April, 29 2010, 12:54pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Suzanne Struglinski, 202-289-2387, sstruglinski@nrdc.org;
Josh Mogerman, 312-651-7909, jmogerman@nrdc.org
LEED for Neighborhood Development Rating System Launches as Benchmark for Green Neighborhood Design
Environmental Leaders Partner to Advance Walkable, Sustainable and Economically Thriving Communities
WASHINGTON
The Natural Resources Defense Council
(NRDC), The U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC), and Congress for the
New Urbanism (CNU) announced today the launch of the LEED for
Neighborhood Development green neighborhoods rating system. LEED for
Neighborhood Development integrates the principles of smart growth, new
urbanism and green building, and benefits communities by reducing urban
sprawl, increasing transportation choices and decreasing automobile
dependence, encouraging healthy living, and protecting threatened
species.
The rating system encourages development within or near
existing communities and/or public infrastructure in order to reduce the
environmental impacts of sprawl. By promoting communities that are
physically connected, LEED for Neighborhood Development conserves land
and promotes transportation efficiency and walkability. A 2008 study
entitled "The Economic Value of Walkability" found that households in
automobile-dependent communities devote 50 percent more money - more
than $8,500 annually - to transportation.
The correlation between transit-oriented development and
proximity to services, amenities and jobs to human health benefits and
economic capital has been found by numerous studies and is advocated by
the Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Health and
Human Services. Furthermore, the connectivity to neighboring communities
with existing transportation and thoroughfares or local retail and
services greatly benefits the citizens, businesses and local economy of
the surrounding regions.
"Half of the buildings we will have in 25 years are not yet
on the ground," said Kaid Benfield, Director of the Smart Growth Program
at the Natural Resources Defense Council. "Where we put them is even
more important to the environment than how we build them, and NRDC is
proud to stand alongside our partners with a system that helps guide
them to the right places while avoiding the wrong ones."
LEED for Neighborhood Development strives to create healthy,
safe neighborhoods in which people from a wide range of economic levels
and age groups can live and work together. Green neighborhoods foster
social inclusivity as they provide accessibility to transportation,
jobs, resources, education and promote healthier lifestyles. LEED for
Neighborhood Development projects include or are sited to have good
access to schools, businesses, residences, shopping, dining and
entertainment.
"Sustainable communities are prosperous communities for the
occupants and businesses which inhabit them," said Rick Fedrizzi,
President, CEO & Founding Chair, U.S. Green Building Council. "LEED
for Neighborhood Development projects are strategically located in or
surrounding metropolitan areas - often times revitalizing brownfields,
infills or other underutilized spaces, opening new revenue streams,
creating jobs opportunities and helping to drive the local, state and
national economies."
NRDC helped to establish LEED for Neighborhood Development by
soliciting the help of Smart Growth America, a national coalition of
organizations working for better communities and recruiting smart growth
experts to participate on the committee of volunteers that authored the
rating system. The principles of smart growth focus on the importance
of considering location, transportation alternatives, equity, and
community form when developing land use plans.
"LEED for Neighborhood Development contains the components
for compact and complete neighborhoods. With walkable streets,
appropriately-scaled schools, and a mix of amenities close by, residents
can lower their environmental impact while improving their quality of
life," said John Norquist, President and CEO, Congress for the New
Urbanism.
CNU brought a number of leading planners and architects from
the New Urbanist movement to help shape the new rating system. New
Urbanism promotes compact neighborhood form, a wide range of urban
housing types from multi-unit buildings to single-family homes, a
vibrant mix of uses within close proximity of each other, humane public
spaces and well-connected streets and blocks serving users ranging from
pedestrians and cyclists to transit riders and drivers.
"LEED for Neighborhood Development projects are designed to
highlight the best in a community," Fedrizzi continued. "By bridging
together adjoining districts, neighborhood developments take advantage
of the greatest things a community has to offer - the people and
amenities which enrich our lives on a daily basis."
The consensus-based process that drives the development of
the LEED rating systems ensures and encourages the very best in
building, design and development practices. The scope of LEED for
Neighborhood Development projects can range from small projects to whole
communities and encompasses a broader set of stakeholders in the
process. Because of the scale of neighborhood development, projects are
measured on acreage - the first LEED rating system to use a measurement
other than square footage.
This is the seventh LEED rating system released by USGBC and
is the first comprehensive benchmark for green neighborhood design.
Projects certifying under LEED for Neighborhood Development must achieve
points in three major environmental categories: Smart Location &
Linkage, Neighborhood Pattern & Design, and Green Infrastructure
& Buildings across a 110-point scale.
Also launching this spring is the LEED Accredited
Professional (AP) Neighborhood Development (ND) credential for
professionals participating in the design and development of
neighborhoods. To read more about the LEED AP ND credential, go to www.usgbc.org/credentials
or to learn about the neighborhood development educational offerings,
visit www.usgbc.org/leedcurriculum.
Read more about LEED-ND on Kaid
Benfield's blog.
NRDC works to safeguard the earth--its people, its plants and animals, and the natural systems on which all life depends. We combine the power of more than three million members and online activists with the expertise of some 700 scientists, lawyers, and policy advocates across the globe to ensure the rights of all people to the air, the water, and the wild.
(212) 727-2700LATEST NEWS
Cori Bush Demands Repeal of 'Zombie Statute' Weaponized by Anti-Abortion Zealots
"The Comstock Act must be repealed," said the Missouri Democrat.
Mar 27, 2024
Rep. Cori Bush on Tuesday called for the repeal of a long-obsolete law that anti-abortion activists, lawmakers, and judges have worked to revive as part of their nationwide assault on reproductive rights.
"The Comstock Act must be repealed," Bush (D-Mo.) wrote in a social media post on Tuesday as the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case brought by a group of anti-abortion doctors aiming to curtail access to mifepristone—a medication used in more than 60% of U.S. abortions.
"Enacted in 1873, it is a zombie statute, a dead law that the far-right is trying to reanimate," Bush warned. "The anti-abortion movement wants to weaponize the Comstock Act as a quick route to a nationwide medication abortion ban. Not on our watch."
Bush's office said she was the first member of Congress to demand the law's repeal since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to abortion in the summer of 2022.
The Comstock Act, which hasn't been applied in a century and was repeatedly narrowed following its enactment, prohibits the mailing of any "instrument, substance, drug, medicine, or thing" that "may, or can, be used or applied for producing abortion." Legal experts have described the dormant law as the "most significant national threat to reproductive rights."
Given that "virtually everything used for an abortion—from abortion pills, to the instruments for abortion procedures, to clinic supplies—gets mailed to providers in some form," a trio of experts wrote earlier this year, the anti-abortion movement's "interpretation of the Comstock Act could mean a nationwide ban on all abortions, even in states where it remains legal."
"Enforcing a Victorian-era law would be deeply unpopular and Democrats have a chance to sound the alarm, take action in both chambers, and run on it."
The Biden Justice Department has argued that the Comstock Act "does not prohibit the mailing of certain drugs that can be used to perform abortions where the sender lacks the intent that the recipient of the drugs will use them unlawfully."
But the law has nevertheless been cited with growing frequency by far-right advocacy groups and judges following the overturning of Roe v. Wade.
In 2023, a Trump-appointed federal judge in Texas, Matthew Kacsmaryk, invoked the Comstock Act in a decision suspending the Food and Drug Administration's 2000 approval of mifepristone. In 2021, the FDA said it would allow patients to receive abortion medication by mail—which Kacsmaryk claimed the Comstock Act "plainly forecloses."
That case, which has massive implications for abortion rights nationwide, is now before the U.S. Supreme Court.
During oral arguments on Tuesday, Justices Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas "repeatedly invoked the Comstock Act," The Washington Postreported, "pressing lawyers about whether the 1873 federal law should apply to abortion drugs sent through the mail today."
The justices' comments raised concerns that they could try to resurrect the Comstock Act in their coming ruling in the mifepristone case.
"While the Biden administration has issued guidance saying that the federal government
will not enforce the laws," the Post noted, "a future administration seeking to restrict abortion could choose to do so."
Donald Trump, the former president and presumptive 2024 Republican nominee, has expressed support for a national abortion ban.
Jezebel's Susan Rinkunas wrote Tuesday that "enforcing a Victorian-era law would be deeply unpopular and Democrats have a chance to sound the alarm, take action in both chambers, and run on it."
"We definitively have one lawmaker on board," Rinkunas added, referring to Bush. "Who's next?"
Keep ReadingShow Less
Container Ship That Destroyed Baltimore Bridge Has Troubled History
The Maersk-chartered MV Dali—which lost propulsion just before the collision—not only was involved in a previous crash, but was also briefly detained last year over problems with its propulsion system.
Mar 26, 2024
The mega-container ship that lost propulsion before toppling Baltimore's Francis Scott Key Bridge in a Tuesday morning collision was involved in a previous crash, and was cited last year for propulsion-related problems.
Newsweekreported that the Maersk Line Limited-chartered MV Dali—which crashed into the Interstate 695 Patapsco River crossing just before 1:30 am, causing the span to collapse and sending a construction crew into the water—collided with a wall in the harbor at Antwerp, Belgium in 2016. The accident, which was reported by Vessel Finder and other outlets at the time, was attributed to errors made by the ship's master and pilot.
The 9-year-old Dali was also detained by port officials in San Antonio, Chile last June after inspectors discovered a problem related to the vessel's "propulsion and auxiliary machinery," according toThe Washington Post, which cited records from the intergovernmental shipping regulator Tokyo MOU.
The ship's owner, Grace Ocean Private Ltd., and operator, Synergy Marine, "have been sued at least four times in U.S. federal court on allegations of negligence and other claims tied to worker injuries on other ships owned and operated by the Singapore-based companies," according toThe Associated Press.
Maersk was also sanctioned last year by the U.S. Labor Department for allegedly stopping employees from reporting safety concerns, documents published by The Lever revealed.
According to a July 14, 2023 Labor Department letter to Maersk regarding an Occupational Safety and Health Administration investigation, the Danish company "suspended and then terminated" a worker "in retaliation for reporting unsafe conditions and contacting the U.S. Coast Guard."
The fired employee "engaged in numerous protected activities" including reporting a leak and the need for repairs to a ship's cargo hold bilge system, alcohol use aboard the vessel by crew members, and inoperable equipment including an emergency fire pump and lifeboat block and releasing gear.
The search for six construction workers who were on the bridge when it collapsed into the river was suspended until Wednesday, according toThe Associated Press. The workers are presumed dead by their employer, Brawner Builders. Local media reported that multiple vehicles plunged into the river and that two workers—one of whom was briefly hospitalized—were rescued from the water.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Pentagon Urged to Just Say No to AI-Powered Killer Robots
"The Department of Defense should declare its opposition to the development and deployment of autonomous weapons."
Mar 26, 2024
The watchdog group Public Citizen on Tuesday led a letter urging Pentagon leaders "to clarify that the Replicator Initiative will not involve the development and deployment of autonomous weapons systems," also known as "killer robots."
Last September, U.S. Deputy Secretary of Defense Kathleen Hicks "asserted that the development of all-domain, attributable autonomy systems (ADA2) is an essential way for the Pentagon to maintain its comparative cutting-edge and keep up with the technological advancements of other states," notes the letter, which was addressed to her and Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin.
"However, those comments failed to specify whether or not supporting autonomous weapons systems is one of the key focuses of this initiative," the letter stresses. "When addressing whether or not 'ADA2 means weapons systems,' Secretary Hicks stated: 'That's a serious question to be sure. They are not synonymous. There are many applications for ADA2 systems beyond delivering weapons effects.'"
"Autonomous weapons are inherently dehumanizing and unethical, no matter whether a human is 'ultimately' responsible for the use of force or not."
Public Citizen and the 13 other organizations argued that "this is no place for strategic ambiguity. Autonomous weapons are inherently dehumanizing and unethical, no matter whether a human is 'ultimately' responsible for the use of force or not."
Deploying lethal weapons that rely on artificial intelligence (AI) "in battlefield conditions necessarily means inserting them into novel conditions for which they have not been programmed, an invitation for disastrous outcomes," the groups warned. "'Swarms' of the sort envisioned by Replicator pose even heightened risks, because of the unpredictability of how autonomous systems will function in a network. And the mere ambiguity of the U.S. position on autonomous weapons risks spurring a catastrophic arms race."
"We believe the Department of Defense should declare its opposition to the development and deployment of autonomous weapons," the coalition concluded. "However, even if you are not prepared to make that declaration, we strongly urge you to clarify that the Replicator Initiative will not employ autonomous weapons."
In addition to Public Citizen, the coalition included the American Friends Service Committee, Autistic Women & Nonbinary Network, Backbone Campaign, Demand Progress Education Fund, Fight for the Future, Future of Life, National Priorities Project at the Institute for Policy Studies, RootsAction.org, United Church of Christ, the Value Alliance, Women's International League for Peace and Freedom U.S., Win Without War, and World Beyond War.
The letter comes on the heels of Public Citizen releasing a report about the rise of killer robots, AI Joe: The Dangers of Artificial Intelligence and the Military.
The February report addresses the Pentagon's AI policy, the dangers of killer robots, the need to ensure decisions about nuclear weapons aren't made by automated systems, how artificial intelligence can increase not diminish the use of violence, risks of using deepfakes on the battlefield, and how AI startups are seeking government contracts.
The publication concludes with recommendations that Public Citizen president Robert Weissman echoed in a statement Tuesday.
"The United States should state plainly that it will not create or deploy killer robots and should work to advance global treaty negotiations to ban such weapons," Weissman said. "At minimum, the United States should commit that the Replicator Initiative will not involve the use of autonomous weapons."
"Ambiguity about the Replicator program essentially ensures a catastrophic arms race over autonomous weapons," he added. "That's a race in which all of humanity is the loser."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular