Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) looks on as Dr. Nisha Virma of Physicians for Reproductive Health speaks about reproductive rights during a news conference outside the U.S. Capitol on August 2, 2022 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
Aug 24, 2022
Reproductive rights advocates on Wednesday warned that pregnant people across Texas are now at risk of facing life-threatening health crises without access to emergency abortion care, following a ruling by a federal judge who rejected guidance from the Biden administration.
"Politicians may think they know better than doctors, but doctors should not have to try to figure out how to be lawyers in order to save lives."
U.S. District Judge James Hendrix's ruling Tuesday night rejected guidance issued by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) that--regardless of the state's abortion ban--would require Texas doctors to perform abortions in the case of a medical emergency.
Following the overturning of Roe v. Wade by the Supreme Court's right-wing majority in June, HHS issued guidance saying the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) requires medical professionals to provide abortion care to a pregnant patient experiencing a medical emergency.
The 1986 law requires anyone who comes to a hospital's emergency department to be "stabilized and treated," and the Biden administration argued that abortion care qualifies as stabilizing treatment for a pregnant person in a medical crisis.
Hendrix, who was appointed by former Republican President Donald Trump, sided with Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and two doctors' associations in Texas which support forced pregnancy.
The ruling was handed down a month after the story of Houston resident Elizabeth Weller became public. Weller experienced a premature rupture of membranes at 18 weeks of pregnancy, causing her own health and that of her fetus to decline. Weller was told that under Texas's abortion ban, she would have to wait until the fetal heartbeat stopped before having a medical abortion, even as her condition worsened. An ethics committee at her local hospital eventually determined she could receive care--after an ordeal she described to NPR as a "dystopian nightmare."
\u201cQuestion for the politicians who think abortion should be banned, even if a pregnant patient is facing a medical emergency: How close to death is close enough?\n\nAt what point can you help someone experiencing a medical emergency?\u201d— Planned Parenthood Action (@Planned Parenthood Action) 1661361026
Planned Parenthood Action Fund president Alexis McGill Johnson warned women across Texas could face similar experiences as the state is permitted to reject the HHS guidance.
"How close to death is close enough?" Johnson asked. "Extremist anti-abortion politicians in Texas are trying to prevent pregnant people experiencing medical emergencies from receiving life-saving care, despite the fact that federal law requires most hospitals to provide that treatment. Politicians may think they know better than doctors, but doctors should not have to try to figure out how to be lawyers in order to save lives."
Hendrix did not enjoin the guidance nationwide, and Planned Parenthood noted that "EMTALA remains federal law and requires most hospitals to provide emergency medical care, including care related to pregnancy."
A ruling in a similar case in Idaho, in which the Biden administration argued EMTALA preempts the state's six-week abortion ban, is expected this week.
Paxton applauded Hendrix's ruling, leading Texas-based journalist Mary Tuma to point out the attorney general "oversees a state that holds a higher-than-average maternal mortality rate" and was now celebrating reduced access to "life-saving abortion care."
\u201cOur Attorney General \u2013 who oversees a state that holds a higher than average maternal mortality rate \u2013\u00a0is celebrating a judge's ruling that blocked Biden's attempt to ensure hospitals/doctors perform *live saving* abortion care for pregnant patients in Texas who may face death.\u201d— Mary Tuma (@Mary Tuma) 1661355381
The White House responded to the ruling by promising, "The fight is not over."
"The president will continue to push to require hospitals to provide life-saving and health-preserving reproductive care," White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Reproductive rights advocates on Wednesday warned that pregnant people across Texas are now at risk of facing life-threatening health crises without access to emergency abortion care, following a ruling by a federal judge who rejected guidance from the Biden administration.
"Politicians may think they know better than doctors, but doctors should not have to try to figure out how to be lawyers in order to save lives."
U.S. District Judge James Hendrix's ruling Tuesday night rejected guidance issued by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) that--regardless of the state's abortion ban--would require Texas doctors to perform abortions in the case of a medical emergency.
Following the overturning of Roe v. Wade by the Supreme Court's right-wing majority in June, HHS issued guidance saying the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) requires medical professionals to provide abortion care to a pregnant patient experiencing a medical emergency.
The 1986 law requires anyone who comes to a hospital's emergency department to be "stabilized and treated," and the Biden administration argued that abortion care qualifies as stabilizing treatment for a pregnant person in a medical crisis.
Hendrix, who was appointed by former Republican President Donald Trump, sided with Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and two doctors' associations in Texas which support forced pregnancy.
The ruling was handed down a month after the story of Houston resident Elizabeth Weller became public. Weller experienced a premature rupture of membranes at 18 weeks of pregnancy, causing her own health and that of her fetus to decline. Weller was told that under Texas's abortion ban, she would have to wait until the fetal heartbeat stopped before having a medical abortion, even as her condition worsened. An ethics committee at her local hospital eventually determined she could receive care--after an ordeal she described to NPR as a "dystopian nightmare."
