Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) questions witnesses during a hearing on January 11, 2022 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Jan 12, 2022
To justify obstructing one of his party's top legislative priorities, Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia has repeatedly claimed that the Build Back Better Act would exacerbate rising inflation.
"The House-passed Build Back Better Act would make crucial investments to lower inflation and cut household costs."
But a new report published Wednesday by the congressional Joint Economic Committee (JEC) argues that Democrats' 10-year, $1.75 trillion reconciliation package would actually relieve inflationary pressures on the economy by slashing the sky-high costs of child care, prescription drugs, housing, and other basic necessities.
"By addressing the threat of climate change," the report adds, "the bill would reduce the role of fossil fuel price spikes and extreme weather in driving future inflation, insulating the economy from key sources of price spikes that can lead to inflation--just as occurred in 2021."
The report goes on to argue that because its costs would be funded by tax hikes on rich individuals and large businesses, the Build Back Better Act "does not present the risk of economic overheating--a concern that was waved aside as previous administrations passed trillions of dollars in tax cuts that were never paid for."
\u201cHow would the Build Back Better Act help American families with costs and reduce inflationary pressure? So many ways:\n\n- Cutting taxes for families with children\n- Lowering the cost of prescriptions\n- Lowering cost of health and child care\n- Reducing dependence on fossil fuels\u201d— Rep. Don Beyer (@Rep. Don Beyer) 1641994670
The JEC released its analysis just as the Bureau of Labor Statistics announced Wednesday that the Consumer Price Index--which measures the costs of consumer goods and services--has risen 7% over the past year, the sharpest increase in four decades.
"Very, very troubling," Manchin said of the new inflation figures.
But Rep. Don Beyer (D-Va.), chair of the JEC, offered a different perspective on the data. While acknowledging that rising prices are "straining household budgets"--particularly for those with low incomes--Beyer disputed the notion that the Build Back Better Act would make matters worse.
In fact, Beyer argued in a statement, "the House-passed Build Back Better Act would make crucial investments to lower inflation and cut household costs by investing in workers, boosting productivity and making healthcare and child care more affordable--all while being fully paid for by asking the wealthy and corporations to pay their fair share."
"The economic recovery and the Federal Reserve's actions [on interest rates] will bring down short-term inflation in 2022, but the Build Back Better Act presents the best tool at Congress' disposal to reduce inflationary pressure long-term, build economic resilience, and promote economic growth that is stronger, stable, and more broadly shared."
Economists have also pushed back on the argument that the Build Back Better package would worsen inflation, which experts say has been fueled by a range of factors, from pandemic-related supply chain disruptions to corporate profiteering.
"There is also no good way to connect the dots between the Build Back Better agenda, which is currently being debated in Congress, and higher inflation," Mark Zandi, the chief economist at Moody's Analytics, wrote in a recent CNN op-ed. "The legislation provides support for public infrastructure and various social programs, and longer-term, it is designed to lift the economy's growth potential, which will ease inflationary pressures."
Despite its potential benefits for families, the economy, and the climate, the Build Back Better Act continues to languish in the Senate with no clear path forward as Manchin refuses to drop his objections to the expanded child tax credit (CTC), affordable housing investments, and other key provisions of the bill.
And as the Washington Postreported over the weekend, Manchin no longer even supports his own counteroffer to the White House, which excluded the CTC and other measures.
Nevertheless, Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.)--the chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus--said in a Wednesday appearance on CNBC that she believes Democrats will ultimately be able to pass some compromise version of the Build Back Better Act in the coming weeks.
"In the end, our view is that we can do Build Back Better, very close to the framework that Senator Manchin committed to the president on," Jayapal said, referring to a proposal the White House released in October. "Right now, we are in the midst of a big push on voting rights... As soon as that is done, probably next week, our attention will turn back to Build Back Better."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
To justify obstructing one of his party's top legislative priorities, Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia has repeatedly claimed that the Build Back Better Act would exacerbate rising inflation.
"The House-passed Build Back Better Act would make crucial investments to lower inflation and cut household costs."
But a new report published Wednesday by the congressional Joint Economic Committee (JEC) argues that Democrats' 10-year, $1.75 trillion reconciliation package would actually relieve inflationary pressures on the economy by slashing the sky-high costs of child care, prescription drugs, housing, and other basic necessities.
"By addressing the threat of climate change," the report adds, "the bill would reduce the role of fossil fuel price spikes and extreme weather in driving future inflation, insulating the economy from key sources of price spikes that can lead to inflation--just as occurred in 2021."
The report goes on to argue that because its costs would be funded by tax hikes on rich individuals and large businesses, the Build Back Better Act "does not present the risk of economic overheating--a concern that was waved aside as previous administrations passed trillions of dollars in tax cuts that were never paid for."
\u201cHow would the Build Back Better Act help American families with costs and reduce inflationary pressure? So many ways:\n\n- Cutting taxes for families with children\n- Lowering the cost of prescriptions\n- Lowering cost of health and child care\n- Reducing dependence on fossil fuels\u201d— Rep. Don Beyer (@Rep. Don Beyer) 1641994670
The JEC released its analysis just as the Bureau of Labor Statistics announced Wednesday that the Consumer Price Index--which measures the costs of consumer goods and services--has risen 7% over the past year, the sharpest increase in four decades.
"Very, very troubling," Manchin said of the new inflation figures.
But Rep. Don Beyer (D-Va.), chair of the JEC, offered a different perspective on the data. While acknowledging that rising prices are "straining household budgets"--particularly for those with low incomes--Beyer disputed the notion that the Build Back Better Act would make matters worse.
In fact, Beyer argued in a statement, "the House-passed Build Back Better Act would make crucial investments to lower inflation and cut household costs by investing in workers, boosting productivity and making healthcare and child care more affordable--all while being fully paid for by asking the wealthy and corporations to pay their fair share."
"The economic recovery and the Federal Reserve's actions [on interest rates] will bring down short-term inflation in 2022, but the Build Back Better Act presents the best tool at Congress' disposal to reduce inflationary pressure long-term, build economic resilience, and promote economic growth that is stronger, stable, and more broadly shared."
Economists have also pushed back on the argument that the Build Back Better package would worsen inflation, which experts say has been fueled by a range of factors, from pandemic-related supply chain disruptions to corporate profiteering.
"There is also no good way to connect the dots between the Build Back Better agenda, which is currently being debated in Congress, and higher inflation," Mark Zandi, the chief economist at Moody's Analytics, wrote in a recent CNN op-ed. "The legislation provides support for public infrastructure and various social programs, and longer-term, it is designed to lift the economy's growth potential, which will ease inflationary pressures."
Despite its potential benefits for families, the economy, and the climate, the Build Back Better Act continues to languish in the Senate with no clear path forward as Manchin refuses to drop his objections to the expanded child tax credit (CTC), affordable housing investments, and other key provisions of the bill.
And as the Washington Postreported over the weekend, Manchin no longer even supports his own counteroffer to the White House, which excluded the CTC and other measures.
Nevertheless, Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.)--the chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus--said in a Wednesday appearance on CNBC that she believes Democrats will ultimately be able to pass some compromise version of the Build Back Better Act in the coming weeks.
"In the end, our view is that we can do Build Back Better, very close to the framework that Senator Manchin committed to the president on," Jayapal said, referring to a proposal the White House released in October. "Right now, we are in the midst of a big push on voting rights... As soon as that is done, probably next week, our attention will turn back to Build Back Better."
To justify obstructing one of his party's top legislative priorities, Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia has repeatedly claimed that the Build Back Better Act would exacerbate rising inflation.
"The House-passed Build Back Better Act would make crucial investments to lower inflation and cut household costs."
But a new report published Wednesday by the congressional Joint Economic Committee (JEC) argues that Democrats' 10-year, $1.75 trillion reconciliation package would actually relieve inflationary pressures on the economy by slashing the sky-high costs of child care, prescription drugs, housing, and other basic necessities.
"By addressing the threat of climate change," the report adds, "the bill would reduce the role of fossil fuel price spikes and extreme weather in driving future inflation, insulating the economy from key sources of price spikes that can lead to inflation--just as occurred in 2021."
The report goes on to argue that because its costs would be funded by tax hikes on rich individuals and large businesses, the Build Back Better Act "does not present the risk of economic overheating--a concern that was waved aside as previous administrations passed trillions of dollars in tax cuts that were never paid for."
\u201cHow would the Build Back Better Act help American families with costs and reduce inflationary pressure? So many ways:\n\n- Cutting taxes for families with children\n- Lowering the cost of prescriptions\n- Lowering cost of health and child care\n- Reducing dependence on fossil fuels\u201d— Rep. Don Beyer (@Rep. Don Beyer) 1641994670
The JEC released its analysis just as the Bureau of Labor Statistics announced Wednesday that the Consumer Price Index--which measures the costs of consumer goods and services--has risen 7% over the past year, the sharpest increase in four decades.
"Very, very troubling," Manchin said of the new inflation figures.
But Rep. Don Beyer (D-Va.), chair of the JEC, offered a different perspective on the data. While acknowledging that rising prices are "straining household budgets"--particularly for those with low incomes--Beyer disputed the notion that the Build Back Better Act would make matters worse.
In fact, Beyer argued in a statement, "the House-passed Build Back Better Act would make crucial investments to lower inflation and cut household costs by investing in workers, boosting productivity and making healthcare and child care more affordable--all while being fully paid for by asking the wealthy and corporations to pay their fair share."
"The economic recovery and the Federal Reserve's actions [on interest rates] will bring down short-term inflation in 2022, but the Build Back Better Act presents the best tool at Congress' disposal to reduce inflationary pressure long-term, build economic resilience, and promote economic growth that is stronger, stable, and more broadly shared."
Economists have also pushed back on the argument that the Build Back Better package would worsen inflation, which experts say has been fueled by a range of factors, from pandemic-related supply chain disruptions to corporate profiteering.
"There is also no good way to connect the dots between the Build Back Better agenda, which is currently being debated in Congress, and higher inflation," Mark Zandi, the chief economist at Moody's Analytics, wrote in a recent CNN op-ed. "The legislation provides support for public infrastructure and various social programs, and longer-term, it is designed to lift the economy's growth potential, which will ease inflationary pressures."
Despite its potential benefits for families, the economy, and the climate, the Build Back Better Act continues to languish in the Senate with no clear path forward as Manchin refuses to drop his objections to the expanded child tax credit (CTC), affordable housing investments, and other key provisions of the bill.
And as the Washington Postreported over the weekend, Manchin no longer even supports his own counteroffer to the White House, which excluded the CTC and other measures.
Nevertheless, Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.)--the chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus--said in a Wednesday appearance on CNBC that she believes Democrats will ultimately be able to pass some compromise version of the Build Back Better Act in the coming weeks.
"In the end, our view is that we can do Build Back Better, very close to the framework that Senator Manchin committed to the president on," Jayapal said, referring to a proposal the White House released in October. "Right now, we are in the midst of a big push on voting rights... As soon as that is done, probably next week, our attention will turn back to Build Back Better."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.