SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
For Immediate Release
January, 28 2010, 01:15pm EDT
Contact:
Joia Jefferson Nuri, TransAfrica Forum, 202.223.1960 x 131
Dan Beeton, 202-239-1460
Jesse Jackson, Danny Glover, Harry Belafonte, Haiti-Based Aid Groups, and Haiti Experts Call for U.S. to Prioritize Aid Delivery Over Military Deployment
WASHINGTON
A letter signed by the Reverend Jesse Jackson, actor Danny Glover,
Harry Belafonte, Haiti-based aid organizations, and a number of other
NGO's and academic experts was sent to House Democratic majority
leaders and the Congressional Black Caucus today, urging for the U.S.
to prioritize and improve coordination of aid delivery over military
deployment in Haiti. The letter notes that an over-emphasis on security
has meant costly delays in distributing aid that have cost lives and
led to otherwise unnecessary amputations in some cases.
The letter, which is also signed by Haiti-based aid groups including
Haiti Konpay, Sustainable Organic Integrated Livelihoods (SOIL), and
the Institute for Justice and Democracy in Haiti, calls for an
accounting of supplies and personnel passing through U.S.-controlled
ports and airports, and commitments to deliver aid to under served
areas and persons and to work with all governments and NGO's in doing
so, as reports continue to describe communities in parts of Haiti that
still await much-needed aid.
The letter follows:
January 27, 2010
Dear Members of Congress,
The outpouring of aid from U.S. citizens and their government to Haiti
in the wake of this immense catastrophe has been important and welcome.
However, it is also clear that there have been serious mistakes that
have unnecessarily delayed the delivery of medical supplies, water, and
other life-saving materials.
Currently, there are major shortages reported of food, tents, and water.
The most costly unnecessary delays had until recently been in the area
of medical supplies.
A team of volunteer surgeons including the incoming president of the
New York State Chapter of the American College of Surgeons, whose
deployment was delayed for days by the U.S. military, reported that "untold
numbers are dying of untreated, preventable infections."
Doctors Without Borders (MSF), the world-renowned humanitarian group is
one of the organizations who had tons of medical supplies re-routed
because of decisions made by the U.S. government.
"We
lost three days," Francoise Saulnier, the head of MSF's legal
department told Reuters Television in an interview. "And these three
days have created a massive problem with infection, with gangrene, with
amputations that are needed now, while we could have really spared this
to those people."
Jarry Emmanuel, air logistics officer for the UN's World Food
Programme, noted on January 16 that "most
flights are for the US military."
Perhaps the biggest mistake has been an overemphasis on security, and
the deployment of 20,000 troops, to the detriment of delivery of
life-saving supplies. This was especially true during the first 10-12
days after the earthquake hit.
Although the situation with regard to medical supplies has recently
improved, there are now other shortages, including food, water, and
tents.
To avoid more unnecessary loss of life in the coming weeks, we call
upon the Administration to guarantee the following:
- A daily public accounting of the shipments of materials and
personnel that pass through the Port-au-Prince airport or any other
ports under control of the U.S. military
- A public commitment to prioritize the distribution of vital aid
and supplies and personnel, including water, medical supplies, food,
medical personnel, and shelter. This means that these supplies and
personnel must be given priority over the deployment of any more
military personnel or equipment.
- A public announcement as to what measures our government will
take going forward to make sure that the mistakes of the first two
weeks are not repeated.
- A public commitment to deliver, water, food, and other urgently
needed supplies to rural areas and other population centers that have
seen little, no, or greatly delayed aid
- A public commitment to ensuring that all survivors in Haiti
receive the necessities: clean water, food, shelter, and medical care,
and that all resources received will be immediately deployed for this
purpose
- A public commitment to work with all governments and Civil
Society Organizations that are delivering these needed goods and
services
While security can help to ensure a better distribution of aid, the
actual distribution of aid is most important. While it is true that
there have been some supplies lost to looting, this is not nearly so
terrible as the loss of life and limb that has occurred due to
unnecessary delays. The over-emphasis on security has been costly, and
must not be repeated - from now on the top priority must be the
delivery and distribution of the basic survival needs of the
population. The Administration must publicly reassure the world that
this will indeed be the priority going forward.
Sincere regards,
Harry Belafonte, Board of Directors
Emeritus, TransAfrica Forum
Rev. Jesse Jackson Sr.
Founder and President, Rainbow/PUSH Coalition
Danny Glover
Chair of the Board, TransAfrica Forum
Brian Concannon Jr., Esq.
Director, Institute for Justice & Democracy in Haiti
Mark Weisbrot
Co-Director, Center for Economic and Policy Research
Rachelle Lyndaker Schlabach
Director, Mennonite Central Committee, U.S. Washington Office
Melinda Miles
Founder and Director, Konbit pou Ayiti (Haiti)
Fritz Gutwein
Co-Director and Haiti Reborn Coordinator
The Quixote Center
Sasha Kramer
Co-founder, Sustainable Organic Integrated Livelihoods (Haiti)
Veerle Opgenhaffen
Sr. Program Director
Center for Human Rights and Global Justice at NYU School of Law
Anne McConnell-Wisskirchen
Co-ordinator, Haiti Advocacy Platform-UK
Briggs Bomba, Michael Stulman and Gerald LeMelle
Africa Action
Larry Birns
Director, Council on Hemispheric Affairs
Mark C. Johnson,
Executive Director, Fellowship of Reconciliation
John Feffer
Co-Director, Foreign Policy In Focus
Institute for Policy Studies
Emira Woods
Co-Director, Foreign Policy in Focus
Institute for Policy Studies
Jane Hamsher
Publisher, Firedoglake.com
Kevin Martin
Executive Director, Peace Action
Blase Bonpane
Director, Office of the Americas
Chuck Kaufman
National Co-Coordinator, Alliance for Global Justice
Doug Henwood
Editor, Left Business Observer
James Jordan
National Coordinator, Campaign for Labor Rights
James G. Devine
Professor of Economics
Loyola Marymount University
Greg Grandin
Professor of History
New York University
Hope Lewis
Professor of Law
Northeastern University School of Law
Carl G. Estabrook
Professor Emeritus
University of Illinois
A. Belden Fields
Professor Emeritus, Political Science
University of Illinois
T. M. Scruggs
Professor of Anthropology
University of Iowa
Amy H. Gardner
Professor of Medical Anthropology
University of California, Berkeley
Rosario Aguilar-Pariente
Visiting Fellow, Center for US-Mexican Studies
University of California, San Diego
Hasan Johnson
Assistant Professor
California State University, Fresno
Peter Hallward
Professor of Modern European Philosophy
Middlesex University
Rosaura Sanchez
Professor, Latin American Literature and Chicano Literature
University of California, San Diego
Millie Thayer
Assistant Professor of Sociology
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Kent Norsworthy
Content Director, Latin American Network Information Center
University of Texas, Austin
Sheila R. Tully
California State University, San Francisco
Chris Chiappari
Associate Professor
Saint Olaf College
Susanne Jonas
Lecturer, Latin American and Latino Studies
University of California, Santa Cruz
Laura Enriquez
Professor of Sociology
University of California, Berkeley
Edgar Ivan Gutierrez
History Instructor
Riverside City College
Dana Frank
Professor, Department of History
University of California, Santa Cruz
Vijay Prashad
George and Martha Kellner Chair in South Asian History and Professor of
International Studies
Trinity College
Martin Luis Cabrera
Assistant Professor, Peninsular and Latin American Literature and
Culture
University of California, San Diego
Steve Ellner
Professor of History
University of Oriente, Venezuela
Miguel Tinker Salas
Professor of Chicano and Latin American Studies
Pomona College
Sidney Lemelle
Professor of History
Pomona College
Victor Silverman
Associate Professor of History
Pomona College
Victor Rodriguez
Professor of sociology of race and ethnicity, Department of Chicano and
Latino Studies
California State University, Long Beach
Susana Chavez Silverman
Professor of Romance Languages and Literature
Pomona College
Forrest Hylton
Universidad de los Andes
Sujatha Fernandes
Assistant Professor of Sociology
City University of New York
Jose Vadi
Professor Eeritus, Political Science
California State University, Pomona
Sonja Wolf
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (UNAM)
Tanalis Padilla
Associate Professor of History
Dartmouth College
Gilbert Gonzalez
Professor
University of California, Irvine
Alma Martinez
Associate Professor of Theater Arts
Pomona College
Ronald Chilcote
Professor Emeritus
University of California, Riverside
Thomas W. Walker,
Professor Emeritus, Political Science, Ohio University
Eric Bindler
Department of Folklore and Ethnomusicology
Indiana University
Dr. Clifford Andrew Welch
UNIFESP - Universidade Federal do Estado de Sao Paulo
Dr. Daniel Faber
Director, Northeastern Environmental Justice Research Collaborative
Jacob Rekedal
University of California, Riverside
Donald Bray
California State University, Los Angeles
Marjorie Bray
California State University, Los Angeles
Mayo C. Toruno
Professor of Economics
California State University, San Bernardino
Carol Hendrickson
Professor of Anthropology
Marlboro College
Michael Brun
Department of Economics
Illinois State University
Estevan Azcona
UH Center for Mexican American Studies (CMAS) Visiting Scholar
University of Houston
William I. Robinson
Professor of Sociology, University of California-Santa Barbara
Sydney Hutchinson, Ph.D.
Humboldt Fellow
Berlin Phonogram Archive
Ethnological Museum, Berlin
Royce Hutson, Ph.D
Associate Professor
School of Social Work
Wayne State University, Detroit, MI
Griselda Rodriguez,
Syracuse University
Gilbert Joseph, Ph.D
Farnam Professor of History & International Studies
Yale University
Marc Becker
Associate Professor of History
Truman State University
Linda Carty, Ph.D.
Director of Graduate Studies
Department of African American Studies
Syracuse University
Lynn Stephen
Distinguished Professor of Anthropology and Ethnic Studies
University of Oregon
Sylvia Tesh, Ph.D
Lecturer
University of Arizona
Alejandra Marchevsky
Associate Professor of Liberal Studies
Department of Liberal Studies
California State University, Los Angeles
Hector Perla
Assistant Professor
University of California, Santa Cruz
Gilberto M.A.Rodrigues, Ph.D,
Brazilian Professor Fulbright Visiting Scholar, Law School
University of Notre Dame
Ester Hernandez
Dept. of Chicano Studies
California State University, Los Angeles
Leisy Abrego, Ph.D
University of California President's Postdoctoral Fellow
University of California, Irvine
Lee Furey
Instructor of General Education
Art Institute of Atlanta
Nicole Weeks
Assistant Professor of Psychology
Pomona College
Lauren Derby
Associate Professor of History
University of California, Los Angeles
Jeanne M. Woods
Henry F. Bonura, Jr. Distinguished Professor of Law
Loyola University College of Law
Keep reading...Show less
LATEST NEWS
‘Super PACs Should Be Outlawed,’ Says Platner, as Pro-Collins Corporate Dark Money Pours Into Maine to Attack Him
"It's fascinating that the more money that goes into our political system, the less we talk about actual politics."
Jun 02, 2026
The super PACs pouring money into the US Senate race in Maine are doing a great job of proving Graham Platner's point.
As new reporting on Monday detailed the flood of dark money targeting his campaign, the Democratic hopeful in recent days has put a spotlight on the super PACs, which he says have created a political system dominated by corporations and wealthy donors who want to distract from the serious issues and struggles faced by everyday voters and working families.
"I think it's very telling that a political system that has become controlled by money, controlled by the power of organized money, is also a political system that is trying to convince all of us down here that policy and discussions around what government can or cannot do is not what they want to talk about," Platner said during a conversation with Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), a longtime critic of super PACs, posted to social media.
"It's fascinating that the more money that goes into our political system," he continued, "the less we talk about actual politics."
"I agree with Senator Sanders: Super PACs should be outlawed," said Platner.
On Monday, Sludge reported that a pair of shadowy nonprofits "with no public presence and no disclosed staff" have dumped at least $750,000 into a super PAC supporting Platner's opponent, the five-term incumbent Republican Sen. Susan Collins, according to Federal Election Commission (FEC) filings.
Condorcet Initiative Corp. has given $500,000 to Pine Tree Results PAC across two separate donations, including $250,000 on May 1 that was disclosed in a filing reported to the Federal Election Commission last week. Ardleigh Impact Corporation contributed an additional $250,000 in April.
The PAC has spent nearly $4 million on attack ads against Sen. Susan Collins’ Democratic challenger Graham Platner, according to FEC data.
The two nonprofits are both described as shell-like entities linked to the same address in Springfield, Virginia, belonging to Republican political consultant Staci Goede.
The groups are part of a much larger network and have poured a combined $9 million into GOP-aligned PACs since 2024, including in four competitive Senate races in this coming cycle.
Goede, meanwhile, is the treasurer or officer for at least nine different nonprofits "that span Republican Senate campaigns, pro-Israel donor pass-throughs, and issue advocacy groups," according to the report.
The Campaign Legal Center has filed a complaint against Ardleigh, arguing that the nonprofit, which contributed an astonishing $2.575 million across six federal committees in its first three months of existence, was being used as a straw donor to conceal the identities of one or more rich benefactors.
The source of the $750,000 aimed at Platner remains unknown. But the Pine Tree Results PAC is already known to have a slate of wealthy backers from the commanding heights of finance and tech, including Blackstone CEO Stephen Schwarzman, hedge fund founder Paul Singer, and Palantir CEO Alex Karp. The fund has also taken in contributions from an affiliate of the tobacco giant Altria and from the far-right news company Newsmax.
According to a FEC data, it has raised more than $16 million to help Collins ward off a challenger in 2026, which will almost certainly be Platner.
While the potential use of straw donors may present legal issues, the use of super PACs by wealthy backers to dump unlimited sums behind their preferred candidates is unquestionably legal under federal campaign finance law.
As of March, super PACs funded by crypto, artificial intelligence, pro-Israel donors, and outside groups had already spent more than $225 million trying to influence the 2026 election cycle, according to the Washington Post.
Platner has argued on the campaign trail that the unchecked ability of the wealthy to influence elections is a genesis point for the growing wealth gap between the rich and poor.
"The inequality we’re experiencing, it didn’t happen organically," he said at a recent campaign event. "We live in the outcome of policy written by establishment politicians who for 40 years have been doing the bidding of those who donate the most money to them."
The Pine Tree Results PAC had already spent nearly $4 million on ads attacking Platner as of May 20, according to FEC data. As Sludge's reporting notes, "Rather than engaging with policy, the ads are exclusively focused on personal attacks against Platner, digging up comments the candidate made online going back as far as 2013."
So far, attempts to mire Platner in personal scandal have done little to blunt the momentum of his populist campaign. A poll from the University of New Hampshire in late May showed him leading the incumbent by a nine-point margin among likely voters and other polls show similar advantages.
It can be expected that the PACs attacking Platner will make a meal out of recent reports from The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times that probe into the private details of his marriage.
But noting the failure of past attempts to drown Platner in controversy, Lever News founder David Sirota questioned in a piece on Monday if these sorts of "character" attacks even work in an age of politics defined by rapacious corporate greed and corruption.
He noted how Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Ct.) and Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) responded to recent questions from news outlets about whether Platner’s controversies mean he’s failed to “pass the character test.” Murphy responded that “character involves standing up to people who are bankrupting and corrupting this country,” while Khanna lauded Platner for “having the character to stand up against the war in Iran, against genocide, and against an unfair and lopsided economy.”
This response, Sirota said, hinted that the country could be entering a new political paradigm—"a reality in which many voters are so economically pulverized and politically disillusioned that they now define 'character' in a politician solely as whether or not they are single-mindedly focused on destroying oligarchy and ending corruption."
“It is, potentially, a new era in which voters who can’t afford anything and who feel totally ignored by their government have reimagined their entire definition of political 'character' on economic/anti-corruption terms—rather than on old definitions of personal moral rectitude,” he wrote. “In this potential new reality, the personal shortcomings of individual politicians—which often have little effect on voters’ actual lives—are less important and electorally salient than the policies those politicians support and oppose."
"And such a shift," he added, "would make sense in the current moment.”
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Absolutely Crazy’: Horror as Trump Moves to Dismantle Crucial Ocean Monitoring System
"Blinding the public to climate change won’t make it go away. It will only accelerate its profound consequences."
Jun 02, 2026
In what a number of scientists suggested was the Trump administration's latest effort to stop tracking the changing climate in hopes of convincing the public that the climate emergency isn't happening, the National Science Foundation announced Monday that it was dismantling a crucial deep-ocean monitoring system that for years has helped researchers understand the impacts of the crisis on the world's oceans.
The NSF said it plans to send ships this month to remove more than 900 instruments, part of a project called the Ocean Observatories Initiative. The project collects data on temperatures, currents, and the ocean's absorption of carbon dioxide off the coasts of Oregon, Alaska, Washington, and North Carolina, as well as in the Irminger Sea between Iceland and Greenland.
A spokesperson for NSF told The New York Times that the dismantling of the initiative will help the NSF in "prioritizing support for evolving scientific priorities and emerging technologies as well as a deliberate approach to smart life cycle management within its portfolio of research infrastructure.”
The reasoning given for the shuttering of the project, said Tara Blume, a journalist at Oklahoma City NBC affiliate KFOR, was "a master class in obfuscation and doublespeak."
Genevieve Guenther of the group End Climate Silence shared her own interpretation of why the $368 million ocean observation system is being discontinued, despite the fact that it had been set to collect data for 25 years.
"We need to track ocean currents to assess how close we are to climate tipping points that will essentially destroy the world as we know it," said Guenther. "The GOP doesn't want us to be able to do that. That's why they're dismantling ocean monitoring."
Scientists have used data gathered by moorings, robotic vehicles, and other instruments that transmit the information to research laboratories, to study changes in the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Current (AMOC), a current system that moves warm water northward and cools the Arctic and Northern Atlantic regions while absorbing carbon dioxide deep into the ocean and keeping it out of the atmosphere.
Data gathered at the observation station in the Irminger Sea has been key to understanding AMOC, which scientists fear is gradually weakening due to planetary heating and could ultimately collapse, likely causing major global weather changes.
"This is absolutely crazy," said David Doniger, a senior strategist and attorney at the Natural Resources Defense Council's climate and energy department. "Wouldn’t you want to know if the ocean currents are changing? Wouldn’t you want to know ocean temperatures? These things affect everything from fishing to hurricanes."
Following the announcement that the stations will be dismantled in the coming weeks, said Blume, "science gasps for breath."
President Donald Trump has attempted several times to shut down or drastically reduce the budget of the Ocean Observatories Initiative, which costs $48 million annually to run. Congress has restored the program's funding.
The dismantling of the program comes months after the Environmental Protection Agency repealed the "endangerment finding," which for years had underpinned the department's environmental regulations; after the administration closed down the National Center for Atmospheric Research, which had gathered data on hurricanes and extreme weather to help improve forecasts; and after the National Aeronautics and Space Administration released a statement on record-breaking temperatures in 2024 and 2025—without any mention of the climate crisis or climate change.
"Blinding the public to climate change won’t make it go away. It will only accelerate its profound consequences," said clinical researcher Iris Gorfinkel.
According to the Trump administration, said historian Nick Kapur, "apparently climate change doesn't exist if you prevent scientists from measuring it."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'This is Nuts': Critics Aghast as Trump Appoints 'Personal Henchman' as Acting DNI
"The president has chosen an official who has demonstrated not just willingness but eagerness to use the authorities of government to pursue political retribution," said US Sen. Mark Warner.
Jun 02, 2026
President Donald Trump shocked many observers on Tuesday when he appointed Federal Housing Finance Agency Director Bill Pulte to be his acting director of national intelligence, weeks after Tulsi Gabbard stepped down from the role.
In a Tuesday morning social media post, Trump announced that Pulte would be taking over as DNI while also remaining at his current post at the FHFA, which regulates government-sponsored housing enterprises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
As noted by a Tuesday CNBC report, Pulte "has no prior experience in an intelligence role. His tenure at FHFA has been marked by his criminal referrals for mortgage fraud against Trump's political foes, including New York Attorney General Letitia James and Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, whom the president has been trying to fire in an effort to stack the US central bank with political loyalists.
James was targeted for prosecution after she won a $450 million judgment against the president and his business in a civil fraud case.
Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), vice chairperson of the Senate Committee on Intelligence, delivered a scathing response to Trump's announcement.
"This appointment speaks volumes about what this president expects from the nation's top intelligence official," he said. "Rather than selecting a respected national security professional capable of delivering independent judgments, the president has chosen an official who has demonstrated not just willingness but eagerness to use the authorities of government to pursue political retribution."
Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.) also denounced the president's decision.
"Bill Pulte led Donald Trump’s efforts to charge and jail his political enemies, now he’s being rewarded with a job he has no business doing," Cortez Masto said. "Putting Pulte at the helm of the intelligence community risks American lives just so Trump can keep going after his political opponents."
Sean Vitka, executive director of Demand Progress, argued that Pulte's appointment was yet another reason for Democrats to oppose further extension of warrantless spying powers under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).
"Congress must not sign away unchecked spying powers to the government," said Vitka, "when Donald Trump’s top spy is a man whose primary qualification is his willingness to weaponize sensitive information held by the government against the president’s political enemies."
Vitka specifically urged Warner to change course on his push to renew Section 702, particularly in light of Pulte's appointment.
"By supporting a FISA extension without any independent checks like warrant protections, Sen. Warner is putting the entire country at serious risk and enabling perhaps the greatest threat to American democracy we have seen in modern history," he said.
Journalist James Surowiecki expressed horror at Pulte's elevation to acting DNI.
"Even for Trump, this is nuts," Surowiecki wrote. "Bill Pulte, who's a [private equity] guy/real-estate developer with exactly zero intelligence experience, is going to be the new Director of National Intelligence—while also continuing to run FHFA and Fannie Mae/Fredde Mac!"
Don Moynihan, a professor of public policy at the University of Michigan, issued a dire warning about Pulte potentially abusing US intelligence services to target Trump opponents.
"Fuck me, this is Bill Pulte," Moynihan wrote. "The guy who was using mortgage data to launch DOJ investigations against Lisa Cook, Letitia James, and [US Sen.] Adam Schiff (D-Calif.). He is being put in charge of national intelligence because of his track record of being willing to manufacture false allegations to target Trump's enemies."
Political commentator Keith Boykin described Pulte as Trump's "personal henchman" who "abused his position as chairman of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to send baseless criminal referrals against Letitia James and Lisa Cook."
National security attorney Bradley Moss, meanwhile, could not hide his disgust at Pulte's appointment in an all-caps social media post.
"WHAT THE... I QUIT," Moss wrote. "I GIVE UP. BILL PULTE??"
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular