SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) looks on as Dr. Nisha Virma of Physicians for Reproductive Health speaks about reproductive rights during a news conference outside the U.S. Capitol on August 2, 2022 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
'How Close to Death is Close Enough?': Fury Over Latest Texas Abortion Ruling
"Extremist anti-abortion politicians in Texas," warns Planned Parenthood, "are trying to prevent pregnant people experiencing medical emergencies from receiving life-saving care."
Aug 24, 2022
Reproductive rights advocates on Wednesday warned that pregnant people across Texas are now at risk of facing life-threatening health crises without access to emergency abortion care, following a ruling by a federal judge who rejected guidance from the Biden administration.
"Politicians may think they know better than doctors, but doctors should not have to try to figure out how to be lawyers in order to save lives."
U.S. District Judge James Hendrix's ruling Tuesday night rejected guidance issued by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) that--regardless of the state's abortion ban--would require Texas doctors to perform abortions in the case of a medical emergency.
Following the overturning of Roe v. Wade by the Supreme Court's right-wing majority in June, HHS issued guidance saying the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) requires medical professionals to provide abortion care to a pregnant patient experiencing a medical emergency.
The 1986 law requires anyone who comes to a hospital's emergency department to be "stabilized and treated," and the Biden administration argued that abortion care qualifies as stabilizing treatment for a pregnant person in a medical crisis.
Hendrix, who was appointed by former Republican President Donald Trump, sided with Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and two doctors' associations in Texas which support forced pregnancy.
The ruling was handed down a month after the story of Houston resident Elizabeth Weller became public. Weller experienced a premature rupture of membranes at 18 weeks of pregnancy, causing her own health and that of her fetus to decline. Weller was told that under Texas's abortion ban, she would have to wait until the fetal heartbeat stopped before having a medical abortion, even as her condition worsened. An ethics committee at her local hospital eventually determined she could receive care--after an ordeal she described to NPR as a "dystopian nightmare."
Planned Parenthood Action Fund president Alexis McGill Johnson warned women across Texas could face similar experiences as the state is permitted to reject the HHS guidance.
"How close to death is close enough?" Johnson asked. "Extremist anti-abortion politicians in Texas are trying to prevent pregnant people experiencing medical emergencies from receiving life-saving care, despite the fact that federal law requires most hospitals to provide that treatment. Politicians may think they know better than doctors, but doctors should not have to try to figure out how to be lawyers in order to save lives."
Hendrix did not enjoin the guidance nationwide, and Planned Parenthood noted that "EMTALA remains federal law and requires most hospitals to provide emergency medical care, including care related to pregnancy."
A ruling in a similar case in Idaho, in which the Biden administration argued EMTALA preempts the state's six-week abortion ban, is expected this week.
Paxton applauded Hendrix's ruling, leading Texas-based journalist Mary Tuma to point out the attorney general "oversees a state that holds a higher-than-average maternal mortality rate" and was now celebrating reduced access to "life-saving abortion care."
The White House responded to the ruling by promising, "The fight is not over."
"The president will continue to push to require hospitals to provide life-saving and health-preserving reproductive care," White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Reproductive rights advocates on Wednesday warned that pregnant people across Texas are now at risk of facing life-threatening health crises without access to emergency abortion care, following a ruling by a federal judge who rejected guidance from the Biden administration.
"Politicians may think they know better than doctors, but doctors should not have to try to figure out how to be lawyers in order to save lives."
U.S. District Judge James Hendrix's ruling Tuesday night rejected guidance issued by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) that--regardless of the state's abortion ban--would require Texas doctors to perform abortions in the case of a medical emergency.
Following the overturning of Roe v. Wade by the Supreme Court's right-wing majority in June, HHS issued guidance saying the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) requires medical professionals to provide abortion care to a pregnant patient experiencing a medical emergency.
The 1986 law requires anyone who comes to a hospital's emergency department to be "stabilized and treated," and the Biden administration argued that abortion care qualifies as stabilizing treatment for a pregnant person in a medical crisis.
Hendrix, who was appointed by former Republican President Donald Trump, sided with Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and two doctors' associations in Texas which support forced pregnancy.
The ruling was handed down a month after the story of Houston resident Elizabeth Weller became public. Weller experienced a premature rupture of membranes at 18 weeks of pregnancy, causing her own health and that of her fetus to decline. Weller was told that under Texas's abortion ban, she would have to wait until the fetal heartbeat stopped before having a medical abortion, even as her condition worsened. An ethics committee at her local hospital eventually determined she could receive care--after an ordeal she described to NPR as a "dystopian nightmare."
Planned Parenthood Action Fund president Alexis McGill Johnson warned women across Texas could face similar experiences as the state is permitted to reject the HHS guidance.
"How close to death is close enough?" Johnson asked. "Extremist anti-abortion politicians in Texas are trying to prevent pregnant people experiencing medical emergencies from receiving life-saving care, despite the fact that federal law requires most hospitals to provide that treatment. Politicians may think they know better than doctors, but doctors should not have to try to figure out how to be lawyers in order to save lives."
Hendrix did not enjoin the guidance nationwide, and Planned Parenthood noted that "EMTALA remains federal law and requires most hospitals to provide emergency medical care, including care related to pregnancy."
A ruling in a similar case in Idaho, in which the Biden administration argued EMTALA preempts the state's six-week abortion ban, is expected this week.
Paxton applauded Hendrix's ruling, leading Texas-based journalist Mary Tuma to point out the attorney general "oversees a state that holds a higher-than-average maternal mortality rate" and was now celebrating reduced access to "life-saving abortion care."
The White House responded to the ruling by promising, "The fight is not over."
"The president will continue to push to require hospitals to provide life-saving and health-preserving reproductive care," White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said.
Reproductive rights advocates on Wednesday warned that pregnant people across Texas are now at risk of facing life-threatening health crises without access to emergency abortion care, following a ruling by a federal judge who rejected guidance from the Biden administration.
"Politicians may think they know better than doctors, but doctors should not have to try to figure out how to be lawyers in order to save lives."
U.S. District Judge James Hendrix's ruling Tuesday night rejected guidance issued by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) that--regardless of the state's abortion ban--would require Texas doctors to perform abortions in the case of a medical emergency.
Following the overturning of Roe v. Wade by the Supreme Court's right-wing majority in June, HHS issued guidance saying the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) requires medical professionals to provide abortion care to a pregnant patient experiencing a medical emergency.
The 1986 law requires anyone who comes to a hospital's emergency department to be "stabilized and treated," and the Biden administration argued that abortion care qualifies as stabilizing treatment for a pregnant person in a medical crisis.
Hendrix, who was appointed by former Republican President Donald Trump, sided with Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and two doctors' associations in Texas which support forced pregnancy.
The ruling was handed down a month after the story of Houston resident Elizabeth Weller became public. Weller experienced a premature rupture of membranes at 18 weeks of pregnancy, causing her own health and that of her fetus to decline. Weller was told that under Texas's abortion ban, she would have to wait until the fetal heartbeat stopped before having a medical abortion, even as her condition worsened. An ethics committee at her local hospital eventually determined she could receive care--after an ordeal she described to NPR as a "dystopian nightmare."
Planned Parenthood Action Fund president Alexis McGill Johnson warned women across Texas could face similar experiences as the state is permitted to reject the HHS guidance.
"How close to death is close enough?" Johnson asked. "Extremist anti-abortion politicians in Texas are trying to prevent pregnant people experiencing medical emergencies from receiving life-saving care, despite the fact that federal law requires most hospitals to provide that treatment. Politicians may think they know better than doctors, but doctors should not have to try to figure out how to be lawyers in order to save lives."
Hendrix did not enjoin the guidance nationwide, and Planned Parenthood noted that "EMTALA remains federal law and requires most hospitals to provide emergency medical care, including care related to pregnancy."
A ruling in a similar case in Idaho, in which the Biden administration argued EMTALA preempts the state's six-week abortion ban, is expected this week.
Paxton applauded Hendrix's ruling, leading Texas-based journalist Mary Tuma to point out the attorney general "oversees a state that holds a higher-than-average maternal mortality rate" and was now celebrating reduced access to "life-saving abortion care."
The White House responded to the ruling by promising, "The fight is not over."
"The president will continue to push to require hospitals to provide life-saving and health-preserving reproductive care," White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.