March, 03 2011, 03:21pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Sam Husseini, (202) 347-0020; or David Zupan, (541) 484-9167
Prosecuting Manning for WikiLeaks: "Killing the Messenger"
Greenwald writes today: "The U.S. Army yesterday announced that it has filed 22 additional charges against Bradley Manning, the Private accused of being the source for hundreds of thousands of documents (as well as [the video 'Collateral Murder']) published over the last year by WikiLeaks.
WASHINGTON
Greenwald writes today: "The U.S. Army yesterday announced that it has filed 22 additional charges against Bradley Manning, the Private accused of being the source for hundreds of thousands of documents (as well as [the video 'Collateral Murder']) published over the last year by WikiLeaks. Most of the charges add little to the ones already filed, but the most serious new charge is for 'aiding the enemy,' a capital offense under Article 104 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Although military prosecutors stated that they intend to seek life imprisonment rather than the death penalty for this alleged crime, the military tribunal is still empowered to sentence Manning to death if convicted."
Manning is alleged to have stated last year, prior to the uprisings now embroiling the Mideast: "Hillary Clinton and several thousand diplomats around the world are going to have a heart attack when they wake up one morning and find an entire repository of classified foreign policy is available, in searchable format, to the public. ... Everywhere there's a U.S. post, there's a diplomatic scandal that will be revealed."
COLEEN ROWLEY
Rowley, whose May 2002 memo described some of the FBI's pre-9/11 failures, was named one of Time Magazine's people of the year in 2002 along with Enron and WorldCom whistleblowers Sherron Watkins and Cynthia Cooper. She said today: "The charging of Bradley Manning with (somehow indirectly but intentionally) 'aiding the enemy' is consistent with the Department of Justice's legal motion filed January 11 of this year in the Jeffrey Sterling case that asserted that leaking is worse than spying for a foreign enemy: 'The defendant's unauthorized disclosures, however, may be viewed as more pernicious than the typical espionage case where a spy sells classified information for money.'
"None of the four actual identified real spies of the last three decades (CIA agents Ivan Nicholson and Aldrich Ames and FBI agents Earl Pitts and Robert Hanssen) who sold United States national security information to the Soviet Union and Russia, ultimately faced the death penalty. These actual CIA and FBI agents' spying for the Soviets did far greater damage to the U.S. than the mere embarrassment allegedly caused by Manning but they did not face the death penalty. The info that Hanssen and Aldrich Ames sold, led to the identification and execution of double agents by the USSR. But in fact Robert Hanssen's wife even got to keep her portion of his FBI pension.
"If leaking to the public to expose governmental illegality and/or war crimes is considered worse than spying for a foreign country, the question then arises: 'Who IS the enemy?' Is it us?"
Rowley recently co-wrote a piece titled "OMB Orders Government Agencies to Monitor Disgruntled Employees -- What's Next?"
Note to producers: The song "You are the Domestic Enemy," which features a voice mix with Noam Chomsky, may be appropriate as a lead in.
RAY McGOVERN
McGovern was a CIA analyst for 27 years, whose duties included preparing the President's Daily Brief and chairing National Intelligence Estimates. He is featured in a recent Panorama segment on German TV. See in English
He said today: "After the U.S. Army abuses at Abu Ghraib became public in April 2004, Maj. Gen. Antonio Taguba led the first (and only honest) investigation. In May 2004 he completed a report that was extremely critical of the Army; it was leaked to the press. For Taguba, this was not career enhancing.
"Then-Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld ridiculed Taguba, and eventually got him fired. And then-CENTCOM commander, Gen. John Abizaid, chided Taguba and warned him that both he and his report would be investigated. At that point, Taguba told investigative reporter Seymour Hersh, 'I'd been in the Army 32 years by then, and it was the first time that I thought I was in the Mafia.'
"Taguba has publicly condemned prisoner abuse and called for the prosecution of those responsible. He has written, 'There is no longer any doubt that the current [Bush] administration committed war crimes. The only question is whether those who ordered torture will be held to account.'
"Sadly, the behavior of the top Army brass since then gives support to Taguba's comparison of the U.S. Army to the Mafia -- except that the Army has been much more heavy-handed. The stakes are high. There is the distinct smell of war crimes.
"Reprisal attacks on Iraqi cities like Fallujah, using white phosphorous and depleted uranium weapons; orders to look the other way as detainees continue to be tortured by Iraqi security forces; drone attacks in Afghanistan and Pakistan that kill unarmed civilians, euphemistically dismissed as 'collateral damage;' reports showing that the Afghanistan occupation is doomed if Pakistan cannot be muscled to cooperate, and that not even billions of dollars are able to create the muscle the U.S. needs -- there is much to hide.
"The mainstream media can, and has, ignored Taguba, but the WikiLeaks disclosures are not as easily covered up. Solution? Kill the Messenger.
"It appears that Army Private Bradley Manning has done what Daniel Ellsberg did in exposing government secrets showing the duplicity of the White House and the U.S. Army regarding Vietnam. And apparently Manning has done it in precisely the way that Dan and others of the Truth-Telling Coalition recommended in September 2004. The duplicity and abuses in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan needed to be exposed in a timely way with official DOCUMENTS, leaving no doubt as to their authenticity. Many believe that Manning should be accorded honors heavier than the cumulative weight of the ten rows of ribbons, badges, and medals weighing down the left breast of Gen. David 'they-burn-their-own-children-to-give-us-a-bad-name' Petraeus.
"And if the generals in charge of our can't-win-a-war-no-more Army were not embarrassed enough already, they now have to swallow Defense Secretary Gates's 'opinion' (by way of a quote from Gen. Douglas MacArthur) that anyone who 'advises the president to again send a big American land army into Asia ... should "have his head examined."'
"What better time to Kill the Messenger -- the alleged source of the WikiLeaks documents! How better to demonstrate the punishment (tantamount to torture) that one should expect, should s/he be tempted to follow Manning's example. How better to divert attention from the damning substance of the WikiLeaks documents, and focus attention instead on the supposed sins of releasing classified material. And how better to divert attention from the awkward fact that the documents remain classified mostly to prevent embarrassment to the U.S. Army, and NOT to safeguard national security.
"The Army has been unable to make a credible claim that anything but reputations have actually been hurt. It is a travesty -- a Mafia-style -- of justice. We owe a debt of gratitude to whomever did take the risk of exposing this duplicity and abuse."
A nationwide consortium, the Institute for Public Accuracy (IPA) represents an unprecedented effort to bring other voices to the mass-media table often dominated by a few major think tanks. IPA works to broaden public discourse in mainstream media, while building communication with alternative media outlets and grassroots activists.
LATEST NEWS
Under Pressure From Anti-Oligarchy Protests, Bezos Moves Venice Wedding Party Venue
"We're just citizens who started organizing and we managed to move one of the most powerful people in the world," said one protest organizer.
Jun 25, 2025
Amazon.com founder Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sánchez on Tuesday relocated their upcoming lavish Venice wedding celebration, a move cheered as an "enormous victory" by protesters whose recent demonstrations in the northeastern Italian city have highlighted the socioeconomic and climate damage caused by billionaires.
Bezos—who is currently the world's fourth-richest person, according to lists published by Bloomberg and Forbes—is set to marry Sánchez, a journalist, later this week, and the couple is planning to celebrate the occasion with a three-day extravaganza costing an estimated $46-56 million, according toReuters.
Around 90 private jets are scheduled to land in area airports and local yacht harbors are fully booked, underscoring the climate and environmental impact on a city struggling to survive on one of myriad frontlines of the planetary emergency.
"We are very proud of this! We are nobodies, we have no money, nothing!"
The nuptial celebration has been relocated from the Scuola Grande della Misericordia to the Arsenale di Venezia, a historic fortified palace about 3 kilometers (1.8 miles) away from the original location. Officials cited concerns for the security of guests including several members of U.S. President Donald Trump's family.
Members of groups including No Space for Bezos, Greenpeace Italy, and Everyone Hates Elon—which targets Elon Musk, the world's richest person—have staged a series of demonstrations, including one on Monday at which protesters laid out a massive banner with Bezos' face and the message "If You Can Rent Venice for Your Wedding You Can Pay More Tax" in Piazza San Marco.
Responding to the celebration's relocation, Tommaso Cacciari of No Space for Bezos told the BBC Wednesday: "We are very proud of this! We are nobodies, we have no money, nothing!"
"We're just citizens who started organizing and we managed to move one of the most powerful people in the world," Cacciari added.
Wedding-related festivities are set to kick off Thursday evening, and city officials have blocked off parts of central Venice. While some residents have welcomed the money and fanfare the event will bring to a city with a long and storied history of oligarchs and opulence, others bristle at what they see as the transformation of their home into a playground for the superrich.
"There's only one thing that rules now: money, money, money, so we are the losers," Venice resident Nadia Rigo toldReuters. "We who were born here have to either move to the mainland or we have to ask them for permission to board a ferry. They've become the masters."
In the United States, critics contrasted the stratospheric cost of Bezos' celebration with the multicentibillionaire's history of personal and corporate tax dodging—and the hyper-capitalist system that enables it.
