

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

The Dow Chemical Company (Dow) cannot
run from its responsibility for the ongoing impacts of the 1984 Bhopal
gas leak by sponsoring Live Earth 'Run for Water' events, Amnesty
International said today.
Thousands of people died and more than 100,000 continue to suffer
from serious health problems as a consequence of 1984's deadly leak of
toxic chemicals from a Union Carbide pesticide plant in Bhopal, India.
Dow became 100% owner of the Union Carbide Corporation (UCC) in 2001.
The Dow Chemical Company (Dow) cannot
run from its responsibility for the ongoing impacts of the 1984 Bhopal
gas leak by sponsoring Live Earth 'Run for Water' events, Amnesty
International said today.
Thousands of people died and more than 100,000 continue to suffer
from serious health problems as a consequence of 1984's deadly leak of
toxic chemicals from a Union Carbide pesticide plant in Bhopal, India.
Dow became 100% owner of the Union Carbide Corporation (UCC) in 2001.
Since then survivors and human rights groups have been campaigning
for Dow to address the ongoing impacts of the disaster, including
contamination of water by chemical waste, but the company has
consistently ignored these calls, denying any responsibility for UCC's
liabilities in Bhopal.
On 18 April Dow is sponsoring a series of running events across the
globe, organized by environmental organization Live Earth to raise
awareness about water scarcity.
"Sponsoring an event that highlights water scarcity while ignoring
ongoing problems with access to clean water and medical care, amongst
other issues, in Bhopal is at best hypocrisy, at worst, a flagrant
attempt by Dow to try to white-wash its image," said Audrey Gaughran,
Director of Global Issues at Amnesty International.
"Dow may be trying to run away from the legacy of Bhopal, but it
can't be allowed to hide behind sponsorship of 'Run for Water' events."
For more than 25 years both the government of India and the
companies involved have failed to address the human rights abuses that
have been the lasting legacy of the Bhopal gas leak.
"Bhopal raises fundamental questions about the accountability of
corporations and the capacity and willingness of governments to address
corporate-related human rights abuses, "said Audrey Gaughran.
"For
years the government of India, UCC and Dow have played 'pass the
parcel' over the issue of responsibility, while the people of Bhopal
have struggled to obtain even basic relief such as clean water."
Amnesty International has called on Live Earth to reconsider the
sponsorship unless Dow publicly commits to the forthcoming government
clean up process in Bhopal. Dow has not done this.
Amnesty International shares Live Earth's concerns about the impact
of climate change and the urgent need to take action to protect human
rights, including the right to water. But the organisation fears that
Dow's sponsorship poses a serious risk to the credibility of the Live
Earth "Run for Water" events.
"Companies must understand that they cannot escape responsibility
for human rights abuses in one area by engaging in positive action
elsewhere. Human rights abuses cannot be 'offset' by corporate good
works," said Audrey Gaughran.
"The only way for Dow and UCC to finally put the legacy of Bhopal to
rest is to work with the affected communities and government of India
to fully, and effectively, address the human rights impact of the
disaster."
Background
Shortly before midnight on 2 December 1984, thousands of pounds of
deadly chemicals leaked from Union Carbide's pesticide plant in Bhopal,
central India. Around half a million people were exposed. Between 7,000
and 10,000 people died in the immediate aftermath and a further 15,000
over the next 20 years. More than 25 years later, the site has not been
cleaned up, the leak and its impact have not been properly
investigated, more than 100,000 people continue to suffer from health
problems without the medical care they need, and survivors are still
awaiting fair compensation and full redress for their suffering.
Leaking waste material has polluted groundwater on which thousands of
people depend for drinking water and other domestic uses.
Dow has consistently denied any responsibility for the liabilities
of UCC in Bhopal, but in stark contrast, Dow accepted asbestos-related
liabilities of UCC in the United States that were incurred as early as
1972.
Amnesty International works in partnership with organisations such
as The International Campaign for Justice in Bhopal to help support
survivors and activists to demand justice, accountability and an end to
25 years of human rights violations.
Their unstinting campaign for adequate clean-up, access to clean
water and proper medical care, compensation and accountability has seen
survivors and supporter groups, including children and people with
disabilities, repeatedly make the 800-kilometre march from Bhopal to
New Delhi.
More than 100 Bhopal survivors are launching an indefinite protest
in New Delhi today, urging the Indian government to resolve the
liabilities in Bhopal.
Amnesty International's work on the Bhopal disaster is part of its
Demand Dignity campaign, calling for an end to the human rights
violations that drive and deepen poverty. The campaign mobilizes people
all over the world to demand that governments, corporations and others
who have power listen to the voices of those living in poverty and
recognize and protect their rights.
On 26 March 2010 Amnesty International wrote to Live Earth to
express concern about Dow's involvement in the "Run for Water" events.
The organization has not received a response to that letter.
Amnesty International is a worldwide movement of people who campaign for internationally recognized human rights for all. Our supporters are outraged by human rights abuses but inspired by hope for a better world - so we work to improve human rights through campaigning and international solidarity. We have more than 2.2 million members and subscribers in more than 150 countries and regions and we coordinate this support to act for justice on a wide range of issues.
“Trump wraps himself in Christianity, wraps the Constitution inside a Bible, and is persuading supporters to finance his political brand while enriching himself," said one critic.
President Donald Trump has provided "a stunning example of political pandering and exploiting religious faith for personal profit," said a religious freedom advocate on Tuesday after financial disclosure forms revealed one of the latest ways in which the president has profited from the presidency: this time, by licensing his name to the "God Bless the USA" Bible sold by supporter and country music star Lee Greenwood.
The Bible bearing the president's name is being sold for $99.99—as are the "First Lady Edition" and the "Vice Presidential Edition."
According to his latest financial disclosures, the president has earned a total of $1,514,521 from placing his name on the religious text in a package that also includes copies of the US Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, the Pledge of Allegiance, and the handwritten chorus of Greenwood's 1984 song "Good Bless the USA."
About $1.3 million was earned while the president was campaigning ahead of the 2024 election, while about $208,000 flowed to the president in 2025.
Anna Laurie Gaylor, co-president of the Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF), said that "Trump wraps himself in Christianity, wraps the Constitution inside a Bible, and is persuading supporters to finance his political brand while enriching himself to the tune of more than $1.5 million."
“As all things are with Trump, this has always been about money,” said Gaylor. "It is a stunning example of political pandering and exploiting religious faith for personal profit.”
Hemant Mehta of The Friendly Atheist noted that the disclosure also showed about $1.4 billion that the president made last year from "crypto-related schemes" and $80 million from lawsuits against media companies including CBS and ABC.
Trump has suggested the Bible venture is closest to his heart, saying in a video promoting the basic version of the "God Bless the USA Bible"—which retails at $59.99—that the religious text is his "favorite book."
"Christians are under siege," he added in the video. "We must protect content that is pro-God. We love God, and we have to protect anything that is pro-God… Our Founding Fathers did a tremendous thing when they built America on Judeo-Christian values."
The notion that the country was founded as a Christian nation has long been a fixation of the far right and has been deeply embedded in the president's celebrations marking the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence—but historians say there is no evidence for the claim.
“The only rules they wrote about religion were ones that keep religion at arm’s length," Princeton University professor Kevin Kruse told The Washington Post as the White House planned an all-day prayer event on National Mall in May. "There’s a difference between saying America is a nation with many Christians in it and that America is a nation dedicated to Christianity and defined by it.”
Both Mehta and FFRF noted that Trump has "struggled to discuss even the most basic aspects of the Bible, declining on multiple occasions to identify a favorite verse or even express a preference between the Old and New Testaments."
"Trump’s Bible enterprise demonstrates how easily religious symbolism can be weaponized to enrich politicians while undermining the constitutional principle of state/church separation that protects believers and nonbelievers alike," said FFRF.
Gaylor added that "religion should never be a marketing strategy."
“Nor should the office of the presidency become a platform for selling religious merchandise," she said. "Americans deserve leaders who respect both religion and government enough to keep them separate—not presidents who see faith as another licensing opportunity.”
"If Graham’s stepping away, I am very, very interested and think I’m the best person to replace him," said Jackson, the former Maine Senate president.
Former Maine Senate President Troy Jackson filed federal paperwork on Tuesday to explore a US Senate bid after a sexual assault allegation against current Democratic nominee Graham Platner prompted a torrent of calls for him to drop out of the race.
Jackson, a fifth-generation logger who lost Maine's Democratic gubernatorial primary last month, was among those urging Platner to end his Senate campaign following Politico's reporting late Monday, writing on social media that "there is no place in our politics for sexual violence."
In an interview with the Bangor Daily News, which first reported the news of Jackson's filing, the former gubernatorial candidate said that "if Graham’s stepping away, I am very, very interested and think I’m the best person to replace him.”
Platner denied the sexual assault allegation and, as of this writing, has yet to drop out of the race, though his departure is widely seen as a foregone conclusion as his most prominent supporters—including Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.)—push him to exit. One unnamed source told The New York Times that Platner is seeking a "guarantee" that he "would be replaced by someone in agreement with 'the values and vision and policy agenda' that he articulated throughout his campaign.
Jackson, like Platner, was endorsed by Sanders and has expressed support for Medicare for All, stronger union protections, wage increases, and other progressive priorities. In recent months, Jackson has joined Sanders and Platner at "Fighting Oligarchy" rallies where the former Maine Senate leader said American workers are being robbed by a billionaire class bent on enriching itself no matter the societal costs.
"I am running for the people who worked their entire lives and still can’t afford to retire because the economic system in this country is rigged against them," Jackson said during a Labor Day rally last year. "And I’m running for all the workers... who’ve been told that they’re replaceable and that their lives are disposable.”
Platner, who backed Jackson's gubernatorial bid, can be replaced as the Democratic nominee in the US Senate race against Republican incumbent Sen. Susan Collins if he withdraws by July 13. By a process yet to be determined, the Maine Democratic Party would have until July 27 to select a replacement.
The New York Times reported that "the options under discussion include a convention or a statewide caucus in late July."
"They didn’t cheat their way in. They simply can’t afford to stay in the program."
President Donald Trump's administration has tried spinning government data showing millions of people have dropped their health insurance coverage under the Affordable Care Act by claiming these people were defrauding the program.
However, an analysis published Tuesday by Public Citizen refutes this claim, finding that most people who lost their ACA coverage did so because they could not afford to keep it after congressional Republicans let enhanced health insurance subsidies expire last year.
Data released last month showed that nationwide ACA enrollment fell from 22.3 million people in 2025 to just 17.5 million in 2026, a drop of nearly five million people over the span of just a year.
US Health and Human Services Director Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Mehmet Oz have both said this drop is due to the administration's efforts to root out fraud, with Oz even saying that current enrollment in the program is at "too high of a number."
The Public Citizen report, however, finds that "the decline in... enrollment this year has nothing to do with removing deceitful enrollees," as what "the numbers show is that American families are being priced out of coverage."
According to Public Citizen's analysis, the best way for a fraudster to game the system created by the ACA would be to falsely claim to have an income right around the poverty line, which would ensure the fraudulent enrollee would get a higher subsidy to purchase coverage.
In other words, if the administration were really pursuing fraud on a mass scale, it would likely mean a drop in enrollees who are claiming incomes near the poverty line.
"But that’s not what is happening," the report explains. "The people losing coverage are concentrated at incomes well above the poverty line. They are low- and middle-income families whose premiums doubled after subsidies were cut. They didn’t cheat their way in. They simply can’t afford to stay in the program."
In fact, the report finds that enrollment is actually growing among people who claim income right at the poverty line, which could suggest there is more prospective fraud in the program than before.
However, the report authors do not think that this increase is due to fraud, but rather to "people living just below the poverty line in states that refused to expand Medicaid" and whose income is not low enough to qualify for Medicaid, but too high to qualify for ACA subsidies.
"To escape the coverage gap, some have reported incomes just above the poverty line," states the report, "enough to be eligible for the ACA marketplace."
The ACA isn't the only federal healthcare program under pressure from Trump administration and GOP policies, as cuts to Medicaid included in Republicans' 2025 budget law are projected by the Congressional Budget Office to leave more than 10 million fewer people enrolled in the program by 2034.