December, 19 2008, 12:13pm EDT
An Open Letter to the New Education Secretary
WASHINGTON
Worldwatch is pleased to publish this open letter from prominent
education and environment leaders urging the newly nominated U.S.
education secretary, Arne Duncan, to consider the importance of
education in carrying out President-elect Barack Obama's environmental
agenda.
Dear Mr. Duncan:
Congratulations on your nomination. As you jump into the daunting
challenge of bolstering our sagging education system, you have a
powerful opportunity presented by the need to create a carbon-free
economy.
President-elect Obama has astutely perceived the linkages between
climate change, economic stimulus, energy security, and job training by
declaring that the transition to a green economy is his "top priority."
The missing link in this system is the critical role that education can
play in quickly making the green economy a reality. By working with him
to include a major role for education in his green economy plans,
you'll help advance his agenda - and yours.
Transforming our nation's economic, energy, and environmental systems
to move toward a green economy will require a level of expertise,
innovation, and cooperative effort unseen since the 1940s to meet the
challenges involved.
Creating millions of new green jobs through targeted investment and
spending is one thing; filling those jobs with qualified candidates is
quite another thing. This transition will require a massive job training (and retraining) effort on the part of business, government, and education if it is to scale up quickly.
But green manufacturing workforce development programs are just one piece of what is needed; the green economy will not be driven by manufacturing workers alone.
Architects, engineers, planners, scientists, business managers,
financial experts, lawyers, entrepreneurs, political leaders, resource
managers, and many others, as well as workers - not to mention
environmentally literate consumers - will all be needed to drive the
green economy.
American workers, managers, and professionals at all levels and
in all sectors must understand the foundations of a green economy as
represented in leading environmental and sustainability education
programs. These foundations call for redesigning the human
economy to emulate nature: operating on renewable energy, creating a
circular production economy in which the concept of '"waste" is
eliminated because all waste products are raw materials or nutrients
for the industrial economy, and managing human activities in a way that
uses natural resources only at the rate that they can self-regenerate
(the ideas embodied in sustainable forestry, fishing, and agriculture).
To produce such a literate workforce and citizenry, America will need to make major new investments in our educational systems to implement the green economy and keep new green jobs from migrating out of America.
It has been well proven that an investment in education and
innovation - in human capital - is without a doubt the best investment
that can be made in long-term, across-the-board economic growth.1Public
investments in education for a green economy will more than pay for
themselves, just as the post-Sputnik education programs did in the
1950s and '60s and the G.I. Bill did in the 1940s.2
In addition, "Education for a Green Economy" is a politically unifying strategy:
-
A serious commitment to global competitiveness and
innovation appeals to a wide range of stakeholders: Americans concerned
with security and energy independence, economic development, climate
change, and the environment; blue-collar workers and citizens calling
for increasing investment in new "green jobs"; parents, students, and
teachers; clean technology and green venture capital firms; and the
academic community.
-
Recent legislation authorizing investments to support
sustainability programs in higher education, improve education in STEM
fields (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics), and build
healthy, high performance "green schools" (both K-12 and higher
education) have passed with broad bipartisan support, but have yet to
be significantly funded.
We, the undersigned, therefore respectfully urge you to support the
following proposed Presidential agenda as it pertains to your
department:
An Action Agenda for a Healthy, Just, and Sustainable Economy
* The President should announce a sweeping initiative to support education as a cornerstone of our new clean energy future.
This initiative should be part of an economic stimulus package with a
focus on green jobs and green education to help Americans of all ages,
all backgrounds, and all walks of life transition to the green economy.
* The President should launch a series of White House Conferences on Creating Healthier, Greener Communities and Economies.
Conference themes, co-sponsored with key federal agencies, would focus
on building a more equitable and green economy, promote social equity,
and support service learning to engage youth in greening local
communities.
* Support a national goal of 100% of renovation and new school construction to meet "Green Schools" Standards by 2012.
Declare a Department of Education policy to support a national goal
that 100 percent of newly constructed or rehabilitated schools (both
K-12 and higher education) to become "Green Schools" to lower energy
costs and greenhouse gas emissions, and provide opportunities for
formal and non-formal environmental education.
* Support legislation to direct 1% of climate change cap-and-trade revenues to education for a green economy.
This comprehensive education bill would advance education for a green
economy through major adjustments to K-12 education, school-to-work
programs, higher education, professional re-education, and consumer and
public education, in order to equip our American workforce and
citizenry with the needed skills and knowledge to maximize
environmental and economic gains in the transition to a green economy.
Related legislation to significantly expand and improve environmental
education in our public K-12 schools (the No Child Left Behind Act)
should also be supported.
* Establish a strong record of funding existing education programs
through the President's budget requests for the University
Sustainability Program, environmental education programs at the
Environmental Protection Agency, National Science Foundation and
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the new Energy
Efficiency Grants and Loans program at the Department of Energy.
* Make new Administration appointments:
a. Senior Policy Advisor to the Secretary of Education, Education for a Green Economy
b. Senior Policy Advisor to the NOAA Administrator, Climate Change Education
c. Environmental Education Advisor, Council of Environmental Quality
d. Senior Policy Advisor to the Director of the US Peace Corps, Sustainability and Environmental Education
* Direct all federal resources agencies to
develop and conduct "education for a green economy" and climate change
literacy training for all personnel to familiarize them with challenges, needs, and appropriate responses for each agency.
One of the most hopeful signs for the future is the rapidly developing
consensus that investment in a clean/green economy is the best way to
improve national security, create millions of jobs, restore U.S.
economic leadership, and stop large-scale climate disruption that could
undercut modern civilization. It is time to reorient the education
system to make this a reality-humanity is depending on us.
With our best wishes for your success,
David E. Blockstein, Ph.D., Senior Scientist, National Council for Science and the Environment
Judy Braus, Senior Vice President of Education, National Audubon Society
Antony D. Cortese, Sc.D., President, Second Nature
Kevin J. Coyle, Vice President for Education, National Wildlife Federation
Brian A. Day, Executive Director, North American Association for Environmental Education
James L Elder, Ph.D., Director, Campaign for Environmental Literacy
Christopher Flavin, President, Worldwatch Institute
Judy Walton, Ph.D., Acting Executive Director, Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education
The Worldwatch Institute was a globally focused environmental research organization based in Washington, D.C., founded by Lester R. Brown. Worldwatch was named as one of the top ten sustainable development research organizations by Globescan Survey of Sustainability Experts. Brown left to found the Earth Policy Institute in 2000. The Institute was wound up in 2017, after publication of its last State of the World Report. Worldwatch.org was unreachable from mid-2019.
LATEST NEWS
Roughly 900 US Troops Still in Syria as Rebels Close in on Damascus
"Whether the Pentagon wants to admit it or not," U.S. troops "are likely involved in the broader conflict unfolding there right now," warned one analyst.
Dec 07, 2024
Syrian rebel groups' rapid advance on the nation's capital city of Damascus and the possible collapse of President Bashar al-Assad's government after more than a decade of civil war has brought renewed attention to the continued presence of U.S. forces in the country, despite the absence of a clear legal authorization.
The U.S. is believed to have around 900 troops deployed to Syria, mostly in the northeast, as well as an unknown number of private contractors. Nick Turse, a contributing writer for The Intercept, observed Thursday that American forces in Syria "have, on average, come under fire multiple times each week since last October," according to internal Pentagon statistics.
"Keeping military personnel in harm's way for the sake of foreign policy credibility has become increasingly risky with the Gaza war and the flare-up of the Syrian civil war," Turse wrote.
Kelley Vlahos, senior adviser to the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, wrote Saturday morning that "whether the Pentagon wants to admit it or not," U.S. troops "are likely involved in the broader conflict unfolding there right now."
Reutersreported Tuesday that as rebels advanced toward the city of Hama, "fighters from a U.S.-backed, Kurdish-led coalition battled government forces in the northeast, both sides said, opening a new front along a vital supply route" and "compounding Assad's problems."
As the coalition of groups led by the Islamist organization Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) and factions of the Turkey-backed Syrian National Army has quickly seized control of large swaths of territory, the White House National Security Council (NSC) said in a statement last weekend that the U.S.—which has previously armed and trained Syrian rebels—"has nothing to do with this offensive."
"The United States, together with its partners and allies, urge de-escalation, protection of civilians and minority groups, and a serious and credible political process that can end this civil war once and for all with a political settlement consistent with UNSCR 2254," said NSC spokesperson Sean Savett. "We will also continue to fully defend and protect U.S. personnel and U.S. military positions, which remain essential to ensuring that ISIS can never again resurge in Syria."
On Friday, the White House said in a letter to Congress that "a small presence of United States Armed Forces remains in strategically significant locations in Syria to conduct operations, in partnership with local, vetted ground forces, to address continuing terrorist threats emanating from Syria."
President-elect Donald Trump, who during his first term opted to keep U.S. troops in Syria for the openly stated purpose of exploiting the country's oil fields, wrote in a social media post on Saturday that "the United States should have nothing to do with" the current conflict.
"This is not our fight," he wrote in all caps. "Let it play out. Do not get involved!"
Trump's post, as The Associated Pressreported, came as rebels' "stunning march across Syria gained speed... with news that they had reached the suburbs of the capital and with the government forced to deny rumors that President Bashar al-Assad had fled the country."
Hassan Abdul-Ghani, an insurgent commander, said in a Telegram post that rebels are entering the "final stage" of their offensive as they began to encircle Syria's capital. Citing unnamed local sources, Al Jazeerareported that "a state of panic has spread as army troops withdraw from their positions around Damascus."
"They also confirmed that opposition forces had advanced in the western Damascus countryside and the withdrawal of army forces from cities and towns in Eastern Ghouta," the outlet added. "There was a rush for food items in markets in the capital."
Government forces have been backed by Russian airstrikes, Hezbollah, and Iraqi militia fighters.
Reutersreported that "Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said in an Arabic-language interview that Tehran would consider sending troops to Syria if Damascus asked, and Russian President Vladimir Putin urged an end to 'terrorist aggression' in Syria."
In a video statement on Saturday, a Syrian military commander said that "our valiant army continues to carry out its operations against terrorist gatherings at high rates in the directions of the Hama and Homs countrysides and the northern Daraa countryside, inflicting hundreds of deaths and injuries on the terrorists."
Anti-war lawmakers in the U.S. have repeatedly questioned the role of American troops in Syria in recent years and launched efforts to force their withdrawal.
In March 2023, a bipartisan group of lawmakers in the U.S. House put forth a resolution that would have required full withdrawal of American forces from Syria within 180 days of passage in the absence of congressional action authorizing their continued presence.
The resolution was voted down by 170 Republicans and 150 Democrats.
Months later, the U.S. Senate tanked a similar effort.
Erik Sperling, executive director of the advocacy group Just Foreign Policy, told The Intercept on Thursday that the Biden administration hasn't "put the war in Syria up for debate because they know the American people don't want another war in the Middle East."
"They know there is no popular support for putting U.S. troops at risk for this," said Sperling, who warned that "many of Trump's advisers will try to drag him deeper into this regional conflict in the Middle East."
The explosion of Syria's civil war in recent days has been disastrous for civilians in the crossfire.
Human Rights Watch (HRW) said Wednesday that "the outbreak of major hostilities... raises concerns that civilians face a real risk of serious abuses at the hands of opposition armed groups and the Syrian government."
"The bloody record of atrocities by all parties to the conflict in Syria is bound to persist until leaders go beyond words and support accountability efforts," said Adam Coogle, HRW's deputy Middle East director. "Without credible justice, there will be no end in sight to the suffering Syrians have endured, no matter who controls the land."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Fury as South Korea's Conservative Party Thwarts Impeachment Vote
"Today, citizens witnessed democracy taking a step backward," said the Korean Confederation of Trade Unions.
Dec 07, 2024
A bid to impeach South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol over his short-lived imposition of martial law failed Saturday after lawmakers from his conservative party left the National Assembly chamber and refused to take part in the vote.
Supporters of impeachment needed at least eight members of Yoon's People Power Party (PPP) to support removing the president, who apologized to the nation in a one-minute-long address Saturday morning but refused to step down after he briefly instituted martial law in a stated attempt to "eradicate shameful pro-North Korea" forces, plunging the country into a political crisis.
Yoon's gambit sparked immediate and sustained protests and was widely seen as a coup attempt.
Saturday's impeachment effort drew a massive number of people into the streets outside the National Assembly building despite below-freezing temperatures, and demonstrators voiced outrage when they learned that Yoon's allies thwarted the initial attempt to oust him. Just two PPP members returned to the National Assembly chamber to cast a ballot Saturday.
"I am so angry. I can't find the words to describe my frustration," 23-year-old Kim Hyo-lim toldThe New York Times. "I am devastated, but I feel honored to be a part of this historic moment for my country."
Another demonstrator said they intend to protest "every weekend" until Yoon is removed.
(Photo: Daniel Ceng/Anadolu via Getty Images)
Organizers said roughly a million people took part in demonstrations Saturday in support of Yoon's impeachment. Many also demanded his arrest.
The Financial Timesreported following the failed impeachment effort that Yoon—whose term expires in 2027—and PPP leaders "appeared to have reached a deal whereby the president would hand over political direction of the country to his party and agree to stand down at a time of the party's choosing, in return for support in the impeachment vote."
The Korean Confederation of Trade Unions (KCTU), which has over 1.1 million members, called PPP lawmakers who boycotted Saturday's vote "accomplices in treason."
"The People Power Party has turned its back on the people's wishes, effectively admitting their complicity," KCTU said in a statement posted to social media. "More than one million citizens gathered in front of the National Assembly. They came together because they cannot forgive a president who declared martial law and aimed weapons at his own people. Despite the cold winter weather, they took to the streets hoping desperately for the impeachment to pass."
"Today, citizens witnessed democracy taking a step backward," KCTU added. "They saw clearly who stands with those who would harm our democracy. The People Power Party must be dissolved. Those who protect Yoon must face consequences. It would be a grave mistake to think this can be resolved through compromise or constitutional amendments for an early resignation. Through the people's judgment, Yoon, his associates, and the People Power Party will face severe consequences."
Opposition lawmakers are expected to file a fresh impeachment motion next week as pressure mounts for Yoon to step down.
Additionally, as The Washington Postreported, "the national police have opened an investigation into Yoon on treason accusations by opposition parties and activists."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Top Democrat Issues Warning Over Trump Plot to 'Steal' From Federal Programs
"The Constitution provides no impoundment power to the president to unilaterally withhold funds appropriated by Congress," said Rep. Rosa DeLauro.
Dec 07, 2024
The top Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee warned Friday that President-elect Donald Trump is planning to "steal from the programs and services that affect middle-class, working, and vulnerable families" by refusing to spend money appropriated by Congress.
Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) said in a statement that Trump's strategy, known as "impoundment," is "uninformed and unconstitutional," adding that "the Supreme Court, the Department of Justice, and the Government Accountability Office are all in agreement—the Constitution provides no impoundment power to the president to unilaterally withhold funds appropriated by Congress."
"It is the sworn duty of the president of the United States to faithfully execute the law," DeLauro added, "and appropriations laws are no exception."
In a new fact sheet, Democrats on the House Appropriations Committee note that "the Constitution gives Congress the power of the purse, and nowhere does it give the president any unilateral power to either temporarily or permanently impound—steal, withhold, or prevent from being spent—funds appropriated by Congress."
"The Framers were right to give Congress the power of the purse," the fact sheet states. "If the president had the unilateral power to decline to spend resources as directed by Congress, then those who rely on Social Security, Medicare, Veterans Medical Care, and other federal spending programs would be subject to the whims of the executive branch. The American people would be unable to depend on promises made by Congress in appropriations laws."
Trump has explicitly vowed to use impoundment to "squeeze the bloated federal bureaucracy for massive savings," a plan endorsed by the billionaire pair tapped by the president-elect to run a new commission tasked with identifying spending and regulations to slash.
"With impoundment, we can simply choke off the money," Trump declared in a campaign ad.
"They have no authority. Does anybody get that?"
Following Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy's visit to Capitol Hill on Thursday to discuss their plans for the "Department of Government Efficiency" (DOGE) with GOP lawmakers, The Washington Postreported that Republicans are "keen on expanding the president's power to impound spending—or refuse to spend money Congress authorizes."
"Musk and Ramaswamy said they were eager to test the constitutional limits of Trump's ability to unilaterally control spending decisions," the Post reported, citing two unnamed lawmakers. "Republicans largely left the more than two-hour meeting giddy."
Analysts argue Trump's plan to withhold federal spending would run afoul of the 1974 Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act (ICA). The law, as Propublica's Molly Redden explained, "forbids presidents from blocking spending over policy disagreements."
"A similar power grab led to his first impeachment," Redden wrote. "During his first term, Trump held up nearly $400 million in military aid to Ukraine while he pressured President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to open a corruption investigation into Joe Biden and his family. The U.S. Government Accountability Office later ruled his actions violated the Impoundment Control Act."
Democrats on the House Budget Committee recently pointed out that "although decided after the ICA passed, the Supreme Court unanimously held in Train v. City of New York that even without the ICA, the president does not have unilateral authority to impound funds."
That hasn't stopped Trump, Musk, and Ramaswamy from exploring ways to cut or block spending without congressional approval.
In a Wall Street Journalop-ed published last month, Musk and Ramaswamy wrote that "even without relying on" the view that the ICA is unconstitutional, "DOGE will help end federal overspending by taking aim at the $500 billion-plus in annual federal expenditures that are unauthorized by Congress or being used in ways that Congress never intended, from $535 million a year to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and $1.5 billion for grants to international organizations to nearly $300 million to progressive groups like Planned Parenthood."
Housing assistance, childcare aid, student loan programs, and other spending would also be vulnerable under such an approach.
"They want [to cut] $2 trillion," DeLauro told reporters Thursday. "Think about the discretionary budget. It's $1.7 trillion. Where are they going for the money? Where are they going?"
"They have no authority," she added. "Does anybody get that?"
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular