SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

The Dow Chemical Company (Dow) cannot
run from its responsibility for the ongoing impacts of the 1984 Bhopal
gas leak by sponsoring Live Earth 'Run for Water' events, Amnesty
International said today.
Thousands of people died and more than 100,000 continue to suffer
from serious health problems as a consequence of 1984's deadly leak of
toxic chemicals from a Union Carbide pesticide plant in Bhopal, India.
Dow became 100% owner of the Union Carbide Corporation (UCC) in 2001.
The Dow Chemical Company (Dow) cannot
run from its responsibility for the ongoing impacts of the 1984 Bhopal
gas leak by sponsoring Live Earth 'Run for Water' events, Amnesty
International said today.
Thousands of people died and more than 100,000 continue to suffer
from serious health problems as a consequence of 1984's deadly leak of
toxic chemicals from a Union Carbide pesticide plant in Bhopal, India.
Dow became 100% owner of the Union Carbide Corporation (UCC) in 2001.
Since then survivors and human rights groups have been campaigning
for Dow to address the ongoing impacts of the disaster, including
contamination of water by chemical waste, but the company has
consistently ignored these calls, denying any responsibility for UCC's
liabilities in Bhopal.
On 18 April Dow is sponsoring a series of running events across the
globe, organized by environmental organization Live Earth to raise
awareness about water scarcity.
"Sponsoring an event that highlights water scarcity while ignoring
ongoing problems with access to clean water and medical care, amongst
other issues, in Bhopal is at best hypocrisy, at worst, a flagrant
attempt by Dow to try to white-wash its image," said Audrey Gaughran,
Director of Global Issues at Amnesty International.
"Dow may be trying to run away from the legacy of Bhopal, but it
can't be allowed to hide behind sponsorship of 'Run for Water' events."
For more than 25 years both the government of India and the
companies involved have failed to address the human rights abuses that
have been the lasting legacy of the Bhopal gas leak.
"Bhopal raises fundamental questions about the accountability of
corporations and the capacity and willingness of governments to address
corporate-related human rights abuses, "said Audrey Gaughran.
"For
years the government of India, UCC and Dow have played 'pass the
parcel' over the issue of responsibility, while the people of Bhopal
have struggled to obtain even basic relief such as clean water."
Amnesty International has called on Live Earth to reconsider the
sponsorship unless Dow publicly commits to the forthcoming government
clean up process in Bhopal. Dow has not done this.
Amnesty International shares Live Earth's concerns about the impact
of climate change and the urgent need to take action to protect human
rights, including the right to water. But the organisation fears that
Dow's sponsorship poses a serious risk to the credibility of the Live
Earth "Run for Water" events.
"Companies must understand that they cannot escape responsibility
for human rights abuses in one area by engaging in positive action
elsewhere. Human rights abuses cannot be 'offset' by corporate good
works," said Audrey Gaughran.
"The only way for Dow and UCC to finally put the legacy of Bhopal to
rest is to work with the affected communities and government of India
to fully, and effectively, address the human rights impact of the
disaster."
Background
Shortly before midnight on 2 December 1984, thousands of pounds of
deadly chemicals leaked from Union Carbide's pesticide plant in Bhopal,
central India. Around half a million people were exposed. Between 7,000
and 10,000 people died in the immediate aftermath and a further 15,000
over the next 20 years. More than 25 years later, the site has not been
cleaned up, the leak and its impact have not been properly
investigated, more than 100,000 people continue to suffer from health
problems without the medical care they need, and survivors are still
awaiting fair compensation and full redress for their suffering.
Leaking waste material has polluted groundwater on which thousands of
people depend for drinking water and other domestic uses.
Dow has consistently denied any responsibility for the liabilities
of UCC in Bhopal, but in stark contrast, Dow accepted asbestos-related
liabilities of UCC in the United States that were incurred as early as
1972.
Amnesty International works in partnership with organisations such
as The International Campaign for Justice in Bhopal to help support
survivors and activists to demand justice, accountability and an end to
25 years of human rights violations.
Their unstinting campaign for adequate clean-up, access to clean
water and proper medical care, compensation and accountability has seen
survivors and supporter groups, including children and people with
disabilities, repeatedly make the 800-kilometre march from Bhopal to
New Delhi.
More than 100 Bhopal survivors are launching an indefinite protest
in New Delhi today, urging the Indian government to resolve the
liabilities in Bhopal.
Amnesty International's work on the Bhopal disaster is part of its
Demand Dignity campaign, calling for an end to the human rights
violations that drive and deepen poverty. The campaign mobilizes people
all over the world to demand that governments, corporations and others
who have power listen to the voices of those living in poverty and
recognize and protect their rights.
On 26 March 2010 Amnesty International wrote to Live Earth to
express concern about Dow's involvement in the "Run for Water" events.
The organization has not received a response to that letter.
Amnesty International is a worldwide movement of people who campaign for internationally recognized human rights for all. Our supporters are outraged by human rights abuses but inspired by hope for a better world - so we work to improve human rights through campaigning and international solidarity. We have more than 2.2 million members and subscribers in more than 150 countries and regions and we coordinate this support to act for justice on a wide range of issues.
The State Department said the women were related to the assassinated Iranian military commander Qasem Soleimani, but Iranian media said they had no connection to him.
With a majority of Americans including President Donald Trump's own base demanding a swift end to the war in Iran—and Iran's military capabilities proving difficult to overpower—observers suggested on Saturday that the White House was looking elsewhere to score "victories," as Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that federal agents had arrested relatives of the late Major General Qasem Soleimani, the Iranian military commander who the US assassinated in 2020 during President Donald Trump's first term.
Rubio accused Soleimani's niece, Hamideh Soleimani Afshar, of promoting "regime propaganda" and voicing support for the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), and said she had been living a "lavish lifestyle" in the US. Afshar's husband has been barred from entering the US and the lawful permanent resident status she and her daughter had has been terminated, said the State Department.
"Are we losing so badly we need to arrest the distant relatives of long-since-dead Iranian commanders?" asked Ryan Grim of Drop Site News.
Aaron Reichlin-Melnick of the American Immigration Council noted that the administration had used the same legal authority to arrest Soleimani's reported family members as it did to detain former Columbia University student organizer Mahmoud Khalil and Tufts University scholar Rümeysa Öztürk for speaking out against US support for Israel—a tactic which is being challenged in court as unconstitutional.
Far-right conspiracy theorist Laura Loomer, who has wielded influence in the White House during the second Trump administration, claimed credit for the arrest of the two women, saying that in communications with the State Department, she had "exposed the fact that Qasem Soleimani’s Niece Hamideh Soleimani Afshar has been living in the United States (Los Angeles, California) where she posts pro-Iranian regime and pro-IRGC content on her social media while she lives a life of luxury."
"She has been arrested and will be deported back to Iran!" she added. "Over the last few months, I have quietly been documenting all of Hamideh Soleimani Afshar’s social media activity. I uploaded it all to a secure file and shared it with [the Department of Homeland Security] and Department of State, and now she has been arrested and she will be deported from our country."
In Iran on Saturday, media outlets were reporting that the two women arrested by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement were not related to Soleimani—who had no nieces, according to journalist Kourosh Ziabari.
Soleimani's daughter told the news outlet Jamaran that "none" of her extended family has ever lived in the US.
Regardless of the women's relation to Soleimani or lack thereof, journalist Ryan Grim said the arbitrary arrest "actively puts innocent Americans around the world at risk."
Rubio's explanation for the detention and his move to revoke the women's green cards is the latest evidence that "the US is now deporting people for thought crimes," said historian Zachary Foster.
Journalist Sana Saeed said the case shows that constitutional protections for due process and free speech, which are supposed to apply to green card holders, "no longer mean anything."
"People cannot lose their green card status simply because of familial relationships, so the justification shifts here to their alleged support for the Iranian government," said Saeed. "But supporting a foreign government is not a criminal offense. And if you begin to treat it as one—as the US government effectively is in this case—then expect a lot more of this."
"It will not stop here, and it will not remain limited to Iranians," she said. "The logic does not contain itself, it expands."
The president demanded once again that Iran open the Strait of Hormuz and said that "all Hell will reign down" on the country if officials don't "make a deal."
As the US military's frantic search continued Saturday for an airman who was aboard an F-15E fighter jet when it was downed by Iranian forces a day earlier, and analysts and Iranian media alike suggested the Trump administration has lost control of its war against Iran, President Donald Trump issued his latest threat against the country—once again appearing to threaten tens of millions of Iranians with war crimes.
Renewing his demand that Iran "MAKE A DEAL or OPEN UP THE HORMUZ STRAIT," the president said he was giving the Iranian government "48 hours before all Hell will reign down on them," appearing to confuse the word "reign" with "rain."
"Time is running out," said Trump in a post on his social media platform, Truth Social.
In his post, Trump did not directly address the ongoing search for the airman, who was one of two who ejected from the fighter jet when Iran reportedly used new air defense systems to shoot down the plane. One crew member was found and rescued on Friday.
Iranian officials were also looking for the missing airman on Saturday, raising concerns that the service member could be taken as a hostage and used as leverage.
The president has said little about the ongoing search, but spoke briefly to The Independent in a phone call Saturday about the possibility that Iran could find the service member first.
"We hope that’s not going to happen,” he said.
Trump's comments on social media, meanwhile, appeared to signal "a countdown to massive war crimes," said New York University law professor Ryan Goodman.
The president has also previously warned Iran with an ultimatum, only to delay the threatened action. He said on March 22 that the US would "hit and obliterate their various POWER PLANTS, STARTING WITH THE BIGGEST ONE FIRST!" if officials did not reopen the strait—prompting critics to condemn him as a "maniacal tyrant."
The March 22 threat was likely a reference to Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant, the vicinity of which was struck by a projectile on Saturday, prompting condemnation from the International Atomic Energy Agency. Human rights experts have repeated warnings in recent weeks that striking power plants would constitute war crimes.
At least five people were killed and 170 were injured in airstrikes on a petrochemical hub in Iran's Khuzestan province on Saturday morning, in addition to the Bushehr attack.
After his initial threat, Trump later said direct strikes on energy infrastructure would not be launched until April 6, and demanded that Iran open the key waterway before then.
Despite Trump's increasingly belligerent threats of "hell" and destruction of civilian infrastructure, a number of media critics noted on Saturday that mainstream Western news outlets including The New York Times, The Economist, and Bloomberg described Iran's use of air defense systems to shoot down US war planes involved in the invasion as an "escalation from Iran's leadership."
"Does Iran have a right to defend itself? Does Palestine? Does Lebanon?" asked commentator Hasan Piker, noting that the US and Israel have claimed they launched the invasion of Iran to "defend" themselves against an imminent attack, contrary to US intelligence analysis. "Or is it just Israel and America who get to claim self-defense as they engage in wars of conquest?"
The International Atomic Energy Agency warned of "the paramount importance of adhering to the seven pillars for ensuring nuclear safety and security during a conflict."
The director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency on Saturday demanded "maximum military restraint" from the US and Israel as it confirmed reports that strikes had targeted a location close to Iran's Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant, killing at least one person.
In a statement released via social media, the IAEA relayed a message from Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi, who expressed "deep concern about the reported incident."
Grossi warned that nuclear power plants or nearby areas "must never be attacked, noting that auxiliary site buildings may contain vital safety equipment" and stressed "the paramount importance of adhering to the seven pillars for ensuring nuclear safety and security during a conflict."
The IAEA said the attack near the Bushehr plant, Iran's only operational nuclear power facility, was the fourth such attack since Israel and the US began its invasion of Iran on February 28. The plant lies in a city inhabited by about 250,000 people.
A security staff member was killed by a projectile fragment and a building on the Bushehr site was impacted by shockwaves and fragments. Grossi said that no increase in radiation levels was reported.
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi also condemned the Bushehr strike and issued a reminder of the "Western outrage about hostilities near Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant in Ukraine" when Russia attacked the site.
"Israel-US have bombed our Bushehr plant four times now. Radioactive fallout will end life in [Gulf Cooperation Council] capitals, not Tehran. Attacks on our petrochemicals also convey real objectives," said Araghchi.
Al Jazeera reported that at least two petrochemical facilities had been hit by the US and Israel in southern Iran’s Khuzestan province, an energy hub in the country. At least five people were injured in those attacks,
Iranian news agency Mehr reported that the state-run Bandar Imam petrochemical complex, which produces liquefied petroleum gas and chemicals as well as other products, sustained damage.
President Donald Trump said late last month that he would delay any attacks on Iran's energy infrastructure until April 6 and said the delay was "subject to the success of the ongoing meetings and discussions.”
He has threatened to destroy Iran's power plants and other civilian infrastructure if Iranian leaders don't end the blockade on the oil export waterway the Strait of Hormuz, which they began in retaliation for the US-Israeli strikes that started more than a month ago and which has fueled skyrocketing global energy prices.
The threat amounted to Trump warning that he could soon commit a war crime, said international law experts.