For Immediate Release
Jenn Ettinger, 202-265-1490 x 35
Free Press Files Amicus Brief in Supreme Court Case on Corporate Personhood
Corporations Cannot Claim 'Personal Privacy' Privileges Under the Freedom of Information Act
WASHINGTON - Yesterday, Free Press filed an amicus curiae (friend of the court)
brief in FCC v. AT&T, Inc., which will be heard by the Supreme Court
on Jan. 19, 2011.
The case asks the Court to decide whether corporations may claim
"personal privacy" rights when trying to prevent mandatory disclosure of
documents under the Freedom of Information Act. FOIA requires that the
government release agency records to anyone who requests them, unless
those documents fall under one of several exemptions.
Before the FCC and in the Court of Appeals, AT&T argued that the
Federal Communications Commission should not disclose records of an FCC
enforcement proceeding because AT&T has a personal privacy interest
in protecting its corporate reputation under FOIA Exemption 7(C). This
exemption states that law enforcement records need not be disclosed if
their release "could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy." The Third Circuit Court of Appeals
agreed with this interpretation, and the FCC petitioned for and was
granted certiorari in the Supreme Court.
Aparna Sridhar, Free Press policy counsel, made the following statement:
"A 'corporate personal privacy' right is simply an oxymoron. In this
case, AT&T seeks to extend a deeply held individual right to the
artificial corporate form. We have always recognized our privacy rights
to be grounded in notions of fundamental human dignity and autonomy, and
we should not deploy these rights as mere tools to promote corporate
"There is a significant cost to withholding enforcement records from
public disclosure that is mandated by the law. The public has a right to
know when large corporations are violating the laws that govern their
business practices, and what the FCC is doing to enforce those laws and
protect the public. Granting AT&T a personal privacy right would
dramatically undermine much needed transparency on both of these fronts.
"The Court should take the opportunity to restore the privacy rights
embodied in FOIA as a shield for vulnerable individuals rather than a
sword for large corporations."
The docket number for the case is 09-1279. A link to the brief is here: http://www.freepress.net/resource/free-press-amicus-brief-supreme-court-...
We know things are bad. We know it's worth the fight.
You are part of a strong and vibrant community of thinkers and doers who believe another world is possible. Alone we are weak. Together we can make a difference. At Common Dreams, we don't look away from the world—we are not afraid—our mission is to document those doing wrong and galvanize those doing good. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. We have now launched our annual Summer Campaign. Can you pitch in today?
Free Press is a national, nonpartisan organization working to reform the media. Through education, organizing and advocacy, we promote diverse and independent media ownership, strong public media, and universal access to communications. Learn more at www.freepress.net