SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Climate activists, working with the Insure Our Future Network, gathered in Manhattan on March 25, 2021 to urge insurance giants to stop underwriting and investing in fossil fuel projects. (Photo: Erik McGregor/LightRocket via Getty Images)
'Big News' for Climate as Global Insurance Giant Shifts Away From Fossil Fuels
The new policy by Swiss Re "is not perfect yet," said one campaigner, but the world's second-largest reinsurer "is headed in the right direction."
Mar 18, 2022
After Swiss Re, the world's second-largest reinsurer, announced Thursday that it is moving to end coverage for most new oil and gas projects, climate justice campaigners who have long pushed for the insurance industry to shift away from fossil fuels offered cautious praise.
"Swiss Re is one of the world's ultimate risk managers and the policy which it published today sends a strong message to fossil fuel companies, investors, and governments: oil and gas operations need to be phased out in accordance with climate science or they may become uninsurable by the end of the decade," Peter Bosshard, global coordinator of Insure Our Future, said in a statement.
According to Reuters:
In its annual sustainability report on Thursday, Swiss Re said it would no longer insure projects that get the go-ahead from their parent company from 2022, unless the company has an independently verified, science-based plan to reach net-zero emissions.
By 2025, Swiss Re said it wanted half of its overall oil and gas premiums to come from companies aligned with such a net-zero by 2050 plan, and by 2030 all its clients in the sector should have done so.
Also, from 2022, the company said it will no longer insure companies or projects with more than 10% of their production in the Arctic, apart from Norwegian producers.
On the issue of treaty reinsurance, whereby it insures bundles of risk in a job lot, Swiss Re said it expected to finalize a policy for the oil and gas sector in 2023.
"By taking steps to stop insuring new oil and gas projects and companies that won't aim at aligning their activities with climate science by 2030, Swiss Re is headed in the right direction," said Reclaim Finance director Lucie Pinson.
"The policy is not perfect yet," she added, "and we encourage its peers to build on it to fully align with a realistic 1.5degC scenario."
The International Energy Agency (IEA) said last May that there is "no need for investment in new fossil fuel supply" if the world is to achieve a net-zero energy system by 2050 en route to meeting the Paris agreement's more ambitious global warming target.
Swiss Re, said Pinson, should respond to the IEA's landmark report by "drawing a red line against fossil fuel expansion and excluding both projects and companies that cross that line well before 2025."
Sharing a detailed Twitter thread by Bosshard, Oil Change International celebrated Swiss Re's move. Becoming the first major oil and gas insurer to deny coverage for most new fossil fuel projects is "big news," said the group.
Arguing that "ending support for oil and gas projects is gaining real momentum," 350.org also praised Insure Our Future and encouraged its campaigners to "keep up the good work."
According to Bosshard, Swiss Re's phase-out commitment represents "a first for the insurance industry" because it "not only applies to the up and midstream sectors, but also to downstream companies (oil refineries, gas utilities, petrochemical plants etc.) without credible net-zero plans."
However, he continued, "the new policy includes some important gaps and contingencies."
"It will not cover new production projects which oil companies move forward as part of their ongoing operations," said Bosshard. "It also exempts Norway from its definition of Arctic oil. The IEA doesn't make any such exemptions."
"Most importantly, the policy hinges on the development of a credible oil and gas framework by the Science Based Targets initiative [SBTi], by which oil companies' net-zero plans will be measured," he added. "It's crucial that the SBTi framework reflect the findings" of the IEA and the United Nations.
Swiss Re's new policy follows similar policies adopted last week by Hannover Re and Mapfre, said Bosshard, who pointed out that "these three companies cover 21% of the global reinsurance market."
"Now, the Insure Our Future campaign calls on Munich Re, Lloyd's, and SCOR, which together account for 26% of the global reinsurance market, to make commitments which build on Swiss Re's approach by the time of their annual general meetings," said Bosshard.
"We'll be watching," he added.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Kenny Stancil
Kenny Stancil is senior researcher at the Revolving Door Project and a former staff writer for Common Dreams.
After Swiss Re, the world's second-largest reinsurer, announced Thursday that it is moving to end coverage for most new oil and gas projects, climate justice campaigners who have long pushed for the insurance industry to shift away from fossil fuels offered cautious praise.
"Swiss Re is one of the world's ultimate risk managers and the policy which it published today sends a strong message to fossil fuel companies, investors, and governments: oil and gas operations need to be phased out in accordance with climate science or they may become uninsurable by the end of the decade," Peter Bosshard, global coordinator of Insure Our Future, said in a statement.
According to Reuters:
In its annual sustainability report on Thursday, Swiss Re said it would no longer insure projects that get the go-ahead from their parent company from 2022, unless the company has an independently verified, science-based plan to reach net-zero emissions.
By 2025, Swiss Re said it wanted half of its overall oil and gas premiums to come from companies aligned with such a net-zero by 2050 plan, and by 2030 all its clients in the sector should have done so.
Also, from 2022, the company said it will no longer insure companies or projects with more than 10% of their production in the Arctic, apart from Norwegian producers.
On the issue of treaty reinsurance, whereby it insures bundles of risk in a job lot, Swiss Re said it expected to finalize a policy for the oil and gas sector in 2023.
"By taking steps to stop insuring new oil and gas projects and companies that won't aim at aligning their activities with climate science by 2030, Swiss Re is headed in the right direction," said Reclaim Finance director Lucie Pinson.
"The policy is not perfect yet," she added, "and we encourage its peers to build on it to fully align with a realistic 1.5degC scenario."
The International Energy Agency (IEA) said last May that there is "no need for investment in new fossil fuel supply" if the world is to achieve a net-zero energy system by 2050 en route to meeting the Paris agreement's more ambitious global warming target.
Swiss Re, said Pinson, should respond to the IEA's landmark report by "drawing a red line against fossil fuel expansion and excluding both projects and companies that cross that line well before 2025."
Sharing a detailed Twitter thread by Bosshard, Oil Change International celebrated Swiss Re's move. Becoming the first major oil and gas insurer to deny coverage for most new fossil fuel projects is "big news," said the group.
Arguing that "ending support for oil and gas projects is gaining real momentum," 350.org also praised Insure Our Future and encouraged its campaigners to "keep up the good work."
According to Bosshard, Swiss Re's phase-out commitment represents "a first for the insurance industry" because it "not only applies to the up and midstream sectors, but also to downstream companies (oil refineries, gas utilities, petrochemical plants etc.) without credible net-zero plans."
However, he continued, "the new policy includes some important gaps and contingencies."
"It will not cover new production projects which oil companies move forward as part of their ongoing operations," said Bosshard. "It also exempts Norway from its definition of Arctic oil. The IEA doesn't make any such exemptions."
"Most importantly, the policy hinges on the development of a credible oil and gas framework by the Science Based Targets initiative [SBTi], by which oil companies' net-zero plans will be measured," he added. "It's crucial that the SBTi framework reflect the findings" of the IEA and the United Nations.
Swiss Re's new policy follows similar policies adopted last week by Hannover Re and Mapfre, said Bosshard, who pointed out that "these three companies cover 21% of the global reinsurance market."
"Now, the Insure Our Future campaign calls on Munich Re, Lloyd's, and SCOR, which together account for 26% of the global reinsurance market, to make commitments which build on Swiss Re's approach by the time of their annual general meetings," said Bosshard.
"We'll be watching," he added.
From Your Site Articles
Kenny Stancil
Kenny Stancil is senior researcher at the Revolving Door Project and a former staff writer for Common Dreams.
After Swiss Re, the world's second-largest reinsurer, announced Thursday that it is moving to end coverage for most new oil and gas projects, climate justice campaigners who have long pushed for the insurance industry to shift away from fossil fuels offered cautious praise.
"Swiss Re is one of the world's ultimate risk managers and the policy which it published today sends a strong message to fossil fuel companies, investors, and governments: oil and gas operations need to be phased out in accordance with climate science or they may become uninsurable by the end of the decade," Peter Bosshard, global coordinator of Insure Our Future, said in a statement.
According to Reuters:
In its annual sustainability report on Thursday, Swiss Re said it would no longer insure projects that get the go-ahead from their parent company from 2022, unless the company has an independently verified, science-based plan to reach net-zero emissions.
By 2025, Swiss Re said it wanted half of its overall oil and gas premiums to come from companies aligned with such a net-zero by 2050 plan, and by 2030 all its clients in the sector should have done so.
Also, from 2022, the company said it will no longer insure companies or projects with more than 10% of their production in the Arctic, apart from Norwegian producers.
On the issue of treaty reinsurance, whereby it insures bundles of risk in a job lot, Swiss Re said it expected to finalize a policy for the oil and gas sector in 2023.
"By taking steps to stop insuring new oil and gas projects and companies that won't aim at aligning their activities with climate science by 2030, Swiss Re is headed in the right direction," said Reclaim Finance director Lucie Pinson.
"The policy is not perfect yet," she added, "and we encourage its peers to build on it to fully align with a realistic 1.5degC scenario."
The International Energy Agency (IEA) said last May that there is "no need for investment in new fossil fuel supply" if the world is to achieve a net-zero energy system by 2050 en route to meeting the Paris agreement's more ambitious global warming target.
Swiss Re, said Pinson, should respond to the IEA's landmark report by "drawing a red line against fossil fuel expansion and excluding both projects and companies that cross that line well before 2025."
Sharing a detailed Twitter thread by Bosshard, Oil Change International celebrated Swiss Re's move. Becoming the first major oil and gas insurer to deny coverage for most new fossil fuel projects is "big news," said the group.
Arguing that "ending support for oil and gas projects is gaining real momentum," 350.org also praised Insure Our Future and encouraged its campaigners to "keep up the good work."
According to Bosshard, Swiss Re's phase-out commitment represents "a first for the insurance industry" because it "not only applies to the up and midstream sectors, but also to downstream companies (oil refineries, gas utilities, petrochemical plants etc.) without credible net-zero plans."
However, he continued, "the new policy includes some important gaps and contingencies."
"It will not cover new production projects which oil companies move forward as part of their ongoing operations," said Bosshard. "It also exempts Norway from its definition of Arctic oil. The IEA doesn't make any such exemptions."
"Most importantly, the policy hinges on the development of a credible oil and gas framework by the Science Based Targets initiative [SBTi], by which oil companies' net-zero plans will be measured," he added. "It's crucial that the SBTi framework reflect the findings" of the IEA and the United Nations.
Swiss Re's new policy follows similar policies adopted last week by Hannover Re and Mapfre, said Bosshard, who pointed out that "these three companies cover 21% of the global reinsurance market."
"Now, the Insure Our Future campaign calls on Munich Re, Lloyd's, and SCOR, which together account for 26% of the global reinsurance market, to make commitments which build on Swiss Re's approach by the time of their annual general meetings," said Bosshard.
"We'll be watching," he added.
From Your Site Articles
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.