June, 02 2009, 09:03am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7413 5566,After hours: +44 7778 472 126,Email:,press@amnesty.org
China: Hold Independent Inquiry into 1989 Tiananmen Square Crackdown
Chinese authorities should hold an open
and independent inquiry into the 1989 violent military crackdown on
peaceful demonstrators in and around Tiananmen Square, Amnesty
International said today.
The Chinese government has thwarted any attempts to shed light on the
military crackdown that resulted in hundreds of deaths and injuries in
June 1989. In the lead up to the twentieth anniversary of the protests,
the authorities have even intensified a current crackdown on activists
and lawyers.
LONDON
Chinese authorities should hold an open
and independent inquiry into the 1989 violent military crackdown on
peaceful demonstrators in and around Tiananmen Square, Amnesty
International said today.
The Chinese government has thwarted any attempts to shed light on the
military crackdown that resulted in hundreds of deaths and injuries in
June 1989. In the lead up to the twentieth anniversary of the protests,
the authorities have even intensified a current crackdown on activists
and lawyers.
The Chinese government has not made official figures public, but
several non-governmental organizations estimate that at least 20 and
maybe as many as 200 individuals remain in detention for their
involvement in the 1989 pro-democracy protests.
"The National People's Congress has within its powers the ability to
lead the way in calling for an account of all those who died, those who
were imprisoned and those who remain in prison still as a result of the
crackdown," said Amnesty International in an open letter sent to Wu
Bangguo, the Chairman of the National People's Congress of China, on 13
May 2009.
"A number of people who remain in prison were convicted of 'counter
revolutionary' crimes that were removed from the Chinese Criminal Code
in 1997," said Roseann Rife, Amnesty International's Asia-Pacific
Deputy Director. "The Chinese authorities should immediately release
these prisoners as a first step towards accountability."
Not all of those who have been imprisoned for their association with
the Tiananmen pro-democracy movement actually participated in the
protests 20 years ago. The Chinese authorities' ongoing suppression of
public discussion of the events means that many have been sentenced to
imprisonment after 1989 simply for exercising their right to freedom of
expression, for example, by hosting online discussions or posting poems
commemorating the crackdown on the Internet.
Imprisonment is not the only method that the Chinese authorities use
to stifle public debate of the 1989 events. The prominent leaders of
the Tiananmen Mothers group, Ding Zilin and Jiang Peikun are frequently
subjected to police harassment and arbitrary detention.. In May they
were forbidden from attending a mourning ceremony that 50 other members
of the group were allowed to attend, after they promised the Ministry
of State Security that no outsiders, especially journalists, present in
the gathering.
At the launch of the Amnesty International Annual Report, Amnesty
International Secretary General Irene Khan called on China to sign and
ratify the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
Although the Chinese government's recent initiative in launching the
National Human Rights Action Plan, which has provisions to eradicate
unlawful detention and protect human rights guaranteed in the Chinese
Constitution, was welcomed by Amnesty International, the Plan's success
hinges on the actual implementation.
"In the midst of a global economic downturn, the Chinese government
has demonstrated its readiness to take up leadership in stabilizing the
world economic system. When it comes to the protection of human rights,
however, the Chinese government has consistently failed to live up to
the world's expectations. The number of people still in prison for
their actions in Tiananmen Square twenty years ago is testament to the
lack of commitment to human rights that still prevails in China," said
Roseann Rife.
Case updates:
As the 20th anniversary of the Tiananmen crackdown approaches,
Chinese authorities have intensified the suppression of human rights
activists across the country. Amnesty International has documented at
least one hundred cases of activists who have been detained briefly or
faced violence from authorities in 2009 as they defended land rights,
housing rights and labour rights and signatories of the Charter 08, a
petition calling for legal and political reforms, continue to face
questioning. Several of these cases are related to the surveillance of
activists ahead of the anniversary.
In the first four months of 2009, Amnesty International documented
at least four cases of lawyers who were threatened with violence by the
authorities as they defended their clients, at least ten cases where
lawyers were hindered from meeting or representing clients, and at
least one case in which a lawyer has been detained for doing his work.
Lawyers recently have been threatened with denial of the licenses in
retaliation for their work on rights defence cases.
To follow are details of several individuals detained in connection
with the 1989 protests who are scheduled to be released from prison in
the coming years:
Jiang Yaqun was in his forties at the time of his
arrest. He was originally sentenced to a suspended death sentence for
'counter-revolutionary sabotage'. After receiving three sentence
reductions, he is scheduled for release from Beijing's Jinzhong Prison
in October 2014.
Li Yujun was originally sentenced to death with a
2-year reprieve for arson, and is detained in Beijing No. 2 Prison.
After six sentence reductions, Li is due for release in November 2014.
Zhu Gengsheng was also convicted of
'counter-revolutionary sabotage' because he waved a flag while shouting
"We win!" on a tank that was set on fire. Zhu was originally sentenced
to death with a 2-year reprieve, and is currently jailed at Beijing No.
2 Prison. He has received five sentence reductions, and his scheduled
release is due in April 2013.
The following individuals continue to be persecuted by the Chinese
authorities for their human rights activism in connection with the
Tiananmen pro-democracy movement
Huang Qi, was sentenced to five-years' imprisonment
for hosting an online discussion about the protests in Tiananmen
Square. The 'evidence' against him included reference to an Amnesty
International document about the Tiananmen crackdown which had been
posted on his web-site. He was released on 4 June 2005. Following his
release, he continued to maintain his website and his human rights work
and was detained again in June 2008, apparently for his assistance to
five families whose children died in the Sichuan Earthquake last year.
Qi Zhiyong, who was left disabled by a gunshot
injury during the 1989 Tiananmen violence, told reporters in a text
message on 15 April that he had been detained by the police. It is
believed that his detention is associated with the 20th anniversary of
the death of Hu Yaobang. Hu's death marked the beginning of the
pro-democracy protests.
Zhou Yongjun, an exiled student leader of the 1989
pro-democracy protests, offers yet another example of arbitrary
detention. Zhou Yongjun was sentenced to two-years' imprisonment for
his involvement in the 1989 pro-democracy protests. When he was
released, he was exiled to the United States. He returned to China in
1998 when he was sent to Re-education Through Labour for another three
years. In a recent attempt to re-enter China via Hong Kong last
October, he was again detained by the Chinese authorities in Shenzhen.
According to his sister, the Chinese authorities denied any repeated
detention of Zhou Yongjun. However, international media including the
Associated Press reported in May 2009, that Zhou Yongjun had been
formally charged with fraud.
Amnesty International is a worldwide movement of people who campaign for internationally recognized human rights for all. Our supporters are outraged by human rights abuses but inspired by hope for a better world - so we work to improve human rights through campaigning and international solidarity. We have more than 2.2 million members and subscribers in more than 150 countries and regions and we coordinate this support to act for justice on a wide range of issues.
LATEST NEWS
Listen Live: US Supreme Court Hears Outrageous Argument That Trump Is Above the Law
"The American people deserve a Supreme Court that does not hesitate to declare that no one is above the law, including a former president," said one campaigner.
Apr 25, 2024
After months of delay, the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday will hear oral arguments in a closely watched case on whether former President Donald Trump should be immune from criminal charges stemming from his efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss—an argument that legal experts say is both absurd and dangerous.
Listen live to the oral arguments, which are set to begin at 10:00 am ET:
Thursday's proceedings mark the high court's final argument of its current term, and pro-democracy campaigners are calling on the justices to quickly reject the former president's sweeping immunity claim so he can face trial on federal election subversion charges before his November rematch with President Joe Biden.
As Bloomberg's Greg Stohr noted earlier this week, Thursday's oral arguments give "Special Counsel Jack Smith only a narrow window to put the former president in front of a Washington jury before voters go to the polls on November 5."
"With the trial on hold until the high court rules," Stohr added, "Smith needs a clear-cut victory, and he needs it quickly."
Sean Eldridge, founder and president of the progressive advocacy group Stand Up America, said in a statement Thursday that "the Supreme Court's right-wing majority has already handed Trump a temporary victory by stalling this case for months, allowing him to delay accountability for his criminal attempts to cling to power."
"With so much at stake for our democracy, the Supreme Court should rule swiftly and decisively in this case," said Eldridge. "Accountability delayed could mean accountability denied."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Grand Jury Indicts Top Trump Aides, 11 Arizona Republicans Over 'Fake Electors' Scheme
Had it succeeded, said the state's attorney general, the scheme would have "deprived Arizona's voters of their right to have their votes counted for their chosen president."
Apr 25, 2024
A grand jury in Arizona on Wednesday charged seven aides to Donald Trump and nearly a dozen Republican officials over a "fake electors" scheme in the state that aimed to keep the former president in power after his 2020 loss to President Joe Biden.
Trump, who is currently facing nearly 90 charges across four criminal cases as he runs for another White House term, was described as "unindicted co-conspirator 1" in the 58-page indictment, which was announced by Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes.
"The people of Arizona elected President Biden," Mayes, a Democrat, said Wednesday. "Unwilling to accept this fact, the defendants charged by the state grand jury allegedly schemed to prevent the lawful transfer of the presidency. Whatever their reasoning was, the plot to violate the law must be answered for."
The indictment names former Arizona Republican Party Chair Kelli Ward, sitting state Republican Sens. Jake Hoffman and Anthony Kern, former U.S. Senate candidate Jim Lamon, and seven others as the "fake electors" who sought to declare Trump the rightful winner of the state's presidential contest.
The names of other individuals indicted by the state grand jury are redacted, but the document's descriptions make clear that former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, former Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani, and top Trump legal strategist Boris Epshteyn are among those facing felony charges—including fraud, forgery, and conspiracy.
"In Arizona, defendants, unindicted coconspirators, and others pressured the three groups of election officials responsible for certifying election results to encourage them to change the election results," the document reads. "Discussions about using the Republican electors to change the outcome of the election began as early as November 4, 2020. Those plans evolved during November based on memos drafted by [an attorney for the Trump campaign, Kenneth Chesebro]."
Mayes said Wednesday that had the fake elector scheme succeeded, it would have "deprived Arizona's voters of their right to have their votes counted for their chosen president."
"It effectively would have made their right to vote meaningless," said Mayes.
A state grand jury, made up of everyday, regular Arizonans, has handed down felony indictments in the ongoing investigation into the fake elector scheme in Arizona. pic.twitter.com/Nu8GcD4ZqJ
— AZ Attorney General Kris Mayes (@AZAGMayes) April 24, 2024
Alex Gulotta, state director of All Voting Is Local Action Arizona, said Wednesday that "the indictment of the eleven fake electors is one of the first steps required in holding these election deniers accountable for their alleged attempts to take power away from voters by disrupting our free and fair elections."
"Arizonans deserve to trust the election officials responsible for administering our elections and preserving our democracy," said Gulotta, "and this is a positive step forward as we continue to strengthen the foundations of our democracy and restore faith in our elections."
The Arizona Republicreported Wednesday that "several of the Arizona electors have previously claimed they were merely offering Congress a backup plan, though nothing in the documents they sent to Congress and the National Archives backs up that assertion."
"The indictment includes several statements the false electors made on social media that contradict those claims," the newspaper observed.
Jenny Guzman, director of Common Cause's Arizona program, said the indictment "marks the start of a new chapter for the fake elector scheme that has plagued Arizona."
"Arizonans are still dealing with the fallout from the false electors and the Big Lie about the 2020 elections," said Guzman. "We are relieved that the investigation by Attorney General Mayes has concluded and Arizonans can now know that what comes next is accountability. These efforts by these fake electors to undermine the will of Arizona’s voters have had implications far beyond their failed attempt to overthrow the 2020 election."
"This indictment can reassure all Arizonans that if anyone, regardless of their political affiliation, attempts to undermine their vote, consequences will follow," Guzman added.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Watchdog Urges FEC to Investigate Trump Campaign Over Scheme for Legal Fees
"By not disclosing the vendors that actually provided legal services, the Trump-affiliated committees effectively blocked the public from knowing which attorneys and firms are being paid—and how much."
Apr 24, 2024
A campaign finance watchdog on Wednesday filed a Federal Election Commission complaint accusing former President Donald Trump's 2024 campaign, affiliated political groups, and an accounting firm of violating U.S. law in a scheme "seemingly designed to obscure the true recipients of a noteworthy portion of Trump's legal bills."
The Washington, D.C.-based Campaign Legal Center (CLC) said that "evidence appears to show an illegal arrangement between several Trump-affiliated committees and a compliance firm named Red Curve Solutions that is designed to obscure the identities of those providing legal services and how much they are being paid."
"Voters have a right to know how the presidential campaigns and other committees supporting presidential candidates spend their money."
CLC alleges that the Trump campaign, Trump's political action committee (PAC) Save America, and three affiliated organizations "violated federal reporting requirements based on a scheme in which the committees reportedly paid over $7.2 million—described as 'reimbursement for legal' costs or expenses"—to Red Curve.
The watchdog also said that Red Curve appears to be "making or facilitating illegal contributions that violate either federal contribution limits or the prohibition on corporate contributions."
According to CLC:
Red Curve is a domestic limited liability company that offers compliance and FEC reporting services but does not appear to offer any legal services. It is managed by Bradley Crate, who also serves as the treasurer for each of the five Trump-affiliated committees concerned in this complaint, as well as over 200 other federal committees.
According to filings with the FEC, Red Curve appears to have been fronting legal costs for Trump since at least December 2022, with Trump-affiliated committees repaying the company later. This arrangement appears to violate FEC rules that require campaigns to disclose not only the entity being reimbursed (here, Red Curve) but also the underlying vendor. By not disclosing the vendors that actually provided legal services, the Trump-affiliated committees effectively blocked the public from knowing which attorneys and firms are being paid—and how much they are being paid—through this arrangement.
"Voters have a right to know how the presidential campaigns and other committees supporting presidential candidates spend their money," CLC senior director of campaign finance Erin Chlopak said in a statement. "When campaigns and committees obscure that information from the public, not only do they make it difficult to determine if the law has been violated, but they deny voters the ability to make an informed choice when casting a ballot."
"The steps taken by the Trump campaign, its affiliated committees, and Red Curve Solutions concealed information about how campaign funds were used to pay former President Trump's legal expenditures, including the amounts and ultimate recipients of these expenditures—and the FEC must investigate immediately," Chlopak added.
Trump—who is the presumptive 2024 GOP presidential nominee—faces 88 federal and state felony charges related to his role in the January 6 insurrection and his organization's business practices. He is currently on trial in New York for allegedly falsifying business records related to hush money payments to cover up sex scandals during the 2016 election cycle. The twice-impeached former president has been open about his use of campaign donations to pay his legal costs.
The new CLC filing comes a day after the watchdog filed separate FEC complaints urging investigations into a pair of Trump-affiliated "scam PACs," which "pretend to fundraise for major candidates or issues while secretly diverting almost all of their donors' money back into fundraising or the fraudsters' own pockets."
Correction: This article originally said Trump faces 91 federal and state felony charges. The correct number is 88.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular