July, 29 2010, 11:27am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Bustar Maitar, Greenpeace forest campaigner, (in Jakata), tel: +62 813 4466 6135
Martin Baker, Greenpeace communications, (in Jakata), tel: +62 813 1582 9513
Greg McNevin, Greenpeace communications, (in Amsterdam) +31 (0) 6 2900 1152
John Novis, Greenpeace International photo editor (in Beijing), tel: +86 (0) 1301 1851 643
Under Fire Rainforest Destroyer Caught Breaking Promises
New investigation shows Indonesia’s largest palm and pulp group still destroying critical habitats
JAKARTA, Indonesia
A new Greenpeace
investigation into the operations of Sinar Mas, one the most notorious
destroyers of Indonesia's rainforests, reveals how it is continuing to
break its own environmental commitments on protecting forests and
peatland.
Publishing new photographic evidence, aerial monitoring and
field analysis [1], Greenpeace International today details how the Sinar
Mas group continues to clear rainforest containing priceless
biodiversity - such as orang-utan habitat - and carbon-rich peatlands,
despite public promises it has made to clean up its act.
The
revelations also highlight Sinar Mas' ambitions to expand its pulp and
palm oil empire into millions more hectares across Indonesia, including
large tracts of rainforest and peatland in the province of Papua. These
ambitions are outlined in confidential Sinar Mas documents obtained by
Greenpeace. Last week, the head of Sinar Mas' palm oil division
confirmed the company's intentions to expand its empire by an additional
1 million hectares. [2]
Sinar Mas claims not to
develop on peatland and to protect forests of 'high conservation value'.
Earlier Greenpeace investigations repeatedly documented cases where
Sinar Mas operations actively cleared rainforest and peatland areas,
including tiger and orang-utan habitats. Now today's report exposes
current rainforest destruction by Sinar Mas in two of its concessions on
the island of Borneo.
In the first case, a
confidential Sinar Mas document shows that nearly one-third of the
concession area is peatland, almost all of which is deep peat that would
be illegal to develop under Indonesian law. Greenpeace photographs show
plant operators engaged in active rainforest clearance in the peatland
area. In the second case, Greenpeace photographs document recent
clearance of rainforest areas of orang-utan habitat, identified by a
United Nations Environment Programme study. [3]
In
both cases the photographs were taken by a Greenpeace photographer
accompanied by journalists from respected news operations Reuters, AFP
and Kompas.
Following the latest revelations
Greenpeace is calling on Sinar Mas to come clean and make public its
maps detailing all its landholdings, to enable analysis of which areas
are critically important for biodiversity and climate protection, and
what it is doing in those areas.
"We've caught
Sinar Mas red-handed destroying valuable rainforests, and breaching the
limited promises it has made to clean up its act. This is typical of a
group that has an appalling record of environmental destruction. Sinar
Mas has to be reigned in if there is to be a future for what's left of
Indonesia's rainforests. Until this group changes course, other
businesses should have nothing to do with Sinar Mas," said Bustar
Maitar, Greenpeace forest campaigner.
The
disclosures come on the day Sinar Mas had planned to publish an audit it
commissioned into its own activities in a small number of its palm oil
operations, in response to revelations made in earlier Greenpeace
reports. The company's audit was not designed to assess its practices
across all of its operations, but instead to examine allegations made by
Greenpeace in recent years. The evidence released by Greenpeace today
includes photographs of peat and forest clearance in a concession due to
feature in the Sinar Mas audit. PR company Bell Pottinger (which Sinar
Mas has hired to run the publicity around the audit) was this week
forced to announce it was postponing its publication.
Bell
Pottinger also represents disgraced oil trading company Trafigura,
which was convicted last week of illegally exporting toxic waste to
Africa. [4]
In recent months several leading
multinationals - including Unilever, Kraft and Nestle - have responded
to Greenpeace's evidence by ending their contracts with Sinar Mas.
However, Greenpeace is calling on others, including trading giant
Cargill, to take immediate action to remove rainforest destruction from
their supply chain.
New Greenpeace investigation, published today, can be found here:https://www.greenpeace.org/international/sinar-mas-empires-of-destructi...
