For Immediate Release
GE Sugar Beets: Groups Condemn USDA Action Avoiding Court Order
Attempt to Circumvent Recent Federal Court Order Making the Plantings Illegal
WASHINGTON - On September 1, 2010,
the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service (APHIS) announced that it was in the process of issuing permits
to authorize the planting of genetically engineered (GE) sugar beet
seedlings this Fall, without performing any review of the crops’
environmental impacts. These GE beets have been altered so that they can
tolerate being sprayed with Monsanto’s herbicide Roundup. The
unprecedented permitting process for a commercially-grown
genetically engineered crop was initiated without public notice and
comment or any environmental review. Last week the agency met with
companies involved and invested in promoting the gene-altered crop.
vacated USDA’s approval of the GE sugar beets, making the planting of
these beets after the date of the order illegal. The Court reversed the
agency’s approval because of the USDA’s failure
to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act. Specifically, the
USDA had failed to prepare an Environmental Statement addressing the
potential of these GE plants to cause a variety of environmental and
social-economic injuries, including contaminating
conventional and organic crops and promoting the growth of “superweeds”
that are resistant to Roundup, and therefore are very difficult to
eradicate unless highly toxic chemicals are used.
the [NEPA] process seriously.” The USDA action today in allowing
planting without any environmental review justifies the Court’s concern.
federal court opinions which reversed USDA approvals of GE plants.
These courts also faulted the agency for its continuing failure to
address the biological pollution issue surrounding genetically
engineered alfalfa, bentgrass and so-called biopharmaceutical crops.
Despite repeatedly being ordered to do so, the USDA has yet to complete a
single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) assessing any GE crop.
Despite numerous court opinions, congressional mandates and federal
investigations, it continues to act illegally,” stated Andrew Kimbrell
Executive Director of the Center for Food Safety.
“The agency and Secretary Vilsack seem to see their mission as defending
Monsanto’s bottom line rather than protecting farmers and consumers,”
refusal to comply with environmental laws in the face of one court
decision after another is remarkable. This is yet another instance of
USDA serving Monsanto’s interests at the expense
of the public interest, without regard to the rule of law.”
We want a more open and sharing world.
That's why our content is free. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported.
All of our original content is published under Creative Commons—allowing (and encouraging) our articles to be republished freely anywhere. In addition to the traffic and reach our content generates on our site, the multiplying impact of our work is huge and growing as our articles flourish across the Internet and are republished by other large and small online and print outlets around the world.
Several times a year we run brief campaigns to ask our readers to pitch in—and thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Our 2019 Mid-Year Campaign is underway. Can you help? We can't do it without you.
Please select a donation method:
Earthjustice is a non-profit public interest law firm dedicated to protecting the magnificent places, natural resources, and wildlife of this earth, and to defending the right of all people to a healthy environment. We bring about far-reaching change by enforcing and strengthening environmental laws on behalf of hundreds of organizations, coalitions and communities.