February, 04 2010, 01:46pm EDT

Kenya: Landmark Ruling on Indigenous Land Rights
African Human Rights Commission Condemns Expulsion of Endorois People for Tourism Development
NEW YORK
A ruling by the African Commission on Human and People's Rights
condemning the expulsion of the Endorois people from their land in
Kenya is a major victory for indigenous peoples across Africa, Human
Rights Watch, WITNESS, and the Endorois' lawyers said today. The
Commission ruled on February 4, 2010 that the Endorois' eviction from
their traditional land for tourism development violated their human
rights.
The Kenyan government evicted the Endorois people, a traditional
pastoralist community, from their homes at Lake Bogoria in central
Kenya in the 1970s, to make way for a national reserve and tourist
facilities. In the first ruling of an international tribunal to find a
violation of the right to development, the Commission found that this
eviction, with minimal compensation, violated the Endorois' right as an
indigenous people to property, health, culture, religion, and natural
resources. It ordered Kenya
to restore the Endorois to their historic land and to compensate them.
It is the first ruling to determine who are indigenous peoples in
Africa, and what are their rights to land. The case was brought on
behalf of the Endorois by CEMIRIDE and Minority Rights Group International.
"The Endorois decision, the first of its kind, can help many others
across Africa who have been forced from their homes," said Clive
Baldwin, senior legal adviser at Human Rights Watch, who was co-counsel
for the Endorois in the case while employed with Minority Rights Group
International. "The African Commission is clear: the land where the
Endorois historically lived is their property and must be returned to
them."
Lake Bogoria is considered to have great tourism potential due to
its hot springs and abundant wildlife, including one of Africa's
largest populations of flamingos. The African Commission accepted the
Endorois' evidence that they have lived there since "time immemorial"
and the lake was the center of their religion and culture, with their
ancestors buried nearby. After being evicted from the fertile land
around the lake, the Endorois were forced to congregate on arid land,
where many of their cattle died.
They tried unsuccessfully to persuade the Kenyan government, the
local authorities, and the Kenyan Wildlife Service to reverse their
policy of evicting everyone, including traditional inhabitants, from
areas the government designated national parks and reserves. They were
also rebuffed when they sought an adequate share of the tourism and
revenues generated by the reserve. After Kenyan courts refused to
address their case, they brought their case to the African Commission
in 2003. As a component of the case, WITNESS and CEMIRIDE collaborated
on a landmark use of video as evidence,
demonstrating how conditions on the ground breached articles of the
African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights, and bringing voices of
the Endorois to the Commission.
Violations of land rights, including the rights of the generations
of Kenyans displaced through historic and recent evictions, are one of
the key unresolved issues in Kenya, which former United Nations
Secretary-General Kofi Annan acknowledged in the aftermath of Kenya's
electoral violence in 2007-2008. The African Commission found that the
Kenyan government has continued to rely on a colonial law that
prevented certain communities from holding land outright, and allowed
others, such as local authorities, effectively to own their traditional
land on "trust" for these Communities. The local authority in Lake
Bogoria was able to end the Endorois trust at will and to seize the
land.
In the last decade there have been several attempts at comprehensive
land reform that would allow for final and fair determination of land
ownership and create a system to restore land to those unlawfully
evicted or to compensate them. None of these reforms has been
completed. While the adoption by the government of a new land policy in
August 2009 marks a significant step forward, it still needs to be
translated into effective protection on the ground for Kenya's most
marginalized.
"This ruling is good for every Kenyan," said Korir Singo'ei, who
represented the Endorois while director of CEMIRIDE. "The law that
treats some communities as children, unable to own their own land, is a
colonial relic that needs to be changed."
The African Commission determined that the Endorois, having a clear
historic attachment to particular land, are a distinct indigenous
people, a term contested by some African governments who claimed all
Africans are indigenous. It also found that the Endorois had property
rights over the land they traditionally occupied and used, even though
the British and Kenyan authorities had denied them a formal title. In
finding a violation of the right to development for the first time the
Commission relied on the failure of the Kenyan authorities to respect
the right of the Endorois to consent to development, and the failure to
provide them adequate compensation for the loss they had suffered, or
any benefit from the tourism.
The African Commission had ruled in 2006 against the Kenyan
government for allowing a ruby mining company to start illegal mining
on another part of the Endorois' land, severely affecting their
remaining access to water. Following that ruling, the mining company
abandoned its activities.
"The African Commission's ruling makes clear to governments that
they must treat indigenous peoples as active stakeholders rather than
passive beneficiaries," said Cynthia Morel, who was co-counsel for the
Endorois as senior legal adviser with Minority Rights Groups
International. "That recognition is a victory for all indigenous
peoples across Africa whose existence was largely ignored - both in law
and in fact - until today. The ruling spells the beginning of a
brighter future."
The Commission requires Kenya to take steps to return the Endorois
land and compensate them within three months. Comprehensive reform to
bring Kenya's land laws to the standards set by the Commission is vital
before the 2012 elections, Human Rights Watch, WITNESS, and the
Endorois' lawyers said.
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
LATEST NEWS
Alan Greenspan, Longtime Fed Chair and Ayn Rand Disciple, Meets Ultimate ‘Invisible Hand’
"For decades, he preached that the self-interest of the predator was the invisible hand of the common good," Yanis Varoufakis said after the man who led the US central bank under four presidents died aged 100.
Jun 22, 2026
Alan Greenspan, whose policies during nearly 20 years as US Federal Reserve chair fueled soaring economic inequality and helped create the conditions for multiple economic crashes, died Monday at age 100 after a long battle with Parkinson's disease.
While many corporate media outlets published hagiographic obituaries lionizing the "Maestro" who presided over nearly two decades of low inflation, rising stock prices, and American economic confidence, critics focused on Greenspan's role in promoting dangerous deregulation and "easy money" policies that inflated financial bubbles, with sometimes disastrous results.
Robert Reich—who served as US labor secretary under President Bill Clinton during all of Greenspan's tenure—called him "in many ways the most powerful person in America" during that era.
"If any single person was responsible for the financial crisis of 2008, it was Greenspan."
"He maintained an iron grip over the Fed, and almost single-handedly decided on interest rates," Reich wrote. "He essentially fired George H. W. Bush by raising interest rates so high (ostensibly to ward off the inflation then threatening the economy) that the economy took a dive, and voters blamed Bush. This was enough to convince my boss, Bill Clinton, to do exactly what Greenspan wanted—which was to reduce the federal budget deficit and thereby destroy much of the agenda Clinton ran on (and I helped create)."
"I don’t want to speak ill of anyone who has passed. Greenspan was an extremely charming, intelligent, and thoughtful man," Reich added. "But the truth must be told: If any single person was responsible for the financial crisis of 2008, it was Greenspan. That crisis—the worst collapse since 1929, which led to the worst recession in decades, in which millions of Americans lost their jobs, savings, and even their homes—resulted from the deregulation of Wall Street that Greenspan advocated."
Former Greek Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis wrote on X: "His epitaph? A singular, glorious confession, 'I found a flaw in my model of the world.' A flaw, he said, as though it were a leaky pipe, not a total collapse of the intellectual architecture that anointed him Oracle. For decades, he preached that the self-interest of the predator was the invisible hand of the common good.
"Then, in 2008, the beast devoured the table, and to his credit, he blinked, admitting that his entire worldview—the one that central bankers canonized and the world swallowed—was a fairy tale for rentiers," Varoufakis added. "He did not, of course, admit to culpability. That would require a moral compass, a device notably absent from his Ayn Randian toolbelt. No, he merely noted the flaw, as a meteorologist might note a gust of wind, and returned to his well-earned silence."
Born 10 miles from Wall Street in Manhattan's Washington Heights during one of the most infamous economic bubbles of all time, Greenspan was a protégé of libertarian writer and philosopher Ayn Rand and was influenced by the Atlas Shrugged author's moral defense of capitalism, her fierce advocacy of deregulation, and her insidious insistence that self-interest was socially beneficial.
Their relationship cooled as Greenspan embraced more mainstream economic policies despised by Rand and gradually became a leading steward of the very sort of state-shepherded system she deeply distrusted.
After heading President Gerald Ford's Council of Economic Advisers, Greenspan was appointed chair of the Fed by President Ronald Reagan in 1987. He would remain in the post well into George W. Bush's second term.
Greenspan generally favored low interest rates, especially after crises like the 1987 stock market crash, the 1998 Long-Term Capital Management crisis, and the 2001 recession. His fame grew after he suggested that the economy might be experiencing a tech-driven “productivity miracle," language that many investors took as validation that traditional valuation limits were obsolete.
Critics would later call it a "productivity mirage."
Staunch devotion to low interest rates by Greenspan's Fed boosted stock prices and real estate values under "easy money" policies. Many investors came to believe that the Fed would intervene aggressively whenever markets fell sharply—the so-called "Greenspan Put."
However, since ownership of financial assets (and the firms that sell and promote them) is concentrated among the wealthy, it was the rich who benefited most from Greenspan's polices. When bubbles burst, as they did after the dot-com boom that ended in early 2000 and during the 2008 global financial crisis, the rich bounced back thanks to their diversified portfolios and bailouts, while middle- and lower-income households were wiped out through asset devaluation, foreclosures, and job losses.
"It is no exaggeration to say the global financial crisis of 2008 had an enormous and lasting impact on American life and the way ordinary people view elites," New York Times global economic correspondent Peter S. Goodman said on social media. "It is also no exaggeration to say that Alan Greenspan has as much responsibility for the crisis as an individual can."
"For those not old enough to remember, it is difficult to state his aura during his time of greatest influence," Goodman continued. "When he told Americans that they should buy houses and use variable-rate mortgages to do it, they listened. Much is made of his econ jargon-laden vernacular that went over the heads of nearly all listeners."
"That was central to the mystique," he added. "When he went to the Hill and spoke to Congress, most people had no idea what he was talking about but assumed that smarter kids did. And so his quasi-religious faith in the efficiency of markets as the ultimate insurance against risk went unchallenged and became dogma, and the risks kept building."
Keep ReadingShow Less
‘Time to Sue This Liar’: Trillionaire Elon Musk Threatens Ro Khanna for Warning of 4.5 Million Child Deaths From DOGE Cuts
"The Dems should have a leader who Elon Musk is threatening to sue and wants imprisoned," said one political observer. "That's the right guy."
Jun 22, 2026
The recently crowned world's first trillionaire Elon Musk threatened Rep. Ro Khanna with legal action on Monday after the California Democrat pointed out the life-ending potential of foreign aid cuts made by the Department of Government Efficiency.
During an appearance on the "I've Had It" podcast on Saturday, Khanna (D-Calif.) said that there must be consequences for Musk, who in February 2025 used DOGE to curtail programs and cut funding for the United States Agency for International Development (USAID).
"There needs to be accountability for Elon Musk," Khanna emphasized. "You know, they’re celebrating that he created 4,400 millionaires, but they don’t talk about the 4.5 million children around the world who he possibly sentenced to death by dismantling USAID.”
A peer-reviewed study published by The Lancet in July 2025 estimated that proposed cuts to USAID could lead to as many as 14 million preventable deaths by 2030 worldwide, including the deaths of 4.5 million children under the ages of five years old.
Musk, who earlier this month became the world's first trillionaire, wrote in response to Khanna's interview that it was "time to sue this liar."
It's not clear how Khanna's statement could be defamatory given that it was based on research published by a prestigious medical journal.
Musk, in a separate reaction to Khanna's remarks about USAID, later added that the US lawmaker "should be in prison."
On Monday afternoon, Khanna posted a video in which he challenged Musk to debate him on the impact the DOGE cuts have had on people throughout the Global South who had previously benefited from USAID.
"The world's richest person has spent all day... going after me," Khanna said. "Why? Because I cited an academic study that his DOGE cuts may lead to the deaths of millions of children overseas. You know, Elon, I thought you were a free speech guy. Why not debate me on these issues instead of threatening lawfare?"
"You're not going to be able to intimidate me," Khanna added.
.@elonmusk let's debate. You game?
I am for free speech, not lawfare. pic.twitter.com/gThLggxiOW
— Ro Khanna (@RoKhanna) June 22, 2026
Mehdi Hasan, editor-in-chief of Zeteo News, said that Khanna’s willingness to directly take on Musk exhibited qualities that Democrats could use more of in leadership positions.
"He is picking/making the right enemies on the right, and really pissing them off," Hasan wrote of Khanna. "The Dems should have a leader who Elon Musk is threatening to sue and wants imprisoned. That's the right guy."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'There Will Come a Day When He Faces Prosecution': Trump Condemned After US Murders Two More at Sea
"The summary execution of two more in an alleged drug boat brings the number of murders ordered by Trump to more than 210," noted one human rights defender.
Jun 22, 2026
Two people were killed, and six others survived, a strike on Sunday that the US military claimed—without providing evidence—targeted a boat full of "narco-terrorists," but that human rights defenders called another summary execution worthy of prosecution.
"On June 21, at the direction of the commander of US Southern Command, Gen. Francis L. Donovan, Joint Task Force Southern Spear conducted a lethal kinetic strike on a vessel operated by Designated Terrorist Organizations," USSOUTHCOM said in a statement. "Intelligence confirmed the vessel was transiting along known narco-trafficking routes in the Caribbean and was engaged in narco-trafficking operations."
"Two male narco-terrorists were killed during this action, and there were six male survivors," the statement added. "Following the engagement, USSOUTHCOM immediately notified US Coast Guard to activate the Search and Rescue system for the survivors."
More lawless killing in the Trump administration’s boat bombing campaign.Real killing in a phony armed conflict with “narco-terrorists.”This strike reportedly left 6 survivors.US record for rescuing survivors alive is…not great.
[image or embed]
— Brian Finucane (@bcfinucane.bsky.social) June 21, 2026 at 11:28 PM
According to The Intercept's Nick Turse, who has tracked all of the reported US boat bombings in the Caribbean Sea and Pacific Ocean, there have now been 66 such strikes, which have killed 215 people and left 12 survivors, based on USSOUTHCOM data.
The fate of previous boat strike survivors is not completely clear. After one April bombing, the US Coast Guard told UPI that search-and-rescue operations were called off after no signs of survivors were found. Last October, President Donald Trump said two strike survivors were repatriated to their home countries of Ecuador and Colombia, where they faced prosecution.
Survivors of some of the strikes have accused US forces of torturing them.
Relatives of people killed in previous US boat bombings, as well as officials in Venezuela and Colombia, have said that numerous victims were fishers who were not involved in the illicit drug trade.
In January, relatives of two Trinidadian fishers killed in the strikes filed a federal wrongful death lawsuit in Massachusetts.
"The summary execution of two more in an alleged drug boat brings the number of murders ordered by Trump to more than 210," former Human Rights Watch executive director Kenneth Roth said on social media. "There will come a day when he faces prosecution for these crimes."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