***
[1] See https://www.greenpeace.org/international/sinar-mas-empires-of-destruction
[2] London Sunday Times, 25 July 2010 -
https://www.timesplus.co.uk/sto/?login=false&url=https://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/business/energy_and_environment/article353075.ece <https://www.timesplus.co.uk/sto/?login=false&url=https://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/business/energy_and_environment/article353075.ece>
(available with subscription only)
[3] The Sinar Mas concessions where this year Greenpeace found the
company breaking its commitments are:
- The PT Agro Lestari Mandiri concession in Ketapang district, West Kalimantan
The PT Bangun Nusa Mandiri concession in Ketapang district, West Kalimantan
Earlier Greenpeace reports detailing Sinar Mas practices can be found here:
- Cooking the Climate - this was our first look at the issue in 2007:
https://www.greenpeace.org.uk/media/reports/cooking-the-climate
Burning up Borneo - This is the report that Unilever have already
had audited (see below for that):
https://www.greenpeace.org.uk/media/reports/burning-up-borneo
Illegal deforestation and RSPO greenwash: Case studies of Sinar Mas:
https://www.greenpeace.org.uk/media/reports/illegal-forest-clearance-and-rspo-greenwash-case-studies-sinar-mas
Nestle and Sinar Mas:
https://www.greenpeace.org.uk/media/reports/caught-red-handed-nestl%C3%A9-sinar-mas-and-palm-oil
According to the HCV map reproduced in a January 2010 internal Sinar
Mas report obtained by Greenpeace, the PT ALM concession area contains
an extensive peat dome covering nearly one-third of the concession
area with the vast majority of this 3 metres deep, clearance of which
would be illegal under Indonesian law. Any clearance of peatland
post-November 2009 violates GAR explicit policy and SMART commitments.
[4] The Guardian, "How UK oil company Trafigura tried to cover up
African pollution disaster", 16 September 2009,
https://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/sep/16/trafigura-african-pollution-disaster
The Guardian, "Trafigura fined EUR1m for exporting toxic waste to
Africa", 23 July 2010,
https://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/jul/23/trafigura-dutch-fine-waste-export
Greenpeace is a global, independent campaigning organization that uses peaceful protest and creative communication to expose global environmental problems and promote solutions that are essential to a green and peaceful future.
+31 20 718 2000LATEST NEWS
Sanders Rips 'Absurd' US Claim That Israel Is Not Violating International Law
"The State Department's position makes a mockery of U.S. law and assurances provided to Congress," said Sen. Bernie Sanders.
Mar 26, 2024
Sen. Bernie Sanders on Monday said the U.S. State Department's determination that Israel is not violating international law with its assault on the Gaza Strip is "absurd on its face," pointing to the mass death, destruction, and starvation that Israeli forces have inflicted on the territory's population over the past six months.
"Thirty-two thousand Palestinians in Gaza have been killed and almost 75,000 injured, two-thirds of whom are women and children," Sanders (I-Vt.) said in a statement. "Some 60% of the housing units have been damaged or destroyed, and almost all medical facilities have been made inoperable. Today, hundreds of thousands of Palestinian children are facing starvation because [Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu won't let in sufficient humanitarian aid, while thousands of trucks are waiting to get into Gaza."
"The State Department's position," said Sanders, "makes a mockery of U.S. law and assurances provided to Congress."
The senator's statement came after State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller told reporters during a press briefing earlier Monday that the Biden administration has not found Israel "to be in violation of international humanitarian law, either when it comes to the conduct of the war or when it comes to the provision of humanitarian assistance."
Miller was responding to a question about assurances the administration has received from the Israeli government that its use of American weaponry has complied with international law and that it has permitted U.S. humanitarian aid to enter Gaza, where the entire population is facing acute hunger.
Under a new Biden administration policy known as NSM-20, recipients of American military aid are required to provide the U.S. government with "credible and reliable" written assurances that they are using such assistance "in a manner consistent with all applicable international and domestic law and policy."
Late last week, a group of U.S. senators—including Sanders—warned the Biden administration that deeming Israeli assurances credible would "be inconsistent with the letter and spirit of NSM-20" and "establish an unacceptable precedent" for the application of the policy "in other situations around the world."
"Until Biden is ready to impose real policy consequences on Netanyahu's government, the famine will continue."
It is a violation of U.S. law to continue sending military assistance to a country that is obstructing the delivery of American humanitarian aid. Last month, far-right Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich blocked a U.S.-funded flour shipment from entering the Gaza Strip, and Israeli forces have repeatedly fired on convoys attempting to deliver aid to desperate Gazans.
Prominent human rights groups have been calling on the U.S. to impose an arms embargo on Israel for months, pointing to documented examples of the Israeli military using American weaponry to commit atrocities in Gaza.
But the Biden administration has refused to even apply concrete restrictions on American military aid. Over the weekend, U.S. President Joe Biden signed into law a measure that approves $3.8 billion in unconditional military assistance for the Israeli government and imposes a one-year ban on funding for the primary humanitarian aid organization in Gaza.
Jeremy Konyndyk, the president of Refugees International and a former USAID official, said Monday that Israel's assurances to the U.S. are "not remotely credible" and argued the Biden administration is undermining efforts to combat the worsening humanitarian crisis in Gaza by accepting the Israeli government's claims.
The U.S., he said, is "talking a big game about fighting the famine that its bombs and diplomatic cover have helped create." Resorting to "gimmicky" efforts such as airdrops and temporary ports while a U.S. ally obstructs humanitarian aid "is not how you fight a famine," Konyndyk argued.
"Fundamentally Biden must choose: between continuing to enable Netanyahu, or ending the famine. There's no way to split the difference," said Konyndyk. "Until Biden is ready to impose real policy consequences on Netanyahu's government, the famine will continue."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Outrageous': US Accepts Israeli Assurances on Legal Use of Weapons in Gaza
Palestinian American author and political analyst Yousef Munayyer called the U.S. assessment "absolutely scandalous."
Mar 25, 2024
The Biden administration on Monday said that Israel's use of U.S.-supplied weapons in a war that's killed and maimed more than 114,000 Palestinians complies with international law, a conclusion that flies in the face of multiple court rulings that Israel is plausibly committing genocide in Gaza and the assessments of legal and human rights experts around the world.
Referring to a letter from Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, U.S. State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said during a Monday press briefing that the Biden administration has "had ongoing assessments of Israel's compliance with international humanitarian law" and "have not found them to be in violation, either when it comes to the conduct of the war or the provision of humanitarian assistance."
U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken had until Monday to certify to Congress that Israel is adhering to President Joe Biden's February 2023 memo stating that "no arms transfer will be authorized where the United States assesses that it is more likely than not that the arms to be transferred will be used by the recipient to commit... genocide, crimes against humanity, grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 1949... or other serious violations of international humanitarian or human rights law."
"These assurances are perspective, but of course, our view on them is informed by our ongoing assessments of Israel's conduct in the war in Gaza," said Miller.
Palestinian American author and political analyst Yousef Munayyer called the U.S. assessment "absolutely scandalous."
US State Department Spokesperson Matthew Miller insisted during a press briefing that Israel has not violated international law in its military operation in Gaza. pic.twitter.com/9OP5xRm0Gx
— The Great Investor (@TheGreatInvest2) March 25, 2024
According to Palestinian and international officials, Israeli bombs and bullets—many of them provided by the United States as part of the $3.8 billion in annual military aid and additional emergency shipments—have killed more than 33,000 Palestinians in Gaza since October 7, the majority of them women and children.
In December, Biden implored Israel to stop its "indiscriminate bombing" of Gaza. Since then, Israeli forces have killed or wounded over 40,000 people.
Experts have pointed to the types of munitions being used by Israeli forces as a major reason why so many Gazans are being killed and injured. These include U.S.-supplied 1,000-pound and 2,000-pound guided "bunker-buster" bombs, which Israel says are necessary to target Hamas' underground tunnels.
Aided by artificial intelligence-based target selection systems, Israel Defense Forces commanders are approving bombings they know will cause large numbers of civilian casualties. In a bid to assassinate a single Hamas commander, the IDF dropped at least two 2,000-pound bombs on the densely populated Jabalia refugee camp on October 31, killing more than 120 civilians.
Even the United States military—which since 2001 has killed hundreds of thousands of people during the open-ended so-called War on Terror—avoids using 2,000-pound bombs in densely populated areas due to the tremendous damage they cause.
Regarding the Biden administration's assessment that Israel is adhering to international law when it comes to providing humanitarian assistance to besieged and starving Gazans, journalist Krystal Ball noted Monday that Blinken "admits 100% of the population is being starved yet somehow certifies that Israel isn't blocking humanitarian aid."
WATCH: "100% of the population of Gaza is experiencing severe levels of acute food insecurity. We cannot, we must not allow that to continue."
U.S. Sec. of State Antony Blinken pushes for an immediate cease-fire and more humanitarian aid into Gaza. pic.twitter.com/U1Mme7fqiJ
— MSNBC (@MSNBC) March 21, 2024
"This is fucking outrageous," Ball said on social media as critics pointed out how Gallant publicly declared in October that Israel would commit the war crime of a "complete siege" of Gaza.
The U.S. assessment stands in stark contrast with two major court rulings—one by the International Court of Justice and the other by a federal court in California—that Israel is plausibly committing genocide in Gaza, as well as with findings by at least hundreds of jurists and other experts around the world, including in Israel, that the assault on Gaza is genocidal. Observers accuse Israel of ignoring an ICJ order for Israel to avoid acts of genocide.
On Monday, the United Nations Human Rights Council published a draft report that found "reasonable grounds to believe" that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. The report recommended suspending military aid to Israel in light of its numerous violations of international law.
A growing number of Democratic U.S. lawmakers and human rights groups have urged the Biden administration to immediately cut off arms transfers to Israel, citing its illegal conduct in Gaza, including mass killing and destruction and the blocking of lifesaving humanitarian aid.
Also on Monday, Palestine defenders rallied in Washington, D.C. to protest a visit to the State Department by Gallant and to demand an end to U.S. aid and weapons to Israel. Another high-level Israeli delegation's visit to Washington was canceled Monday after the U.S. abstained from a U.N. Security Council vote on a resolution demanding an immediate cease-fire in Gaza.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Federal Court Rules Major Wyoming Oil and Gas Lease Sale Illegal for Ignoring Climate Impacts
"This is a huge victory for the protection of our public lands," said Friends of the Earth.
Mar 25, 2024
The U.S. Bureau of Land Management will have to reevaluate the wildlife and public health impacts of a major 2022 oil and gas lease sale in Wyoming after a federal judge ruled Friday that the agency had overlooked "what is widely regarded as the most pressing environmental threat facing the world today" when it moved forward with leasing 120,000 of federal land.
U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper ruled in Washington, D.C. that the BLM did not halt the lease sale even after it acknowledged that oil and gas drilling on the federal lands could result in the same negative environmental and social impacts as the addition of hundreds of thousands of cars to U.S. roads each year.
Moving forward with one of the Biden administration's largest lease sales despite its likely environmental harm, said Cooper, was illegal under the National Environmental Policy Act and other laws.
Representing The Wilderness Society and Friends of the Earth (FOE), environmental legal group Earthjustice sued BLM over its leasing plans' potential impact on the greater sage grouse, an endangered bird species, and other wildlife, as well as groundwater impacts.
The judge found BLM did not complete a sufficiently detailed review of drilling impacts on the greater sage grouse, and relied too heavily on outdated and overly broad analyses of oil and gas drilling in Wyoming.
While the agency has been attempting to "stop the bleeding" of the greater sage grouse, whose population has declined nearly 40% since 2002, the BLM still refused to postpone leasing in a critical habitat for the bird.
The Biden administration also did not adequately explain its analysis of potential groundwater harms, said the ruling.
Despite some conservation strides by the Biden administration, The Wilderness Society's Ben Tettlebaum said the court's decision "affirms that much work remains" to be done. The BLM, he added, "must fully account for the serious impacts of its oil and gas program on groundwater, wildlife, and the climate."
Tettlebaum said the ruling also proves the agency is required to "factor into its leasing decisions the enormous costs that greenhouse gas emissions stemming from its oil and gas program impose on public land resources and on the communities that depend on them for clean air and water."
Hallie Templeton, legal director for FOE, added that the federal government "simply cannot ignore climate, wildlife, and water impacts when analyzing the myriad risks of oil and gas leasing, whether in Wyoming or across the country," as the ruling makes clear.
"We are beyond pleased with this outcome," said Templeton.
The ruling "should be another wake up call for the Bureau of Land Management to at long last address the damage caused from federal oil and gas development," said Alexandra Schluntz, senior associate attorney for Earthjustice. "It is time to make fossil fuel leasing on our public lands a thing of the past."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular