

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Jenny Harbine, Earthjustice, (406) 586-9699
Suzanne Asha Stone, Defenders of Wildlife, (208) 861-4655
Louisa Willcox, Natural Resources Defense Council, (406) 222-9561
Melanie Stein, Sierra Club, (307) 733-4557
Noah Greenwald, Center for Biological Diversity, (503) 484-7495
Late Tuesday evening, a federal district court issued an order finding that the delisting of wolves
in the northern Rockies was likely illegal, but declined to stop wolf
hunts in Idaho and Montana. In the ruling, the court stated that the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's decision to remove protections from
wolves in Idaho and Montana while retaining protections for Wyoming
wolves appeared to be "a practical determination that does not seem to
be scientifically based."
The court order came
in an ongoing lawsuit seeking to restore federal Endangered Species Act
protections to wolves in the northern Rocky Mountains until wolf
numbers are stronger, the states develop an adequate legal safety net,
and connectivity between recovery areas is ensured. The order came just
over a week after Idaho's wolf-hunting season opened on September 1 in
two of the state's 12 hunting units. Montana is set to begin wolf
hunting on September 15.
Idaho
authorized the killing of 220 wolves in a wolf hunt, which represents
25 percent of the last official Idaho wolf population estimate at the
end of December 2008. Montana has authorized the take of 75 wolves in a
wolf hunt, which is 15 percent of its last official wolf population
estimate.
The court declined to stop the hunts
because it held that a single hunting season at these levels in Idaho
and Montana would not "irreparably harm" the wolf population as a
whole.
The wolf hunting is in addition to wolf
killing due to livestock conflicts, defense-of-property wolf killing,
and natural mortality, which last year accounted for more than 200 wolf
deaths in Idaho and Montana. The hunting would occur throughout the
states, including in core wilderness regions where wolves have
virtually no conflicts with livestock. The combined loss of all these
wolves threatens the recovery of the still-vulnerable regional wolf
population in the northern Rockies.
Under the
challenged U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service wolf delisting rule, Idaho
and Montana are free to reduce the wolf population down to 150 per
state - a potential loss of roughly two-thirds of the region's wolves.
No other endangered species has ever been delisted at such a low
population level and then immediately hunted to even lower,
unsustainable levels.
The wolf hunts threaten to
cripple the regional wolf population by isolating wolves into
disconnected subgroups incapable of genetic or ecological
sustainability. The wolf hunts would also allow the killing of the
breeding alpha male and female wolves, thereby disrupting the social
group, leaving pups more vulnerable.
Wolves are
still under federal protection in Wyoming because a federal court
previously ruled that Wyoming's hostile wolf-management scheme leaves
wolves in "serious jeopardy." The Fish and Wildlife Service in the
recent past held that a state-by-state approach to delisting wolves was
not permitted under the Endangered Species Act, but the federal
government flip-flopped on its earlier position and this year took
wolves in Idaho and Montana off the endangered species list while
leaving those in Wyoming on the list.
In addition to Wyoming,
the states of Idaho and Montana have refused to make enforceable
commitments to maintain viable wolf populations within their borders.
Earthjustice
represents Defenders of Wildlife, Natural Resources Defense Council,
Sierra Club, Center for Biological Diversity, The Humane Society of the
United States, Jackson Hole Conservation Alliance, Friends of the
Clearwater, Alliance for the Wild Rockies, Oregon Wild, Cascadia
Wildlands, Western Watersheds Project, Wildlands Network, and Hells
Canyon Preservation Council.
###
"We're
disappointed that wolves will continue to be hunted in the short term,
but we're very encouraged that the court has expressed agreement that
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service acted illegally by delisting wolves
under the current rule." Suzanne Stone, Northern Rockies representative of Defenders of Wildlife
"In the big picture, this is a win," said Louisa Willcox, senior wildlife advocate at NRDC.
"We feel good about the judge's analysis of the merits of our case. The
Department of Interior has clearly missed an opportunity to get this
right. We need a national wolf recovery plan and this piecemeal effort
just won't get us there."
"We are encouraged by the
fact that Judge Molloy agrees that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
violated the Endangered Species Act when removing protections for
wolves. However, we are disheartened that public hunting will be
allowed to continue in Idaho and Montana this fall. Wolves are at the
brink of recovery in the northern Rockies and we believe a public hunt
is premature and could negatively impact their chance to make a full
recovery." Melanie Stein, Sierra Club representative
"Today's
order affirms that removal of protections for wolves in the northern
Rockies before they have fully recovered was illegal," said Noah Greenwald, endangered species program director with the Center for Biological Diversity. "Although the court's decision to leave wolves unprotected is a setback for recovery, we hope it is a temporary one."
"Here in Oregon, we just had two young wolves killed after conflicts with livestock," said Rob Klavins with the conservation group Oregon Wild.
"The last thing our neighbors need to be doing is shooting these still
recovering animals for sport. We hope that the state-sponsored hunts
can be ended soon and recovery can begin once again."
"In
keeping with Judge Molloy's findings in this Order, WWP looks forward
to the overturning of the delisting of wolves in the northern Rockies
and the ending of hunting of wolves," said Jon Marvel, executive director of Western Watersheds Project.
"Today's ruling is a split decision," said Doug Honnold of Earthjustice,
who represents the conservation groups in the wolf-delisting lawsuit.
"We are glad the court agreed with us that the Fish and Wildlife
Service violated the Endangered Species Act. We are deeply saddened by
the fact that the court decided not to stop the Idaho and Montana wolf
hunts this year."
"I don't care about any other part of him: his choices caused mass death. That's it," said one critic.
Hours after Sen. Lindsey Graham unexpectedly died on Saturday, many of his Democratic colleagues in the US Senate posted statements on their social media pages paying tribute to the South Carolina Republican.
Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) said that he would most remember Graham (R-SC) for his "his sense of humor and how he deployed it to move his policy positions forward."
"Though we did not often agree," Schiff added, "Senator Graham was never disagreeable."
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) similarly said of Graham that "even though we disagreed on much, he was always willing to negotiate, with humor and wit," adding "my heart goes out to his loved ones."
Sen. Andy Kim (D-NJ) said he was "saddened" to hear of news of Graham's death, which he said came "as a real shock."
"I’m grateful I had the chance to work with Lindsey," said Kim, "including several international trips working on foreign policy."
However, many critics argued that these tributes to Graham overlooked his destructive legacy in public office, including his decades of war mongering and his slavish devotion to the authoritarian President Donald Trump.
"I don't give a fuck that Graham used to be friends with Democratic senators," wrote Thomas Lecaque, associate professor of history at Grand View University. "He was a bloodthirsty bastard who cheered the killing of Muslims and sold his soul to the fascists to be able to push it more effectively. I don't care about any other part of him: his choices caused mass death. That's it."
Princeton historian Kevin Kruse, responding directly to Schiff's post, reminded him of Graham's behavior during the Brett Kavanaugh confirmation hearings when he "threw an angry tantrum in defense of a SCOTUS nominee credibly accused of rape."
"Did you all have a good collegial chuckle over that?" Kruse asked.
Brandon Friedman, co-founder of the Rakkasan Tea Company and a veteran of the Iraq War, also responded directly to Schiff.
"What I'll remember most about Senator Graham," Friedman wrote, "is how he sent my friends to die in an unnecessary war in Iraq."
Jen Rubin, editor-in-chief of The Contrarian and former columnist for The Washington Post, described the Democrats' tributes to Graham as "nauseating" and "everything that is wrong" with the US Senate.
Nicholas Grossman, professor of international relations at the University of Illinois, said the Democrats' statements were just one more signal of weakness from the party.
"The Democratic Party's approval rating is in the toilet," Grossman wrote, "and the main reason is voters see Dem leaders and prominent members acting like things are basically okay instead of fighting like there's an emergency. Slot 'my friend Lindsey Graham, so funny, how great to work with him' comments into that."
Cartoonish Eli Valley was apoplectic about Democrats' fawning hagiography of their late Republican colleague.
"That Democrats see mass-murdering fascists dismantling the country as nothing more than 'colleagues they dislike' is why we've been in a non-stop plummet," Valley wrote. "Incredible this is still debatable, by people who ostensibly oppose fascism, ten years into this?!?"
Political consultant Jamison Foser wrote a parody of the Democrats' statements that imagined them paying tribute to none other than Satan.
"Deeply saddened to learn of the loss of my dear friend Satan, the Prince of Lies," wrote Foser. "Though we often disagreed about matters such as the appropriate role of torture in the afterlife, I will most remember how his quick wit and affable nature made our weekly golf outings a ritual. He will be missed."
Despite the strait's closure, Trump insisted it was "open as far as we're concerned."
US President Donald Trump on Sunday twice told journalists to stop asking him about the status of the Strait of Hormuz, which Iran once again closed after the president declared an end to the ceasefire deal between the two countries.
The first instance came during an interview with NBC News' Kristen Welker, who pointed to conflicting statements from the Iranian government and US Central Command about the status of the strait, which is an essential shipping lane for global petroleum supplies.
Trump replied that "it's open, and I don't want to talk about it because I want to honor the life" of the late Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), who died on Saturday from what his office described as "a brief and sudden illness."
"So I don't want to talk about it," Trump continued. "I told you that before the call."
WELKER: Iran says the Strait of Hormuz is closed. CENTCOM says it's open. Which is it?
TRUMP: It's open, and I don't want to talk about because I want to honor the life of Lindsey Graham, so I don't want to talk about it. I told you that before the call. pic.twitter.com/3ed7dN1bhK
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) July 12, 2026
Shortly after, during an interview with CNN's Jake Tapper, Trump was again asked whether the strait was still open.
"It's open as far as we're concerned," Trump told Tapper. "Don't talk about it. Talk about the reason you asked me to speak."
"Okay," Tapper replied. "We appreciate your time, sir."
TAPPER: Iran has declared the Strait of Hormuz closed. Is that true?
TRUMP: It's open as far as we're concerned. Don't talk about it. Talk about the reason you asked me to speak. pic.twitter.com/TwssTycQdF
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) July 12, 2026
Iran shut down shipping traffic in the strait after Trump launched an illegal war against the country in late February. The strait's closure resulted in spiking oil and gasoline prices, which coincided with further erosion in Trump's approval ratings.
Although traffic through the strait initially picked up in the wake of a June memorandum of understanding signed by the US and Iran, it has since slumped as the ceasefire between the two nations has fallen apart.
Ana Marie Cox, contributing editor at The New Republic, bashed both Welker and Tapper for heeding the president's requests and not pushing him to answer questions about the war he unlawfully started.
"Frankly astonished that supposed news sources agreed to terms to interview Trump and appeared to be deferential to them," Cox wrote in a social media post, "enough that they were apologetic in brining up other topics."
Cox's sentiment was echoed by Kai Ryssdal, host of NPR's Marketplace, who remarked that "the guy being interviewed doesn’t get to pick the questions."
Journalist Helen Kennedy challenged Trump's assertion that asking about the status of the Iran war was irrelevant when talking about Lindsey Graham.
"Making war with Iran was Lindsey Graham's favorite thing," Kennedy observed. "It's not like it's unrelated."
"Lindsey Graham will forever be remembered as an enabler of a regime that has murdered people, destroyed democratic norms, and caused irreparable harm to this country. What a horrific legacy," said one critic.
Sen. Lindsey Graham, one of the most relentless proponents for using US military force overseas, died on Saturday night at the age of 71.
In a statement posted on Graham's (R-SC) social media account, the senator's office said that he "passed away from a brief and sudden illness."
"Sen. Graham's family appreciates prayers at this time," the office added, "and asks for privacy during this incredibly difficult period."
During his life, Graham advocated either starting or getting involved in multiple wars across the world, and he was reportedly instrumental in convincing President Donald Trump to launch an illegal attack on Iran without any authorization from the US Congress.
Although Graham was once a Trump critic—he infamously declared in 2016 that the Republican Party would get "destroyed" if it made the former Celebrity Apprentice host its presidential nominee—the South Carolina Republican grew to become one of the president's staunchest allies.
Some critics of Graham reacted to his death by rehashing what they considered to be his least admirable traits.
David Dayen, executive editor of The American Prospect, remarked that Graham "never met a war he didn't want to send your kids to."
Alejandra Caraballo, clinical instructor at the Harvard Law School Cyberlaw Clinic, also reflected on Graham's lifetime of war mongering.
"You can say a lot about Lindsey Graham," Caraballo wrote, "but at least he got to see the thing he most wanted before he died, bombing school children in Iran."
Princeton historian Kevin Kruse predicted that Graham would leave behind a decidedly poor legacy.
"When Lindsey Graham appears in a history book," wrote Kruse, "it'll be his prediction in 2016 that the Republican Party would be destroyed for supporting Donald Trump and then a few lines about how he proved it by becoming Trump's toady. That's pretty much it. That's his legacy. Pathetic lickspittle."
Steve Schmidt, a former Republican strategist who left the party due to its embrace of Trump, wrote that Graham was "a simple, tragic man" who "lacked a moral core."
"The great empty spaces of his life were filled with an insatiable need for 'relevance,'" Schmidt observed. "He found it as a cast member in the most malignant reality show ever made."
Kenneth Roth, former executive director of Human Rights Watch, had a similar analysis of Graham's character.
"Lindsey Graham supported the International Criminal Court when it charged [Russian President Vladimir] Putin but turned on it when it charged [Israeli Prime Minister] Netanyahu," wrote Roth. "Principled, he wasn't."
Nicholas Grossman, professor of international relations at the University of Illinois, wrote that Graham "spent the last decade of his life in public service... trying hard to be remembered as an enemy of the Constitution who worked to destroy American democracy."
Grossman added that Graham "exhibited occasional signs that he knew why that was bad but kept doing it anyway."
Ruth Zakarin, CEO of the Massachusetts Coalition to Prevent Gun Violence, offered a grim assessment of the late senator.
"Lindsey Graham will forever be remembered as an enabler of a regime that has murdered people, destroyed democratic norms, and caused irreparable harm to this country," wrote Zakarin. "What a horrific legacy."