"Jeff Bezos is worth $230 billion and is reportedly spending $20 million on a three-day wedding in Venice while sailing around on his $500 million yacht," former U.S. Labor Secretary Robert Reich said Wednesday on the social media site X. "If he can afford to do that, he can afford a wealth tax and to pay Amazon workers a living wage. Hello?"
This is oligarchy. This is obscene.While 60% live paycheck to paycheck & kids go hungry, Jeff Bezos, worth $230 billion, goes to Venice on his $500 million yacht for a $20 million wedding & spends $5 million on a ring while his real tax rate is just 1.1%.End this oligarchy.
— Senator Bernie Sanders (@sanders.senate.gov) June 24, 2025 at 9:04 AM
While No Space for Bezos organizers are celebrating their victory and have canceled plans to fill Venice's canals with inflatable crocodiles in a bid to block celebrity guests from accessing the Scuola Grande della Misericordia, they said they still plan on protesting the festivities by holding a "No Bezos, No War" rally and march.
"It will be a strong, decisive protest, but peaceful," Federica Toninello of the Social Housing Assembly network toldEuronews Wednesday. "We want it to be like a party, with music, to make clear what we want our Venice to look like."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Iran Suspends Cooperation with IAEA, Accusing Nuclear Watchdog of 'Complicity' in Trump Strikes
"The IAEA, which did not even formally condemn the attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities, has put its international credibility up for sale," said Iran's parliament speaker, Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf.
Jun 25, 2025
The Iranian parliament approved a bill Wednesday suspending its cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
The resolution states that weapons inspectors with the United Nations nuclear watchdog organization will not be allowed to enter the country unless it guarantees the security of Iran's nuclear facilities and their ability to pursue peaceful nuclear activities.
Ahead of the vote, lawmakers denounced the IAEA, accusing it of enabling U.S. airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities Saturday—strikes Iran, as well as other observers of international law, have denounced as a clear violation of its sovereignty.
"The IAEA, which did not even formally condemn the attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities, has put its international credibility up for sale," said Iran's parliament speaker, Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf. "For this reason, the [Atomic Energy Organization of Iran] will suspend its cooperation with the Agency until the security of its nuclear facilities is guaranteed, and Iran's peaceful nuclear program will proceed at an even faster pace."
In response to the resolution, IAEA chief Rafael Grossi said that "the return of inspectors to Iran's nuclear facilities is a top priority."
Independent inspectors have not yet been able to inspect the damage to the three nuclear sites—Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan—hit by the U.S.
Following the strikes, U.S. President Donald Trump claimed that Iran's nuclear sites were "completely and fully obliterated."
However, reporting by CNN and The New York Times on Tuesday, based on unnamed sources familiar with an internal assessment by the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency, undercut that claim, stating that the strikes only set back Iran's nuclear program by a matter of months.
Grossi said Monday that the airstrikes likely inflicted "very significant damage" at Fordo, but that no conclusions could be reached until independent inspectors are allowed to examine the site and account for Iran's uranium stockpile.
The latest IAEA report issued on May 31 found "no credible indications of an ongoing, undeclared structured nuclear program" being pursued by Iran—a finding echoed by U.S. intelligence agencies.
However, the IAEA did find that Iran had significantly increased its uranium stockpile enriched to 60%, near weapons-grade, which it said was a violation of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).
Despite no "imminent threat," according to the most recent intelligence assessments, the Trump administration cited those IAEA findings to justify its attacks.
As a result, Iran's nuclear organization has questioned the IAEA's credibility as a neutral broker, accusing them of "deliberate inaction," following American and Israeli strikes. It said in a statement Sunday that these strikes were carried out "with the IAEA's silence, if not complicity."
Some critics have argued that the IAEA's decision to declare Iran in violation of the NPT was the result of significant U.S. arm-twisting and that the IAEA has not applied similar scrutiny to Israel's nuclear weapons program.
Iran maintains that its nuclear program is entirely peaceful and that strikes upon its nuclear facilities violate the NPT, which grants countries an "inalienable right" to develop nuclear energy for nonmilitary purposes.
Nuclear experts warn that the U.S. strikes on Iran have undermined the credibility of the NPT, prompting some factions in Iran to call for the nation's exit altogether.
Kelsey Davenport, the director for nonproliferation policy at the Arms Control Association, suggested Monday that U.S. attacks may only embolden Iran and other nations to violate the treaty and pursue nuclear weapons, perceiving them as necessary for their protection.
"From a nonproliferation perspective, Trump's decision to strike Iran was a reckless, irresponsible escalation that is likely to push Iran closer to nuclear weapons in the long term," Davenport said. "Politically, there's greater impetus now to weaponize."
Keep ReadingShow Less
After Mamdani Victory, Progressives Call for Primary Challenges to Democratic Establishment
"The establishment has never been more weak than they are now," one advocate told potential progressive candidates. "You need to run."
Jun 25, 2025
New York state Assemblymember Zohran Mamdani's victory over disgraced former Gov. Andrew Cuomo in New York City's Democratic mayoral primary was quickly dismissed by some commentators as one that likely wouldn't be replicated in federal elections and that said little about the views of Democratic voters at large.
But the news that Cuomo had conceded on Tuesday night left many progressives eager to continue the momentum started by Mamdani's (D-36) campaign—one characterized by a laser-sharp focus on making life more affordable for working people, a rejection of the outsized influence of billionaires and corporations on elections, and a demand for the Democratic Party to end its insistence that popular economic justice proposals are impossible to achieve in the United States.
Instead of viewing Mamdani's victory as an aberration, said journalist and organizer Daniel Denvir, the left should treat it as "an earthquake" that threatens the entire Democratic establishment—and its prioritizing of wealthy donors over the needs of ordinary voters.
"The left everywhere must dedicate itself to an insurgency against Democratic incumbents," said Denvir. "The Democratic establishment has lost credibility with its base in the face of a fascist threat. The base is looking leftward for new leadership. We are the opposition party."
Several progressive observers urged potential primary challengers to look to other upcoming races in New York, with several expressing hope that New York City Comptroller Brad Lander—another mayoral candidate who was widely praised for boosting Mamdani's campaign by cross-endorsing with him—will continue his political career by fighting for a U.S. Senate or House seat.
New York Democratic centrists including U.S. Rep. Dan Goldman and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer were named as lawmakers Lander could challenge in a primary. Goldman is up for reelection in 2026, and Schumer could face a primary in 2028.
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.), who has angered progressive advocates during President Donald Trump's second term by complaining about their demands for the Democrats to act as an opposition party, and Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-N.Y.), a vehement supporter of Israel who attacked Mamdani and accused him of antisemitism when he spoke out in support of Palestinian rights, were also mentioned as incumbents who should be challenged.
Mamdani won both Jeffries' and Goldman's House district, according to political analyst Armin Thomas.
Organizer Aaron Regunberg pointed to an article published by Politico last week detailing how 40% of Cuomo's endorsements came from lawmakers who had previously called for his resignation when he was accused of sexually harassing more than a dozen women.
"Politico ran this very convenient piece listing out every New York Democrat who needs to get primaried!" said Regunberg.
All the centrists named would likely have vast financial resources at their fingertips should a progressive vie for their seats, with powerful groups like the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) liable to spend heavily on their campaigns—but so did Cuomo, who benefited from a super political action committee that raised $25 million, including from right-wing billionaires.
"But if all of Cuomo's advantages led to a thorough election thrashing, perhaps they weren't advantages," wrote Jeet Heer at The Nation on Wednesday. "Mamdani proved to be a superb campaigner with a message about affordability that resonated with voters... Mamdani's victory is a sign that the Democratic Party establishment is in trouble, and the party is ready for a wider revolt. The next move of progressive Democrats is to start running insurgent candidates in primaries to harness the anger of the moment."
CNN political analyst Harry Enten also acknowledged that "the Democratic establishment" will likely feel threatened by Mamdani's victory, which follows "poll after poll showing Democratic voters fed up with their leaders in Washington."
In his victory speech, Mamdani himself suggested broader lessons should be taken from his campaign, during which he walked the length of Manhattan to talk directly to New Yorkers, spoke to Trump voters in the outer boroughs about their concerns over the cost of living, and advocated for fare-free buses and no-cost universal childcare.
"This is a victory for every New Yorker who has been told they don't have a voice," Mamdani said in his victory speech. "It's proof that organized people can beat organized money."
In a column at Common Dreams Wednesday, writer David Andersson wrote that "Mamdani's win signals a seismic shift in the balance of power between entrenched political institutions and a new generation demanding change. The sheer scale of resources the establishment mobilized—and still fell short—reveals the depth of their fear of losing control over the city's financial and political machinery."
"New York City, and perhaps the nation, is at a turning point," he added.
David Hogg, the anti-gun violence activist who was recently pushed out of his position as vice chair of the Democratic National Committee after he advocated for primary challenges to "asleep-at-the-wheel" Democrats in blue districts, urged young progressives to consider launching their own campaigns.
"It has never been more clear—the establishment has never been more weak than they are now," he said. "You need to run."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular