

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Worldwatch is pleased to publish this open letter from prominent
education and environment leaders urging the newly nominated U.S.
education secretary, Arne Duncan, to consider the importance of
education in carrying out President-elect Barack Obama's environmental
agenda.
Dear Mr. Duncan:
Congratulations on your nomination. As you jump into the daunting
challenge of bolstering our sagging education system, you have a
powerful opportunity presented by the need to create a carbon-free
economy.
President-elect Obama has astutely perceived the linkages between
climate change, economic stimulus, energy security, and job training by
declaring that the transition to a green economy is his "top priority."
The missing link in this system is the critical role that education can
play in quickly making the green economy a reality. By working with him
to include a major role for education in his green economy plans,
you'll help advance his agenda - and yours.
Transforming our nation's economic, energy, and environmental systems
to move toward a green economy will require a level of expertise,
innovation, and cooperative effort unseen since the 1940s to meet the
challenges involved.
Creating millions of new green jobs through targeted investment and
spending is one thing; filling those jobs with qualified candidates is
quite another thing. This transition will require a massive job training (and retraining) effort on the part of business, government, and education if it is to scale up quickly.
But green manufacturing workforce development programs are just one piece of what is needed; the green economy will not be driven by manufacturing workers alone.
Architects, engineers, planners, scientists, business managers,
financial experts, lawyers, entrepreneurs, political leaders, resource
managers, and many others, as well as workers - not to mention
environmentally literate consumers - will all be needed to drive the
green economy.
American workers, managers, and professionals at all levels and
in all sectors must understand the foundations of a green economy as
represented in leading environmental and sustainability education
programs. These foundations call for redesigning the human
economy to emulate nature: operating on renewable energy, creating a
circular production economy in which the concept of '"waste" is
eliminated because all waste products are raw materials or nutrients
for the industrial economy, and managing human activities in a way that
uses natural resources only at the rate that they can self-regenerate
(the ideas embodied in sustainable forestry, fishing, and agriculture).
To produce such a literate workforce and citizenry, America will need to make major new investments in our educational systems to implement the green economy and keep new green jobs from migrating out of America.
It has been well proven that an investment in education and
innovation - in human capital - is without a doubt the best investment
that can be made in long-term, across-the-board economic growth.1 Public
investments in education for a green economy will more than pay for
themselves, just as the post-Sputnik education programs did in the
1950s and '60s and the G.I. Bill did in the 1940s.2
In addition, "Education for a Green Economy" is a politically unifying strategy:
We, the undersigned, therefore respectfully urge you to support the
following proposed Presidential agenda as it pertains to your
department:
An Action Agenda for a Healthy, Just, and Sustainable Economy
* The President should announce a sweeping initiative to support education as a cornerstone of our new clean energy future.
This initiative should be part of an economic stimulus package with a
focus on green jobs and green education to help Americans of all ages,
all backgrounds, and all walks of life transition to the green economy.
* The President should launch a series of White House Conferences on Creating Healthier, Greener Communities and Economies.
Conference themes, co-sponsored with key federal agencies, would focus
on building a more equitable and green economy, promote social equity,
and support service learning to engage youth in greening local
communities.
* Support a national goal of 100% of renovation and new school construction to meet "Green Schools" Standards by 2012.
Declare a Department of Education policy to support a national goal
that 100 percent of newly constructed or rehabilitated schools (both
K-12 and higher education) to become "Green Schools" to lower energy
costs and greenhouse gas emissions, and provide opportunities for
formal and non-formal environmental education.
* Support legislation to direct 1% of climate change cap-and-trade revenues to education for a green economy.
This comprehensive education bill would advance education for a green
economy through major adjustments to K-12 education, school-to-work
programs, higher education, professional re-education, and consumer and
public education, in order to equip our American workforce and
citizenry with the needed skills and knowledge to maximize
environmental and economic gains in the transition to a green economy.
Related legislation to significantly expand and improve environmental
education in our public K-12 schools (the No Child Left Behind Act)
should also be supported.
* Establish a strong record of funding existing education programs
through the President's budget requests for the University
Sustainability Program, environmental education programs at the
Environmental Protection Agency, National Science Foundation and
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the new Energy
Efficiency Grants and Loans program at the Department of Energy.
* Make new Administration appointments:
a. Senior Policy Advisor to the Secretary of Education, Education for a Green Economy
b. Senior Policy Advisor to the NOAA Administrator, Climate Change Education
c. Environmental Education Advisor, Council of Environmental Quality
d. Senior Policy Advisor to the Director of the US Peace Corps, Sustainability and Environmental Education
* Direct all federal resources agencies to
develop and conduct "education for a green economy" and climate change
literacy training for all personnel to familiarize them with challenges, needs, and appropriate responses for each agency.
One of the most hopeful signs for the future is the rapidly developing
consensus that investment in a clean/green economy is the best way to
improve national security, create millions of jobs, restore U.S.
economic leadership, and stop large-scale climate disruption that could
undercut modern civilization. It is time to reorient the education
system to make this a reality-humanity is depending on us.
With our best wishes for your success,
David E. Blockstein, Ph.D., Senior Scientist, National Council for Science and the Environment
Judy Braus, Senior Vice President of Education, National Audubon Society
Antony D. Cortese, Sc.D., President, Second Nature
Kevin J. Coyle, Vice President for Education, National Wildlife Federation
Brian A. Day, Executive Director, North American Association for Environmental Education
James L Elder, Ph.D., Director, Campaign for Environmental Literacy
Christopher Flavin, President, Worldwatch Institute
Judy Walton, Ph.D., Acting Executive Director, Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education
The Worldwatch Institute was a globally focused environmental research organization based in Washington, D.C., founded by Lester R. Brown. Worldwatch was named as one of the top ten sustainable development research organizations by Globescan Survey of Sustainability Experts. Brown left to found the Earth Policy Institute in 2000. The Institute was wound up in 2017, after publication of its last State of the World Report. Worldwatch.org was unreachable from mid-2019.
"Brendan Carr is threatening the media to cover the war the way the Trump regime wants. It’s one of the most anti-American messages ever posted by a government official," one news network said.
In a move one administration critic described as "fragrantly unconstitutional," Federal Communications Commission Chair Brendan Carr wrote a post on social media on Saturday that appeared to threaten the broadcast license of any media outlet that reported information concerning President Donald Trump's war on Iran that the president did not like.
"Broadcasters that are running hoaxes and news distortions—also known as the fake news—have a chance now to correct course before their license renewals come up. The law is clear. Broadcasters must operate in the public interest, and they will lose their licenses if they do not," Carr's message began.
Carr also shared a screenshot of a Trump post on Truth Social complaining about "Fake News Media" coverage of five US Air Force refueling planes that were reportedly hit and damaged in an Iranian missile strike on Prince Sultan air base in Saudi Arabia.
"The[is] is the federal government telling news stations to provide favorable coverage of the war or their licenses will be pulled," wrote Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) on social media in response to the post. "A truly extraordinary moment. We aren't on the verge of a totalitarian takeover. WE ARE IN THE MIDDLE OF IT. Act like it."
Several other media professionals, free speech advocates, and Democratic politicians understood Carr's post as a threat.
"The truth is this war has been a failure of historic proportions. They don’t want Americans to know that."
"The FCC is threatening the licenses of news stations that report on the effects of Iranian attacks on the American military," wrote journalist Séamus Malekafzali.
Bulwark economics editor Catherine Rampell wrote, "FCC Chair Brendan Carr threatens broadcast licenses over Iran War coverage."
Journalist Sam Stein posted, "The state doesn't like the war coverage, threatens the license of the broadcasters."
Independent news network MediasTouch wrote: "Brendan Carr is threatening the media to cover the war the way the Trump regime wants. It’s one of the most anti-American messages ever posted by a government official."
"The truth is this war has been a failure of historic proportions. They don’t want Americans to know that," the group continued.
"This is worse than the comedian stuff, and by a lot. The stakes here are much higher. He’s not talking about late night shows, he’s talking about how a war is covered."
Several pointed out that such a threat would be in violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution, which guarantees freedom of speech and of the press.
"Constitutional law 101: It’s illegal for the government to censor free speech it just doesn’t like about Trump’s Iran war," Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) posted on social media. "This threat is straight out of the authoritarian playbook."
Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), who has faced scrutiny from the administration for advising service members to disobey illegal orders, wrote: "When our nation is at war it is critical that the press is free to report without government interference. It is literally in the Constitution. This is overreach by the FCC because this administration doesn’t like the microscope and doesn’t want to be held accountable."
California Gov. Gavin Newsom wrote, "If Trump doesn't like your coverage of the war, his FCC will pull your broadcast license. That is flagrantly unconstitutional."
Aaron Terr, the director of public advocacy at the Foundation of Individual Rights and Expression, said: "The president's hand-picked misinformation czar is at it again, singling out 'fake news' that conflicts with his boss' political agenda. The First Amendment doesn't allow the government to censor information about the war it's waging."
Free Press senior director of strategy and communications Timothy Karr responded to Carr with a screenshot of the First Amendment and the words: "Here it is—as it seems you've forgotten what you swore an oath to 'support and defend.'"
This is not the first time that Carr has been accused of putting his loyalty to Trump over his duty to the Constitution. In September, he pressured ABC to take comedian Jimmy Kimmel off the air over remarks Kimmel had made following the murder of Charlie Kirk.
While ABC eventually reinstated Kimmel's show following public backlash, free speech advocates warned at the time that the Trump administration would not stop trying to censor opposing views.
“The Trump regime’s war on free speech is no joke—and it’s not over," Free Press co-CEO Craig Aaron said at the time.
Indeed, Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) wrote of Carr's Saturday statement: "This is worse than the comedian stuff, and by a lot. The stakes here are much higher. He’s not talking about late night shows, he’s talking about how a war is covered."
Carr's note comes at a particularly urgent time for independent media coverage in the US, as Paramount Skydance, which is run by the son of pro-Trump billionaire Larry Ellison, is set to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery, which owns CNN. The Trump administration has often criticized CNN's coverage, including of the war.
On Friday, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth told reporters, “The sooner David Ellison takes over that network, the better,” as he complained about a CNN report on how the Pentagon underestimated the risk that Iran would close the Strait of Hormuz in response to US aggression.
Carr has already spoken out in favor of the merger, telling CNBC he thought it was a "good deal, and I think it should get through pretty quickly."
This piece has been updated with quotes from Sens. Chris Murphy, Elizabeth Warren, and Mark Kelly.
“Mandating a restart of these defective oil pipelines won’t curb high gas prices, but it will put coastal wildlife at huge risk of another oil spill," one advocate said.
State leaders and environmental advocates responded with outrage after the Trump administration on Friday ordered the restarting of a California pipeline that caused one of the largest oil spills in the state's history, a move that comes as oil prices have skyrocketed following President Donald Trump's launching of an illegal war against Iran and Iran's subsequent closure of the Strait of Hormuz.
After Trump issued an executive order on Friday authorizing the Department of Energy (DOE) to ramp up oil and gas development under the Defense Production Act, Energy Secretary Chris Wright ordered Sable Offshore Corp. to restart operations on the Santa Ynez Unit and Pipeline System, which include an offshore rig and a network of offshore and onshore pipelines along the Santa Barbara coast. Among them is a pipeline that ruptured in 2015, spilling around 450,000 gallons of oil into Refugio State Beach and killing hundreds of marine mammals and sea birds.
“Californians have repeatedly rejected dangerous drilling off our coast for decades," Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) said in a statement on Saturday. "Now, after dragging the US into a war with Iran and driving up oil prices, the Trump administration is trying to exploit this crisis to further enrich the oil industry at the expense of our communities and our environment."
In his statement, Wright emphasized the defense benefits of resuming drilling, arguing that "today’s order will strengthen America’s oil supply and restore a pipeline system vital to our national security and defense, ensuring that West Coast military installations have the reliable energy critical to military readiness.”
“Directing a private oil company to push its project through without safety checks and adherence to California laws that keep our coast safe is appalling and illegal."
The DOE added that "Sable's facility can produce approximately 50,000 barrels of oil per day, a 15% increase to California’s in-state oil production, that can replace nearly 1.5 million barrels of foreign crude each month."
Yet, far from a novel response to an unexpected emergency, the order is actually an escalation in a preexisting battle between California and the Trump administration over the future of the pipeline system. The state's Attorney General Rob Bonta sued to stop the administration from a federal takeover of two of the pipelines in January.
Sable also faces several lawsuits due to its attempts to restart the system after it purchased it from ExxonMobil in 2024, and has not yet cleared all of the state permitting requirements, according to the Center for Biological Diversity.
"In its latest brazen abuse of power, the Trump administration is attempting to seize exclusive federal control over two of California’s onshore pipelines," Bonta said on social media Friday evening. "We will not stand by as this administration continues their unlawful all-out assault on California and our coastlines, and we are reviewing all of our legal options."
California Gov. Gavin Newsom also spoke out against Wright's announcement.
"Trump knew his war with Iran would raise gas prices," he wrote on social media. "Now he wants to illegally resurrect a pipeline shut down by courts and facing criminal charges. And it won't even cut prices. I refuse to let Trump sacrifice Californians, our environment, or our $51 billion coastal economy."
The Center for Biological Diversity noted that this order would mark the first time that the Defense Production Act was used to force an oil company to restart out-of-use Infrastructure and to disregard the state permitting process.
“This is a revolting power grab by an extremist president. Trump is misusing this Cold War-era law just to help a Texas oil company skirt vital state laws that protect our coastline, and Californians will pay the price,” Talia Nimmer, an attorney for the center, said. “Mandating a restart of these defective oil pipelines won’t curb high gas prices, but it will put coastal wildlife at huge risk of another oil spill. Overriding state law to let an oil company restart pipelines sets a radically dangerous precedent. It’s clear that no state is safe from Trump.”
The center also promised to push back against the order.
“Directing a private oil company to push its project through without safety checks and adherence to California laws that keep our coast safe is appalling and illegal,” Nimmer said. “We’re exploring all legal avenues. This dangerous action should be swiftly blocked by the courts.”
"He's a white supremacist," said one critic. "He doesn't hide it."
US President Donald Trump was accused Friday of espousing white supremacist ideology after he blamed the "genetics" of Muslim immigrants who commit crimes like Thursday's assault on a Michigan synagogue, while calling for their exclusion from the United States.
"Well, it's been going on for a long time. It's a disgrace. They're sick, they're really demented people," Trump said during a call-in interview with Fox News Radio host Brian Kilmeade. "They come into the country, they sneak in."
Trump was responding to a question about recent attacks by people who happen to be Muslims, including Mohamed Bailor Jalloh, who was stabbed to death by a cadet at Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia after fatally shooting instructor Lt. Col. Brandon Shah, and Ayman Mohamad Ghazali, who was shot dead by security guards at the Temple Israel synagogue in West Bloomfield Township, Michigan after crashing his vehicle into the building.
Neither Jalloh nor Ghazali "snuck" into the country. Both were naturalized US citizens. Jalloh, originally from Sierra Leone, was a former National Guardsman. Ghazali had recently lost two of his brothers and other relatives to an Israeli airstrike in his native Lebanon.
"They’re sick people, and a lot of them were let in here. They shouldn’t have been let in," Trump told Kilmeade. "Others are just bad. They go bad. Something wrong—there’s something wrong there. The genetics are not exactly, they’re not exactly your genetics."
Trump has made many racist statements and has occasionally invoked what critics say is the language of eugenics, a debunked pseudoscience embraced by many white supremacists. He has also boasted about his own "much better blood."
While running for reelection, Trump echoed Nazi dictator Adolf Hitler's screed against "poisoning" by an "influx of foreign blood," declaring during a December 2023 campaign rally in New Hampshire that undocumented immigrants are "poisoning the blood" of the country.
"Trump is an old-school eugenicist nativist. He actually is fine with immigrants as long as they have the right 'genes,'" said David J. Bier, director of immigration studies at the libertarian Cato Institute, in response to Friday's interview. "This argument was the basis of the creation of the restrictive US immigration system 100 years ago."
Trump has previously said that he wants more immigrants from countries like Norway and not from what he called "shithole" nations in the Global South. His second administration has effectively ended refugee admissions—with the notable exception of white South Africans, the only people in the world allowed into the United States as refugees since last October, according to US Department of State data.
Progressive journalist Alex Cole said on X: "Imagine being the grandson of immigrants—who dyes his hair, paints his face orange, and wears lifts—lecturing the country about 'genetics.' The irony writes itself."
Trump's political rise began with his promotion of the racist "birther" conspiracy theory falsely positing that then-President Barack Obama was not born in the United States. He launched his 2016 presidential campaign by calling Mexican immigrants "rapists."
Once in office, Trump enacted a series of restrictions and outright bans on immigration from nations with Muslim majorities.
"He's a white supremacist," journalist Mehdi Hasan wrote Friday on X. "He doesn't hide it."