

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
In the U.S.: Nick Magel 1-419-283-2728 nick@amazonwatch.org
In Peru: Gregor MacLennan + 511 - 993 916-389
In
the aftermath of Friday's bloody raid on a peaceful indigenous road
blockade near Bagua in the Peruvian Amazon, numerous eyewitnesses are
reporting that the Special Forces of the Peruvian Police have been
disposing of the bodies of indigenous protesters who were killed.
"Today I spoke to many eyewitnesses in Bagua reporting that they saw
police throw the bodies of the dead into the Maranon River from a
helicopter in an apparent attempt by the Government to underreport the
number of indigenous people killed by police," said Gregor MacLennan,
spokesperson for Amazon Watch speaking.
"Hospital workers in Bagua Chica and Bagua Grande corroborated that the
police took bodies of the dead from their premises to an undisclosed
location. I spoke to several people who reported that there are bodies
lying at the bottom of a deep crevasse up in the hills, about 2
kilometers from the incident site. When the Church and local leaders
went to investigate, the police stopped them from approaching the
area," reported MacLennan.
Police and government officials have been consistently underreporting
the number of indigenous people killed by police gunfire. Indigenous
organizations place the number of protesters killed at least at 40,
while Government officials claiming that only a handful of indigenous
people were killed. Also the Garcia Government claims that 22 police
officers were killed and several still missing.
"Witnesses say that it was the police who opened fire last Friday on
the protesters from helicopters," MacLennan said. "Now the government
appears to be destroying the bodies of slain protesters and giving very
low estimates of the casualty. Given that the demonstrators were
unarmed or carrying only wooden spears and the police were firing
automatic weapons, the actual number of indigenous people killed is
likely to be much higher."
"Another eyewitness reported seeing the bodies of five indigenous
people that had been burned beyond identification at the morgue. I
have listened to testimony of people in tears talking about witnessing
the police burning bodies," continued MacLennan.
At least 150 people from the demonstration on Friday are still being
detained. Eye-witness reports also confirm that police forcibly
removed some of the wounded indigenous protesters from hospitals,
taking them to unknown destinations. Their families expressed concern
for their well being while in detention. There are many people still
reported missing and access to medical attention in the region is
horribly inadequate.
The Organizing Committee for the Indigenous Peoples of Alto Amazonas
Province issued this statement: "It is appalling that political powers
have acted in such a cruel and inhuman manner against Amazonian
Peoples, failing to recognize the fundamental rights and protections
guaranteed to us by the Constitution. We express deep grief over the
death of our indigenous brothers, of civilians and the officers of the
National Police."
The government expanded the State of Emergency and established a curfew
on all traffic in the region from 3 pm to 6 am. Indigenous and
international human rights organizations are worried about plans of
another National Police raid on a blockade in Yurimaguas close to the
town of Tarapoto where thousands are blocking a road.
President Alan Garcia is being widely criticized for fomenting a
climate of fear mongering against indigenous peoples by drawing
parallels to the brutal Shinning Path guerrilla movement of the 1980s
and early 1990s, and by vaguely referring to external and
anti-democratic threats to the country.
The Amazonian indigenous peoples' mobilizations have been peaceful,
locally coordinated, and extremely well organized for nearly two
months. Yet Garcia insists on calling them terrorist acts and
anti-democratic. Garcia has even gone so far as to describe the
indigenous mobilizations as "savage and barbaric." Garcia has made his
discrimination explicit, saying directly that the Amazonian indigenous
people are not first-class citizens.
"These people don't have crowns," Garcia said about the protesters.
"These people aren't first-class citizens who can say -- 400,000
natives to 28 million Peruvians -- 'You don't have the right to be
here.' No way. That is a huge error."
Ironically, Peru was the country that introduced the United Nations
Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples on the floor of the
General Assembly when it was adopted in September 2007.
A coalition of indigenous and human rights organizations will protest
in front of the Peruvian Embassy in Washington D.C. on Monday, June 8
at 12:30 pm.
Indigenous peoples have vowed to continue protests until the Peruvian
Congress revokes the "free trade" decrees issued by President Garcia
under special powers granted by Congress in the context of the Free
Trade Agreement with the United States.
Among the outpouring of statements condemning the violence in Peru were
those from Peru's Ombudsman's office, the chair of the United Nations
Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, a coalition of 45 international
human rights organizations, Indigenous organizations from throughout
the Americas, and the Conference of Bishops of Peru. Also famous
personalities including Q'orianka Kilcher, Benjamin Bratt, Peter Bratt,
and Daryl Hannah and Bianca Jagger called on the Peruvian Government to
cease the violence and seek peaceful resolution to the conflict.
AIDESEP, the national indigenous organization of Peru has called for a nationwide general strike starting June 11th.
Amazon Watch is continually updating photographs, audio testimony, and video footage from Bagua on www.amazonwatch.org.
Newly released b-roll at https://amazonwatch.org/peru-protests-highres-photos.php
Amazon Watch is a nonprofit organization founded in 1996 to protect the rainforest and advance the rights of indigenous peoples in the Amazon Basin. We partner with indigenous and environmental organizations in campaigns for human rights, corporate accountability and the preservation of the Amazon's ecological systems.
A 20-year-old suspect was found at the company's headquarters, where he was threatening to burn down the building.
A suspect was arrested in San Francisco Friday after being accused of throwing a Molotov cocktail at the home of Sam Altman, the CEO of the artificial intelligence firm OpenAI.
The 20-year-old man was found at the OpenAI headquarters about three miles away from Altman's home, where he was threatening to burn down the building, San Francisco police said.
The device the suspect threw onto Altman's property in the Russian Hill neighborhood caused a fire on the exterior gate. It was unclear whether Altman and his family were at home.
The suspect was in custody Friday, with charges pending.
Altman's company and other companies have been under fire as AI has expanded rapidly at President Donald Trump's urging, with the president issuing an executive order attacking states' ability to regulate the industry.
Experts have warned the expansion of generative AI threatens jobs and democracy, with political campaigns already using the technology to create fraudulent media in advertisements.
Massive, energy-sucking AI data centers have also been blamed for higher household electricity bills and water consumption.
Protesters have rallied against Altman's company for agreeing to provide its technology to the Department of Defense.
In November, The New York Times reported, a person who had once been associated with the anti-AI group Stop AI "expressed interest in causing physical harm to OpenAI employees," causing the company to lock down its headquarters.
On Friday, Stop AI condemned the attack on Altman's house and emphasized that the group "seeks to protect human life."
"We do not condone any violence whatsoever," said the group. "We pray everyone involved in this situation puts aside violence and finds peace, and we continue to hope the AI industry stops the development of frontier AI systems in the interest of public safety and the preservation of humanity. To the best of our knowledge, this incident did not involve anyone who has ever been associated with our group. And this action is wholly inconsistent with our values."
"While Americans worry about skyrocketing costs and another endless war, President Trump is focused on a taxpayer-funded vanity project," said Rep. Don Beyer.
On the same day that the US Bureau of Labor Statistics showed that inflation spiked at its fastest monthly rate in four years, the Trump administration unveiled renderings of President Donald Trump's proposed gold-covered 250-foot-tall arch to be built at Memorial Circle in Washington, DC.
The renderings, which were produced by architecture firm Harrison Design and posted on social media by the White House's rapid response account, show a gigantic arch that would be flanked on its corners by four gold lions and topped by a 60-foot-tall gold statue of what appears to be an angel.
🇺🇸 pic.twitter.com/zcH5TtaOu7
— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) April 10, 2026
According to a Friday report in The Washington Post, some preservationists have expressed concerns that the arch, which would be more than twice the height of the Lincoln Monument, would disproportionately tower over the DC skyline, and would block views of Arlington National Cemetery.
Rep. Don Beyer (D-Va.) slammed the president for pushing construction of a gaudy gold-covered arch at a time when Americans are struggling due to the cost-of-living crisis worsened by his war in Iran.
"While Americans worry about skyrocketing costs and another endless war," he wrote in a social media post, "President Trump is focused on a taxpayer-funded vanity project that would choke traffic, block our skyline, and tower over sacred ground where those who served our nation are buried, including my own parents and sister."
Beyer added that the arch is "about Donald Trump's ego," and vowed, "we're going to stop it."
Rep. Katherine Clark (D-Mass.) responded to the renderings by reminding the White House that "Americans can't afford groceries."
Progressive activist Nina Turner had a similar reaction to Clark, posting that "people can’t afford rent" in response to the renderings.
Podcaster Brian Taylor Cohen contrasted the renderings of the arch with a statement Trump made earlier this month when he said "it’s not possible" for the federal government "to take care of daycare, Medicaid, Medicare, all these individual things," because it needs to fund wars instead.
University of Missouri English professor Karen Piper also remarked on the opportunity cost of building the arch, along with other assorted Trump projects.
"This is why they're going to take away your Social Security, saying we can't afford it," she wrote. "Ballrooms, arches, and Don Jr. draining the Treasury."
California Gov. Gavin Newsom, who has been named as a contender for the Democratic Party's 2028 presidential nomination, responded to the arch renderings by accusing Trump of "doing everything he can to wreck this country—this time with our nation's capital."
Rep. Jared Huffman (D-Calif.) took issue with the decision to inscribe the phrase "one nation under God" at the top of the arch.
"That phrase came from Cold War propaganda, not our Founders," observed Huffman. "Trump stamping it on his vanity arch tells you everything about what this project is: a Christian nationalist monument, paid for with your tax dollars."
"Billionaire-funded super PACs—AIPAC, AI, crypto, and others—are spending hundreds of millions to defeat any candidate who crosses them. They should be banned from Democratic primaries. Period."
Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders on Friday called for a total ban on dark money a day after the Democratic National Committee voted down a resolution that would have condemned the leading US pro-Israel lobby, which has spent nine figures on US elections over the past five years.
The DNC Resolutions Committee rejected the resolution, which condemned “the growing influence” of dark money and corporate-backed outside spending on Democratic races, specifically calling out the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee. United Democracy Project, AIPAC's dark money arm, unleashed a $100 million blitz targeting progressives during the 2024 election cycle.
When combined with other pro-Israel lobby groups, like GOP megadonor Miriam Adelson's Preserve America PAC, that figure soars to over $200 million, according to the public interest group AIPAC Tracker.
Instead, the DNC panel opted for a broader resolution decrying the influence of dark money—defined as undisclosed independent campaign contributions—in the 2026 Democratic primaries.
"The DNC just passed a resolution condemning dark money," Sanders (Vt.) said Friday on X. "That’s a start, but not enough."
"Billionaire-funded super PACs—AIPAC, AI, crypto, and others—are spending hundreds of millions to defeat any candidate who crosses them," the senator added. "They should be banned from Democratic primaries. Period."
Sanders campaigned twice for president, centering his opposition to the Supreme Court's 2010 Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ruling, which effectively ushered in the modern era of secret unlimited political spending.
According to the Brennan Center for Justice, dark money spending in federal elections has skyrocketed from negligible amounts before 2010 to over $1.9 billion in the 2024 cycle alone, with over $4 billion in total undisclosed outside financing following the high court's contentious ruling.
Polling has repeatedly affirmed that support for Israel—which stands accused in the International Court of Justice of committing genocide in Gaza and has already been found by the ICJ to be illegally occupying Palestine under apartheid rule—is detrimental to Democrats.
The DNC's own suppressed postmortem of the 2024 presidential election also showed that former President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris' unconditional support for Israel cost Harris votes.
As AIPAC has grown more toxic to US voters amid a litany of Israeli atrocities in Gaza and the West Bank under the government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu—who is wanted by the International Criminal Court for alleged crimes against humanity and war crimes in Gaza—a growing number of Democrats, including some who once welcomed the group's support, are turning their backs on the lobby.
“AIPAC really is not an organization that I think today I would want any part of," Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker said last month after affiliated groups poured $22 million into House races in his state.
While AIPAC cash was instrumental in unseating congressional progressives including former Reps. Jamaal Bowman (D-NY) and Cori Bush (D-Mo.), its largesse failed to oust others, including Reps. Summer Lee (D-Pa.), Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), and Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.).
Sanders wasn't the only one to criticize the DNC's rejection of the anti-AIPAC resolution.
“The American people are clear: They want our government to invest in life and stop funding the bombs that are destroying lives in Palestine, Lebanon, and Iran," Jewish Voice for Peace political director Beth Miller said Friday.
"The DNC’s failure to pass this simple resolution condemning the outsized spending of an extremist and Republican-funded group like AIPAC in Democratic primaries shows how wildly out of touch the party is with its base," Miller added.