\u201cQuestion for the politicians who think abortion should be banned, even if a pregnant patient is facing a medical emergency: How close to death is close enough?\n\nAt what point can you help someone experiencing a medical emergency?\u201d— Planned Parenthood Action (@Planned Parenthood Action) 1661361026
Planned Parenthood Action Fund president Alexis McGill Johnson warned women across Texas could face similar experiences as the state is permitted to reject the HHS guidance.
"How close to death is close enough?" Johnson asked. "Extremist anti-abortion politicians in Texas are trying to prevent pregnant people experiencing medical emergencies from receiving life-saving care, despite the fact that federal law requires most hospitals to provide that treatment. Politicians may think they know better than doctors, but doctors should not have to try to figure out how to be lawyers in order to save lives."
Hendrix did not enjoin the guidance nationwide, and Planned Parenthood noted that "EMTALA remains federal law and requires most hospitals to provide emergency medical care, including care related to pregnancy."
A ruling in a similar case in Idaho, in which the Biden administration argued EMTALA preempts the state's six-week abortion ban, is expected this week.
Paxton applauded Hendrix's ruling, leading Texas-based journalist Mary Tuma to point out the attorney general "oversees a state that holds a higher-than-average maternal mortality rate" and was now celebrating reduced access to "life-saving abortion care."
\u201cOur Attorney General \u2013 who oversees a state that holds a higher than average maternal mortality rate \u2013\u00a0is celebrating a judge's ruling that blocked Biden's attempt to ensure hospitals/doctors perform *live saving* abortion care for pregnant patients in Texas who may face death.\u201d— Mary Tuma (@Mary Tuma) 1661355381
The White House responded to the ruling by promising, "The fight is not over."
"The president will continue to push to require hospitals to provide life-saving and health-preserving reproductive care," White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said.
Reproductive rights advocates on Wednesday warned that pregnant people across Texas are now at risk of facing life-threatening health crises without access to emergency abortion care, following a ruling by a federal judge who rejected guidance from the Biden administration.
"Politicians may think they know better than doctors, but doctors should not have to try to figure out how to be lawyers in order to save lives."
U.S. District Judge James Hendrix's ruling Tuesday night rejected guidance issued by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) that--regardless of the state's abortion ban--would require Texas doctors to perform abortions in the case of a medical emergency.
Following the overturning of Roe v. Wade by the Supreme Court's right-wing majority in June, HHS issued guidance saying the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) requires medical professionals to provide abortion care to a pregnant patient experiencing a medical emergency.
The 1986 law requires anyone who comes to a hospital's emergency department to be "stabilized and treated," and the Biden administration argued that abortion care qualifies as stabilizing treatment for a pregnant person in a medical crisis.
Hendrix, who was appointed by former Republican President Donald Trump, sided with Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and two doctors' associations in Texas which support forced pregnancy.
The ruling was handed down a month after the story of Houston resident Elizabeth Weller became public. Weller experienced a premature rupture of membranes at 18 weeks of pregnancy, causing her own health and that of her fetus to decline. Weller was told that under Texas's abortion ban, she would have to wait until the fetal heartbeat stopped before having a medical abortion, even as her condition worsened. An ethics committee at her local hospital eventually determined she could receive care--after an ordeal she described to NPR as a "dystopian nightmare."
\u201cQuestion for the politicians who think abortion should be banned, even if a pregnant patient is facing a medical emergency: How close to death is close enough?\n\nAt what point can you help someone experiencing a medical emergency?\u201d— Planned Parenthood Action (@Planned Parenthood Action) 1661361026
Planned Parenthood Action Fund president Alexis McGill Johnson warned women across Texas could face similar experiences as the state is permitted to reject the HHS guidance.
"How close to death is close enough?" Johnson asked. "Extremist anti-abortion politicians in Texas are trying to prevent pregnant people experiencing medical emergencies from receiving life-saving care, despite the fact that federal law requires most hospitals to provide that treatment. Politicians may think they know better than doctors, but doctors should not have to try to figure out how to be lawyers in order to save lives."
Hendrix did not enjoin the guidance nationwide, and Planned Parenthood noted that "EMTALA remains federal law and requires most hospitals to provide emergency medical care, including care related to pregnancy."
A ruling in a similar case in Idaho, in which the Biden administration argued EMTALA preempts the state's six-week abortion ban, is expected this week.
Paxton applauded Hendrix's ruling, leading Texas-based journalist Mary Tuma to point out the attorney general "oversees a state that holds a higher-than-average maternal mortality rate" and was now celebrating reduced access to "life-saving abortion care."
\u201cOur Attorney General \u2013 who oversees a state that holds a higher than average maternal mortality rate \u2013\u00a0is celebrating a judge's ruling that blocked Biden's attempt to ensure hospitals/doctors perform *live saving* abortion care for pregnant patients in Texas who may face death.\u201d— Mary Tuma (@Mary Tuma) 1661355381
The White House responded to the ruling by promising, "The fight is not over."
"The president will continue to push to require hospitals to provide life-saving and health-preserving reproductive care," White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.