of New York City, to name a few.
Many organizations backing Mamdani have endorsed a slate of candidates because of New York City's rank choice voting system, which allows voters to select multiple candidates on their ballot as opposed to one.
In their release on Tuesday, the national Sunrise Movement did not opt to endorse a slate, but noted that Sunrise Movement NYC is "urging voters to rank a full progressive slate—and to reject Andrew Cuomo—in the upcoming election."
The recommendation not to rank mayoral candidate and former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who has consistently polled at number one, aligns with the aims of the "DREAM" campaign (which stands for Don't Rank Eric or Andrew for Mayor). The DREAM campaign, which is also targeting candidate and current Mayor Eric Adams, is backed by United Auto Workers Region 9A, another Mamdani endorser, and the political action committee New Yorkers for A Better New York Today.
The group is urging voter unity around keeping Cuomo and Adams off ballots, and hoping that their campaign will cut into Cuomo's formidable lead, and further destabilize Adams' position in the race.
Mamdani has become a viable contender in the race in part because of an impressive ground game. Last week, the campaign announced that volunteers have so far knocked on over 220,000 doors across the city.
According to the Sunrise Movement, Sunrise Movement NYC is mobilizing "neighborhood teams" to canvass and turn out voters for Mamdani.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular