Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

For Immediate Release


Barry Robinson, Lawyer | Ecojustice 403.705.0202 x302 
Chris Genovali, Executive Director | Raincoast Conservation Foundation 250.655.1229 
Paul Paquet, Senior Scientist | Raincoast Conservation Foundation 250.655.1229

Press Release

Supreme Court of Canada Asked to Weigh In on Future of Environmental Assessment Law

 Troubling precedent in Enbridge case stopped pipeline, but may shut door to legal challenges of other projects, groups say

Environmental groups are asking Canada’s highest court to overturn a legal precedent that restricts the public’s ability to challenge flawed environmental assessments.

In June, the Federal Court of Appeal quashed the approval of Enbridge’s Northern Gateway Pipeline, which would have shipped diluted bitumen from Alberta’s tar sands through the Great Bear Rainforest to the British Columbia’s rugged northern coast. While the ruling was feted as a major success, particularly for First Nations communities who fought long and hard to oppose this project, it failed to address fundamental concerns about Canada’s environmental assessment process. 

“The Court held that reviewing the legality of environmental assessment reports is outside its jurisdiction,” said Barry Robinson, Ecojustice lawyer.  “However, we know all too well that environmental assessment panels make mistakes.  The Court has put a legal decision into the hands of the politicians.”

Ecojustice lawyers file for leave to Supreme Court of Canada

Ecojustice lawyers, acting on behalf of Raincoast Conservation Foundation, have filed an application to bring this matter before the Supreme Court of Canada.

The courts — not cabinet — have a crucial role in determining whether an environmental assessment report meets its legal requirements, Robinson said. 

“Environmental assessment panels are required, by law, to conduct a meaningful review of the long-term social, cultural, and environmental health impacts of major pipeline projects,” Robinson said. “When they fail to do so, as was the case in Enbridge and the Kinder Morgan project, those panel reports must be reviewable by the courts.”

In the Enbridge decision, the Federal Court of Appeal abruptly dismissed all arguments based on the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012, and declined to rule on whether the review panel had considered the project’s environmental impacts on humpback whales and other at-risk species; whether it had appropriately balanced the project’s benefits and impacts; and whether the panel ignored evidence that spilled bitumen would sink in the marine environment. 

Days after the Enbridge decision was released, Kinder Morgan brought a motion to dismiss a lawsuit Ecojustice lawyers filed on behalf of its clients over the National Energy Board’s flawed final report on the Trans Mountain pipeline project.  And earlier this month, the Federal Court of Appeal relied on the Northern Gateway decision to deny an application by the Tsleil-Waututh Nation challenging certain decisions of the NEB with respect to the Trans Mountain project. 

“With its decision, the Federal Court of Appeal has made it that much harder for concerned citizens and public interest groups to defend our communities from projects that put entire ecosystems and cultures at risk,” said Chris Genovali, Executive Director of Raincoast Conservation Foundation.  “When a review panel makes a bad call, which often seems to be the case, where else but the courts are we to turn to ensure those wrongs are made right?”


Ecojustice is a Canadian charity that goes to court to enforce and strengthen Canada’s environmental laws on behalf of people and the planet.

Raincoast Conservation Foundation is a team of conservationists and scientists empowered by research to protect the lands, waters and wildlife of coastal British Columbia.  Ecojustice lawyers represented Raincoast during the Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline review process, and during the consolidated judicial review of the project last fall.


As Canada's only national environmental law charity, Ecojustice is building the case for a better earth.

In Landslide 1,108-to-387 Vote, Maine Nurses Reject Effort to Decertify Their Union

"They thought because we were a new union, they could manipulate Maine Med nurses and overturn our 2021 election," said one nurse. "But we just showed them the door."

Jake Johnson ·

Dems Threaten to Subpoena FTI Consulting Over 'Blanket Refusal' to Provide Info on Fossil Fuel Work

"FTI's refusal to cooperate with this congressional inquiry shows that they have something to hide, which will reveal the dangerous ways agencies like theirs have promoted fossil fuel greenwash and misinformation," said the Clean Creatives campaign's leader.

Jessica Corbett ·

Bad Day for DeSantis as 'Stop WOKE Act' Hit With Injunction, Lawsuit

"If Florida truly believes we live in a post-racial society, then let it make its case," a federal judge wrote in blocking part of the controversial law. "But it cannot win the argument by muzzling its opponents."

Brett Wilkins ·

US Judge Says Mar-a-Lago Affidavit 'Can Be Unsealed' With Redactions

"This is going to be a considered, careful process, where everybody's rights, the government's and the media's, will be protected," declared U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart.

Jessica Corbett ·

Federal Judge Orders Starbucks to Rehire Fired Union Organizers in Memphis

"It was a ruling in favor of what's right," said one member of the Memphis Seven. "We knew from day one that we were going to win this, it just took time."

Brett Wilkins ·

Common Dreams Logo