

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Alice Slater, 646-238-9000
Jean Stevens, CODEPINK national media coordinator, 508-769-2138
"Star Wars" may soon be more than a blockbuster movie franchise.
For the past three years, the United States has been the only United Nations member to refuse to negotiate a ban against weapons in space (Israel has abstained). Two years ago, President Bush signed a new National Space Policy that rejects future arms-control agreements that might limit U.S. flexibility in space; it also asserts a right to deny access to space to anyone "hostile to U.S. interests," according to the Washington Post (Oct. 18, 2006). The document, the first full revision of overall space policy in 10 years, emphasizes security issues, encourages private enterprise in space, and characterizes the role of U.S. space diplomacy largely in terms of persuading other nations to support U.S.policy.
WHAT: New Yorkers say "NO" to space weapons
WHEN: 12 p.m. Monday, Oct. 6
WHERE: Outside L-3 Communications headquarters, at 600 3rd Ave. (at E. 39th St.)
To protest weapons in space, New Yorkers will rally at 12 p.m. Oct. 6 outside the New York City headquarters of military space weapons contractor, L-3 Communications, which produces specialized electronic systems for satellites, air, ground and marine-based weapons, and earns 80 percent of its business from the U.S. government. They will call for a stop to this "Star Wars" research and development, demand the U.S. join a ban against space weapons, and demand a redirection of government funds toward education, health care and infrastructure.
"We're in an arms race with ourself," said Alice Slater of CODEPINK Women for Peace NYC, a main organizing group. "It's driven by corporate lobbyists, huge campaign contributions and a corrupt Congress, spending billions of our national treasure on a needless weaponization of the heavens."
The protest, co-organized by No War Westchester, Westchester Coalition for Peace and Justice and others, is one of hundreds being held worldwide, part of the "Keep Space for Peace" week organized by the nonprofit group Global Network Against Weapons and Nuclear Power in Space. It is meant to alert the public to the space arms race.
The demonstrators will call on L-3 Communications to cut its ties to the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. The company, the largest weapons maker in New York State, also creates laptops used by U.S. troops for air strikes in Iraq and Afghanistan, and is developing multi-sensor fusion and tracking systems for cruise and ballistic missiles for the Missile Defense Agency and the Department of Defense. owns MPRI, a global military security company with at least 500 employees working in Iraq on 12 different contracts, including training civilian workers at the Iraqi Defense Ministry.
For more information, call Jean Stevens, CODEPINK national media coordinator, at 508-769-2138 or e-mail at jean@codepinkalert.org.
CODEPINK is a women-led grassroots organization working to end U.S. wars and militarism, support peace and human rights initiatives, and redirect our tax dollars into healthcare, education, green jobs and other life-affirming programs.
(818) 275-7232The FTC quietly removed from its website an article titled "AI and the Risk of Consumer Harm" as the Trump administration looks to undercut efforts to regulate artificial intelligence.
The Trump administration's sweeping purge of government content that conflicts with its far-right ideological and policy project has extended to Federal Trade Commission blog posts warning about the threat that burgeoning artificial intelligence technology poses to US consumers.
Wired reported Monday that the Trump administration has, without explanation, deleted AI-related articles published by the FTC during antitrust trailblazer Lina Khan's tenure as chair of the agency. The headlines of two of the removed posts were "Consumers Are Voicing Concerns About AI" and "AI and the Risk of Consumer Harm."
The latter article, which can still be read here, states that the FTC "is increasingly taking note of AI's potential for real-world instances of harm—from incentivizing commercial surveillance to enabling fraud and impersonation to perpetuating illegal discrimination."
"As firms think about their own approach to developing, deploying, and maintaining AI-based systems, they should be considering the risks to consumers that each of them carry in the here and now, and take steps to proactively protect the public before their tools become a future FTC case study," reads the post, which was authored by staff at the FTC's Office of Technology and Division of Advertising Practices.
The page on the FTC website that previously hosted the article now displays an error message.
Wired noted that the Trump FTC's deletion of the Khan-era blog post is part of a broader scrubbing of government content critical of tech giants and artificial intelligence. In March, the outlet reported that Trump's FTC—currently led by Andrew Ferguson—"removed four years' worth of business guidance blogs as of Tuesday morning, including important consumer protection information related to artificial intelligence and the agency's landmark privacy lawsuits under former chair Lina Khan against companies like Amazon and Microsoft."
The mass removal of Khan-era posts marks a sharp—and potentially illegal—break from the previous administration's handling of government-hosted content that conflicted with its views.
"During the Biden administration, FTC leadership placed 'warning' labels on business directives and other guidance published during previous administrations that it disagreed with," Wired reported. One unnamed FTC source told the outlet that the Trump administration's removal of the Khan-era posts "raises serious compliance concerns under the Federal Records Act and the Open Government Data Act."
The Trump administration's deletion of government content critical of AI comes months after it released an "AI Action Plan" that watchdogs pilloried as a gift to large tech corporations and an attempt to hamstring future efforts to regulate artificial intelligence.
The plan calls for a review of all AI-related FTC investigations launched during Khan's tenure "to ensure that they do not advance theories of liability that unduly burden AI innovation."
Robert Weissman, co-president of the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, said in July that the Trump White House's AI plan was "written by Big Tech."
"A serious AI plan would recognize that the regulation to which this administration is so hostile facilitates innovation—it can help us ensure that we have AI for social good, rather than just corporate profit," said Weissman.
"This is not a 'satire,' it's debasement," argued one critic.
US House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) on Monday drew swift criticism after he excused President Donald Trump's decision to post an artificial intelligence-generated video featuring him dropping sewage on "No Kings" protesters.
During a Monday press conference, Johnson was asked by a reporter what he made of Trump posting a video that depicted him "pooping on the American people."
Johnson responded by praising Trump for his purported social media savvy.
"The president uses social media to make a point," he said. "You can argue he's probably the most effective person who's ever used social media for that. He is using satire to make a point."
Reporter: Speaker Johnson, you say that Democrats had a hate America rally, but what does it say that the president of released video of him pooping on the American people?
Johnson: The president uses social media to make a point. You can argue he's probably the most effective… pic.twitter.com/3BuyfEGIiZ
— Acyn (@Acyn) October 20, 2025
Many critics, however, didn't see anything satirical about the Trump video and questioned what point it was trying to make other than a desire to defecate on his political opponents.
"His point was that he’s an unaccountable, imperious would-be monarch who would like to dump poop on American cities," wrote Leah Greenberg, co-executive director of Indivisible, one of the main organizers of the "No Kings" demonstrations.
Investment banker Evaristus Odinikaeze disputed that there was anything satirical about Trump's post.
"This is not a 'satire,' it's debasement," he argued. "When the speaker of the House defends a video of the president literally defecating on Americans as 'making a point,' it tells you everything about the moral rot in this cult movement. Leaders with integrity elevate discourse, they don’t normalize humiliation as humor."
Democratic strategist Mike Nellis also questioned whether Johnson had a firm grasp of the meaning of satire.
"So Mike Johnson defended Trump’s weird AI videos this morning as 'satire' meant to 'make a point,'" he wrote on Bluesky. "Can someone ask Johnson what point Trump was making when he posted a video of himself dumping shit all over America? Or when he dropped napalm on Chicago? I’d like an answer."
Just before he deployed hundreds of armed and masked federal immigration agents in Chicago last month, the president posted another AI-generated image that showed the city under attack with a reference to the famous line, "I love the smell of napalm in the morning" from the film Apocalypse Now.
Rep. Sean Casten (D-Ill.) marveled that Johnson appears willing to defend anything the president does, no matter how juvenile.
"Mike Johnson is too much of a coward to condemn pooping on people," he wrote.
A majority of voters agree "Democrats in Congress should only vote for a government funding bill that reverses Republican healthcare cuts, even if that means the government shutdown continues."
Twenty days into the federal government shutdown, polling released Monday by Data for Progress and Groundwork Collaborative shows that US voters are concerned about rising healthcare premiums and want Democrats in Congress to keep fighting for a fix.
The GOP has majorities in both chambers of Congress, but some Democratic support is required to get most bills through the Senate. The government shut down at the beginning of the month after Republicans tried to continue with their spending plans, but Democrats pushed for undoing some of the healthcare cuts in President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA).
The OBBBA is expected to cause at least 10 million Americans to lose Medicaid coverage, and over 20 million more to soon face soaring health insurance premiums because Republicans refused to extend expiring Affordable Care Act (ACA) tax credits. Data for Progress, which polled 1,264 likely voters nationally from October 14-15, found that 72% of respondents were somewhat or very concerned about premiums rising.
A majority—52%—agreed that "Republicans' healthcare cuts will kick millions off their plans and double healthcare premiums on average for millions more. Democrats in Congress should only vote for a government funding bill that reverses Republican healthcare cuts, even if that means the government shutdown continues."
The think tank also found that 43% of respondents blame Trump and congressional Republicans "the most" for the shutdown, while 33% mostly blame Democrats, 21% blame both parties equally, and 2% were not sure.
While voters were split (48% each) on whether congressional Democrats "are fighting on behalf of people like me," a majority (54%) said they do not believe that "President Trump and Republicans in Congress are fighting on behalf of people like me."
The polling comes as Politico reports that "the confidence and cohesion from Republicans on both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue—and a similar confidence among Democrats—augurs no quick end to what is approaching one of the longest shutdowns in history."
Appearing on The Checkup podcast with Dr. Mikhail "Mike" Varshavski on Sunday, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) highlighted that with the OBBBA, the GOP "slashed Medicaid by a trillion dollars. What does that mean? First, it means rural hospitals all across the country, mainly in Republican states and districts, are gonna close. Some have closed already because so many of these hospitals depend on Medicaid. For many counties, like including in some of my counties in upstate New York, they're the only hospital. And they're the largest employer."
"Second, this applies to lots of your audience who I know tend to be young folks," he said. "The parents who were in nursing homes are gonna get kicked out. I was at Silver Lake nursing home on Staten Island where I know your dad lives. The owner told me if these cuts go through, all 300 patients, many of whom are Staten Islanders, are gonna have to leave because I have to close."
"Even more devastating is how the premiums will rise. In other words, we wanna just renew the tax credits that have existed for a while on your ACA," Schumer continued. "If they are not renewed, we asked the Republicans three times, we put votes on the floor, and three times they voted no, unfortunately. Here's what will happen. The average American who's on ACA will pay $500-1,000 more a month, not a year, a month. That's, you know, $6,000-10,000 a year."
The top Democrat stressed that "we hate the shutdown. That's why we want the Republicans to simply sit down and meet with us."
"Essential services, the military, law enforcement, air traffic control, they continue to work without pay. Some other people are furloughed, and they come back when the shutdown is over," Schumer noted. Trump is also pursuing a policy "no president has tried during the shutdown," he added, pointing to the administration's attempt to illegally fire some federal workers.
Data for Progress and Groundwork Collaborative found that 58% of people polled disagreed with Trump's shutdown firings.