January, 26 2010, 11:21am EDT
World Report 2010: Harsher Climate for Human Rights
Missed Opportunities and Bigger Challenges in Middle East in 2009
BEIRUT
Middle East governments repressed efforts to promote human rights
and backed away from bold reforms despite growing human rights
challenges and promises to take action, Human Rights Watch said today
in releasing the Jordan, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Syria, and Yemen
country studies from its World Report 2010.
The 612-page report,
the organization's 20th annual review of human rights practices around
the globe, summarizes major human rights issues in more than 90 nations
and territories worldwide, including 15 countries in the Middle East
and North Africa.
"The year 2009 was one of the missed opportunities for women and
migrants in the region," said Sarah Leah Whitson, Middle East director
at Human Rights Watch."For human rights defenders, their small space
for maneuvering shrank even further."
The studies detail missed opportunities on women's rights in Jordan,
Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, and Syria; ineffective measures to protect
migrant domestic workers in Jordan, Lebanon, and Saudi Arabia; torture
of suspects in custody in Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, and Syria; and
repression of human rights defenders in Saudi Arabia, Syria, and Yemen.
Saudi Arabia discriminated against its Shi'a population and Syria
against its Kurds; Lebanon disregarded the plight of its Palestinian
refugees; and Jordan stripped some Jordanians of Palestinian origin of
their Jordanian nationality. Yemen's government committed violations in
the civil war in the north and the social unrest in the south.
"Middle East governments should publicly set out their human rights
agenda for 2010," Whitson said, "and expect to be measured against
their achievements."
Middle Eastern governments responded weakly to calls to curb
violence against women. Perpetrators of so-called honor killings in
Jordan (where there were at least 20 such killings), and in Syria (at
least 12), benefit from legal provisions that mitigate their
punishments, even though Syria closed a legal loophole that allowed
such perpetrators to avoid criminal sanction altogether. Domestic abuse
went largely unpunished in Saudi Arabia and Yemen. In Lebanon and
Jordan, where domestic abuse can be tried as assault, protection
mechanisms for women are largely inadequate and ineffective.
Despite their increasing participation in public life, women faced
discrimination in personal status, nationality, and penal laws. In
Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia, women cannot confer their
nationality either on foreign spouses or their children. Saudi women
require a male guardian's approval for travel, study or work, and to
receive health care in certain circumstances. Saudi Arabia promised to
abolish the male legal guardianship system over women, but failed to
take steps to do so.
Migrant domestic workers in the Middle East faced exploitation and
abuse by employers, including excessive work hours, non-payment of
wages, and restrictions on their liberty. Governments adopted some
measures to reduce the abuse but did not enforce them. Jordan issued
regulations providing certain rights to migrant domestic workers after
becoming the first Middle Eastern country in 2008 to include them under
the labor law. However, these regulations fell short of international
standards, and allow for an employer to confine a worker in the
employer's house.
In January in Lebanon, the Labor Ministry put in effect tighter
regulations for employment agencies and a standard employment contract
that clarifies certain terms and conditions of employment for domestic
workers, such as the maximum number of daily working hours. However,
the rules have no enforcement mechanisms. Suicides and botched escape
attempts killed many migrant domestic workers in Lebanon, with eight
deaths in October alone.
In Saudi Arabia, Syria, and Yemen, human rights defenders paid a
heavy price for their activities. Syrian State Security detained
Muhannad al-Hasani, president of the Syrian Human Rights Organization
in July, and Haytham al-Maleh, a prominent human rights lawyer, 78, in
October, and later charged them with "weakening national sentiment."
They remain detained. In Saudi Arabia, the secret police (mabahith)
arrested Muhammad al-'Utaibi and Khalid al-'Umair in January for
attempting to hold a peaceful protest in solidarity with the people of
Gaza. One year later, the mabahith still hold them despite the six-month legal limit on pre-trial detention and the prosecution's decision not to press charges.
In Yemen, Central Security, National Security, and Political
Security officers arrested scores of activists, mostly from the
secessionist so-called Southern Movement, and began trials of some of
them for "contesting the unity of the state," including Professor
Husain al-'Aqil, an online journalist, Salah al-Saqladi, and a former
diplomat, Muhammad 'Askar Jubran.
Syria has not licensed any human rights groups, and Saudi Arabia
refused legal recognition to at least two new rights groups. Jordan
passed a new law extending the government's ability to control and
interfere in the work of charitable organizations.
Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Syria, and Yemen failed to tackle frequent
incidents of torture. Jordan's prison reform program has not
strengthened accountability mechanisms for torture. Conditions in
prisons and detention facilities were poor in Lebanon, with
overcrowding and lack of proper medical care a perennial problem. While
Lebanon ratified the Optional Protocol to the Convention against
Torture (OPCAT) in December 2008, the country has not yet fulfilled its
obligation to set up a national preventive mechanism to visit and
monitor places of detention.
Saudi authorities punished those they believed responsible for
leaking footage of torture in Ha'ir prison, but did not announce steps
taken to hold accountable the prison guards who beat the inmates. In
Yemen, there were increased reports by detainees of torture in central
prisons around the country and in the detention facility of the
National Security and the Political Security Organizations in San'a.
The estimated 300,000 Palestinian refugees in Lebanon lived in
appalling social and economic conditions and were subject to
wide-ranging restrictions on housing and employment. Jordanian
authorities since 2004 have arbitrarily deprived over 2,700 Jordanians
of Palestinian origin of their nationality, usually on grounds that
they did not hold valid Israeli-issued residency permits for the West
Bank. No such condition for maintaining Jordanian nationality exists in
law. Hundreds of thousands more Jordanians may be at risk of losing
their nationality.
Following clashes in Saudi Arabia between minority Shi'a pilgrims
and Wahhabi religious policemen in Medina in February, the authorities
arrested scores of Shi'a in Medina and in the Eastern Province. The
Eastern Province governorate also arrested Shi'a who led prayers in
their private homes in Khobar and in Ahsa' and closed Khobar's only
mosque for Isma'ilis, a branch of Shi'ism.
Kurds, Syria's largest non-Arab ethnic minority, were subject to
systematic discrimination, including the arbitrary denial of
citizenship to an estimated 300,000 born in Syria. Authorities
suppressed expressions of Kurdish identity and prohibited teaching
Kurdish in schools. On February 28, security forces violently dispersed
Kurds who had gathered to protest a decree restricting real estate
transactions in border areas, and the authorities subsequently detained
21
demonstrators. The authorities also detained and tried at least nine
prominent Kurdish political leaders on vague charges of "weakening
national sentiment" and "broadcasting false information."
"Middle Eastern governments need to recognize that the rights of
minorities, refugees, and stateless persons need greater protections,"
Whitson said.
In 2010, Jordan should:
- Strike clauses from the law that allow for punishment-reducing mitigating circumstances for "honor" killers.
- Ease restrictions in the law governing the operation of
nongovernmental organizations to bring it into compliance with
international standards on freedom of association. - Revise regulations governing migrant domestic workers to comply
with international labor and human rights standards, and set up a
mechanism to investigate allegations of abuses against workers. - Strengthen accountability for torture by moving jurisdiction over
acts of torture by police agents from the Police Court to the civilian
courts. - Stop withdrawing the nationality of Jordanian citizens of Palestinian origin.
In 2010, Lebanon should:
- Amend its citizenship law to ensure that all Lebanese women,
regardless of the nationality of their husbands, can pass on their
citizenship to their children and husbands. - Publish the results of the Interior Ministry's 2008 investigations
into torture, set up a national prevention mechanism for torture, and
prosecute officials suspected of torture. - Amend the labor code to provide legal protection for domestic
workers equal to that for other workers and create a labor inspection
unit to monitor working conditions for migrant domestic workers. - Amend legislation that restricts the ability of Palestinian
refugees to own property and remove restrictions on their employment.
In 2010, Saudi Arabia should:
- Dismantle the system of male legal guardianship over women, and
strengthen protection for women against violence and accountability for
perpetrators of such violence. - Ensure equal citizenship rights for its Shi'a minorities, especially the freedom to practice their religion.
- Release long-term detainees or try them in fair proceedings that meet international standards.
In 2010, Syria should
- Free people being detained for peacefully exercising freedom of expression, association, or assembly.
- Form a commission to address the human rights grievances of the Kurdish minority.
- Investigate officials alleged to have tortured or mistreated detainees.
- Reform all the articles in the criminal code that treat those who
say they killed for "honor" more leniently than other murderers.
In 2010, Yemen should
- End child marriage and strengthen protection for victims of
violence against women and accountability for perpetrators of such
violence. - Take steps to combat torture, including facilitating visits by
independent monitors to all places of detention and prosecuting
officials alleged to have participated in torture. - Stop indiscriminate bombardments of civilians in the armed conflict
with northern rebels, and create a mechanism to ensure that the armed
forces, or allied tribal militias, do not employ child soldiers. - Train law enforcement officers on non-lethal methods of crowd
control, and do not use deadly force against unarmed protesters, such
as those who participated in large demonstrations in the southern
provinces. - Respect the rights to freedom of expression and of assembly and
release all persons detained for their peaceful expression or
participation in peaceful protests.
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
LATEST NEWS
Supreme Court Urged to 'Rule Quickly' After Trump Immunity Arguments
"It'd be a travesty for justices to delay matters further," said one legal expert.
Apr 25, 2024
After about three hours of oral arguments Thursday on former President Donald Trump's immunity claims, legal experts and democracy defenders urged the U.S. Supreme Court to rule swiftly, with just over six months until the November election.
Trump—the presumptive Republican candidate to challenge Democratic President Joe Biden, despite his 88 felony charges in four ongoing criminal cases—is arguing that presidential immunity should protect him from federal charges for trying to overturn his 2020 loss to Biden, which culminated in the January 6, 2021 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol.
Justices across the ideological spectrum didn't seem inclined to support Trump's broad immunity claims—which critics have said "reflect a misreading of constitutional text and history as well as this court's precedent." However, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) shared examples of what it would mean if they did.
"Trump could sell pardons, ambassadorships, and other official benefits to his wealthy donors, members of his clubs, or cronies who helped him commit other crimes," CREW warned. "Trump could sell nuclear codes and government secrets to help pay back crippling debts."
"But this isn't just about what Donald Trump could do. It's really about how total immunity for the president would threaten our democratic system of checks and balances," the group continued. "The president could order the military to assassinate activists, political opponents, members of Congress, or even Supreme Court justices, so long as he claimed it related to some official act."
After warning that a president could also order the occupation or closure of the Capitol or high court to prevent actions against him, CREW concluded that "the Supreme Court never should have taken this appeal up in the first place. They should rule quickly and shut these ludicrous claims down for good."
The organization was far from alone in demanding a quick decision from the nation's highest court.
"In the name of accountability, the court must not delay its decision," the Brennan Center for Justice said Thursday evening. "The Supreme Court's time is up. It needs to let the prosecution move forward. The court decided Bush v. Gore in three days—it should act with similar alacrity in deciding Trump v. U.S."
In Bush v. Gore, the case that decided the 2000 election, the high court issued a related stay on December 9, heard oral arguments on December 11, and issued a final decision on December 12.
On Thursday, the arguments "got away from the central question: Is a former president immune from criminal prosecution if he tried to overthrow a presidential election, using private means and the power of his office to do so?" the Brennan Center noted. "The answer is simple: No."
"It is not an 'official act' to try to overthrow the peaceful transfer of power or the Constitution, even if you conspire with other government officials to do it or use the Oval Office phone," the center said. "Trump's attorney was pushing the court to come up with a sea change in the law. That's unnecessary and a delay tactic that will hurt the pursuit of justice in this case."
In a departure from previous claims, Trump's attorney, D. John Sauer, "appeared to agree with Special Counsel Jack Smith, who is leading the prosecution, that there are some allegations in the indictment that do not involve 'official acts' of the president," NBC Newsreported, noting questions from liberal Justice Elena Kagan and conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett, a Trump appointee.
Barrett summarized various allegations from the indictment and in three cases—involving dishonest election claims, false allegations of fraud, and fake electors—Sauer conceded that Trump's alleged conduct sounded private, suggesting that a more narrow case against the ex-president that excluded any potential official acts could proceed.
Due to Trump attorney's concessions in Supreme Court oral argument, there's now a very clear path for DOJ's case to go forward.\n\nIt'd be a travesty for Justices to delay matters further.\n\nJustice Amy Coney Barrett got Trump attorney to concede core allegations are private acts.\u2b07\ufe0f— (@)
According to NBC:
Matthew Seligman, a lawyer and a fellow at the Constitutional Law Center at Stanford Law School who filed a brief backing prosecutors, said Sauer's concessions highlight that Trump is "not immune for the vast majority of the conduct alleged in the indictment."
Ultimately, he said, the case will go to trial "absent some external intervention—like Trump ordering [the Justice Department] to drop the charges" after having won the election.
At the same time, Sauer's backtracking might have little consequence from an electoral perspective. Further delay in a trial, which Sauer is close to achieving, is a form of victory in itself.
Slate's Mark Joseph Stern pointed out that when Barrett similarly questioned Michael Dreeben, the U.S. Department of Justice lawyer arguing the case for Smith, it seemed like they "were trying to work out some compromise wherein the trial court could distinguish between official and unofficial acts, then instruct the jury not to impose criminal liability on the former."
"It was fascinating to watch Barrett nodding along as Dreeben pitched a compromise that would largely preserve Smith's January 6 prosecution but limit what the jury could hear, or at least consider," Stern added. "That, though, would take months to suss out in the trial court. More delays!"
Stern and other experts signaled that the decision likely comes down to Barrett and Chief Justice John Roberts, with the three liberals seemingly supporting the prosecution of Trump and the other four conservatives suggesting it is unconstitutional.
People for the American Way president Svante Myrick said in a statement that "today's argument brought both good and bad news. It was chilling to hear Donald Trump's lawyer say that staging a military coup could be considered part of a president's official duties."
"Thankfully, the majority of the court, including conservative justices, did not seem to buy that very broad Trump argument that a former president is absolutely immune from prosecution under any circumstances," Myrick added. "On the other hand, it's not clear that there is a majority on this court that will quickly reject the immunity arguments and let the case go forward in time for a trial before the election. That's a huge concern."
Trump was not at the Supreme Court on Thursday; he was at his trial in New York, where he faces 34 counts for allegedly falsifying business records related to hush money payments to cover up sex scandals during the 2016 election cycle. The are two other cases: a federal one for mishandling classified material and another in Georgia for interfering with the last presidential contest.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Just the Beginning': 50+ Arrested for Blockading Citigroup Bank Over Climate Crimes
"Through people-powered resistance, we can give money a conscience and stop Citi's destruction of our planet," said one Indigenous campaigner.
Apr 25, 2024
Twenty more demonstrators were arrested Thursday, the second day of Earth Week protests targeting Citigroup's Manhattan headquarters in what organizers called "the beginning of a wave of direct actions to take place over the summer targeting big banks for creating climate chaos that is killing our communities and our planet."
Protest organizers—who include Climate Defenders, New York Communities for Change, Planet over Profit, and Stop the Money Pipeline—said 53 activists were arrested over two days of demonstrations, which included blocking the entrance to Citigroup's headquarters, to "demand that the bank stop funding fossil fuels."
Organizers said this week's demonstrations "were just the beginning" of what they're calling a "Summer of Heat" targeting big banks for their role in the climate emergency and for "polluting our land, air, and water, and threatening the health of children, families, and our planet." Citigroup is the world's second-largest fossil fuel financier.
"We're holding Citi accountable for financing dirty fossil fuels from Canada to Latin America and beyond," said Chief Na'moks of the Wet'suwet'en Nation, one of several Indigenous leaders who took part in the action. "Through people-powered resistance, we can give money a conscience and stop Citi's destruction of our planet."
Jonathan Westin, executive director of Climate Defenders, asserted that "Citigroup's racist funding of oil, coal, and gas is creating climate chaos that's devastating communities of color across the country."
"We're taking action to tell Citi that we won't put up with their environmental racism for one more day," Westin continued. "Our communities have reached the boiling point. Our children have asthma, our city's sky was orange, and our air polluted because of the climate crisis caused by Citi and Wall Street."
"We're going to keep organizing and taking direct action until Citi listens to us," he vowed.
Stop the Money Pipeline co-director Alec Connon said: "To have any chance of reigning in the climate crisis, we must stop investing in fossil fuel expansion. Yet, Citibank is pumping billions of dollars into new coal, oil, and gas projects."
"We're here to make it clear: If they're going to fund the companies disrupting our climate and our lives, we're going to disrupt their business," Connon added.
Activists have repeatedly targeted Citigroup in recent years as the megabank has pumped more than $300 billion into fossil fuel investments around the world since the Paris climate agreement.
According to the protest organizers:
Citi has provided $668 million in funding to Formosa Plastics between 2001-2021, which is trying to build a $9.4 billion plastics facility in a majority Black community in the heart of Cancer Alley in Louisiana.
Citigroup is also one of the biggest funders of state-run oil and gas companies in the Amazon basin, pumping in over $40 billion between 2016-2020, and a major backer of Petroperú, which has been involved in oil spills and Indigenous rights violations.
"From wildfires, heatwaves, and floods to deadly air pollution and mass drought, Citi's fossil fuel financing is killing us," said Alice Hu of New York Communities for Change. "We've sent polite petitions and had pleading meetings with bank representatives, but Citi refuses to stop pouring billions each year into coal, oil, and gas."
"That's why we're fighting for our lives now with the best tool we have left: mass, nonviolent disruptive civil disobedience," Hu added.
Keep ReadingShow Less
No Outside Probe, US Reiterates as Gazans Reportedly Buried Alive in Mass Grave
"How does it ever make sense that the United States asks the accused party to examine itself?" asked one incredulous reporter.
Apr 25, 2024
A Biden administration spokesperson once again brushed off calls for an independent investigation into how hundreds of Palestinians found in mass graves near Gaza hospitals died when asked Thursday about new reports that many of the victims were tortured, summarily executed—and in some cases, buried alive by Israeli invaders.
During a Thursday U.S. State Department press conference in Washington, D.C., a reporter noted Gaza officials' claim that mass grave victims "including children were tortured before being killed" and that "some even showed signs of being buried alive, along with other crimes against humanity."
"What's wrong with an independent, scientific, forensic investigation?"
Noting calls by Palestinian officials and United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk for an independent probe into mass graves, the reporter said that "this administration repeatedly said that it asks... the Israeli government to investigate itself."
"How does it ever make sense that the United States asks the accused party to examine itself and provide reports that you have previously said that you actually trust?" the reporter asked State Department Principal Deputy Spokesperson Vedant Patel. "What's wrong with an independent, scientific, forensic investigation?"
Patel replied: "We continue to find these reports incredibly troubling. And that's why yesterday you saw the national security adviser for this to be thoroughly investigated."
While National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan on Wednesday called reports of mass grave atrocities "deeply disturbing" and said that "we want answers" from Israel, he did not call for an independent investigation.
When the reporter pressed Patel on the legitimacy of asking Israel to investigate itself, Patel said, "we believe that through a thorough investigation we can get some additional answers."
Thursday's exchange followed a similar back-and-forth on Tuesday between Patel and Said Arikat, a journalist for the Jerusalem-based
Palestinian news outlet al-Quds who asked about the mass graves.
At least 392 bodies—including numerous women and children—have been found in mass graves outside Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis, southern Gaza, where Palestinian Civil Defense and other workers have been exhuming victims for nearly a week. Officials believe there are as many as 700 bodies in three separate mass graves.
Based on more recent exhumations, local Civil Defense chief Yamen Abu Sulaiman said during a Wednesday press conference that "we believe that the occupation buried alive at least 20 people at the Nasser Medical Complex."
"There are cases of field execution of some patients while undergoing surgeries and wearing surgical gowns," he stated, adding that some victims showed signs of torture and 10 bodies had medical tubes attached to them.
Gaza Civil Defense official Mohammed Mughier told reporters that "we need forensic examination" to definitively determine the causes of death for the 20 people believed to have been buried alive.
Previous reporting on the mass graves quoted rescue workers who said they found people who were apparently executed while their hands were bound, with some victims missing heads, skin, and internal organs.
Other mass graves have been found in Gaza, most notably on the grounds of al-Shifa Hospital, where Israeli forces last month committed what the Geneva-based Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor called "one of the largest massacres in Palestinian history."
It's also not the first time there have been reports of Israeli troops burying victims alive during the current war, in which Palestinian and international officials say Israeli forces have killed or wounded more than 122,000 Gazans, including at least 11,000 people who are missing and feared dead. Israeli forces attacking Kamal Adwan Hospital in Beit Lahia last December reportedly bulldozed and buried alive dozens of injured patients and displaced people.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular